Clitoral Pain and Dyspareunia after Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Case Report

Background: Current evidence has focused on the complications of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) types 2 and 3, and there is a gap in the knowledge of the complications of FGM/C types 1 and 4, which are often considered milder forms of cutting. Case Presentation: A 23-year-old Somali woman with FGM/C was referred for chronic clitoral pain and superficial dyspareunia after several inconclusive gynecological examinations. Her clitoris was found to be entrapped under the scar of the cut clitoral hood. We surgically lysed the scar and reconstructed a prepuce. At the two-month follow-up, the patient reported no pain and physiologic sexual response. Conclusion: Clitoral pain and dyspareunia after FGM/C can be due to the incarceration of the clitoral glans. Treatment is surgical lysis of the scar.

International Journal of Clinical Medicine points) or 2) deep after recurrent genital infections that might lead to pelvic inflammatory disease [5] [6] [7]. Dyspareunia can be associated with primary or secondary vaginismus and be part of a genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder.
Superficial dyspareunia may have vulvar, clitoral, and/or psychosexual causes [8]. Clitoral pain during sex or otherwise can be present in the case of post-traumatic neuromas of the clitoris, vulvar or clitoral cysts, abscesses, keloids, or scarring [9].
Non-surgical methods of addressing clitoral pain include the use of painkillers, psychosexual therapy, topical analgesics, and pelvic floor therapy. Surgical methods include excision of scar tissue, keloids, neuromas, and cysts and restoration of normal anatomy, such as clitoral reconstruction in the case of FGM/C involving the clitoral glans [10]. However, the evidence for these treatments comes mainly from case reports and case series [9] [10]. A recent systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical interventions for vulvar and clitoral pain in girls and women living with FGM/C was unable to include any studies and indicated this area as an important field of research [9].
The present case study details the presentation and successful treatment of a woman with a form of FGM/C without cutting of the clitoris who experienced clitoral pain and superficial dyspareunia in the clitoral area. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a woman with a painful clitoral incarceration after undergoing a form of FGM/C that did not involve the cutting of the clitoral glans.

Case Presentation
A 23-year-old nulligravida Somali woman with a history of FGM/C during childhood was referred to our specialized outpatient clinic for women and girls with FGM/C for chronic clitoral pain and dyspareunia. She had been experiencing pain for at least eight months and had seen several gynecologists without a conclusive diagnosis or treatment.
General physical examination was normal, with no remarkable medical history besides the FGM/C, from which there had been no prior reported short-or long-term complications besides the clitoral pain. Upon exam, classification of her FGM/C was not trivial. It could appear to be a type 1b because the scar from the cutting completely covered the glans of the clitoris, or type 2b because the scar involved the upper part of the labia minora ( Figure 1). There was no narrowing of the vaginal orifice, nor covering of the urethral meatus. Careful examination revealed that the patient had undergone FGM/C that involved the cutting of the clitoral hood with probable stitching of the prepuce. The glans of the clitoris was intact but incarcerated by the scar (Figure 1). A q-tip test revealed that most of the patient's pain was localized at the level of the 11 o'clock clitoral bridle (Figure 2).
The patient also referred to vulvar and vaginal dryness during sex that con- We surgically liberated the clitoris under general anesthesia ( Figure 3) with a laryngeal mask to avoid pain and experiences that might recall the event of FGM/C [11]. The scar was placed under tension and sectioned with Iris scissors, releasing an intact glans of the clitoris and reconstructing a prepuce ( Figure   4(a)). There were no intraoperative complications.
The patient was advised to take 1 g of acetaminophen four times per day for pain management and apply Chlorhexidine 0.1% to the surgical area for seven days. In addition, she was instructed to apply local estriol cream one time per day for the first week and two times per week for the following three weeks. We

Discussion
This case study addresses two current research gaps: long term complications of FGM/C that does not involve cutting of the clitoris, and treatments for pain after FGM/C. We also establish that painful incarceration of the clitoral glans is a possible long-term consequence of FGM/C and that pain is successfully treated by lysing the adhesions around the clitoral glans.  [17]. It can be hypothesized that some clitoral cysts after FGM/C might result from smegma accumulation under the phimosis, similar to those cysts reported in Lichen Sclerosus (LS) and clitoral and penile phimosis [18].
Clitoral pain and dyspareunia were easily alleviated and quality of life improved by conducting a simple surgical procedure that relieved the tension imposed on the clitoral glans by the FGM/C scar. We did not perform any additional surgical procedure, as performing surgery in the clitoral area is not without risk; extreme consequences could include nerve damage that results in chronic pain or reduced sexual response [19].

Conclusions
The subject of the study has a scar incarcerating the clitoris due to a form of FGM/C that might be considered milder as it involved cutting and probable stitching the prepuce but the glans of the clitoris was not cut. However, the scar caused clitoral pain and dyspareunia. Treatment of the clitoral incarceration was surgical lysis of the scar.
Our case study emphasizes the need for healthcare provider education regarding FGM/C and its consequences for a quick diagnosis and treatment. Our patient underwent several exams over a period of many months and had to be referred to a specialized clinic to obtain diagnosis and treatment.

Author's Contributions
DH provided the patient referral to JA. JA made the diagnosis, performed the surgery, and followed the patient post-op. JA and EM wrote the manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The patient gave her consent for the procedure and for the pictures to be published.