Elucidating the Chemisorption Phenomena in SERS Studies via Computational Modeling

Colloidal gold solutions with nanostars and nanospheres as well as KlariteTM gold and gold-copper bimetallic substrates were used for SERS analysis of aniline and nitroaniline isomers to investigate their chemisorption phenomena. Computational modeling based on Density Functional Theory (DFT) was used in conjunction with the SERS analysis to study the adsorption behaviors of the analytes on metal surfaces. Gold nanospheres and KlariteTM samples produced about a 10-fold increase in signal enhancement compared to gold nanostars for the SERS analysis of aniline, nitroaniline isomers, and nitrobenzene. Signal enhancement is significantly greater for aniline compared to nitrobenzene and it is dependent on the proximity of the NH2 to the NO2 group for the nitroaniline isomers. Charge-transfer in chemisorbed analytes is an important contributing factor for SERS signal. The relative strengths of enhancement can be predicted by the DFT calculation of the HOMO-LUMO energy gaps of the analyte-metal cluster. Aniline and the three nitroaniline isomers showed stronger preference for the copper substrates if both the gold and copper substrates are present. The NO2 group in 2-nitroaniline has a very strong preference and affinity for the copper in the Au-Cu bimetallic cluster.


Introduction
The underlying mechanisms responsible for Surfaced Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) are related to the two important phenomena of electromagnetic in the utilization of Raman scattering as an analytical technique [1].Noble metal substrates such as copper, gold, and silver are the most frequently used metal substrates.Computational methods have provided a quantitative basis for understanding the electromagnetic enhancement and predicting vibrational mode energies such as C-H stretches, C-C stretching, C-S stretching, C-H in-plane bending, NO 2 bending, NH 2 wagging, overtones, and combination bands [2]- [7].
The chemisorption phenomenon or chemical enhancement depends on the charge transfer between metal and the analyte that is adsorbed directly onto a roughened metal surface.Hence, the mechanism is site-specific and dependent on the analyte [1], its molecular interactions, orientation, steric hindrance, as well as the texture of the metal surface [2].The charge transfer from metal to analyte or analyte to metal occurs because the HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) of the adsorbates are similar in their energy levels with respect to the Fermi level of the metal [2] [8] [9] [10].The chemical mechanism provides an average enhancement factor of 100 whereas the electromagnetic mechanism provides an average enhancement factor of equal or greater than 10,000 [11].
The electromagnetic (EM) or plasmonic enhancement effect requires that the Raman-active analyte be located within the EM field of the metal substrate.The morphologies of the metallic nanostructure such as size, shape, interparticle spacing, and surface textures of the substrate determine the resonant frequency of the electronic conduction within the metallic nanostructure [1].When the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of the metal substrate is excited by visible light, the radiating electric field that is formed drives the conduction electrons into collective oscillation generating an intensified EM field.Raman-active molecules within the strong EM field exhibit an increase in the magnitude of their induced dipole and intensity of the inelastic scattering.Hence, the Raman signal from a molecule adsorbed on the surface of the metal is significantly amplified due to the excitation of the surface plasmon [2] [12] [13].
Studies using isomers with ortho, meta, and para-substituent groups showed that the analyte adsorption on the metal substrate could be intensely influenced by the surface characteristic (i.e.solid or liquid state) of the substrate and the orientation of the adsorbate with respect to the surface [4] [5] [6] [14] [15] [16].Some of these effects with regard to nitroaniline derivatives are due to the relative distance between the amino group (electron-donating substituent) and the nitro group (electron-withdrawing substituent) on the benzene ring [5] [6].Even though the ortho-, metaand para-substituents of nitroaniline have the same molecular formula, their Raman spectra, enhancement factors, molecular orientation, and adsorption on the metal colloids such as gold or silver are different [4] [5] [6].Besides silver and gold substrates, copper has also been shown to have a strong affinity for the nitrogen atom in the amino group of

Chemicals and Preparation of Analyte Solutions
Aniline at 99.5% purity as well as its ortho-, meta-, and para-substituents, which were at purity levels of 99.0%, 98%, and 99.

Preparation of Gold Nanostars
Colloidal gold nanostars were prepared using the method described by Xie et al.
with slight modification [20].Gold nanostars were prepared by using 115 μL of 24.25 mM gold (III) chloride trihydrate solution that was slowly added as droplets into the 2:3 fold diluted 100 mM HEPES solution (pH 7.5 ± 0.5, adjusted with 1.0 M NaOH).The reaction was allowed to progress without shaking or stirring for 20 minutes until dark purple star-like crystals formed indicating the end of the reaction.

Preparation of Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles
Colloidal gold nanoparticles were prepared using the Lee et al. method with minor modifications [21].A 90-mL aqueous solution of 1.1 mM gold (III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl 4 ) was heated until boiling.Then a 10.2-mL 10% ethanol-methanol mixture containing 120 mg trisodium citrate dihydrate was slowly added to the rapidly boiling gold (III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl 4 ) solution while stirring continuously and vigorously until a rust-red-brown chalky color change occurred.The mixture was left to cool for 15 minutes to at room temperature.

Raman Spectroscopy Analysis
Aqueous samples for SERS analysis were prepared in 2-mL vials using a 1:1 volume ratio of analyte solution to the gold nanostars or gold nanoparticles.Normal Raman signals were collected using neat analyte and solutions.The aniline (102 ppm or mg/kg), 2-nitroaniline (1100 ppm), 3-nitroaniline (833 ppm), 4-nitroanline (800 ppm) and nitrobenzene (1800 ppm) solutions were also analyzed on Klarite ™ chips (Renishaw Diagnostics Ltd., Glasgow, UK) by meticulously placing 1 μL at a time using a 10 μL-Hamilton syringe.The enhancement effect of copper was determined by mixing a drop of 2-μL gold colloidal nanoparticles with 2 μL analyte on a copper wafer.The wafer was cleaned using 6 M HCl prior to analysis.
The Raman spectra were collected using the EnWave ProRaman-L spectrometer (EnWave Optronics Inc., Irvine, CA) equipped with a fiber-optic probe and a laser with an excitation wavelength of 785 nm and line width of 0.04 nm.
The signals were collected with integration times of 5, 10, 30, 60, and 120 seconds while the samples were wet and when dried on the Klarite ™ or copper wafer.Spectra were displayed using Thermo Electron's OMNIC 7.0 software via the "full scale" and "spectra offset" modes; peak areas were obtained with the

Computational Analysis
Molecular structures of aniline, nitrobenzene, and 1-, 2-, and 3-nitroaniline, as well as their complexes with 4Au and 5Au5Cu clusters, were constructed using SPARTAN10 (Spartan'10 Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA).Except for molecular mechanics and semi-empirical models, the calculation methods used in Spartan were done according to method documented in Shao et al. [22] and then imported into Gaussian09 Revision C.01 [23].Each of the free anilines and nitrobenzene structures were then optimized using the B3LYP density functional [24] and the 6-311++G(d,p) [25] basis set.The structures of the cluster complexes were also optimized using the B3LYP functional and the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set for the anilines and the LANL2DZ [26] [27] basis set for the gold and silver atoms.Vibrational frequencies and Mulliken charges [28] for all structures were also calculated using the B3LYP/(6-311++G(d,p)/LANL2DZ) level of DFT.Raman vibrational modes were assigned visually using GaussView 5 (GaussView 5.0.9,Gaussian, Inc. Wallingford, CT).

Dependence of SERS Signal Intensities on Different Gold Nanostructures
Surface enhancement Raman spectroscopy technique relies on the application of a metal substrate such as gold, silver, or copper to enhance the Raman signal of an analyte by as much as 10 4 to 10 6 fold and even up to 10 10 fold depending on the specific analytical conditions [29] [30] [31] [32].There are many different SERS substrates and some are even available commercially.The popularity of using the SERS technique for analytical measurements is due in part to the availability of commercially prepared substrates and the ease of preparing many of these substrates in the laboratory to achieve signal enhancement needed to detect or quantify analytes at low concentrations.In this study, various gold substrates were evaluated for the SERS analysis of aniline and nitroaniline isomers.Figure 1 shows that the strongest signals for detecting 102 ppm of aniline were obtained using Klarite ™ or with colloidal nanospheres.It also shows that gold nanospheres and gold nanostars give different degrees of Raman signal enhancement for aniline.This observation is consistent with the previously reported finding that the preparation method for the nanostructures affects the intensity of the SERS signals [7].
The present study also found that the degree of enhancement is also analyte   Normal and SERS spectra of aniline analyzed using different types of substrate.Spectra for gold nanostars and nanospheres were obtained using 1 to 1 volume ratio of 102 ppm aniline to nanoparticles solution in a vial (final volume 1.0 mL).The spectrum for Klarite ™ was obtained using 1 µL of 102 ppm aniline solution.Normal Raman was obtained using 99.5% aniline.
The Raman spectra, shown on a common scale, were collected using the same laser power setting and 30 seconds if integration time.
highest enhancement factors compared to the other two isomers for the three types of SERS substrates.All three isomers displayed at least a 10-fold increase in enhancement factor with gold nanospheres and Klarite ™ compared with the nanostar substrate.SERS signals obtained using the Klarite ™ substrate tend to have a greater extent of peak broadening and partially resolved peaks compared to the normal Raman spectra.On the contrary, SERS signals obtained using colloidal nanospheres tend to have sharper and more distinct peaks (Figure 2) making the spectral pattern of each isomers easily distinguishable from one another.Despite that, the spectral pattern obtained with Klarite ™ was still distinguishable for each isomers (Figure A1 in Appendix A).The advantage of using Klarite ™ is that a very small analyte volume of 1 µL is sufficient to produce a strong signal.However, it is very difficult to precisely aim the laser beam from the fiber-optic probe onto a 1 µL sample on the Klarite ™ with the laser beam.Nanospheres have greater stability or a longer shelf life, can withstand vigorous mixing and are still active after 2 weeks from the time they were prepared.Nanostars on the other hand are easy to prepare but are prone to structural deformation so they must be pipetted and mixed gently.Generally, nanostars are formed in clusters and each preparation will contain an uneven distribution of nanostars.Stirring or mixing may cause the prongs on the nanostar Figure 2. Raman spectra of nitroaniline isomers and nitrobenzene for SERS analysis with colloidal gold nanospheres.The spectra were collected using a 1 to 1 volume ratio of analyte to colloidal gold nanospheres in a vial (final volume 1.0 mL).The concentration of the analytes was as follows: 800 ppm 4-nitroaniline, 833.3 ppm 3-nitroaniline, 1100 ppm 2-nitroaniline, and 1800 ppm nitrobenzene.The Raman spectra shown in full scale with offset mode were collected using the same laser power settings and 30 seconds of integration time.
structures to break.Nanostars have a short self-life and must be prepared fresh for use.The orientation of the analyte with respect to the metal substrate is based on matching the spectrum predicted by the DFT calculation with the experimentally derived spectrum.The HOMO-LUMO energy gaps are listed in parenthesis.In the case of the Au clusters, the HOMO of the analyte (H analyte ) and the LUMO of the metal (L metal ) energy differences are listed.These energy differences are the smaller energy gap for all except nitrobenzene for which the energy gap between the metal HOMO and analyte LUMO is the smaller (3.24 eV).In the modeling of AuCu bimetal clusters, the Mulliken charge data (see Appendix A) indicates that the charge transfer is from the HOMO of the AuCu cluster (H metal ) to the LUMO of the analyte (L analtye ), which is the smaller energy gap for 2-nitroaniline and 3-nitroaniline.The Mulliken charge data for aniline is also in agreement with the use of HOMO-LUMO energy gap in determining that the charge transfer is from the analyte HOMO to the metal LUMO.* Detected two different types of interactions in the experimental spectrum although the DFT modeling of gold interacting with nitrobenzene shows adsorption via the two oxygen atoms of the NO 2 group.
for the NH 2 wagging mode (Table A1 in Appendix A) in the SERS spectrum of aniline.This large shift was also predicted by the DFT-calculation and it corresponds with the largest enhancement factor of aniline for the NH 2 wagging mode.
This suggests that the strongest interaction between aniline and the metal surface is via its NH 2 group.
Y The SERS enhancement factor for the NH 2 wagging mode of aniline was 20 times smaller than that of 3-nitroaniline for gold nanospheres and 10 times smaller in the case of Klarite ™ substrates.This suggests that the presence of the nitro group in the nitroaniline isomers reduces or eliminates the charge transfer interaction via the NH 2 group.This deduction is also consistent with the computational clue that the DFT calculation for the NH 2 wagging mode of 3-nitroaniline and 4-nitroaniline predicted only small red shifts of 30 cm −1 and 147 cm −1 (i.e.494 cm −1 to 464 cm −1 and 390 cm −1 to 243 cm −1 ), respectively.This suggests that the interactions between the metal and NH 2 group of these two nitroaniline isomers are minimal compared to aniline that has spectral shifts of 456 cm −1 experimentally and 471 cm −1 theoretically.For 2-nitroaniline, a blue shift of 82 cm −1 (i.e.181 cm −1 to 263 cm −1 ) was predicted.This value was smaller than the blue shift of aniline at 456 cm −1 , suggesting that the interaction of the NH 2 group with gold surface is greatly diminished.In summary, the DFT studies and SERS enhancement factors predicted that the preferred interactions between gold metal surface and the meta-nitroaniline and para-nitroaniline isomers are via their NO 2 groups (Table 2) whereas ortho-nitroaniline interacts with gold via NO 2 and possibly the NH 2 groups due to proximity of the two groups.The trend of SERS enhancement factors (i.e.2-nitroaniline > 3-nitroaniline > 4-nitroaniline) is inversely related to the degree of separation between the NH 2 and the NO 2 group (see Table 1).In the case of nitrobenzene, the enhancement factor is the smallest because the nitro group is not efficiently involved in the charge transfer to the metal like the amino group in the case of aniline or nitroanilines.Thus, one can infer that the presence and proximity of the NH 2 group to the NO 2 group increases the enhancement factor of the analytes.
The ability to reliably predict the magnitude of SERS enhancement factors by using DFT modeling is crucial to the fundamental understanding of the chemisorption phenomena involving analytes adsorbed on SERS-active surfaces of gold, silver, and copper.The molecular modeling of adsorbed analytes by DFT not only allows the prediction of Raman shift of bulk and adsorbed analytes for different vibrational modes, it also allows the calculation of the energy gap between the HOMO of the analytes and the LUMO of the metal and the Mulliken charges on the various atoms of the analyte molecules [35].Both these parameters elucidate the chemisorption phenomena and contribute to predicting the strengths of the chemical enhancement effect.In the case of aniline, explanation for the strong interactions between the NH 2 group and the gold substrate is based on the charge transfer between the lone pair electrons from the nitrogen atom of the NH 2 group to the metal.The charge transfer of aniline in SERS analysis can be attributed to the optimal orbital overlap as a result of small energy difference of 1.55 eV between the HOMO of aniline and the LUMO of metal [33].As shown in This order of the HOMO-LUMO energy gap explains the decreasing order of enhancement factors from aniline to nitrobenzene because the strength of the charge transfer is related to the energy gap or effectiveness of orbital overlap between the chemisorbed analyte and the metal.The smaller the energy gap, the greater the degree of orbital overlap and consequently the stronger the charge transfer interaction.The various mechanisms of the SERS phenomenon arising from chemical and electromagnetic enhancement for many types of compounds, including aromatic amines, have been reviewed recently [36].It is important to point out the relative contribution of different mechanisms varies for different molecular structures.For the aniline, nitrobenzene, and nitroanilines described in this study, the HOMO-LUMO energy gaps and charge transfer effects have predominant influence on both the SERS intensities and vibrational shifts.
For the nitroaniline isomers, their HOMO-LUMO energy gaps of 2.25 eV for 2-nitroaniline, 2.29 eV for 3-nitroaniline, and 2.41 eV for 4-nitroaniline closely parallels the order of the interaction strength and enhancement factor relative to aniline.Nitrobenzene on the other hand has the largest energy gap of 3.73 eV and the lowest enhancement effect.This implied that the orbital overlap is far from optimal resulting in weak interaction between the NO 2 group of nitrobenzene and gold.Even though electrons are drawn away from the N and O, the charge transfer towards the metal is comparatively small as indicated by the Mulliken charge data (see Table A2).There is a charge transfer of 0.422 e from aniline to the gold cluster as a result of the aniline-gold interaction whereas the charge transfer from nitrobenzene to gold cluster is only 0.265 e for the nitrobenzene-gold interaction.Hence, aniline-gold interactions are significantly stronger than nitrobenzene-gold interaction.The increasing degree of charge transfer from analyte to gold was in the order of aniline (0.422 e) > 2-nitroaniline (0.310 e) > 4-nitroaniline (0.296 e) > 3-nitroaniline (0.276 e) > nitrobenzene (0.265 e).
Since charge transfer is also an indication of the strength of analyte-metal interaction that contributes to signal enhancement, the charge transfer magnitude estimated by DFT can provide an insight or explanation for the experimental observation of the SERS enhancement factors.Although the Mulliken charge transfer for 4-nitroaniline is greater than that for 3-nitroaniline, the signal enhancement factors in Table 1 show that 3-nitroaniline adsorbed on gold substrate has about a ten-fold stronger signal enhancement relative to 4-nitroaniline.This implies that other contributing factors to signal enhancement such as the electromagnetic or plasmonic effect [37] [38] as a result of the incoming laser excitation of the electrons on the gold surface, which activates the surface plasmons or the collective oscillations of the electrons, may have been more significant in the case of 3-nitroaniline.The proximity of the NH 2 group to the NO 2 group on the nitroaniline isomers can affect the adsorption orientation of the isomers on the metal surface and influence SERS signal enhancement [6].
SERS spectra of analytes adsorbed onto a substrate of gold colloidal nanospheres supported on a copper foil show peak broadening and overlapped peaks in the region from 1100 -1600 wavenumbers like the SERS spectra obtained using Klarite ™ (Figure 3).The same analyte, 2-nitroaniline produced spectra with more distinctly resolved peaks when used with gold nanospheres alone.The purpose of using the SERS substrate of gold nanospheres supported on a copper foil is to determine whether aniline and nitroaniline isomers prefer the gold or the copper when both metal surfaces are available and whether the SERS spectra of the isomers are still easily distinguishable despite peak broadening and merging.tend to induce high background interference as a combination of analyte fluorescence and substrate reflectance whereas there is less background interference with the Au-Cu mixed substrates (Figure 3 & Figure 4).DFT-modeling predicted (Table 2) that aniline and the three nitroaniline isomers all preferred the copper over the gold surface when both metals are available.Nitrobenzene, on the other hand, preferred gold to the copper substrate.Except for 2-nitroaniline, the NO 2 group of the adsorbate does not like to interact with the copper surface.
The Mulliken charge data (Appendix A, Table A3) is in agreement with the smaller HOMO-LUMO energy gap of 2.29 eV, 2.59 eV and 2.51 eV for aniline, 2-nitroaniline and 3-nitroaniline, respectively.The data indicates a charge transfer from the HOMO of the analyte to the LUMO of the metal cluster for aniline, 4-nitroaniline and nitrobenzene but a charge transfer from the HOMO of the metal cluster to the LUMO of the analyte for 2-nitroaniline and 3-nitroaniline.arranged in proximity to the gold and away from the copper side showed that the molecule will rotate as well as migrate until its NO 2 group is in proximity to the copper side (Figure 5).If the DFT-calculation was performed with the NH 2 group initially facing the copper side while the gold is on the other side, then the molecule will shift its position slightly towards the NO 2 group such that NO 2 functional group is also interacting with the copper.This is similar to the study on the 4-aminobenzenethiol molecule, which demonstrated that the N atom in that molecule has a very strong affinity for copper [17].
Figure 5. Models of 2-nitroanilne interacting with Au-Cu bimetallic substrates.The predicted spectrum based on Model "a" matches with the experimentally derived spectra when the DFT calculation was carried out with the assumption that the NH 2 group facing the gold substrate but the molecule would rotate to interact with the copper surface instead.The predicted spectrum and the experimentally derived spectrum are also similar if the DFT calculation is modeled with the NO 2 group placed initially nearest to the copper; in which case the molecule would remain in place with the NO 2 interacting with the copper substrate.The calculation for Model "b" was performed with the NH 2 group initially nearest the copper but there was a shift towards the NO 2 group such that the copper moiety in the bimetallic cluster is oriented toward the NO 2 group.The predicted spectra for Model "b" contradict the experimentally derived spectra.

Conclusion
Regardless of whether SERS analysis was performed using the colloidal nanospheres (Figure 2), nanostars, or the Klarite ™ solid surface (Figure A1 enhancement and chemical enhancement.The introduction of laser and the progression of photon detection technologies have created a widespread interest Y. E. Ejorh et al.DOI: 10.4236/opj.2018.86019213 Optics and Photonics Journal

[
11].Recent studies demonstrated the superiority of gold colloidal nanoparticles compared to the silver substrate in enhancing the SERS signals for compounds such as aniline derivatives, melamine, and 4-aminobiphenyl[9] [10].Gold nanostars (ca 140 nm) have been shown to have a stronger SERS activity compared to either the rod-shaped (length × width of ca 65 nm × 30 nm) or the spherical (ca 150 nm) nanoparticles for 2-mercaptropyridine and crystal violet[7].The non-linear dependence of SERS intensities on analyte concentrations was demonstrated for the SERS study of 2-mercaptropyridine and crystal violet.The non-linear relationships were observed at concentrations greater than 1.5 µM for 2-mercaptropyridine and greater than 1.6 µM for crystal violet.This can be attributed to the accumulation of excess analyte molecules beyond the saturation point of the surface monolayer resulting in the formation of additional layers that lowers both the electromagnetic and chemical contribution to the signal enhancement[7].SERS spectra have been used to distinguish between isomers as well as for predicting the most favorable molecular orientation of adsorbate on the metal surfaces.Computational analysis is needed to aid in modeling how molecules are interacting with the nanoparticles during chemisorption.DFT (density functional theory) calculations and simulated Raman spectra have been used to study the chemical transformation of 4-aminobenzenethiol into 4,4'-dimercaptoazobenzene on silver nanoparticle surfaces[3] [18].In this study, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to corroborate the experimental data as well as to elucidate the most relevant model for the chemisorption of the adsorbate on the substrate.The theoretical technique of computational modeling performs a key role in interpreting and perceiving the influences of the diverse elements on SERS mechanisms[4] [5] [6] [8] [10] [17] [19].
dependent since different isomers of nitroaniline with the same gold substrates preparations have different levels of enhancement.The enhancement factors along with the experimental and predicted wavenumbers of the normal Raman and SERS signals for aniline and three nitroaniline isomers are summarized in

Figure 1 .
Figure1.Normal and SERS spectra of aniline analyzed using different types of substrate.Spectra for gold nanostars and nanospheres were obtained using 1 to 1 volume ratio of 102 ppm aniline to nanoparticles solution in a vial (final volume 1.0 mL).The spectrum for Klarite ™ was obtained using 1 µL of 102 ppm aniline solution.Normal Raman was obtained using 99.5% aniline.The Raman spectra, shown on a common scale, were collected using the same laser power setting and 30 seconds if integration time.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Normal and SERS spectra of 2-nitroaniline acquired with gold and gold-copper mixed substrates.The SERS spectra were collected for samples containing 1100 ppm 2-nitroaniline at 1 to 1 volume ratio with colloid nanospheres in a vial (1.0 mL final volume) or on copper foil (4 µL final volume).The normal Raman signal was obtained using a neat sample of 98.0% purity 2-nitroaniline.The spectra were collected using the same laser power setting of the Raman spectrometer and 30 seconds of integration time.The spectra are shown in full scale with offset for greater clarity of spectral features.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. SERS spectra of aniline and nitroaniline isomers adsorbed onto gold nanospheres supported on a copper foil substrate.The spectra were collected using a 1 to 1 volume ratio of analyte to colloidal nanospheres (final volume 4 µL) on copper foil.The concentration of the analytes was as follows: 102 ppm aniline, 833.3 ppm 3-nitroaniline, 1100 ppm 2-nitroaniline and 800 ppm 4-nitroaniline.All spectral signals were collected using the same laser power settings and 30 seconds of integration time except for 4-nitroaniline that has an integration time of 5 seconds.The SERS spectra were overlaid in full scale with offset mode using OMNIC 9 software.
in Appendix A), the spectrum of each nitroaniline isomer can be easily distinguished from one another.In this study, the gold colloidal nanospheres and Klarite ™ gave about a 10-fold signal enhancement compared to the nanostars for the same analyte.The signal enhancement is also analyte dependent.The overall SERS enhancement for gold substrates from strongest to weakest is aniline > 2-nitroaniline > 3-nitroaniline > 4-nitroaniline > nitrobenzene.The DFT modeling shows that charge-transfer is an important contributing factor for SERS signal enhancement and the relative strengths of SERS enhancement can be predicted or explained by the HOMO-LUMO energy gaps and Mulliken charges for aniline, nitroaniline isomers, and nitrobenzene.Other contributing factors are the polarizabilities of the electric field produced by the surface plasmon and the inherent molecular dipole movements.In the case of the nitroaniline isomers, there is also a preference for the gold to interact with the NO 2 group over the NH 2 group.Aniline, 2-nitroaniline, 3-nitroaniline and 4-nitroaniline have a preference for the copper substrate when both gold and copper or Au-Cu mixed substrates were used.The DFT study found that the NO 2 group in 2-nitroaniline has a very strong preference and affinity for the copper in the Au-Cu bimetallic cluster.
onto the three different metal substrates.The strong affinity prevents the azo-bond formation between the nitrogen of adjacent molecules adsorbed on the copper substrate, whereas the same molecule adsorbed onto a silver or gold substrate will result in photocatalytic formation of 4-aminobenzenethiol in a SERS study in which the metal substrates served as electrodes for investigating the variation of the SERS spectra as a function of Y. E. Ejorh et al.DOI: 10.4236/opj.2018.86019214 Optics and Photonics Journal electrochemical potentials applied

Table 1
. It is observed that the SERS signals of 2-nitroaniline generally has the

Table 2
[34]cates that when both the NH 2 group and the NO 2 group are present on the nitroaniline isomers (i.e.2-nitroaniline, 3-nitroaniline and 4-nitroaniline), the preferred chemisorptive interaction between the SERS substrate and the analyte molecules depends upon the position of the NO 2 group relative to the NH 2 group.The chemisorptive interactions produced the strongest signal enhancement if the two groups are closest together in the molecule as in 2-nitroaniline and the least enhancement if the groups are furthest apart as in the 4-nitroaniline (Table1).withthemetalnanostructures[5][15][16][17].In this (see Table1) and previous studies[9][10][33][34], introduction of a blue shift of the normal or bulk Raman signal by as much as 456 cm −1 (i.e.540 cm −1 to 996 cm −1 ) was observed Y. E. Ejorh et al.DOI: 10.4236/opj.2018.86019219 Optics and Photonics Journal

Table 1 .
Comparison of enhancement factors of analytes with different gold substrate type.
MDL means below minimum detection limit.Enhancement factors for 2-nitroaniline with AuCu bimetallic substrates ranged from 1.34 × 10 3 to 2.73 × 10 4 which also corresponded with the lowest (817 cm −1 ) to highest wavenumbers.The vibrational mode assignment is listed in TableA1(see Appendix A).OSR*: Outside spectrometer range; NA*: Not applicable due to out-of-range or unresolved SERS signal.

Table 2 .
DFT modeling of analyte orientations with respect to the metal substrate and the HOMO-LUMO energy gaps.
AnalyteAnalyte Orientation on Substrate: Preferred Interactions between Substrates and Functional Groups *NO 2 interact with Au H analyte − L metal (4.47 eV)

Table 2
, aniline has the smallest HOMO-LUMO energy gap compared to the three isomers of nitroaniline and nitrobenzene.The increasing order of HOMO-LUMO energy gap from smallest to largest was found Y. E. Ejorh et al.DOI: 10.4236/opj.2018.86019222 Optics and Photonics Journal to be aniline < 2-nitroaniline < 3-nitroaniline < 4-nitroaniline < nitrobenzene.

Table 2
teract with the copper via the NH 2 group bonding as well as π-bonding with the aromatic ring.The SERS signal for 2-nitroaniline is produced via itsNO2 group bonding with the copper in the AuCu bimetal cluster.The DFT calculation per-Y.E. Ejorh et al.DOI: 10.4236/opj.2018.86019225 Optics and Photonics Journal formed on 2-nitroaniline for gold-copper substrates with the NH 2 group initially