Subalpine Forest and Treeline Ecotone under the Influence of Disturbances: A Review

This article considers disturbances caused by abiotic and biotic factors and human impact in the ecological region extending from subalpine forest to the upper tree limit. Both abiotic and biotic factors may cause reversible or irreversible disturbances. Disturbances by mass movement and avalanches give the subalpine forest and the treeline ecotone a distinct spatial pattern characterized by forest on safe topography and sites that preclude forest. Removal of the upper subalpine forests by humans has enlarged the snow-catchment area of avalanches and elongated the avalanche pathways. Consequently, avalanche destructive potential has increased. Hazards will probably increase due to climate change. External factors, like cyclonic storms, may cause fundamental disturbances. Fires have played a major role in the removal of high-elevation forests. Forest destruction by fire is often followed by soil erosion. Wild fires are likely to increase as a result of warming climate and would possibly prevent climatically-driven treeline advance. Cyclic or episodic mass outbreaks of defoliating insects and bark beetles, and pathogens also cause severe disturbances. Oversized populations of wild ungulates impede tree regeneration and can cause local soil erosion. Inadequate game management is the primary cause of intolerable ungulate numbers. Due to man-caused habitat fragmentation, the animals’ impact on the remained habitats has increased. Subalpine forest may recover from disturbance or become replaced by a substitute formation (e.g. krummholz). A subsequent absence of natural disturbances may also be considered a disturbance initiating a new development. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances may counteract positive influences of climatic warming on subalpine forests and treeline. Effective measures to reduce or prevent abiotic and biotic disturbances of high-elevation forest may contriHow to cite this paper: Holtmeier, F.-K. and Broll, G. (2018) Subalpine Forest and Treeline Ecotone under the Influence of Disturbances: A Review. Journal of Environmental Protection, 9, 815-845. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2018.97051 Received: April 20, 2018 Accepted: June 26, 2018 Published: June 29, 2018 Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Introduction
Treeline is the transition zone (ecotone) reaching from closed subalpine or northern forests to the outliers of tree growth in the mountain or arctic tundra.
The transition zone is characterized by a mosaic of usually scattered and climatically stunted groups and solitary trees interspersed with patches of subalpine or subarctic/arctic vegetation. The width of the ecotone may vary considerably in dependence from the local conditions. Subalpine forests and the treeline ecotone are strongly influenced by abiotic (e.g., climate, landslides, avalanches, soil erosion, wild fires) and biotic factors (defoliating insects, herbivores, bark beetles). Theoretically, on an ideal smooth, uniform slope with uniform climate, and soil, the treeline would run parallel to the contour lines. The treeline could then coincide with the position of an isotherm (mean air or soil temperatures) above which trees could not exist. In nature, however, and at a local scale treeline position is usually not identical with the position of an apparent critical isotherm. The differences are due to the influence of local topography on site conditions, and disturbances which might be equally important.
We desist from entering the general discussion about the term "disturbance" [1] [2] [3]. In the context of the present paper we consider changes caused by natural abiotic and biotic factors as disturbances. These are "normal" events in the high mountain environment and may occur at almost regular intervals or episodically. Disturbances can be caused by both local agents (e.g., avalanches, rockfalls, and debris slides) and large-scale events such as severe cyclonic storms, extremely snow-rich winters, and lengthy droughts ( Figure 1). Both abiotic and biotic factors may cause fundamental reversible or irreversible disturbances in subalpine forests and in the treeline ecotone. The time span may also play an important role in this respect. Thus, total removal of a forest by a larger landslide, for example, is unlikely to be compensated by regrowth in the forseeable future. On the other hand, wind throw or burn area will be recolonized by forest, if no adverse factors prevail within less than a hundred years.
Gravitational mass movements such as landslides, debris avalanches, and rockfalls are abrupt and rapid, and they are usually very destructive as are also snow avalanches. Solifluction and soil creep, on the other hand, are mostly relatively slow processes. These are usually restricted to comparatively small areas in the treeline ecotone. They play a minor role in the subalpine forest. Biotic disturbances such as defoliation during mass outbreaks of leaf-eating insects and bark beetles, for example, usually cover several years. Not least, the successional development of the forests stand plays a decisive role [4].
In addition to natural disturbances, historical anthropogenic impact has been influencing species composition, age structures, and dynamics of the current high-elevation forests and the treeline ecotone on landscape and local scales [5] [6].
Although abundant literature exists on disturbances in high mountain areas (e.g., review in [7]), relatively little attention has been paid to their specific role in subalpine forests and treeline causation, elevational position, physiognomy (spatial patterns, growth forms, etc.) and dynamics. There however are a few exceptions (e.g., [5] [7]- [21]. Nevertheless, disturbances may overrule positive influences of the warming climate on subalpine forests and treeline (e.g., [5] [12] [16] [22] [23] [24] [25]). up-lifted valley terraces) as talus cones, for example. Merged talus cones often mantle the entire footzone of rockfall cliffs. Recurrent supply with slope debris from the upper slopes interrupts soil formation and may prevent the forest from reaching its potential climatic limit. Single trees and tree groups, however, may occasionally become established on structural benches and ledges far above this zone of disturbance where the trees are relatively safe from gravitational disturbances ( Figure 2). ers (structural benches) alternating with more gentle treads. Subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) and alder scrub (Alnus sinuata) occupy most of the treads, whereas slope debris has largely prevented a closed plant cover on the comparatively small area at the right handside. Nevertheless, fir and alder have been invading the debris slides' runout area. The uppermost occurrences of fir are found on narrow ledges on the steep upper slope. Photo by F.-K. Holtmeier.
Mass movements may take place at different velocities. Large debris avalanches are usually fast and highly destructive. They eliminate trees often down to the distal end of the runout. Runouts may reach far down into the subalpine forest. Many landslides occur after glacier retreat. The valley sides warm up and become destabilized. Landslides will probably become more frequent in the future due to thawing permafrost ( Figure 3) at high elevations [26] [27] [28]. In the long-term (>100 years), consolidated landslide debris will probably be colonized by forest. By contrast, slow processes such as talus creep and solifluction do not necessarily prevent tree establishment [22].
On unstable slope debris, soil formation usually remains at an initial stage for a long time. In such sites, limited availability of moisture and nutrients may be critical for tree establishment, particularly on sun-facing slopes. In the long-term, fine mineral and organic material from pioneer vegetation accumulating between the blocks, can improve site conditions. In the absence of new disturbances, willows, larch, spruce and pine trees or "true" krummholz [29] such as green alder (Alnus viridis) and prostrate mountain pine (Pinus mugo) may gradually colonize debris mantles and talus cones.

Snow Avalanches
Snow avalanches often cause severe disturbances to subalpine forests (outside the tropics). Avalanche formation depends on multipe factors. Any avalanche combining high density with high velocity (v 2 ) has a great destructive potential [30] [31] [32]. Solid material (blocks, broken and uprooted trees) carried downslope with the snow masses increases the destructiveness of avalanches.
There are two main groups of avalanches; loose-snow avalanches and slab avalanches. The latter consist of more compacted snow. Slab avalanches are Figure 3. View on the south-west exposed mountain slope (Dos Suors) above Pontresina village (Upper Engadine, Switzerland). Thawing permafrost under coarse block debris in the glacial cirque (2800 m) may trigger a disastrous debris and mud outburst that would probably follow the gullies and destroy everything on its way. Photo by F.-K. Holtmeier. Journal of Environmental Protection usually confined to discrete areas on mountain slopes. Occasionally, however, the entire mountainside may become affected ( Figure 4).
While loose-snow avalanches are usually small and relatively harmless, slab avalanches, consisting of more compacted snow, are highly destructive. Slab avalanches consisting of water, largely saturated snow, ice and entrained soil or rock material (=slush avalanches) may reach extremely high densities (>1000 kg/m 3 ) and therefore have a high destructive potenial. Nevertheless, rapidly moving powder-snow avalanches preceded with a dense cloud of ice crystals may also cause severe damage. The blasts can reach maximum speeds of >300 km/h [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]. Such an impact the forest cannot usually withstand, especially as the trees are impacted several meters above the ground.
In general, dry flowing avalanches are the most destructive (highest product of speed squared and flow density). In addition, snow glides can occur, especially on smooth grassy slopes. The speed of gliding snow glide is usually low (1 -100 mm/d). Trees, however, may become uprooted or broken and the ground eroded.
When mountain people have removed the upper subalpine forests to expand the alpine grazing areas, the snow-catchment area of avalanches becomes enlarged and the avalanche pathways elongated. Hence, the destructiveness of avalanches considerably increased. While dense forests with a closed canopy may prevent avalanche formation, open, snow-collecting forests (e.g., former forest pastures) are prone to avalanche formation within the tree stands themselves [37]. In any case, no forest can withstand avalanches that start at high elevation.
Most (about 60%) of the highly destructive avalanches are released far above the anthropogenic forest limit [38] [39]. They often affect comparatively large areas as for example the disastrous avalanche event, that occurred near Vinadi (Lower Engadine, Grison) on 18 February 1962. Three slab avalanches started next to each other far above the forest at an altitude of about 2800 m. On an area  of a 120 years-old conifer forest was completely destroyed [40] [41]. The mixture of snow and broken or uprooted trees had increased the destructive force of the avalanche (cf. Figure 4).
Intervals between avalanches can vary between several times a year to once in a few hundred years [32]. Mountain slopes with an inclination of 30˚ -45˚ are particularly prone to avalanches. On steeper slopes (>50˚), no big snow masses normally accumulate that could produce avalanches. From low-angle terrain (<28˚) avalanches are usually absent [30] [35]. Drifting snow, forming leeward cornices and accumulation of snow in gullies, increases the risk of avalanches.
Snow-rich gullies are particularly prone to avalanche release. Collapsing cornices often trigger avalanches. Gullies channelize avalanches. In converging gullies, avalanche snow mass and destructive energy may increase. Avalanches often destroy the forest down to the lower slope foot zone. Thus, they create a spatial pattern of avalanche pathways alternating with strips of undamaged high-stem forest ( Figure 5). As the forest belt narrows towards high-lying valley heads, intense fragmentation of the forest and decline of the treeline towards the valley heads, are all typical of this area ("Valley phenomenon"). Both debris slides and avalanches, not only destroy most trees in their pathways, but also cause distinct changes in the physiognomy of surviving trees. The distribution pattern of intolerant tree and scrub species also changes. The latter are less susceptible to mechanical damage by avalanches and debris slides.
Norway spruce (Picea abies), European larch (Larix decidua), and Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra) occasionally become established in avalanche and debris flow pathways. The trees can only exist in these sites as long as their stems are flexible enough to bend down under the pressure of the snow masses without breaking off [22] [42]. Stems that lose their elasticity can no longer resist avalanches. Larch and spruce are more flexible than Swiss stone pine. In response to disturbance through snow creep, snow slides and avalanches, trees that survive display a multitude of growth forms reflecting mechanical impacts (e.g., [5] [43] [44]).
At short avalanche intervals (a few years) elimination of occasional young trees is very likely. Avalanches may also remove ground vegetation and soil. Young evergreen conifers that survived avalanches often fall victim to parasitic snow fungi (Herpotrichia juniperi, Herpotrichia coulteri, Gremeniella abietina, Phacidium infestans) [43] [45] [46]. Natural succession usually starts mainly with grasses, tall herbs, and willows. Young growth of subalpine conifers and deciduous trees is also found. During long intervals (e.g., ≥60 yrs) between avalanche events, even trees intolerant of stem breakage and almost unable to recover from avalanche disturbances (Pinus cembra) may become established in the avalanche pathways. These trees can grow to several meters in height before the next destructive avalanche breaks them or turns them over. The pathways of large recurrent destructive avalanches hardly ever recover with mature forest in the long-term (>100 yrs [47] [48]).
"True Krummholz" [29] is characterized by inherent decumbent growth, like prostrate mountain pine (Pinus mugo), green alder (Alnus viridis), and willows (Salix sp.). This characteristic provides a clear advantage. In cases of low disturbance frequency, these krummholz species may allow the colonization of avalanche-prone terrain, talus cones and slope debris mantles. The krummholz species can recover from breakage through sprouting from the root stock and/or release of vertical stems from layered branches [ Birch (Betula pubescens) is also found in such locations. These are probably the only sites within the subalpine forest zone where birch may persist in the long-term [5] [22] [53]. In the Rocky Mountains, dense clonal stands of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) often occupy avalanche pathways ( Figure 6).
"Krummholz" may be considered a substitute formation of the high-stemmed subalpine forests in such places. Similar substitute formations also exist in other high mountains, as for example in the Carpathian Mountains [54] and in the Himalayas (e.g., [ While the substitution of normal, erect tree species and facilitation of woody scrub are typical of slopes prone to recurrent avalanches and debris slides, it depends however on slope aspect and substrate as to whether prostrate mountain  pine or green alder are found in such places. Drought-tolerant prostrate mountain pine typically occurs on sun-exposed slopes and carbonatic substrate. Green alder, on the other hand, occupies corresponding sites on shady and moist slopes, seemingly with a preference for silicate substrate. Obviously, however, it is soil moisture, rather than soil acidity, that makes the difference (e.g., [47] [60]). Soil moisture (meltwater, seepage) is increased by late-lying avalanche snow.
Thus, on both sunny avalanche slopes and areas with shady aspects, thickets of green alder and prostrate mountain pine may be found next to each other.
The small-scale distribution of these krummholz species however usually varies due to the local climatic conditions. On sun-facing avalanche-controlled slopes in the relatively continental Upper Engadine (Switzerland), for example, green alder is mostly found in moist (and nutrient-rich) gullies, along rivulets and at the lower rim of screes, where seepage comes near to the surface. In such areas, extensive stands of Pinus mugo may cover the relatively dry terrain. On avalanche-affected moist north-facing slopes, prostrate mountain pine is usually re-  In the case of increasing winter precipitation due to climate change more snow will probably accumulate above the subalpine forests. Thus, the risk of disastrous avalanches will increase [61] [62] [63], particularly when big snow masses accumulate during a few days of extreme synoptic conditions. In addition, damage to vegetation and soils by gliding snow will increase.

Severe Storms
Severe storms may cause windthrow and also stem and crown breakage on wide areas. In the Alps, for example, winter storms like Vivian (1990) and Lothar (1999) destroyed mountain forests in many high-mountain valleys (e.g., [64]). Storm damage was positively correlated with the height of tree stands and stem diameter.
Tree stands on soaked, fine-textured soil were particularly affected.
Windthrow causes abrupt changes of the ecological conditions in the windthrow areas (cf. Figure 1). The amount of litter and litter quality change completely, and the heat and water balance of the topsoil also alter. deer, and chamois) benefit from increased protein-rich forage supply on the disturbed areas. Natural reforestation of the windthrow areas largely depends on the distance from the seed sources. The smaller the area of windthrow is, the higher the seedling and young growth densities are [65].
Trees in the treeline ecotone are usually less affected by storms. This might be

Wildfires and Man-Ignited Fires
Both wildfires and man-ignited fires have affected subalpine forests throughout landscape history (e.g., [5] and references therein [72] [73]). Fire types, fire frequency, intensities and after-effects depend on a multitude of locally and regionally varying preconditions: climate, location and orientation of mountain ranges and mountain valleys, slope exposure to prevailing winds, forests' species composition, stem-and crown-density, spatial structures, and successional stages [74]. Thus, generalization is problematic.
On slopes controlled by upslope winds, fires may spread rapidly from the closed forests to higher elevation and affect subalpine forest and the treeline ecotone ( Figure 8). As to the effects of fires, the different fire-tolerance of the tree species plays an important role. In the European Alps, for example, larch having a thick insulating cork-like bark and annually renewing needles, is highly fire-tolerant, whereas evergreen Swiss stone pine and spruce are very vulnerable.
In the Rocky Mountains, whitebark pine is usually not much affected by light surface fires, whereas Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir are intolerant (e.g., [75] [76]).
Wildfires are often associated with periods of drought. In the Rocky Mountains, the number of forest fires has dramatically increased during the last decades (by about 73%). Higher spring temperatures, earlier snowmelt and subsequent dry summers have been the main driving factors [77]. Fire risk increases [77], for review), as for example, after mass outbreaks of bark beetles. Forests on dry southern aspects are particularly prone to destruction by fire (cf. Figure 1).
While fires are most destructive to the closed subalpine forest stands, scattered trees and open tree stands in the treeline ecotone are relatively seldom affected.
Even if tree individuals or scattered tree stands are ignited by lightning, for example, the fire will usually not spread over a great distance from the point of ignition (see also [66]). Broad persistent avalanche pathways may act as natural fire breaks.
In harsh treeline environment, recovery from burning by natural succession takes many decades (e.g., [78]) (cf. Figure 8). In the subalpine forests, the absence of wildfires (light surface fires), however, may be considered as a (secondary) disturbance. Shade-tolerant tree species (e.g., spruce, subalpine fire, mountain hemlock = Tsuga mertensiana) that were suppressed by fire, may rapidly outcompete the light demanding tree species. This is of particular importance for example in habitats where whitepark pine is seral [79]. In the long-term, natural regeneration will fail and the forests may become overmature.
Man-caused fires have played a major role in the removal of high-elevation forests (see below). Lightning-ignited fires are comparatively rare (e.g., [80]). In most high mountains of Central Asia overgrazing and particularly burning still are the most important disturbances to the high-elevation forests (e.g., [59]). Forest fires are likely to increase as a result of warming climate (e.g., [73] [74] [81]- [88]). Increased wild fires would possibly prevent climatically-driven treeline advance (e.g., [88]). For the Swiss Alps, the influence of forest fires has been predicted to be even more important than the direct effects of climate change [83].
Total forest destruction by fire is often followed by soil erosion (Figure 9). Erosion intensity, however, varies depending on a multitude of local factors. Slope gradient, intensity and duration of heavy rain and surface runoff, high amounts of melt water, soaked soil (water-saturated soils, avalanches), and substrate susceptibility are involved.

Biotic Disturbances
The main types of biotic disturbances are 1): mass outbreaks of phyllophagous insects and bark beetles, 2) damage caused to trees, shrubs, ground vegetation and soil by oversized populations of large herbivorous mammals, and 3) pathogens and diseases (e.g., blister rust, parasitic snow fungi).

Mass Outbreaks of Leaf-Eating Insects and Bark Beetles
Mass outbreaks of leaf-eating insects and bark beetles (cf. Figure 1) depend on relatively slow population cycles at intervals of eight to ten years (e.g.

Disturbance by Bark Beetle
Mass outbreaks may be local or affect comparatively large forested areas. Bark beetle infestations (e.g. Dendroctonus ponderosae, Dendroctonus rufipennis) depend on the trees' phloem thickness. Only if the phloem is thick enough, are the beetles able to excavate galleries for oviposition (e.g., [100]).
Thus, tree stands with a high proportion of mature trees are prone to bark beetle attacks. Systematic fire suppression has been supposed to support bark beetle mass outbreaks, as trees grow older and bigger in diameter [101]. Bark beetle attacks will not end until the beetles have killed all thick trees or man and/or wildfires have removed them.  [100], and further references therein). Mountain pine beetle and spruce beetle mass outbreaks have lasting effects on the mountain forests composition, structure, and dynamics. Thus, in spruce-fir forests (Picea engelmannii, Abies lasiocarpa) in Colorado 90% of the trees were spruce and 10% subalpine fir before a spruce beetle outbreak. Afterwards, the proportion had almost re-Journal of Environmental Protection versed (20% spruce, 80% subalpine fir [4] [102] [103]). Mass-outbreaks of bark beetles may also have far-reaching socio-ecological consequences (for review see [104]). A change in fire control would probably have a mitigating effect on mass outbreaks of bark beetle and their effects on subalpine whitebark pine forests.

Disturbance by Autumnal Moth and Winter Moth
In northernmost Finland and adjacent Norwegian areas, hundreds and in places up to thousands of square kilometers of subarctic mountain birch forests were destroyed, or else severely affected during the peak of a major mass outbreak of the autumnal moth (Epirrita autumnata) during the 1960s, for example. In the past, mass outbreaks occured at intervals of 9 -11 years [89] [105]. During the last decades, however, the clear cyclicity of outbreaks has disappeared in the more continental areas or else become more episodic [92] [105].
Depending on the local conditions, however, defoliation may occasionally be restricted to smaller areas, such as a single mountain slope ([4] [5], many references therein). For example, a mass outbreak of the autumnal moth on Ailigas mountain (620 m, east of Karigasniemi village, Finnish Lapland) in 1927 caused a depression of the upper birch forest limit [106]. Afterwards, birch forest has not moved upslope again (personal observation 2008). There is some evidence [107] [108] that also in northernmost Finnish Lapland the birch treeline had declined due to Epirrita outbreaks. This has been concluded from numerous rotten birch stumps far above the current mountain birch forests [108]. During the last two decades the winter moth (Operophtera brumata) expanded to the northeast of northern Fennoscandia. A warmer climate has possibly been the driving factor. This area was previously occupied by the autumnal moth only [109]. The overlapping disturbances through both geometrids will probably have lasting ecological consequences for the mountain birch, especially when combined with overgrazing by reindeer.

Disturbances by Larch Bud Moth
In the Central Alps, larch bud moth (Zeitraphera diniana) eruptions have caused complete needle loss in pure larch forests at intervals of eight to ten years. Larch bud moth usually attacks subalpine larch stands within the so-called warm slope zone. Larch stands in the treeline ecotone and also just above the valley bottom, are relatively safe from defoliation [4] [5] [110]. The absence of defoliation below and above the warm slope zone is very likely due to delayed needle flush, rather than to extremely low frost temperatures. The over-wintering eggs of the larch bud moth are highly frost tolerant. Even temperatures below −40˚C would not kill them. If the caterpillars, however, hatch before needle flush they will die from starvation [110]. Larch bud moth mass-outbreaks are associated with reduction of diameter growth and failure of seed production [4] [115]. Disturbance through the larch bud moth could be reduced by giving free rein to natural succession: This would support Swiss stone pine, Norway spruce, and arboreous mountain pine (Pinus montana). Larch, however, is preferred as it has a higher economic value compared with the other conifer species. Therefore, instead of reducing the proportion of larch, artificial disturbances are used in the present mixed larch-stone pine forests to facilitate the establishment of larch seedlings. These disturbances include removal of the ground vegetation, exposure of the mineral soil, and creation of sunlit microsites. Facilitation of larch would probably be appropriate in the lower subalpine forest, where production of high-quality timber (construction wood) can be expected. In the upper subalpine forests, however, severe high-elevation climate impairs the growth of merchandable timber.
While from a short-term perspective, the mass outbreaks appear as "ecological catastrophes", they can turn out to be a factor stabilizing the existing pure or larch-dominated forests in the long-term. The outbreaks interrupt the natural succession towards the climax stage that would be dominated by Swiss stone pine. Although the recurrent larch bud moth eruptions did not eliminate larch forests, they however reduce their esthetic value. The seasonally changing bright foliage colours of this deciduous conifer make them very attractive for tourists [47] [60].

Disturbances by Pathogens
In addition to outbreaks of leaf-eating insects and bark beetles, pathogens (cf. Figure 1) are strong disturbance factors (for reviews see [4] [5] [116]). The role of snow fungi infections as strong disturbance factors has already been addressed in context with avalanche disturbances. However, these fungi can also cause severe damage to high-altitude afforestation and spontaneous young growth (e.g., [16] [117] [118] [119] [120]).
Disturbance by blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) is another example. Blister rust was accidentally introduced from Europe to North America in 1910 [121]. While European Swiss stone pine is highly resistant to this fungal disease, blister rust has destroyed extensive whitebark pine stands in the Rocky Mountains. It appears that blister rust is threatening the existence whitebark pine of this pine species in the Rockies. Subalpine whitebark pine forests are important habitats of many animal species, among them grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) that relies on the heavy energy-rich seeds of whitebark pine for hibernation [122] [123]. Thus, the economic losses due to expanding blister rust, however, are by far less important than its ecological impact on the animals' habitat.
Pines affected by blister rust are highly prone to assaults by mountain bark beetle [124] [125]. Not only whitebark pine at lower elevations but also pine  [131]. Thus, blister rust is acting opposite to a possible climatically-driven forest advance to greater elevations.

Disturbances by Oversized Populations of Wild Ungulates
Animals' impacts must be considered in the mountain landscape context. Composition, age structures and dynamics of subalpine forest and the present treeline landscape have been continuously influenced by human activities (e.g., pastoral and forest use, mining, charcoal production). As kind and extent of man's influences vary regionally and locally, the possibility of generalization is limited. Conclusions by analogy would run the risk of disguising problems and preventing in-depth effects. Disturbances by oversized ungulate populations usually are more locally restricted than those caused by mass outbreak of insects. Wild ungulates, particularly cervids have locally suppressed tree regeneration and self-maintenance of tree stands at the altitudinal treeline. Treeline tree species become affected at varying intensities [116].
Originally, ungulate-populations were controlled by natural regulation whenever they exceeded the habitat carrying capacity [4]. This has changed due to human impact. In most cases, inadequate game management and habitat fragmentation due to landscape use are the primary causes of "over-sized" deer populations [4] [5] [116], for further references. In the Alps, for example, natural seasonal migration routes of red deer from the mountains to the foreland have become interruped by expanding landscape use, roads, highways, railway, and channels. Seasonal migrations had prevented overuse of the alpine summer grazing areas. The riparian forests in the mountain foreland and also on the bottoms of the mountain valleys, had previously been important winter grazing habitats. In addition, expanding tourism and infrastructure in the Alps have caused considerable habitat losses. Consequently, impact of wild ungulate populations on the remained high elevation habitats has increased. Now, it often exceeds the carrying capacity of the fragmented habitats. Natural young growth in the subalpine forest and in the treeline ecotone usually suffers more from wild ungulates than afforestation at high elevation [119] [132].
In northernmost Finland, excessively high numbers of semi-domesticated reindeer are an important disturbance factor in the treeline ecotone and mountain tundra [22] [116] [133]. In the overgrazed areas, soil erosion has increased ( Figure 10). As in the case of over-sized red deer populations, the problem is man-made ([4] [22] [134] [116] for details). In some neighbored areas of northern Finnmark (Norway), the effects of overgrazing on ground vegetation and soil erosion were already visible on satellite images taken more than twenty years  ago [13]. Only reduced reindeer numbers combined with pasture rotation would help to ensure carrying capacity of the summer grazing areas in the long-term [135] [136].
The greatest disturbance to the treeline birch stands, however, is probably the combined effect of overgrazing by reindeer and defoliation during episodic mass outbreaks of the autumnal moth [94] [137] [138] [139] [140]. Mass outbreaks of the autumnal moth and subsequent very cold summers combined with an increased reindeer impact probably enforced birch decline in the past [108]. Effects on seedlings and saplings may locally overrule positive influences of changing climate (e.g., [5] [16] [141]). On the other hand, warming climate has been suggested decreasing phenolic substances in dwarf birch (Betula nana). As a result, higher palatability of the leaves may increase reindeer grazing pressure and adversely affect climatically-driven expansion of this dwarf shrub [142] [143].

Anthropogenic Disturbances
Anthropogenic disturbances are those that humans have been causing to treeline forests. Pastoralism, cutting trees for fuel, construction, and ore mining (construction wood, charcoal production) have influenced subalpine forests throughout history. In addition, winter mass-tourism, alpine skiing and associated infrastructure have become a severe disturbance affecting both the subalpine forests and the treeline ecotone.
High-elevation forests were removed to expand the seasonally used alpine graz- Thus, grazing pressure was especially intense on relatively gentle topography, such as trough shoulders and similar terrain ( Figure 11). In glacially-moulded valleys, the upper limit of closed subalpine forests became usually located to the upper rim of steep trough walls. Pastoral use impeded natural regeneration of high elevation forests, and many tree stands such became over-mature.
Fire has been used for the past 4500 years to create alpine pastures. In some areas, fire clearing probably started already during the Neolithic [151] [152]. The pastures were burned to remove dwarf shrub vegetation ("weeds") and to maintain or increase pasture productivity. such as runouts of debris slides and talus cones ( Figure 12) [47].
Increasing pure larch forests fuelled mass outbreaks of the larch bud moth. In the Alps, most forest fires were caused by human beings [80]. In the central Alps, clearing alpine pastures by fire considerably decreased during the last 2000 years, probably because forests had been removed long ago from subalpine areas suitable for pastoral use [148]. In many mountain ranges, lasting effects were caused by mining activities combined with consumption of immense quantities of wood (construction, fuel, charcoal production for ore melting). On the heavily grazed subalpine/alpine pastures and on clear-cut areas, soil erosion increased considerably. On the other hand, exposed mineral soil facilitated establishment of wind-mediated tree species (e.g., larch, spruce, mountain pine, birch, aspen, willows).   In the high mountains across Europe, the situation has however changed, mainly due to the widespread decline of pastoral use and mining [5] [25] [153] [154]. In the absence of grazing-pressure, grasses can grow to full length. Long downslope-leaning grasses not only reduce surface roughness but also keep snowpack temperatures near the ground around the freezing point. Thus, the risk of snow gliding and avalanches has been increasing. Therefore, with some reservation the decline of centuries-long pastoral use may also be considered a disturbance. In the European Alps, forest cover has increased by about 4% since the 19th century. Landuse change and afforestation have been the main driving factors. In the medium-term (decades), growing biomass and accumulation of deadwood will increase the susceptibility to disturbances by bark beetle eruptions, windthrow and fire [155]. In most high mountains of Central Asia overgrazing and particularly seasonal burning were and still are the most important disturbances to the high-elevation forests (e.g., [59]).
In the reindeer herding areas, only reduced reindeer numbers combined with pasture rotation would help to ensure the carrying capacity of summer grazing areas in the long-term [135] [136].
In many high-mountains, alpine skiing associated with the creation and maintenance of unobstructed ski runs from the Alpine down to the valley floor has become a severe disturbance affecting both the trees in the treeline ecotone and subalpine forests. On the ski slopes, destruction of the ground vegetation and soil erosion due to the skiers, and the use of heavy equipment are common, though locally more restricted than disturbances by mass movement, avalanches and historical pastoral usage.

Concluding Remarks
Disturbances caused in subalpine forests through abiotic factors have been omnipresent on steep mountain slopes throughout the Holocene. Mass movement and avalanches have prevented long-term forest establishment on many steep Journal of Environmental Protection mountain slopes. Disturbances disregarded whether natural or anthropogenic, cause, direct and indirect damage (removal, spatial distribution, age structure, sucessional stage, susceptibility, etc.) to subalpine forests. Disturbances are usually locally restricted. They may be abrupt (e.g., by avalanches) or gradual, episodic or periodic (cyclic) (e.g., insect mass-outbreaks).
All abiotic disturbances, disregarded of whether caused by avalanches, debris slides or windthrow, are associated with alterations of the ecological conditions. In the cases where there has been a destruction of subalpine forest stands, there is in place an environment with high light intensity, reduced water-holding capacity of the soil and subsequent increase of surface runoff and soil erosion. Such conditions are highly stressful for the ground vegetation and tree seedlings. Heavily affected subalpine forests and tree stands in the treeline ecotone may or may not recover from disturbance. Depending on whether adverse factors will prevent this, such as recurrent disturbances by avalanches, it may follow that substitute formations such as krummholz may take the place of the original high-stemmed subalpine forests in such places.
In many high mountains, pastoral use, fire and mining have been the most important disturbance factors throughout history. The cessation of traditional pastoral use and surface fires in subalpine forests may be considered a "secondary disturbance". The same applies to the absence of light surface fires (fire suppression), that have been of major importance in natural succession of whitebark pine forest in the Rocky Mountains, and, for example, for larch-Swiss stone pine forests in the Central Alps.
Although disturbances through mass-outbreaks of insects and bark beetles and pathogens are natural in subalpine forests, they have increased due to the anthropogenic impact. Forest management can mitigate the effects.
Changes due to irruptions of the autumnal moth and the winter moth in the mountain birch forests of the European Subarctic combined with heavy grazing pressure by too many reindeer will have lasting ecological and economic consequences. In the long-term, only reduced reindeer numbers combined with pasture rotation would ensure carrying capacity of the grazing areas.
Natural disturbances are likely to increase due to climate change. Mountain areas such as the Alps, the Scandinavian mountain range, and the Rocky Mountains will probably become seriously affected.
Maintenance of subalpine forests and afforestation up to the potential tree limit have been and still are mandatory to create new protective subalpine forests preventing avalanche formation. Successful natural regeneration above the anthropogenic forest limit is of primary importance in this context. Pastoral use should be terminated or reduced at least to the lowest possible intensity. Wild ungulate populations must be strongly controlled and adjusted to the tolerable carrying capacity of the habitats. In combination, these measures may contribute to greater safety for people living in the endangered areas of the mountain valleys and also improve other ecosystem services of the subalpine forest ( Figure   13).