Arp 2 / 3 Complex Is Expressed in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma : An Immunohistochemical Study of 88 Cases

Background: We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of Arp2/3 complex in 88 oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) and correlated it with the tumor type and grade. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 88 cases of OSCCs (9 verrucous carcinomas, 4 carcinomas in situ, 37 well differentiated OSCCs, 32 moderately differentiated OSCCs, and 6 poorly differentiated OSCCs), stained with mouse monoclonal antibodies for Arp2 and Arp3. Staining was graded according to the extent of positivity by two observers. Results: Arp2 positivity was seen in 79 (89.77%) cases and Arp3 positivity in 78 (88.63%) cases. In positive cases, Arp2 expression was graded as (+) in 12.5%, (++) in 28.4% and (+++) in 48.86% of the cases; Arp3 was graded as (+) in 36.36%, (++) in 30.68% and (+++) in 21.59% of the cases. Conclusion: Expression of Arp2 and Arp3, indicative of the formation of the Arp2/3 complex, was seen in most OSCCs examined. Although no statistically significant correlation was found between the immunohistochemical expression of Arp2/Arp3 and tumor type or grade, the more common expression in invasive OSCCs than in non-invasive verrucous carcinomas and carcinomas in situ is indicative of its involvement in the biological behaviour of the lesions. The availability of Arp2/3 inhibitors that could be used in clinical practice warrants further study of the expression of Arp2/3 in OSCC.


Introduction
Oral cancer is one of the 10 most common cancers and despite progress in di- agnosis and treatment survival has not improved significantly during the last years [1].Prognosis and survival are associated with certain clinicopathological parameters, the most significant being regional and distant metastasis [2] [3].
However, metastatic behavior cannot be accurately predicted by histology or individual gene or protein expression/activity.Metastasis requires motility of cancer cells [4].The main types of cellular structures associated with motility that may have a role in the invasion process are filopodia, lamellipodia, invadopodia and podosomes, the latter two collectively known as invadosomes [5].The formation and regulatory activities of these cellular "feet" are controlled by a variety of molecules with specific roles in their formation [5] [6].Formation of filopodia, lamellipodia and invadopodia is driven by spatially and temporally regulated actin polymerization at the leading edge of migrating and invading cells [6].This is associated with the actin related protein 2/3 complex (Arp2/3 complex), an activator of actin filament nucleation and branching [7] [8] [9] [10].Several lines of evidence indicate that these proteins are necessary for cell movement associated with cell migration and invasion.Moreover, the expression Arp2/3 complex has been associated with malignant cell phenotypes, indicating the importance of these proteins in cancer cell migration and invasion [11]- [18].The Arp2/3 complex consists of seven proteins with five unique subunits (ARPC1-5) forming the dimer Arp2/3 [19].Cooperative interactions with ATP, nucleation promoting factors and the side chain of an actin filament activate Arp2/3 complex to initiate the production of a new actin filament [20].However, silencing of any of the Arp2/3 complex subunits genes results in a significant decrease in the cell migratory capacity [11] [18].Since the first report about its distribution in colorectal cancer [12], overexpression of Arp2/3 has been found in 56% to 91.8% of various malignant tumors, such as liver metastasis from colon primary carcinoma, breast, pancreatic, lung, gastric carcinoma and human gliomas [12]- [18] and has been associated with pathogenesis, growth and invasion in some of them [13] [14] [15] [16] [17].In head and neck carcinomas, silencing of the ARPC5 gene that encodes one of the seven subunits of Arp2/3 complex led to changes in cell morphology, and suppression of cell migration and invasion [11].However, expression of Arp2/3 in oral squamous cell carcinoma has not been previously investigated.
We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of Arp2/3 in 88 OSCCs and correlated it to tumor type and grade.

Material and Methods
This is a retrospective immunohistochemical study of 88 cases of oral carcinomas retrieved from the files of the Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, during the years 2005-2008 (approval no.5171).All tissues were diagnostic biopsies resected at Athens University Hospital (clinic of Dermatology and Stomatology A. Syggros during these years) and fixed in 10% for-Open Journal of Stomatology malin for <24 hours and embedded in paraffin (FFPE).Age and gender of the patients, as well asprimary location, were retrieved from the biopsy request form of each case, where available.Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of all cases were reviewed for confirmation of the diagnosis and grading [3].
For immunohistochemical staining, 5 µm tick FFPE tissue sections were stained with mouse monoclonal antibodies for Arp2 (E12 dilution 1:50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. USA) and Arp3 (A1, 1:50 Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. USA) utilizing a standard streptavid in-biotin-peroxidase technique.Antigen retrieval was performed with EDTA/Tris buffer (pH 9.0) in a microwave oven for 25 minutes.Positive controls were sections of colon cancer, while substitution of the primary antibodies by bovine serum of the same specificity served as a negative control.
For statistical analysis the Fisher exact test was performed, with a value of p < 0.05 for statistical significance.Statistical evaluation was performed using Fisher's test to compare the positive or negative (binary) expression of Arp2 and Arp3 with the type and differentiation of OSCC (factor variable) forming consistency tables and we investigated as well the correlation between the expression of Arp2 and Arp3.
There was a tendency for increased expression of Arp2 and Arp 3 in invasive OSCC, compared to verrucous carcinomas (Figure 2) and carcinomas in situ    (Figure 3), but this correlation was not statistically significant (Table 2).Finally, Arp2 and Arp3 expression was more common in well differentiated OSCC compared to moderate or poorly differentiated OSCC, but statistical significance between grade and expression was not seen (Table 4).

Discussion
In this study it was shown that Arp2 and Arp3 proteins were expressed in 89.7% and 88.6%, respectively, of the 88 cases of OSCC examined.Arp2 and Arp3 expression in cancer cells was cytoplasmic as has been previously described [12] Figure 3. Immunohistochemical expression of Arp3 (+++) in a in situ carcinoma (streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase immunostaining, original magnification ×10).Both proteins were co-expressed in 78 cases (88.6%) and the statistical significant correlation between Arp2 and Arp3 expression seen in positive cases suggests formation of the Arp2/3 complex in those cells [12] [13] [15].Formation of Arp2/3 complex is a prerequisite for the neoplastic cells to form filopodia, lamellipodia and invadopodia and acquire motility [4] [5] [22] and cells that express the Arp2/3 complex have greater ability for tissue movement [8] [22] [23] [24] [25].Similar expression of Arp2/3 complex has been reported in gastric, colorectal, breast, lung, pancreatic and liver metastasis from colon carcinomas, as well as in gliomas [12]- [18].Arp2 and Arp3 are more commonly expressed in invasive than in intramucosal carcinomas of the colon, as well as in gastric carcinomas than in intestinal metaplasia and gastritis [12] [13].In various tumors Arp2/3 expression ispositively correlated to tumor size, depth of invasion, venous invasion and higher stage disease [13] [14] [15] [16] [17].In colorectal adenocarcinomas Arp2/3 expression was higher in cases with liver metastasis and in moderately differentiated tumors [15] while ingliomas increased Arp2/3 expression was associated with higher stage disease and Arp2/3 upregulation was seen in migrating cells [17].The immunohistochemical expression of ARPC2 was included in a multimarker diagnostic assay that was able to correctly distinguish melanomas from benign and atypical nevi [26].Co-expression of Arp2 and Wave2, a member of the WASP protein family binding to Arp2/3 complex to form lamellipodial protrusions, was an independent risk factor for colorectal carcinoma with liver metastasis [15].It was, also, detected more frequently in cases of lung carcinoma with lymph node metastasis and poor outcome [16], and was significantly different between invasive and not invasive carcinoma of the breast, and poor clinical outcome [14].In the present study, Arp2/3 was more commonly expressed in invasive OSCC than in non-invasive verrucous carcinoma and carcinoma in situ, although this correlation was not found to be statistically significant, possi- bly due to small number of non-invasive cases included.The difference found in Arp3 expression between invasive OSCCs and verrucous carcinoma should be further examined, as it could be utilized in recognizing invasive cells in verrucous carcinoma.
In glioma cell cultures inhibition of the formation of Arp2/3 complex by CK666 leads to the disappearance of lamellipodia and significant inhibition of migration and invasive ability [17] [27].In head and neck carcinoma cell silencing of ARPC5 genereduced the invasive potential [11], while in pancreatic cancer cell, silencing of any of the Arp2/3 complex subunits, in particular ARPC4, resulted in a significant decrease in cell migratory capacity [18].Therefore, more information on Arp2/3 expression in OSCCs could indicate whether such inhibitors could be helpful in clinical practice.

Table 1 .
Main clinical features of 88 cases of OSCC.