Flu Epidemics Force versus Virus Type in USA

We estimate the influenza force according to the virus type in the USA (United States of America) for the season 2010/11 to 2019/20. For these we use the data available from CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) related to Public Health Laboratory Virologic Age Surveillance and The Burden Estimates presented by CDC yearly.


Introduction
Influenza is a seasonal epidemic and in general occurs in the winter months, which presents more conditions for contagion ([1] [2]). There are two types of Influenza viruses which affect humans, A and B. Type A has subtypes based on the antigens HA and NA and it has been responsible for the most reported cases until now. In the last 40 or 50 years the types A (H1N1), A (H3N2) and B of influenza viruses have co-circulated globally ( [12]).
In the north hemisphere, where the subject of this work is focused, the in-fluenza season goes from the week 40 of a year to week 10 of the following year (winter months). Although the vaccination does not avoid the seasonal epidemics across the world, it can still protect some part of the population, mainly those that are more susceptible, youngsters, pregnant women and elders.
We study the epidemic force in the USA according to the virus type and for these we used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the season 2010/11 through 2019/20.

Influenza Force
In general, when people get any ILI (Influenza-Like Illness) symptoms, they do not seek for assistance at a first moment, and most of the population with mild symptoms recover without medical assistance. In this way, the statistics provided by the sentinel programs or surveillance systems worldwide do not reflect the actual number of influenza infected people. This can be observed in other epidemic diseases, like the recent COVID-19.
The strategy here to estimate the influenza force according the virus type and age group is: 1) to gather the respective percentage rates of influenza positive specimens reported by Public Health Laboratories in USA, available at the CDC site ([13]), 2) to apply these rates to the Burden Estimates of influenza illnesses ([14]), 3) to analyze the age group data available both as the reported cases ([13]) and the burden estimates ([14]). Considering that in [13] the age groups are (0 -4, 5 -24, 25 -64, 65+) and in [14] are (0 -4, 5 -17, 18 -49, 50 -64, 65+) and therefore not all age groups match, we define new age groups (0 -4, 5 -64, 65+) to present our burden estimates, keeping the focus on the younger cohort (age group 0 -4) and the elders cohort (age group 65+).
In Figure 1 we have the Burden Estimates of Influenza Illnesses according to [14], we can observe a periodic behavior by the total cases over the years. This report gives an overall account but still it is not possible to estimate the ages classes with more incidence rate per inhabitant, because the respective populations are not considered. Gathering the information of (1) and (2) we can obtain the total burden estimates and the respective virus type distribution, which is shown in Figure 3. At a first glance we can see that in most of the seasons there is a predominant virus type and that the types A(H3) and A(H1N1) dominate, with B (Lineage Unspecified) and B (Yamagata Lineage) appearing next.
In Figure 4 we have the Burden Estimates by week, where we can observe the peak on December and January, weeks 50-10. It is possible to identify a direct relation between these peaks with the season totals of burden estimates in Figure   1.
In Figure 5 we have the Distribution of Influenza Positive Specimens by virus type according to the age group. Although, in general for a same season the virus type prevalence is equal for the different age groups, we can observe an interesting behavior which is not equal for each of the age groups. For instance, the virus type A (H3) occurrence was more significant for the elders and for the youngers was the virus type A (H1N1).
In Figure 6 we have the Burden Estimates by virus type according to the age group per 100,000 inhabitants.     Here we observe that higher values occur in the age group 0 -4, and the age group 65+ is the lowest. This difference in incidence rates probably can be explained by the conscious "social distancing" and even "isolation" of the elders, considering that elderly people know the great risks of getting influenza. We are observing these kind of precaution and care, not only for the elders but for everyone in the current fight against Covid-19.
In Figure 7 we have the Burden Estimates only by the virus type A (H1N1) according to the age group per 100,000 inhabitants.
In Figure 8 we have the Burden Estimates by the virus types A (H3) according to the age group per 100,000 inhabitants.
In Figure 9 we have the Burden Estimates by the virus types A (H1N1) and A (H3) per 100,000 inhabitants.
It can be observed that in general, virus A subtypes compete in a way that there is always one which dominates.
In Figures 10-12 we have the Burden Estimates by the virus types B (Lineage Unspecified), B (Victoria Lineage) and B (Yamagata Lineage), according to the age group per 100,000 inhabitants. We observe a behavior similar to the A types, higher incidence for the youngers and we recall that the vaccination programs also include B types. We do not have the related data for the season 2019/20 yet.
In Figure 13 we have the Burden Estimates for Virus Type A and B, with subtype and lineage not unspecified per 100,000 inhabitants. From the comparison between A and B virus types, we can observe that A type has the dominance.

Conclusion
We presented the incidence of influenza disease in USA for the seasons 2010/11 through 2019/20. We analyzed several graphs according to age groups and virus type. The study of the influenza outbreak according to the virus is an important issue which can be used for works dealing with prevention and control measures. Open Journal of Epidemiology       We observed the prevalence of virus type A and also that the great occurrence appears in age group 0 -4, with the least in the elders, age group 65+. We hope to extend this study to more regions in the globe.