The Value of Speckle Tracking Strain Imaging at Recovery Period of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Background: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a well-established method for detecting myocardial ischemia. The classic echocardiographic findings of ischemia are new or worsening abnormalities of radial wall thickening. However, interpretation of these findings is subjective and dependent on experience. Speckle tracking strain imaging (STI) has been introduced as a novel method to overcome these limitations. Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the value of speckle tracking imaging (STI) by estimating the mean global longitudinal systolic (GLS) and the mean global circumferential systolic (GCS) strain imaging at recovery period of dobutamine stress echocardiography for prediction of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chest discomfort. Methods: Fifty three patients presented for evaluation of chest discomfort underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography and coronary angiography at Cardiology Department, Menoufia University Hospital. The mean global left ventricular longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) at apical views—3 chambers, 4 chambers & 2 chambers apical views and global left ventricular circumferential systolic strain (GCS) at short axis view at level of papillary muscle were measured at rest and during recovery period of dobutamine stress echocardiography using automated functional imaging (AFI). Coronary angiography was done for all patients. Significant coronary artery lesion was defined as having a ≥ 70% diameter stenosis on coronary angiography. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of significant coronary artery lesion into CAD positive (+ve) group vs. CAD negative (−ve) group. Results: In both groups, there were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics and baseline conventional transthoracic echocardiography. GLS and GSC at recovery were lower in the CAD (+ve) group than in the CAD (−ve) group (−16.69% ± 1.10% vs How to cite this paper: Abushabana, M.M., Samy, N.I., Soliman, M.A. and Fareed, W. (2019) The Value of Speckle Tracking Strain Imaging at Recovery Period of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 9, 223-235. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcd.2019.93020 Received: February 14, 2019 Accepted: March 22, 2019 Published: March 25, 2019 Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access M. M. Abushabana et al. DOI: 10.4236/wjcd.2019.93020 224 World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases −19.05% ± 1.41% p < 0.0001 respectively for GLS and −19.90 ± 1.69 vs −21.24% ± 1.49% p = 0.002 respectively for GCS). GLS and GCS during recovery period of DSE were valuable for prediction of CAD when cutoff at recovery is less than −17.95% (sensitivity of 84% & specificity of 84%) for GLS and less than −20.2% (sensitivity of 76% & specificity of 84%) for GCS. Also, we observed that the GLS and GCS percentile decreased from baseline to recovery period of DSE by about −9.95% ± 4.82% and −7.72% ± 3.90% respectively. Conclusion: Speckle tracking Imaging GLS and GCS at recovery period of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography is feasible and offers an objective technique for prediction of significant coronary artery disease with increasing the accuracy of DSE in patient with chest discomfort.


Introduction
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of death and disability in developed countries.Although CAD mortality rates have declined over the past four decades in the United States (and elsewhere), CAD remains responsible for about one-third of all deaths in individuals over age 35 [1].
The combination of stress testing and echocardiography-SEcho-has assumed an important role in the diagnosis of CAD.The appearance of a new stress-induced regional wall motion abnormality (WMA), readily identified by echocardiography, allows the detection of ischemia, and its location may be used to predict the stenosis in coronary vessels [2].Global and regional cardiac functions are key parameters reported during this test.Their assessment is mostly based on visual interpretation of the B-mode cine loop with a high risk of intraand inter-observer variability, depending on the reader's experience [3].
The accuracy of stress echo tests for the detection of coronary artery disease is expressed as the sensitivity and specificity of the technique for the detection of angiographically demonstrated stenosis.Nonetheless, this parameter has a number of limitations, some reflecting the limitations of an angiographic cutoff for significant disease, including the variation of the physiologic effect of a stenosis based on site, length, and vessel size, as well as over-and under-estimation of coronary lesion severity [4].
Speckle tracking imaging (STI) is a newer approach to assess myocardial deformation [5].It relies on detecting features (mostly "speckles") in 2D greyscale images, the displacement of which is measured.Velocity, strain and strain rate is then derived from the displacement information.Speckles can be tracked in any direction within the image plane which offers new options for motion and deformation analysis compared to the one-dimensional tissue Doppler imaging World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases (TDI) method [6].Assessment of STI at peak stress of DSE is especially difficult because of an inadequate low frame rate for the rapid heart rate, failure to maintain respiratory holding in symptomatic patients, subsequent tracking problems and the development of signal to noise due to hyper dynamic LV contractility and excessive annular motion.While assessment of STI at recovery is easier because of the ease of respiratory control due to improvement in symptoms, lower heart rate and decreased myocardial hyper-contractility [7].So this study aimed to evaluate the value of speckle tracking imaging during the recovery period after DSE for prediction of significant CAD in patients with chest discomfort.

Methods
This prospective study was carried on 53 patients who presented with chest pain to cardiac clinic at Menoufia university hospital during the period between June 2017 and July 2018.While patients with acute coronary syndrome, wall motion abnormalities (WMAs) at rest or previous myocardial infarction, previous cardiac surgery, valvular heart disease of greater than moderate grade, Non-sinus rhythm such as atrial fibrillation, Artificial pacemaker, .Systolic dysfunction with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) < 50%, patient with Systemic diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary syndrome and also patients with poor echogenic window were excluded from the analysis.All patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography and coronary angiography after giving written informed consent.

Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography and Speckle Tracking Imaging
Patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography, the examinations were performed in the left lateral supine position with Vivid E9 machine (GE Vingmed, Norway) using standard protocol with incremental infusion of 5, 10, global strain% = L (end-systolic) − L (end-diastolic)/L (end-diastolic) × 100 [11] [12], using automated functional imaging (AFI) with tracing of the endocardium border, and adjusted region of interest (ROI ) to include the entire myocardium at end-systolic frame at aortic valve closure (AVC) [13].All images analyzed offline used Echo PAC SW version 9.0.0,GE Vingmed Ultrasound Horton Norway).

Coronary Angiography
Coronary angiography was performed for all patients utilizing retrograde percutaneous trans-radial and trans-femoral technique for evaluation of the coronary lesion.Conventional views with addition cranial and caudal angulations were used to maximize imaging of coronary lesions.According to coronary angiography findings patients were divided into two groups.Group 1: CAD (+ve): including patients with significant CAD including coronary artery lesion > 70% diameter stenosis (assessed by visual inspection) [14] and group 2: CAD (−ve): including patients without significant CAD including normal coronaries defined as no luminal narrowing and non-significant lesion is defined as CAD lesion having less than 40% by coronary angiography [15].Patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions between 40% & 70% were excluded as FFR to evaluate the significance of the lesion was not available.
All data were exported to a spread-sheet (Microsoft excel 2013, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results
The 53 patients had mean age of 55.There was no significant difference as regards demographic data and risk factors between two groups (Table 1) and this actually was planned from the start to eliminate the possible effects of diabetes mellitus and hypertension on myocardial deformation proved by other studies [18] [19].
There is no significance difference between the two groups as regard systolic and diastolic blood pressure at rest or at peak DSE, only resting heart rate is higher in CAD +ve group than CAD -ve group ( p = 0.001) (Table 1).
No significance difference as regard baseline conventional transthoracic echocardiography including left ventricular (LV) size, LV wall thickness, ejection fraction (EF), left atrial (LA) size, volume and different diastolic parameter between the two groups (Table 2).
Wall motion abnormalities (WMA) at peak DSE were observed in 21 patients (84%) in the CAD +ve group and in 6 patients (21.4%) in the CAD -ve group with a sensitivity and specificity of WMA for CAD of 84% and 84.6%, respectively.WMA were normalized at recovery period of DSE (Table 3).
In CAD +ve patients, the values of GLS and GCS at recovery period of DSE had significantly greater reduction (p < 0.0001, p = 0.002 respectively) when compared with GLS and GSC at same stage of DSE in CAD -ve individuals respectively.While there is no significant difference between the two studied groups as regard the GLS and GCS at rest (Table 4).With NPar Tests, Mann-whitney Test the GLS and GCS percentile change from baseline to recovery period of DSE = -9.95%± 4.82% p < 0.0001 and -7.72% ± 3.90% p = 0.001 respectively (Table 5).Upon ROC analysis, the values of GLS and GCS at recovery period of DSE showed significantly greater AUCs than the values of GLS and GCS at rest respectively (p < 0.0001, CI = 95% and p = 0.002, CI = 95%) respectively.The optimal cutoff value of GLS and GCS at recovery for prediction of significant CAD was −17.95% and −20.2% respectively, which resulted in a GLS sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 84% respectively (Figure 1), and GCS sensitivity and specificity of 76% and of 83.5% respectively (Figure 2).There was no significant difference as regard sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values between visual WMA at peak stress and the quantitative GLS (Table 6) and GCS (Table 7) technique at recovery period of DSE.

Discussion
Although stress ECHO is a relatively easy to use technology that poses only a low risk of adverse events compared to other imaging technologies, it may potentially be overused and/or misused in CAD diagnosis [20].Several recent advances have been made focusing on quantitative methods for assessment, improved image quality and enhanced portability, however, evidence on the effectiveness and clinical utility of these enhancements is limited [21].Speckle tracking, a tool based on gray-scale image processing emerged as an exciting alternative for assessing global and regional myocardial deformations.
Speckle tracking analysis is based on a block-matching approach of the specklepatterns within the myocardium.It allows strain assessment of myocardial segments relatively independent of their position with respect to the ultrasound beam direction [22] [23].
Recent studies showed that transient ischemic injury after DSE persists and can persist for at least 5 minutes in 90% of patients [22] [25].According to    Hui-Jeong Hwang et al. [26] suggest that systolic stunning after a transient ischemic event persists and that assessment by GLS during the recovery period allows this phenomenon to be objectively and quantitatively assessed.
This study was designed to investigate whether assessment of myocardial deformation using STI during the recovery period after DSE allows for detection of CAD in patients with chest discomfort.GLS & GCS at recovery period of DSE may be a good marker for the prediction of significant CAD, as well as developed WMA at peak stress similar result from Patricia et al. [27]   The findings of our study demonstrate that measurement of speckle tracking imaging of both GLS and GCS during recovery period of dobutamine stress echocardiography is feasible and provide quantifiable information for the prediction of significant coronary artery disease.Our feasibility and reproducibility rates match those reported by other authors, Ryo K et al. [28] who shown that evaluation of circumferential and longitudinal strains during DSE has real potential for quantitative evaluation of LV deformation in the routine assessment of ischemia.We found that GLS & GCS at recovery period of DSE may be a good marker for the prediction of significant CAD, as well as development of WMA at peak stress.Wierzbowska-D et al. [29] and Yu Y et al. [30] found that 2D strain can be calculated at any stage of DSE giving significant information for the presence of ischemia, even at low dose stage.
This study has revealed that longitudinal strain had higher diagnostic accuracy than circumferential strains and reported similar diagnostic accuracy as expert wall motion analysis for the detection of CAD, this finding is match report with other author, Ng AC et al. [7] found that Longitudinal strain analysis had comparable accuracy to wall motion score index (WMSI) and its diagnostic accuracy was incremental to either longitudinal strain or WMSI alone and they concluded that the Longitudinal strain analysis had higher diagnostic accuracy than circumferential and radial strains and was comparable to WMSI for detection of significant coronary artery disease.Constantina A. et al. [31] who found that the combination of GLS and WMSI offers enhanced diagnostic ability.
Valttri U et al. [32] who showed that GLS, strain rate and Post systolic strain index (PSI) spickle tracking echocardiography during early recovery after DSE can help in detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease compared with visual wall motion alone.World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases In this study, the sensitivity of newly developed WMA at peak stress for detection of CAD was similar to Hui-Jeong Hwang, et al. [26].
In this study the amplitude cutoffs of GLS & GCS for the prediction of significant CAD at recovery period of DSE is lower when compared with rest with high diagnostic accuracy, similar result from Hui-Jeong Hwang, et al. [26] for GLS, Patricia et al. [27] for CS.Therefore, the values of speckle tracking Imaging GLS and GCS at recovery period of DSE may be offer useful method for prediction of significant CAD and added to the test to aid inexperienced interpreter of wall motion analysis.

Study Limitations
The strain rate was not analyzed in fact, and the noise in the strain rate signal increased with higher heart rates, and the image quality decreased.Second, we only showed global longitudinal strain analysis using an automatic functional imaging method.Another limitation is that this was a study of relatively small sample size.

Conclusion
Speckle tracking imaging with estimation of GLS and GCS at recovery period of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography is feasible and offers an objective technique for prediction of significant coronary artery disease with increasing the accuracy of DSE in patients with chest discomfort.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Reciever-operating characteristic curve of GLS at rest & during recovery period of DSE for prediction of CAD. a sensitivity of 84% & specificity of 84% are observed when cutoff at recovery is less than −17.95% for prediction of CAD.GLS: Global Left ventricular Strain.‫ــــــــــ‬ GLS at rest 0.547 (CI 0.385 -0.710); ‫ــــــــــ‬ GLS at recovery 0.913 (CI 0.832 -0.993); ‫ــــــــــ‬ Reference Line.

Table 1 .
Baseline characteristics between CAD positive patients and CAD negative individuals.

Table 2 .
Baseline transthoracic echocardiography between CAD Positive and CAD negative group.

Table 3 .
WMA at peak of DSE in CAD positive and CAD negative individual's patients.
n: number of cases, WMA wall motion abnormalities, CAD: Coronary artery disease.

Table 4 .
Comparison between CAD negative individuals and CAD positive patients as regard Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) and Global Circumferential Strain (GCS) at rest and at recovery period during dobutamine Stress Echocardiography.

Table 5 .
Percentage of change in GLS and GCS measures from baseline to recovery.

Table 6 .
Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of wall motion abnormalities at peak stress and GLS value lesser than −17.95 % at recovery period of DSE for prediction of significant CAD.

Table 7 .
Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of wall motion abnormalities at peak stress and GCS value lesser than −20.02 % at recovery period of DSE for prediction of significant CAD.