Journal of Modern Physics

Volume 4, Issue 5 (May 2013)

ISSN Print: 2153-1196   ISSN Online: 2153-120X

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.86  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Topological-Geometrical and Physical Interpretation of the Dark Energy of the Cosmos as a “Halo” Energy of the Schrödinger Quantum Wave

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 347KB)  PP. 591-596  
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2013.45084    20,899 Downloads   50,044 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The paper concludes that the energy given by Einstein’s famous formula E = mc2 consists of two parts. The first part is the positive energy of the quantum particle modeled by the topology of the zero set. The second part is the absolute value of the negative energy of the quantum Schr?dinger wave modeled by the topology of the empty set. We reason that the latter is nothing else but the so called missing dark energy of the universe which accounts for 94.45% of the total energy, in full agreement with the WMAP and Supernova cosmic measurement which was awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics. The dark energy of the quantum wave cannot be detected in the normal way because measurement collapses the quantum wave.

Share and Cite:

M. El Naschie, "Topological-Geometrical and Physical Interpretation of the Dark Energy of the Cosmos as a “Halo” Energy of the Schrödinger Quantum Wave," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 4 No. 5, 2013, pp. 591-596. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2013.45084.

Cited by

[1] Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Disentanglement in Connection to the Ordinary and Dark Energy of Cosmos
[2] Fuzzy Wilson Loops, Witten's Topological Field Theory and the Golden Mean Number System Theory as the Deep Roots of Hardy's Quantum Entanglement
International Journal of Innovation in Science and …, 2021
[3] Fluid Turbulence Road to Quantum Cantorian Spacetime Via Nested Solitonic Golden Eddies Chaos Implied by Batchelor's Law-A Possible Rationale for the …
2020
[4] Massive Gravity from a Fractal-Cantorian Spacetime Perspective
2020
[5] A fundamentally fractal universe from Einstein, Kaluza-Klein, Witten and Vafa‟ s spacetime
2019
[6] A Fundamentally Fractal Universe from Einstein, Kaluza-Klein, Witten and Vafa's Space-Time
2019
[7] El Naschie,“From Nikolay Umov= 2 E kmc via Albert Einstein's γ= 2 E mc to the dark energy density of the cosmos()= 2 21 22 E mc.”
2018
[8] QED Cosmic Dark Energy Density Using Schwinger-Fredkin and E-Infinity Theory
2018
[9] From Nikolay Umov E= kmc2 via Albert Einstein's E= γmc2 to the Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos E=(21/22) mc2
2018
[10] Golden Mean Unification Via Fractional Statistics Leading to the Accurate Cosmic Dark Energy Density of a Cosmos with Pointless Geometry
2018
[11] Symmetria Massima of the Fractal M-Theory Via the Golden Mean Number System–A New Language for A Deep Dialogue between Man and Nature
2018
[12] World Formula Interpretation of E= mc2
2018
[13] Density of the Cosmos () E mc 2 21 22=
2018
[14] Golden ratio beauty as scientific function
2018
[15] From Nikolay Umov E=kmc2 via Albert Einstein's E=γmc2 to the Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos E=(21/22)mc2
2018
[16] Naschie: A combined Heterotic string and Kähler manifold elucidation of ordinary energy, dark matter, Olbers's paradox and pure dark energy density of …
Journal of Modern Physics, 2017
[17] A Combined Heterotic String and Kähler Manifold Elucidation of Ordinary Energy, Dark Matter, Olbers's Paradox and Pure Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos
2017
[18] From a Dual Einstein-Kaluza Spacetime to 'tHooft Renormalon and the Reality of Accelerated Cosmic Expansion
2017
[19] Meaning of Life and the Universe: Transforming
World Scientific Publishing, 2017
[20] The Physics, Mathematics and Common Sense of Cosmic Dark Energy and Spacetime Extra Dimensions
2017
[21] Quantum Disentanglement as the Physics behind Dark Energy
2016
[22] Cantorian-Fractal Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy as the Ordinary and Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos Respectively
2016
[23] Kähler Dark Matter, Dark Energy Cosmic Density and Their Coupling
2016
[24] The Speed of the Passing of Time as Yet Another Facet of Cosmic Dark Energy
2016
[25] Completing Einstein's Spacetime
2016
[26] Cosserat-Cartan and de Sitter-Witten Spacetime Setting for Dark Energy
Quantum Matter, 2016
[27] Max Planck Half Quanta as a Natural Explanation for Ordinary and Dark Energy of the Cosmos
2016
[28] On the Stringy Ghosts Which We Call the Missing Dark Energy of the Cosmos
2016
[29] The Emergence of Spacetime from the Quantum in Three Steps
2016
[30] On El Naschie's Fractal-Cantorian Space-Time and Dark Energy—A Tutorial Review
Natural Science, 2015
[31] Casimir-Dark Energy Nano Re Based
2015
[32] A Resolution of the Black Hole Information Paradox via Transfinite Set Theory
World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 2015
[33] The Cantorian Monadic Plasma behind the Zero Point Vacuum Spacetime Energy
American Journal of Nano Research and Applications, 2015
[34] A Casimir-Dark Energy Nano Reactor Design—Phase One
Natural Science, 2015
[35] The Casimir Effect as a Pure Topological Phenomenon and the Possibility of a Casimir Nano Reactor–A Preliminary Conceptual Design
American Journal of Nano Research and Applications, 2015
[36] Quantum Fractals and the Casimir-Dark Energy Duality—The Road to a Clean Quantum Energy Nano Reactor
Journal of Modern Physics, 2015
[37] If Quantum “Wave” of the Universe Then Quantum “Particle” of the Universe: A Resolution of the Dark Energy Question and the Black Hole Information Paradox
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2015
[38] An Exact Mathematical Picture of Quantum Spacetime
Advances in Pure Mathematics, 2015
[39] Hubble Scale Dark Energy Meets Nano Scale Casimir Energy and the Rational of Their T-Duality and Mirror Symmetry Equivalence
World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering, 2015
[40] What should be the vacuum level maintained for vacuum casting of Titanium?
2015
[41] From Kantian-Reinen Vernunft to the Real Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos via the Measure Concentration of Convex Geometry in Quasi Banach Spacetime
2015
[42] Dark energy and its cosmic density from Einstein's relativity and gauge fields renormalization leading to the possibility of a new 'tHooft quasi particle
2015
[43] From Kantian-Reinen Fernunft to the Real Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos via the Measure Concentration of Convex Geometry in Quasi Banach …
2015
[44] The Casimir Effect as a Pure Topological Phenomenon and the Possibility of a Casimir Nano Reactor—A Preliminary Conceptual Design
American Journal of Nano Research and Applications, 2015
[45] Three Quantum Particles Hardy Entanglement from the Topology of Cantorian-Fractal Spacetime and the Casimir Effect as Dark Energy – A Great Opportunity for Nanotechnology
American Journal of Nano Research and Application, 2015
[46] A Complementarity Resolution of the Black Hole Information Paradox
American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2015
[47] Banach Spacetime-Like Dvoretzky Volume Concentration as Cosmic Holographic Dark Energy
2015
[48] On a Casimir-Dark Energy Nano Reactor
2015
[49] The self referential pointless universe geometry as the key to the resolution of the black hole information paradox
2015
[50] From Kantian-Reinen Fernunft to the Real Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos via the Measure Concentration of Convex Geometry in Quasi Banach …
2015
[51] Einstein's General Relativity and Pure Gravity in a Cosserat and De Sitter-Witten Spacetime Setting as the Explanation of Dark Energy and Cosmic …
2014
[52] The measure concentration of convex geometry in a quasi Banach spacetime behind the supposedly missing dark energy of the cosmos
2014
[53] Hardy's Entanglement as the Ultimate Explanation for the Observed Cosmic Dark Energy and Accelerated Expansion
2014
[54] Deriving E= mc2/22 of Einstein's ordinary quantum relativity energy density from the Lie symmetry group SO (10) of grand unification of all fundamental forces …
2014
[55] From nonlocal elasticity to nonlocal spacetime and nano science
2014
[56] Einstein's General Relativity and Pure Gravity in a Cosserat and De Sitter-Witten Spacetime Setting as the Explanation of Dark Energy and Cosmic Accelerated …
2014
[57] Why E Is Not Equal to mc2
2014
[58] Entanglement of E8E8 Exceptional Lie Symmetry Group Dark Energy, Einstein's Maximal Total Energy and the Hartle-Hawking No Boundary Proposal as the …
2014
[59] Why E Is Not Equal to mc 2
Journal of Modern Physics, 2014
[60] Asymptotically safe pure gravity as the source of dark energy of the vacuum
Astrophysics and Space Science, 2014
[61] E-Infinity Dualities, Discontinuous Spacetimes, Xonic Quantum Physics and the Decisive Experiment
Journal of Modern Physics, 2014
[62] Logarithmic running of 't Hooft-Polyakov monopole to dark energy
International Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014
[63] Nonlocal Elasticity to Nonlocal Spacetime and Nanoscience
Bubbfil Nanotechnology, 2014
[64] Deriving E= mc 2/22 of Einstein’s ordinary quantum relativity energy density from the Lie symmetry group SO (10) of grand unification of all fundamental forces and without quantum mechanics
American Journal of Mechanics …, 2014
[65] Rindler space derivation of dark energy
Journal of Modern Physics and Applications, 2014
[66] From Chern-Simon, Holography and Scale Relativity to Dark Energy
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2014
[67] Einstein’s General Relativity and Pure Gravity in a Cosserat and De Sitter-Witten Spacetime Setting as the Explanation of Dark Energy and Cosmic Accelerated Expansion
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2014
[68] From Highly Structured E-Infinity Rings and Transfinite Maximally Symmetric Manifolds to the Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos
Advances in Pure Mathematics, 2014
[69] Entanglement of E8E8 Exceptional Lie Symmetry Group Dark Energy, Einstein’s Maximal Total Energy and the Hartle-Hawking No Boundary Proposal as the Explanation for Dark Energy
World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 2014
[70] Pinched Material Einstein Space-Time Produces Accelerated Cosmic Expansion
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2014
[71] E-Infinity Spacetime, Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Gravity
Journal of the Institute of Science in Society, 2014
[72] Deriving E= mc2/22 of Einstein's ordinary quantum relativity energy density from the Lie symmetry group SO (10) of grand unification of all fundamental …
American Journal of Mechanics & Applications, 2014
[73] From Yang-Mills photon in curved spacetime to dark energy density
Journal of Quantum Information Science, 2013
[74] Experimentally based theoretical arguments that Unruh's temperature, Hawking's vacuum fluctuation and Rindler's wedge are physically real
2013
[75] Geometric Transformations on Manifolds and Dimensions
Fractal Spacetime and Noncommutative Geometry in Quantum and High Energy Physics, 2013
[76] An Invitation to El Naschie's Theory of Cantorian Space-Time and Dark Energy
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2013
[77] Quantum gravity and dark energy using fractal Planck scaling
Journal of Modern Physics, 2013
[78] The Hydrogen Atom Fractal Spectra, the Missing Dark Energy of the Cosmos and Their Hardy Quantum Entanglement
International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, 2013
[79] Nash embedding of Witten's M-theory and the Hawking-Hartle quantum wave of dark energy
Journal of Modern Physics, 2013
[80] The Missing Dark Energy of the Cosmos from Light Cone Topological Velocity and Scaling of the Planck Scale
Open Journal of Microphysics, 2013
[81] What is the missing dark energy in a nutshell and the Hawking-Hartle quantum wave collapse
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2013
[82] The Three Page Guide to the Most Important Results of MS El Naschie's Research in E-Infinity Quantum Physics and Cosmology
Open Journal of Microphysics, 2013
[83] A Rindler-KAM spacetime geometry and scaling the Planck scale solves quantum relativity and explains dark energy
International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2013
[84] Experimentally Based Theoretical Arguments that Unruh's Temperature, Hawkings's Vacuum Fluctuation and Rindler's Wedge Are Physically Real
American Journal of Modern Physics, 2013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.