Metal Uptake by Plants from Soil Contaminated by Thin-Film Solar Panel Material

Various metals, including zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), gallium (Ga), lead (Pb), copper (Cu) and indium (In), may be released and cause contamination when scrapped end-of-life (EoL) Cu(InGa)Se2 thin-film solar panel (CIGS TFSP) is buried in the soil. In this study, we grew Brassica parachinensis L. H. Bariley (VegBrassica) in three different types of soils, namely, a commercial soil, a Mollisol, and an Oxisol, which had been contaminated by CIGS TFSP to various extents. The concentrations of contaminants in these soils were positively correlated with both the amount of CIGS TFSP added and the burial period. Plants grew well in commercial soil and Mollisol, but those in Oxisol showed prominent signs of chlorosis and died after 30 days. The bioaccumulation factor (BF) and concentration of Zn in VegBrassica grown in commercial soil with 10% of CIGS TFSP added were 3.61 and 296 mg/kg, respectively, while the BF and concentration of In of VegBrassica grown in Mollisol were 3.80 and 13.72 mg/kg, respectively. The results showed that soils were contaminated by metals released from CIGS TFSP, and different adsorption patterns were observed for VegBrassica depending on which types of metals associated with the soil properties.


Introduction
Because of their persistence in the environment, there is great concern about the effects of heavy metals on human health.Mining and smelting industries, fossil fuel consumption, and the disposal of metal-containing wastes are the main anthropogenic sources of metals that accumulate in soils [1] [2].Metals may enter the food chain when they are taken up by plants [3] [4].Toxic metals can be accumulated in plants cultivated on metal-contaminated soils in variable quantities via their roots, and then produce further toxic effects in animals and humans through assimilation [2].Vegetables, especially leafy species, tend to accumulate not only nutrients but also toxic metals in their tissues, with subsequent impacts on food quality and safety.Thus, food consumption was identified as the major pathway of human exposure to heavy metals [5].Brassica parachinensis L. H. Bariley (Veg Brassica ) is a kind of vegetable commonly grown in south China.It has been reported that Veg Brassica can uptake heavy metals such as Cd and Zn when grown on polluted soil [5].Therefore, vegetables can be used as a proxy for metal contamination to different levels in agricultural environments [3].In China, suburban vegetable farms are mainly small-scale family businesses.Organic fertilizers and other agrochemicals are applied generously to soils, and the farms are rarely subject to government food quality checks [6].In an earlier study, Tan et al. [5] found that the vegetables grown on a farm close to a metal manufacturing factory were heavily polluted by metals.The concentrations of lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) in plants exceeded the thresholds outlined in the National Food Safety Standard of China (GB 2762(GB -2017)).Although some metals are essential elements for both plant and human at low concentrations, these metals may be bioaccumulated and their concentrations may be higher than normally acceptable levels and consequently have adverse effects on the ecosystem [6] [7] [8].Some heavy metals, such as Cu and zinc (Zn), act as co-factors in various enzymes and are essential in small doses for animal and human.Over-accumulation of these metals in human may result in acute toxicity because of redox cycling and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can damage DNA and cause chronic conditions such as Wilson's disease and cirrhosis of the liver [9] [10].
Copper and Zn in food at high concentrations are therefore of great concern because of their toxicity to human [8] [10] [11].Over-accumulation of Zn in human body may cause ataxia and suppress Cu and iron (Fe) absorption, leading to Cu and Fe deficiency [9].Moreover, the consumption of food contaminated by nickel (Ni) can cause respiratory problems, including a type of asthma specific to Ni, decrease lung function, and bronchitis [12].Some studies have reported that the heavy metals in soils have different availabilities to plants [3].Contaminants released to soils mainly exist as metal ions at first; these ions are easily acquired by plant roots and raise the amount of metal contaminations in plant tissues.On the other hand, the contaminants that remain trapped in aluminosilicates cannot be absorbed by plant roots, and so the metals in such forms contribute very little to environmental pollution.In general, heavy metals that are originated from anthropogenic sources can be initially converted to ions and can be absorbed by plant roots.Because of bioaccumulation, the concentrations of heavy metals and other toxins in some plants would be higher than those in the natural environment [3].
With the rapid development of clean and renewable energy, solar energy devices, including solar thermal heaters, silicon photovoltaic panels, and thin-film photovoltaic panels, are used increasingly and frequently worldwide.Lee [13] reported that Cu(InGa)Se 2 (CIGS), α-Si, and CdTe are the three most widely commercialized thin-film solar cells, with energy conversion efficiencies of 22.3%, 13.6%, and 22.1%, respectively.As competitors in the field of module efficiency, CIGS and CdTe technologies are accounted for more than 55% of the global photovoltaic market with the greatest promise for the future [13].The lifetimes of crystalline silicon and thin-film photovoltaic modules are between 20 and 30 years [14].The utilization of solar photovoltaic systems has increased rapidly in the recent years, meaning that there may be problems with their disposal in the near future.McDonald and Pearce [15] have predicted that there will be a huge volume of discarded photovoltaic waste to be dealt with after 2030.Because some photovoltaic modules contain heavy metals and organic pollutants, there are concerns about the potential risks from unappropriated treatment and disposal of end-of-life (EoL) solar photovoltaic panels, particularly relating to the release of toxic metals and lethal gases into the soil [16].It is therefore suggested that a level of administration for EoL photovoltaics may be a financially practical and viable solution for dealing with these issues [17].In the recent past, numerous privately-owned businesses and research establishments worldwide have carried out lab-scale experiments or pilot industrial procedures to determine the potential for reusing photovoltaic panels including crystalline silicon and thin-film panel [16] [18].Although there are some techniques for recycling solar photovoltaic panels, the methods are so complex and energy demanding that such EoL treatment is rarely applied in developing countries.For example, in China, to date most EoL thin-film solar panels (TFSP) have not been recycled but rather have been treated as domestic or construction wastes.Some have been directly buried in the soil after disassembly.To promote more efficient use of natural resources and the use of secondary raw materials in the production of photovoltaic panels, a step has been taken towards mindful EoL treatment of photovoltaic modules in the European Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE; Directive 2012/19/UE of the European Parliament and the Council), which outlines that abandoned photovoltaic modules should be included as residential or special WEEE [19].
To date there have been few studies of plants that have been contaminated from metals released when scrapped CIGS TFSP is buried in the soil.Tammaro [20] reported that the leachates of crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels may contain Al, Pb, Cd and Sb and those of thin-film photovoltaic panels may contain Al, Cr, Pb, Se and Cd.These metals might be released if those panels are disposed of to the soil.Monier and Hestin [21] reported that Pb and Cd can be leached from crystalline silicon and thin-film photovoltaic panels.Luo [22] demonstrated that the soils from a previous E-waste incineration site contain high concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn.They also found moderately high concentrations of Cd and Cu in the soils from adjacent paddy fields and vegeta-ble farms, where the concentrations of Cd and Pb in the palatable tissues of vegetables surpass the highest level allowed in food in China.In this study we investigated the uptake of metals by Brassica parachinensis L. H. Bariley (Veg Brassica ) grown in a commercial soil, a Mollisol, and an Oxisol that had been contaminated with different amounts of CIGS TFSP.We also investigated the mechanisms that drove the release and transfer of metals from CIGS TFSP to the soil and then their bio-accumulation in plants.The results of this study should provide updated information about the environmental risks associated with the disposal of EoL CIGS TFSP by burial in the soil.

Thin-Film Solar Panel and Soil Collection
We obtained the CIGS type of TFSP from a solar energy company in Zhuhai, China.The collected materials were crushed into pieces of approximately 9.5 mm*9.5 mm (length*width).The crushed pieces were pre-treated by rinsing with distilled deionized (DI) water and then were air-dried.The soil samples for the simulated burial experiments were collected randomly from between 0 and 20 cm in depth of the soil profiles from two sites in Zhuhai and Shaoguan, both in Guangdong Province, China.The sample from Zhuhai was a neutral Mollisol that represented clean soil while the sample from Shaoguan was an acidic Oxisol that had been contaminated by mineral waste with a low pH.The collected soil samples were air dried and ground to less than 2 mm, and stored in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) buckets.We also used a commercial soil, a type of garden soil used commonly on vegetable farms in China, to simulate the effects of pollution from waste materials in a control environment.All the soil samples were heated at 121˚C for 24 hrs to eliminate indigenous microorganisms, which could probably result in bio-leaching of metals.

Soil Burial Experiment
Forty-five high-density polyethylene sample pots (250 × 150 × 200 mm) were used for the burial experiment, with fifteen pots for each type of soil and triplicates for each sample of crushed CIGS TFSP.We made two small holes, each with a 5 mm diameter, in the bottom of each pot to allow water to drain and then placed a pan underneath each pot to collect the drainage water that was returned to the pot once a day.Each pot containing approximately 2 kg of soil (e.g.Mollisol, Oxisol, and commercial soil) was prepared for the burial experiment.
Selected amounts (0 (control, 0%), 50 (2.5%), 100 (5%), 150 (7.5%), and 200 g (10%)) of crushed CIGS TFSP by weight were mixed evenly with different soil samples in the pots.Potted samples were then soaked with 100 mL of deionized (DI) water once a week and were incubated under natural conditions with a temperature of 25˚C ± 5˚C for 60 days.For soil sampling at the completion of burial experiment, 1 g of soil was taken from 5 different points selected randomly in each pot and combined into one sample, air dried, and passed through After germination, the percentages of successful seeds were recorded, and the plants were thinned out so that five seedlings were remained in each pot.The edible parts (leaves & stems) of the vegetables were harvested on days 30, 60, 90 and 120 of growth and the lengths of each plant were recorded.The plant samples were rinsed with DI water, and the edible parts were dried at 65˚C in an oven for 24 hrs.The pretreated plant samples were then ground with an agate mortar and passed through a 0.15 mm sieve and stored in polyethylene bags in a desiccator until further analysis of metal concentrations.The final analytical data of edible materials were taken from the average value of three tests of each replicate.
The soil pH was determined based onsoil:DI water at a weight:volume ratio of 1:2.5.We determined the particle size of soil samples by using the sieve and pipette method [23].The organic matter (OM) content was estimated after dry combustion at 550˚C for 5 hrs, and the percentage of OM was calculated using Equation (1) [24] [25] [26]: ( ) where OM is the percentage of organic matter in the soil sample, M 1 is the weight of the crucible and soil sample before combustion, M 2 is the weight of the crucible, and M 3 is the weight of the crucible and soil sample after combustion.
The homogenized soil material (approximately 200 mg) was microwave-digested in 10 mL of 69% nitric acid using a Sineo Corporation microwave extraction system.The microwave extraction method USEPA3051A was used according to the Sineo Corporation (Shanghai, China, 2015).After digestion the liquid was separated from the solid particles by vacuum filtration through a 0.22 μm filter and diluted to 50 mL [14] [27] [28].The homogenized plant materials were digested in line with the USEPA3050B.The concentrations of metals (Zn, Ni, aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), gallium (Ga), Pb, Cu and indium (In)) in soil and plant samples after digestions were determined using ICP-OES.Experiments were performed in triplicate.Certified standard reference materials (GBW07605 (GSV-4) for vegetables and GBW07403 (GSS-3) for soils), obtained from the National Institute of Metrology (NIM) China, were used for analysis of 15-samples from each batch according to the guideline in the quality assurance programme.Reagent blanks and analytical triplicates comprised 10% of the total samples and were used where appropriate to test the accuracy and precision of the analysis.The recovery rates were higher than 90% for all the metals in the standard reference materials.

Calculation of Bioaccumulation Factor (BF)
We calculated BFsby comparing the metal concentrations in vegetables with those in soils.Using Equation ( 2), the BF for each metal was calculated from the metal concentrations in the vegetables (mg/kg) and soil (mg/kg): where C vegetable is the concentration of metal in the vegetable (mg/kg) and C soil is the concentration of metal in the soil (mg/kg) after 60 days of burial experiment.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS (Ver.22).We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) Duncan's multiple range tests to test the relationships between metal concentrations and different leaching times for various soils.Means were separated using the least significant difference option with α = 0.05.The correlations between bioaccumulation factor (BF) of Veg Brassica and the cultivation period and the percentage of crushed CIGS TFSP added are analyzed using Pearson rank order correlation analysis.

Metal Constituent of CIGS TFSP
The metal constituents in CIGS TFSP are shown in Table 1.Aluminum and Ni were the two most abundant metals with over 57% of total metal constituent by weight.As expected, Zn, Cu, Ga, and In, the important components of CIGS semiconductor layers used for generating electricity, were also present at moderate percentages.The main source of sodium (Na) was glass, while iron (Fe) and vanadium (V) were present in the metal frames used for protection.The remaining metals, detected at low percentages, are added to the CIGS semiconductor layers during manufacturing to optimize the optical and photovoltaic properties, or to prevent from corrosion of the paint coat.

Soil Properties
As shown in Table 2, the commercial soil, with a neutral pH of 7.2 and a high organic matter percentage (OM commercial = 9%), provides the most suitable soil conditions for plant cultivation.The Mollisol that has a lower pH value of 5.8 and a higher percentage of clay (Clay Mollisol = 56%) than the commercial soil represents the natural conditions for plant cultivation in southern China.In the Oxisol, the pH is the lowest (3.9), and the initial heavy metal concentrations are high, since the Oxisol has been heavily polluted by mining wastewater and was used to represent a contaminated environment (Table 3).
As shown in Table 3, the metal concentrations in commercial soil, Mollisol, and Oxisol increased as the additions of CIGS TFSP increased.The variability in metal concentrations in these soils highlights the varying abilities of different soils to mobilize pollutants from the buried CIGS TFSP.Overall, the commercial soil showed the best ability to promote Ni leaching, and the Mollisol to Zn leaching.The Oxisolca used the greatest amount of Cumobilization over 60 days of burial, but it had the highest background concentration of metals.We found that the metals in CIGS TFSP could be released when the protective layers were broken.Metals released from CIGS TFSP resulted in medium to heavy soil contamination and the amounts of metals released varied according to the properties of soils and the amounts of CIGS TFSP added.Studies have shown that heavy metals released into soils can cause serious illnesses in human, as a consequence of consuming vegetables grown on heavy metal contaminated soils [9] [29] [30] [31] [32].

Metal Uptake during Vegetable Cultivation
The vegetables grew in the commercial soil and the neutral Mollisol for 120 days, but those in the Oxisol germinated and then died within 30 days.There were no significant differences in either percentages of vegetables that germinated or the lengths of the vegetables (10 -25 cm) among the treatments for the same type of soil.

Commercial soil
The concentrations of major metals in vegetables cultivated in the commercial soil with different amounts of CIGS TFSP added are plotted in Figure 1.Over the entire experimental period, the metal concentrations showed a tendency to increase in the edible vegetable tissues.As the amounts of CIGS TFSP added increased, the concentrations of Zn, Ni and In in the commercial soil also increased over the first 30 days of experiment (Table 3).The ongoing release of Zn, Ni and In from CIGS TFSP over 120 days of cultivation may suggest that the thin-film protective coating layer was corroded, thus accelerating the release of   .The increases in concentrations of metals in vegetable tissues reflect the amounts of CIGS TFSP added to soils over the cultivation period; they also showed that metals in CIGS TFSP were transferred into vegetable tissues via the soil.The metal BFs of Veg Brassica cultivated in the commercial soil (after 60 days of burial experiment) on days 30, 60, 90 and 120 of growth, which were treated with 0% (Blank), 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% of CIGS TFSP respectively, are shown in Table 4.These values clearly show that the plants can accumulate different amounts of metals in their edible tissues, and the differences in accumulation reflect the selectivity of plants for the uptake and translocation of different metals.In general, the values of BF increased as the plant cultivation time increased but decreased or remained slight variation as the amounts of CIGS TFSP added increased.The BFs of Ni, Ga and In of Veg Brassica grown in commercial soil showed negative correlations with the amounts of CIGS TFSP added to soil (p < 0.05 or < 0.01), indicating that BF decreased with an increase in the amount of CIGS TFSP added.This illustrated that these three metals could be absorbed by Veg-Brassica , but high background concentrations of metals in soil could resulted in low BF values after calculation even if the total amounts of metals were increased in Veg Brassica .There was a positive relationship between cultivation period and the BF values of some metals (e.g.BF Zn-10% :r = 0.951, p < 0.05; BF Ni-10% :r = 0.961, p 0.05; BF In-10% :r = 0.910, p < 0.05), indicating that the BF Zn , BF Ni and BF In of Veg-Brassica cultivated in the commercial soil after 10% of CIGS TSFP was added increased with the cultivation period.This suggested that a longer cultivation period could result in higher bioaccumulation of metals Zn, Ni and In.The BF values of other metals might not reveal the highest ones associated with the largest amounts of CIGS TSFP added, but they show similar trends in other treatments with various amounts of CIGS TSFP added.The increases in BF with cultivation time may reflect the transfer of metals from soils via a root system to plant tissues.The lower BF values with time may partly reflect the increases in background metal concentrations in the soil (after 60 days of burial experiment); alternatively, they may reflect an exclusion strategy by metal immobilization in roots or a pending equilibrium because of saturation of the adsorbed metals [33].
The concentrations of Ga, Zn, In and Al were usually higher in plants than in the commercial soil (after 60 days of burial experiment), indicating high accumulation rates of these metals especially in plant roots, while the concentrations of Ni, Cr, Cu and Pb were usually lower in the plants than in the commercial soil.This could indicate the low affinity to adsorption by plant roots, or immobilization of these metals, or less competitive of Ni, Cr, Cu and Pb compared to Ga, Zn, In and Al.Even among the high accumulation metals, Zn accumulation was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than were Ga, In and Al.Zinc is an essential element for plant growth.With the BF value of 3.61 (when the concentration in soil treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP is 82 mg/kg (Table 3) and the concentration in the Veg Brassica is 296 mg/kg (Figure 1)), Zn has a stronger bioaccumulation ability than other metals.The BF values of Zn were almost the same for all the treatments after different amounts of CIGS TFSP were added, but the amount of uptake changed significantly with the period of cultivation (p < 0.05).The amount of Zn uptake increased as both the cultivation period and the amounts of CIGS TFSP increased.The reason for very similar BF values obtained was because the Zn concentrations performed Al most identical increasing trends in both plants and soils.This indicates that was able to tolerate a high concentration of Zn in the soil and to accumulate Zn in its tissues.Han et al. [34] reported that some Cruciferae plants, such as Thlaspi caeralescens, had a very strong ability to accumulate Zn in their tissues, and some hyper-accumulator plants, such as Brassica juncea, Brassica napus and Brassica rapa, could absorb and accumulate Zn in their leaves and roots [34].After 120 days of cultivation for other metals, the BFs for Ga, and In were 2.44, and 2.04 for plants grown in blank commercial soil samples, but were 1.45, and 0.99, respectively, in the commercial soil samples treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP (Table 4).Based on the discussion earlier, the BF of Zn remained almost constant in all the commercial soil samples treated between none and 10% of CIGS TFSP added, indicating that for all the metals, Veg Brassica grown in the commercial soilaccumulated the higher amount of Zn.Although BF of Ga was 2.44 in the blank but was 1.45 in the 10% treatment, it performed the second highest BF in the commercial soil (Table 4).The BF of In changed from 2.04 in the blank treatment to approximately 0.99 (after 10% CIGS TFSP was added), indicating that there might be a state of equilibrium (~1.00) of In uptake in plants (Table 4).It was noted that the uptake and accumulation of In in Veg Brassica increased as both the cultivation time and the concentrations of In in the commercial soil increased.The In concentrations in the vegetable tissues and the soils without CIGS TFSP added were 13.5 and 6.6 mg/kg, respectively, while the In concentrations in plant tissues and commercial soils treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP were 16.3 and 16.5 mg/kg, respectively (Figure 1(d); Table 3).It was clear that the In concentration was higher in vegetable tissues grown in soil treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP than in the soil with no CIGS TFSP added (Figure 1(d)), but the BF was lower in contrast (Table 4).This dynamic equilibrium was probably influenced by In interactions within the rhizosphere, such as adsorption and desorption of metals in the soil, and the selectivity and affinity of plant root systems to metals.

Mollisol
As shown in Figure 2, the main metals accumulated in vegetables grown in Mollisol were Zn, Ni, Al and In.In Mollisol treated with different amounts of CIGS TFSP, all the metal concentrations showed a tendency to increase in all the vegetable samples over the entire experiment period.These patterns are similar to those for the commercial soil.The Zn concentrations in vegetables grown in the Mollisol continued to increase over the 120-day cultivation period, but were much lower than those in the vegetables grown in the commercial soil.
The metal BFs of Veg Brassica cultivated in the Mollisol (after 60 days of burial experiment) at days 30, 60, 90, and 120, treated with 0% (Blank), 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, riod.This suggested that longer cultivation period could result in higher bioaccumulation of Cr, Pb, Cu and In.These BFs of metals clearly show that bio-accumulation varied in plant samples, and the metal uptake and storage in plants increased as the cultivation period increased but decreased as the additions of CIGS TFSP increased.For instance, the BF of In was 8.43 with no CIGS TFSP added but was 3.80 when treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP after 120 days of cultivation while, in general, the In BFs were higher after 120 days than after 30 days of cultivation for all treatments.Similar trends were also observed for most of other metals (Table 5).
After 120 days of cultivation, the BF of Zn was 0.76 in plants grown in the Mollisol treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP (Table 5), while it was 3.61 for the plants cultivated in commercial soil treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP ( and 131.65 mg/kg, respectively (Table 3).Plants grown on soils with low Zn concentrations therefore had higher BFs because of the lower Zn background concentration.Efroymson [35] reported that plants could tolerate a maximum Zn concentration of 50 mg/kg in the soil.Another study showed that the biomass of soybean decreased by 30% when grown on the soil with high Zn concentrations (131 mg/kg, pH = 5.5), but the decrease in biomass was insignificant when the Zn concentration in the soil was diluted to 115 mg/kg [36] [37].As in other studies, the high Zn concentration in the soil limited the uptake of Zn by plant roots [36] [37].
In the commercial soil treated with 10% CIGS TFSP, the concentration and BF of Ni in plants were only 40.48 mg/kg and 0.30, respectively (Figure 1(b) and Table 4), indicating that more than 70% of the Ni was retained in the commercial soil.The concentration of Ni in the Mollisol treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP was approximately 13 mg/kg (Table 3), while Ni was about 9 mg/kg (Figure 2(b)) in the plants grown on it, with a BF of 0.67.Efroymson [35] reported that Ni in soil was toxic when the concentrations exceeded 30 mg/kg.The concentration of Ni in commercial soil was most likely toxic to plant roots (Table 3), therefore less Ni was taken up from the commercial soil than from the Mollisol, which is consistent with other studies [37].
We also considered bioaccumulation of metals in vegetables regarding to food safety.The Al concentrations in vegetables grown on the Mollisol were usually higher than those in the commercial soil.We found that the BFs of Al in vegetables cultivated in Mollisol remained almost the same when treated with CIGS TPSP between 0 and 10% (Table 5), indicating a potential for further Al bioaccumulation as BFs of Al were greater than 1 between 1.15 and 1.36.Similar trends were observed for other metals, for example, the Cu BFs ranged between 0.72 and 0.54 while the Cu concentrations varied between 13.54 and 20.38 mg/kg from the blank soil to the soil treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP.This indicated that In and Cu bioaccumulation may level off when metal concentrations reach a certain threshold concentration in the soil.
By referring the BFs higher than 1, bioaccumulation of Zn, Ni, In and Al in

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Metal concentrations in vegetables cultivated in commercial soil.Labels in (a) indicate the amounts of CIGS TFSP added.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Metal concentrations in vegetables cultivated in the Mollisol.Labels in (a) indicate the amounts of TFSP added.

Table 1 .
Metal content of CIGS type thin-film solar panel material (by percentage).

Table 2 .
Properties of three soils used in this study.

Table 3 .
Metal concentrations in CIGS TFSP-contaminated soils after incubation for 60 days and before vegetable cultivation (mg/kg).
aThe value shown is the mean ± S.D. The different small letters indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 with the Duncan's multiple range test (n = 3).

Table 4 .
Metal BFs of vegetables cultivated in commercial soil contaminated by CIGS TFSP.

Table 4
), which indicated that the plants grown in the commercial soil could accumulate more Zn than those grown in the Mollisol.Meanwhile, the Zn concentrations in the commercial soil and the Mollisol treated with 10% of CIGS TFSP were 82.03

Table 5 .
Metal BFs of vegetables cultivated in the Mollisol contaminated by CIGS TFSP.