Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Outcomes in Patients with Gastrointestinal Symptoms: Retrospective Analysis at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background: Endoscopic procedures are frequently performed to rule out any disease process which eventuates with either a positive or negative outcome. Association of patient demographics, clinical features with endoscopic outcomes are of paramount importance for better understanding and practice of endoscopy. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the frequency of positive endoscopic findings in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms compared to those with negative findings. As a secondary objective, the association between relevant demographics, symptoms, laboratory investigations and procedural outcomes of the participants and positive endoscopic findings were also assessed. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy from January 2017 to December 2017 was conducted. A total of 1066 endoscopy records were retrieved and using a convenience sampling technique, relevant data were manually entered to the questionnaires. Records with incomplete or inconsistent data were disregarded as per the exclusion criteria, resulting in 1011 patient records ultimately utilized for the study. All data were entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS 23.0. Results: The study comprised a total of 1011 patients where 52.2% were females and 47.8% males while the mean age of patients was 42.16 ± 15.45. Positive endoscopic findings were observed in 88.1%, where the most common finding was gastritis (49.1%). Approximately 14.5% had positive investigation findings for HBsAg and 23.1% were seropositive for anti-HCV antibody. How to cite this paper: Naqvi, I.H., Talib, A., Tabraze, M., Siddiqui, O.M., Hussaini, M.F., Paryani, N.S., Effendi, R., Siddiqui, S.I., Hassan, S.Z., Munawar, M., Waseem, Z., Khan, A.A., Khan, Z.Z.H., Rizvi, S.Z.N., Farooqui, S.F., Munaf, M., Obaid, H. and Khan, F. (2019) Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Outcomes in Patients with Gastrointestinal Symptoms: Retrospective Analysis at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Open Journal of Gastroenterology, 9, 141-157. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2019.98017 Received: July 11, 2019 Accepted: August 4, 2019 Published: August 7, 2019 Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access


Introduction
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy or Upper Gastrointestinal (G.I.) Endoscopy gives excellent revelation of the esophagus, stomach and proximal duodenum mucosa.
Since its invention in 1958, it has been successfully used to inspect the insides of body cavities [1]. Rudolph Schindler, along with George Wolf, introduced the Wolf-Schindler semiflexible gastroscopy in 1932 [2]. Since its conception, upper G. I. endoscopy has improved dramatically, transforming from a simple visualization tool into one with both vast diagnostic and therapeutic significance.
The United States and other Western countries have shown approximately 25% annual prevalence of recurrent upper abdominal pain or discomfort which reaches approximately 40% if heartburn is accounted for it [3]. Other gastrointestinal symptoms such as dysphagia, odynophagia, melena, hematemesis and gastrointestinal bleeding are also considered in healthcare facilities. These gastrointestinal symptoms are related to various diseases which are leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Upper G.I. endoscopy has a unique value in the diagnosis of various upper G.I. conditions by permitting, apparition, imaging, ultrasonography, and biopsies of suspicious lesions [4]. Esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, upper G.I. bleeding, vascular malformations, peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) along with various diseases are there for which upper G.I. endoscopy is used to aid the diagnosis [5].
With the ongoing technological advancements in the field of medicine, upper G.I. endoscopy is no longer just a screening or diagnostic procedure but it has a strong therapeutic value such as endoscopic resection for early malignancy arising in Barrett's esophagus [6]. Large balloon pneumatic dilation (PD) and the injection of botulinum toxin (BTI) are being the most common therapeutic intervention used in the treatment of Achalasia [7]. Furthermore, endoscopic ligation is the foremost choice of treatment for bleeding esophageal varices with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy as an alternative [8].
With the growing usage of endoscopy worldwide, this study primarily aimed to represent the procedure-related data of 1011 esophagogastroduodenoscopies strointestinal symptoms compared to those with negative findings. As a secondary objective, the association between relevant demographics, symptoms, laboratory investigations and procedural outcomes of the participants and positive endoscopic findings were also assessed.
To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective study from Pakistan within the last 10 years that evaluated the outcomes of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in a public, tertiary care hospital setting irrespective of the patients' gender, age or symptoms. This study will serve to inform physicians and gastroenterologists of relevant patient demographics and patterns of endoscopic outcomes to better guide their practice and evaluation of patients.

Methodology
A retrospective study was conducted in Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital, a 1900-bed largest public sector hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, to assess the outcomes of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures performed in the year 2017. This study included all the patients who presented to Medical Unit 1 for endoscopy and those who were referred from other units. Patient endoscopy records of a total of 1066 consecutively performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures presenting to the hospital over a period of 1 year, from January 2017 to December 2017, were retrieved from the patients' endoscopy records at the hospital using convenience sampling technique and were entered manually into questionnaires. Only the most recent data for that particular patient in the year of 2017 was entered; other records of prior endoscopies were excluded from the study to prevent the redundancy of data. Some questionnaires had to be excluded due to incomplete or inconsistent data, bringing the final count to 1011.

Questionnaire
A well-structured questionnaire was employed to collect all information. The questionnaire consisted of three parts. The first part included basic demographic details like age, gender and addictions as well as details regarding the patients' family history of G.I. malignancy, acid peptic disease, chronic liver disease and other conditions. The second part dealt with common gastrointestinal symptoms that patients presented with, including abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, flatulence, heartburn, melena, hematemesis and dysphagia. The last part of the questionnaire was concerned with investigations carried out as well as the endoscopic findings of the patients that were broadly classified into esophageal, gastric or duodenal pathologies. The questionnaire was attached as in Appendix 1. Any patient who presented with one or more of the following was warranted an endoscopy as per the doctors' judgment: upper abdominal pain, heartburn, dysphagia, odynophagia, vomiting, unexplained weight loss, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia, suspected gastrointestinal malignancy and mass in the epigastrium detected on sonography, magnetic resonance imaging or computed to-Open Journal of Gastroenterology mography scan imaging. To minimize flaws and reduce any sort of bias, the questionnaire was reviewed by two senior doctors and a pilot study was conducted using data from 139 patients. The pretest validity and reliability of the endoscopic questionnaire were determined where the questionnaire was found to be valid (Cronbach alpha 0.71) and reliable.

Endoscopy
All patients included in this study underwent standardized pre-procedure protocols. Patients were kept nil per oral 12 hours prior to the endoscopy and confirmed as being hemodynamically stable with IV lines maintained before and during the procedure. Insertion of the 180 series Olympus video-scopes required 4% Xylocaine (Lidocaine) nasal spray and Xylocaine gel. The same equipment, protocols and endoscopic expert team were used for all patients, standardizing the level of care.

Statistical Analysis
The data was entered into and analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 23.0 (IBM, NY, USA). Chi-square tests were applied to see the relationship of abnormal endoscopic findings with the symptoms and investigations for which the endoscopy was performed.

5) Association of positive endoscopic outcome with symptoms
The symptom and investigation-based characteristics of participants stratified with positive endoscopic findings are presented in Table 3. In relation to symp- The symptoms of participants stratified with positive endoscopic findings are presented in Table 3.

Discussion
This study shows that 11.9% of patients with gastrointestinal or other symptoms, Open Journal of Gastroenterology had normal endoscopic findings where the percentage is in accordance with other contemporary studies [9] [10]. Of the many reasons, one explanation can be employing the safe clinical practice of medicine, where investigations or procedures are ordered or carried out as part of the standard care. So, it's rational for someone practicing safe to order a specific procedure without making the patient aware of its purpose in order to avoid subjective issues or to use the same for further confirmation of a physician's initial examination and assessment of the patient to avoid malpractice charges in the future [11]. Another reason for carrying out an endoscopy can be to offer patient satisfaction and comfort, even with vague symptoms or without specific relevant indications as per guidelines for having an endoscopy [12]. In an unaware and biased background owing to minimal medical knowledge and low educational status altogether, denial plays yet another dilemma to the situation. Hence, qualitative evidence of negative findings apart from the clinical inference by the physician is a source of great relief to the patient. Due to these factors, physicians do carry out endoscopic investigations, despite having ruled out significant existing pathology by evaluating symptoms and patient examination.
Furthermore, a study conducted in Multan, Pakistan concluded that 76% of the participants had functional dyspepsia, a disorder which presents with dyspeptic symptoms without any positive endoscopic findings [13]. Where, functional dyspepsia is yet another entity of substantive gastrointestinal symptoms without documentable endoscopic findings. Consequently, though the expertise of endoscopist is to determine the outcome of a relevant endoscopic finding, however, an unremarkable endoscopy or a miss of endoscopic findings could both be subsequent to lack of experience or error or both at hands of the endoscopist.
The commonest endoscopic finding of this study (49.1%) was gastritis which is similar to earlier research carried out in Saudi Arabia in 1991 [14]. Pakistan, being a developing country, has colossal variation in the levels of education and socioeconomic stratification of the population. The lower socioeconomic profile entails illiteracy which is associated with improper diet both due to lack of resources as well as knowledge [15]. Therefore, the high incidence of gastritis is attributed to dietary patterns, both in terms of the standard of hygiene and choice of diet. Helicobacter pylori is a key cause of gastritis, which is linked to its mode of transmission via the fecal-oral route explains the high incidence of gastritis. According to Zaidi et al., the Pakistani population has a high occurrence of H. pylori infections [16]. The p-value for the presence of H. pylori antigen linked with positive endoscopic findings was found to be 0.032, proving to be statistically quite significant. In addition, the overuse of NSAIDs in Pakistan [17] can also be associated with increased gastritis. NSAIDs function by reducing prostaglandin production via inhibition of the cyclooxygenase pathway; prostaglandins in the gastric mucosa play a vital role in mucosal protection. NSAIDs are also known for increasing gastric acid secretion and reducing gastric mucosal blood supply.
The easy commercial availability and rampant use on a self-prescription basis of

I. H. Naqvi et al. Open Journal of Gastroenterology
NSAIDs [18] could also embark an important role in the high prevalence of gastritis among our population.
Where seropositivity of HBsAg and anti-HCV antibody being the diagnostic criteria, 14.5% (n = 147) patients in our study were having Hepatitis B infection compared to 23.1% (n = 234) who were found positive for Hepatitis C infection.
Hepatitis C virus has emerged as the most frequent etiology of chronic liver disease in certain parts of Pakistan [19]. The remarkable endoscopic features are invariably subsequent to the complications of cirrhosis such as portal hypertension, esophageal and gastric varices, peptic ulcer disease leading to gastric ulcers, and portal gastropathy [20]. Subsequently, 31.8% of the patients in this study were diagnosed with esophageal varices upon endoscopy with the p-value (P = 0.043) for an association between Hepatitis C infection and positive endoscopic finding which was found to be statistically significant. Furthermore, there is existing literature representing a minor percentage of transmission of such infections via GI endoscopy itself [21] as well as spreads which were secondary to improper methods of sterilization [22]. The aforementioned issue has hoisted an alarming notion regarding the prerequisite to perform GI endoscopy for patients having chronic liver disease, if necessary, with a standardized adequate sterilizing technique protocol employed per se.
Demographically almost equal participation of genders was found, with females comprising 52.2% and males comprising 47.8% of the sample population.
These figures are in accordance with other studies conducted where the gender segregate was relatively equal [23]. The marginally greater number of women presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms compared to men is a trend noted in other contemporary studies and is further supported by the proposition that the female gender may be an independent risk factor for dyspepsia [24], a clinical spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms including, but not limited to, abdominal pain associated with nausea, vomiting and heartburn. An existing elucidation proposes that increased prevalence of stress and anxiety disorders in females [25] as additional risk factors themselves can trigger bouts of dyspepsia, as well as other gastrointestinal symptoms. However, this study also establishes 88.8% of our male participants to be having positive endoscopic findings as compared to 87.5% of females which in turn suggests females to more likely suffer from functional dyspepsia than males, as shown by existing literature [26].
The age pattern shows that the presentation of endoscopic features is most likely to arise in or around the 3rd to 5th decades of life, a statistic in line with other studies [23]. The analysis identified positive endoscopic findings in 90.1% of the participants aged 40 years old and above as compared to 84% in the ones younger than 40 years. Not only have certain studies established associations between age and positive endoscopic findings [27], the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines particularly advocate endoscopy in dyspeptic patients above the age of 45 years a recommendation supported by our significant p-value (0.044) associating age with any positive endoscopic finding. Open Journal of Gastroenterology Among the numerous addictions noted within our sample population, a positive association was found between the use of betel quid and positive endoscopic findings. The use of betel quid (which is a mixture of betel leaf, tobacco, areca nut and slaked lime) has previously been linked to an increased risk of developing peptic ulceration along with oral and esophageal carcinoma, as outlined in a study conducted among Pakistani population [28]. This is specifically a result of nitrosamine based compounds derived from the 4 constituents of betel (namely guvacoline, arecaidine, arecoline and guvacine), where all have potential carcinogenic properties [29]. These components present in betel induce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemicals while further potentiating the damage caused. This viciously leads to systemic chronic inflammation, widespread damage and the development of multi-systemic diseases [30]. Interestingly though while an awe-inspiring majority of our participants with addiction to smoking had discernable positive endoscopic findings (91.3%), despite having early evidence of positive correlation between smoking and positive endoscopic findings [28], this study could not demonstrate a statistically significant association between the two which is in contrast to earlier study reported on the same subject.
This study has one notable limitation. The entire data used in this study was obtained retrospectively from patient records. As such, any existing discrepancies in the database would have adversely affected our outcomes and findings.

Statement of Ethics
Exemption has been sought from Institution review board for this study.

Funding Sources
The authors declare that they have not received any financial support for this article.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.