The Outcome of Transvesical Prostatectomy—A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the commonest causes of lower obstructive uropathy and usually presents with lower urinary tract symptoms. However, in developing nations, the presentation is late often large prostate and associated complications of bladder outlet obstruction (diverticulae, stones, impaired renal function etc.) warranting open prostatectomy. Objective: The objective of this study is to share our experience of perioperative outcomes of open transvesical prostatectomy over a year involving two referral centers in Monrovia Liberia. Methodology: This was a retrospective study performed at The John F. Kennedy Medical Center and the Saint Joseph Catholic Hospital involving a total of 31 patients. Results: The mean age was 64.6 years (SD = 9.03) with a range 52 85 years. The study showed that 54.8% (17/31) of patients had preoperative catheter. The maximum duration of Catheter was greater than 4 weeks with a mean duration of 3.17 weeks. The mean hemoglobin was 11.30 g/dl. The commonest presenting complication was urinary retention at 25.8% (8/31) followed by hematuria 16.1% (5/31). Hypertension 41.9% (13/31) and diabetes 6.5% (/31) were the commonest comorbidity. The rate of postoperative complication was 38.7% with the commonest being surgical site infection 16.1% (5/31) and clot retentions 9.7% (3/31). There was a high rate of transfusion was 77.4% (24/31) patients. Up to about 13% (4/32) patients had coexisting stricture with 6.5% (2/31) patients treated with urethroplasty and 6.5% (2/31) patients treated by dilatation. The mortality rate was 6.5% (2/31) from renal impairment and severe sepsis. Conclusion: BPH is a common cause of lower obstructive uropathy. Most patients present with complications of the disease such as refractory symptoms, bladder stones or diverticulae necessitating surgery. However, due to the absence of endourological equipments in most parts of Africa and the large prostate at presentation, most settings consider open transvesical prostatectomy as a viable option. The perioperative morHow to cite this paper: Yunusa, B., Cassell, A., Konneh, S., Sheriff, S. and Ikpi, E. (2019) The Outcome of Transvesical Prostatectomy—A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Open Journal of Urology, 9, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.4236/oju.2019.95010 Received: April 25, 2019 Accepted: May 28, 2019 Published: May 31, 2019 Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access


Introduction
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the commonest causes of lower obstructive uropathy and usually presents with lower urinary tract symptoms [1] [3]. Most patients in the developed nations seek earlier care and are usual candidates for the less invasive transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) [1].
However, in developing nations, the presentation is late often large prostate and associated complications of bladder outlet obstruction (diverticulae, stones, impaired renal function etc.) warranting open prostatectomy [1].
Prostatectomy is one of the most commonly performed operations across the world [2]. Open prostatectomy has been the only surgical option for the management of BPH during most of the 20th century, however the frequency of open prostatectomy has gradually decreased with the widespread use of endoscocpic equipments [2]. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is now considered as the gold standard for treatment of BPH because it is less invasive methods, cost effectiveness with lower morbidity [2] [3].
Though the usual indications of open transvesical prostatectomy includes an adenoma of 80 cc or greater with associated bladder stone or diverticulum; yet another important indication is the absence of endourological equipments common in most African settings [2]. Open prostatectomy offers the advantages of a lower re-treatment rate and more complete removal of the prostate adenoma under direct vision, while it avoids the risk of additional hyponatremia (TURP syndrome) [4].
Therefore, the objective of this study is to share our experience of perioperative outcomes of open transvesical prostatectomy over a year involving two referral centers in Monrovia Liberia and establish baseline information about the procedure and outcome; to our knowledge no such information has been earlier documented in Liberia.

Materials and Methods
The study was performed at two hospitals, The John F. Kennedy medical Center and the Saint Joseph Catholic Hospital in Monrovia. A total of 31 patients were included in the study. The hospitals' records were retrospectively reviewed from February 2018 to February 2019 for cases of open transvesical prostatectomy and data on age, presentation, duration of catherization, perioperative complications, transfusion requirement and associated urethral stricture were retrieved and recorded.
Patients with retropubic prostatectomy were excluded from the study. All patients in the study had a preoperative ultrasound assessing prostate volume, residual bladder volume, bladder stones and evidence of hydronephrosis. The indication for open transvesical prostatectomy was independent of prostate volume as there was no other option as transurethral resection or Holium Laser enucleation of the prostate in both facilities.
Indications of prostatectomy included patient with BPH refractory to medical treatment or presenting with complications as recurrent acute urinaryretention, chronic urinary retention, bladder stones, recurrent urinary tract infection, hernia, hemorrhoids, obstructive uropathy and recurrent hematuria. The standard open transvesical prostatectomy was performed under regional or general anesthesia with the patient in the supine position. A pfannistiel incision was used and the bladder mobilized of the surrounding perivesical fat. A longitudinal incision was made to explore the intravesical cavity and the patency of the ureteral meatus assessed. An appropriate plane between the adenoma and the prostate capsule was developed. The adenoma was dissected off using the index finger until the attachment of the distal urethral which was cut off using a Metzenbaum scissors. Harris' Stitch and balloon tamponade were used to achieve hemostasis in the prostatic fossa. A 3-way 22 Fr catheter was left in place for irrigation with normal saline. The irrigation was stopped after the irrigation fluid appeared clear usually on the 2 nd or 3 rd day postoperatively.
Postoperatively, all patients had a complete blood count but patients with postop hemoglobin of 8 g/dl or lower were transfused. Normal Creatinine, blood urea and nitrogen as well as serum electrolytes were also surrogate of early discharge. The patients received postoperative antibiotics for a minimum of 72 hours. Follow ups were done weekly for 4 weeks in the urologic clinic and then subsequently as required. Catheters were removed around postoperative day 14 unless dictated by post-operative complications.
The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS data editor and the results are presented as percentage or mean standard deviation

Result
This was a multicenter retrospective study from February 2018 to February 2019 involving a total of 31 patients treated for benign prostate hyperplasia. The study showed in (Table 1) a mean age of 64.6 years (SD = 9.03) with a range 52 -85 years. The commonest age range managed for BPH in our study as shown in (Table 2) was 61 -70 years comprising 41.9% (13/31) followed by age range 51 -60 years about 35.5%. The study showed that 54.8% (17/31) of patients had preoperative catheter placed either for urinary retention or hematuria. The maximum duration of Catheter was greater than 4 weeks with a mean duration of 3.17 week. Hemoglobin was as low as 6.90 g/dl with the mean hemoglobin at 11.30 g/dl. In (Table 3), most of the patient presented with urinary retention at 25.8% (8/31) followed by hematuria 16.1% (5/31) which were treated as emergency. Other complications on presentation include hernia 9.7% (3/31), Open Journal of Urology  epidydimo-orchitis 9.7% (3/31), urinary retention and hernia 9.7% (3/31), urinary retention and stones 3.2% (1/31). Hypertension 41.9% (13/31) and diabetes 6.5% (2/31) were the commonest comorbidity. These patients were managed along with an Internist for optimization before surgery. The total postoperative complications in (Table 4) was about 38.7% with surgical site infection accounting for 16.1% (5/31) which was treated with continuous wound care. There were 3 clot retentions 9.7%; two were taken back for relook cystostomy and clot expulsion. Another was treated by forceful irrigation. One patient developed vesicocutaneous fistula that closed spontaneously after 21 days of catherization while another developed pelvic abscess that was drained surgically. The rate of transfusion in the series was 77.4% (24/31) patients. Up to 13% (4/32) patients had coexisting stricture with 6.5% (2/31) patients treated with urethroplasty and 6.5% (2/31) patients treated by dilatation prior to prostatectomy. The mortality rate was 6.5% (2/31) from renal impairment and severe

Discussion
Currently, there are various modalities for the surgical management of BPH but TURP is the now the gold standard because of its cost effectiveness, less invasiveness with fewer complications [2] [3] [5]. Holium laser enucleation of the prostate is even being considered as an alternative to open prostatectomy for large prostate not amenable to TURP due to its good outcome and safety profile [1] [5]. However, the initial setup and maintenance of these endourological equipments are far from being available in most sub-Saharan and developing nations [2]. Therefore, open prostatectomy is still to date a suitable option for BPH refractory to medical treatment and those presenting with complications  with a mean duration of 3.14 weeks. The prolonged preop catheterization was attributed to most patients presenting with urinary retention with associated alteration in electrolytes and renal function that needed correction before surgery.  [11] have shown that urinary retention is the commonest presenting complication with refractory urinary retention being a common indication for surgery.  Most of these deaths were attributed to pulmonary embolism and severe postoperative hemorrhage. The marked difference in our data could be possibly explained by the relatively lower sample size giving a higher mortality rate.

Study Limitation
This study is challenged by its retrospective design which is subject to selection bias. The relatively lower sample size limits the potential for a more robust statistical and comparative analysis with other high-volume studies.

Conclusion
BPH is a common cause of lower obstructive uropathy. Most patients present with complications of the disease such as refractory symptoms, bladder stones or diverticulae necessitating surgery. However, due to the absence of endourological equipments in most parts of Africa and the large prostate at presentation most settings consider open transvesical prostatectomy as a viable option. The perioperative morbidity is relatively higher, but the outcome remains acceptable.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest towards this publication.