Adsorption of Gold on Iridium

The work described in this paper is a study of gold adsorption on the whole tip surface of iridium field emitter. The study has been carried out using field emission microscope. Changes in electron work function of the iridium substrate which are produced by vapor of deposition of submonolayers of gold in ultra high vacuum have been measured by noting the changes in the slope of Fowler-Nordheim plots. The same procedure for studying the adsorption of copper on iridium [1] was followed to study the adsorption of gold on iridium. Adsorption of gold was examined on the iridium surface containing the (100) ring which could not be removed thermally.


Introduction
The field emission microscope (fem) was invented by Muller in 1937 [2].He was the first person to experimentally observe atoms.This device is an analytical technique used in material science to investigate molecular structures and their electronic properties [3].One of the most important applications of field emission microscope is the study of adsorption on metallic cathode surface.Such studies provide a powerful approach to problems in catalysis and surface chemi- Electron Spectroscopy (AES), and the Field Ion Microscopy (FIM).A comprehensive review of these techniques has been given by Gomer [5] and Coles [6].
Gold, which is adsorbed on iridium in the present study, crystallizes (as copper and silver) with face-centered cubic (fcc) structure.Simple field emission microscopy was used previously to study the adsorption of group 1b elements (copper, silver, and gold) on tungsten which has a body-centred cubic (bcc) structure and rhenium which has hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure [7] [8], so in this study we have used iridium as a substrate because it has the fcc structure which is isomorphous with that of the bulk adsorbate.

Experimental
Before talking about the experimental procedure we give a brief review of how the field emission microscope works.Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a simple field emission microscope, as it can been seen, it consists of an evacuated glass bulb, the end face of which is covered with a conducting tin oxide layer which acts as an anode, and a layer of phosphor which serves as a screen.The specimen in the form of a sharp point (tip) acts as the cathode.To obtain a high field (3 − 7 × 10 6 volts/ cm) required for electron emission from the point, it is etched electrolytically to about 1000 Å radius.The field (F) at the surface of a free space sphere of radius r and potential V is given by [9] F V r = At the surface of the tip the field (F) is reduced by the presence of the shank and it can be approximated to Figure 1.A schematic diagram of a simple field emission microscope.

Positive lead
Conducting layer where r is the mean radius of the tip and k is the field reduction factor which has a value of about 5 near the apex and increases with polar angle [10].
When the field emitted electrons become free, they have essentially no kinetic energy [11] [12] in the emission direction and they follow the lines of force of the applied electric field travelling through the vacuum to impinge upon the phosphor screen producing an enlarged image of the tip surface.A field emission pattern usually consists of bright and dark areas depending on the flux density of the emitted electrons reaching the screen from different planes of the tip surface.Planes of low work function appear brighter than other higher work function regions.
Ideally the magnification would be given by R/r [12], however, due to the presence of the emitter shank, the actual magnification is given by [4] [10] M R r where (α) usually lies between the values of (1.5) and ( 2) [4] [10] [13] [14] [15] and arises from the fact that the emitter shank decreases the field and compresses the lines of force toward the axis so that the image is almost uniformly compressed with axial symmetry over the displaced potion of the emitter.In general, an average magnification of the order of 10 5 to 10 6 is obtained [12].The large magnification of the microscope could be of a little value if the resolution was not proportionally good.The resolution of a field emission microscope is defined as the minimum distance between two objects on the tip surface that will produce separable images on the screen [10] [14] [16] [17].A resolution in the order of 20 Å is usually obtained in a field emission microscope [10] [12] [18].
The study of gold adsorption on the total tip surface of iridium was conducted as follows: The thermally cleaned tip was held at 78 K by cooling it with liquid nitrogen, in the absence of the applied electric field, small doses of gold were successively deposited on the iridium emitter and evenly spread over the surface of the emitter by heating the supporting loop at a predetermined temperature for 60 seconds, the time which experiments showed was sufficient for a quasi-equilibrium state to be reached.By measuring the voltage (V) required to draw a certain field emission current before deposition and after equilibrium of the adsorbate, the voltage (V) versus coverage (θ) curve was plotted at every spreading temperature (Ts).FN readings were taken when the tip surface was clean (θ = 0) and at every third or fourth equilibrated dose afterwards.The resulting electron work function (Φ) was measured at those points.This procedure was repeated until there was no further change in (Φ) with gold adsorption.At this stage the tip was flash cleaned to remove the adsorbate gold and the whole process was repeated for a different spreading temperature.respectively.Figure 1 depicts the (Φ-θ) characteristics at spreading temperature of 500 K (Ts = 500 K) and it shows that (Φ) increases from 5.27 eV for clean iridium to a maximum value (Φ max) of 5.39 eV at θ = 0.7 followed by a decrease to a minimum value (Φ min) of 5.24 eV at θ = 1.4.Addition of more gold increases (Φ) slowly to attain a value of 5.29 eV at θ = 2.1 where it remains coverage-independent (Φ sat).

Variation of Electron Work Function (Φ) with Gold Coverage (θ)
The shape of (Φ-θ) curve at spreading temperature of 556 K (Ts = 556 K) which is illustrated in Figure 3 resembles that at Ts = 500 K (Figure 2), but (Φ min) at this temperature is 5.10 eV and occurs at θ = 2.1 followed by an increase to 5.16 at θ = 2.8 where it decreases once more to attain (Φ sat) of 5.10 eV at θ = 3.5.
The thermally cleaned iridium tip used in this study contained the bright ring around the (100) plane from the early stages of the work, thus all the work reported has been carried out in the presence of the ring.
The first part of (Φ-θ) curves of our results at Ts = 500 K and Ts = 556 K which are depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 3 respectively has shown an increase in (Φ) with (θ) to a maximum value (Φ max) at a coverage θ = 0.7.The gold atom has an electronegativity of (2.4) [19] and when it is adsorbed on iridium which has an electronegativity of (2.2) [19], it forms an iridium-gold dipole in which gold is negatively charged with respect to iridium and this leads to a higher work function than that of the clean iridium.
It seems probable that differences in the distribution of the gold adatoms on the iridium substrate at 500 K and 556 K are responsible for the small differences in the values of (Φ max).With further addition of gold at the both spreading temperatures our results show an increase in (Φ).At Ts = 500 K with further coverage, (Φ) remains unchanged at the value of 5.3 eV, but at Ts = 556 K (Φ) displays another decrease before it becomes a coverage-independent at a value of about 5.1 eV.
Our results of (Φ sat) of gold adsorption on iridium total emitter surface are shown to be in agreement with the results of the other workers [20] [21] [22] [23].A value of 5.1 eV was observed by [24]- [29], while Farrer et al. [30] and Trouwborst et al. [31] observed that the value of the work function of gold was less than 5.1 eV which is less than our value.Abid et al. [32] observed a value of 5.2 eV which is in the range of our values.Park et al. [33] observed values in the range of 5.1 -5.3 eV which are in a good agreement with our value.Frederisken et al. [34] found the values of the gold work function to be in the range of 5.31 -5.41 eV which are higher than our measured value.Salisbury et al. [35] adopted a value of 5.5 eV for the work function of gold which is much higher than the value we obtained in our study.

Conclusions
1) Adsorption of gold on the total surface of the iridium tip increases the average work function (Φ) at low coverage.This increase in (Φ) is expected if the electronegativity differences between the two atoms are considered.Gold has an electronegativity of (2.4) [19], while iridium has an electronegativity of (2.2) function surface, which is of technical interest, can be obtained by the coadsorption of gas which decreases the emitter work function below that due to adsorption of the metallic adsorbate alone.Thus the understanding of the adsorption is a prerequisite to the development of methods for controlling the K. I. Hashim DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.661111325 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics electrical behaviour of the cathode for use in practical electronic devices [4].Many other techniques are now available to study the adsorption phenomena in addition to field emission microscopy, for example, Pulsed Temperature-Field (T-F) emission microscopy, Low Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED), Auger (Φ-θ) curves have been obtained at two spreading temperatures 500 K and 556 K K. I. Hashim DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2018.661111327 Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Change in work function of iridium tip surface with gold coverage (θ) at spreading temperature (Ts) 500 K.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Change in work function of iridium tip surface with gold coverage (θ) at spreading temperature (Ts) 556 K.