Climatology of Air Quality in Arctic Cities — Inventory and Assessment

Freely available data of sulfur dioxide (SO2), ammonia (NH3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), and particulate matter (PM) observed in Arctic cities (north of 59.99 N) between 1972 and 2016 were compiled into an air-quality inventory of samples taken for limited periods. For cities with multiple years of data, air-quality climatology was determined in terms of daily means in the annual course. Mean urban air-quality climatology was calculated for regions of similar insolation, emission standards, topography, Köppen-Geiger classification, and city size. Urban concentrations of PM precursors (SO2, NH3, NO2), PM2.5 and PM10 (PM with diameter less than 2.5 and 10 μm) were assessed in the sense of climatology with evidence from current knowledge. Typically, annual SO2 and NO2 means were lower for small than large Arctic cities, but can vary more than an order of magnitude over short distance. Cities seeing seasonal sea-ice had W-shaped mean annual courses of daily O3, while other cities had a spring maximum. Typically, annual means of urban pollutants in North America exceeded those in Scandinavia except for O3, where the opposite was true. Annual mean urban PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations varied from 1.6 to 21.2 μg∙m and 2 to 18.2 μg∙m, respectively. Since PM10 encompasses PM2.5, annual PM10 means must be at least 21.2 μg∙m. According to rural-to-urban ratios of species, seasonal transport of pollutants from wildfires, shipping, and the Kola Peninsula mining area occurred at some sites in Interior Alaska, western and northern Norway, respectively. Concurrent SO2 and PM or NO2 and PM measurements revealed combustion or traffic as major contributors to urban concentrations. Recommendations for potential future measurements of Arctic urban air quality were given based on the assessments of climatology and inventory.


Introduction
Urban air quality in the Arctic is not well understood for various reasons.First, meteorological and chemical measurements are challenging.Network maintenance to keep instruments functional is high due to low temperatures and icing.Energy supply for the sites must come from the electricity grid; batteries freeze in the extremely cold conditions; low or even the lack of insolation prohibits solar energy.Fossil-fuel consuming transportable generators, as often applied during special field campaigns, are unsuitable for long-term monitoring.Such generators would also affect air-quality measurements by their own emissions.Second, in the North American Arctic, many communities are off the road network requiring expensive travel by boat or small aircraft for network maintenance [1].Third, population density is low.Cities are small and often the only anthropogenic emission source in a wide radius [2].Only few taxpayers would benefit from research.Therefore, securing funding is difficult, and pollutant monitoring is sparse along the Arctic Ocean [3].In the Arctic, most observational data were collected in protected areas like natural reserves, National Parks, wilderness areas, or at low populated research stations (e.g.[4]) where remote pristine air for reference and/or changes therein have been of interest.
Given these challenges, it is no surprise that most urban air quality, environmental exposure and health outcome studies have focused on large urban centers and megacities [5].They revealed that major urban health adverse pollutants are particulate matter (PM), mainly inhalable in the micron-to sub-micron fractions, ozone (O 3 ) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) [6] [7].Particulate matter increases the risk of respiratory, allergic and oncological diseases due to its toxic compounds (e.g.polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), heavy metals, microorganisms) [8].Exposure to high PM concentrations causes about 30% of respiratory diseases [9].A systematic study on non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke-a major air-quality issue in Boreal forest-linked wildfire smoke with increased risks of respiratory disease, cardiovascular diseases and mortality [10].A 1995-2000 study at Drammen, Norway (60,145 inhabitants, 59.7441N, 10.2045E) related PM of diameter less than 10 µm (PM 10 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), O 3 , benzene, formaldehyde, and toluene with acute hospital admissions for respiratory diseases [11].Data of observed PM of diameter less than 2.5 μm (PM 2.5 ), NO 2 and carbon monoxide (CO) and hospital emergency-room visits in Helsinki (1,231,595 inhabitants, 60.1699N, 24.9384E) revealed that respiratory impacts of air pollution differed by age group; children showed symptoms later than elderly people did [12].
Results from urban air-quality studies in mid and low latitudes are difficult to transfer to Arctic cities because of the quite different physical and chemical environmental conditions.In winter, for instance, low or the lack of solar in-DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004solation limits or excludes photochemical activity.Thus, nighttime chemical processes become dominant.In summer, daytime chemistry dominates due to the midnight sun.Solar radiation is also a key factor needed for PM formation [13].
In winter, radiative cooling and subsidence in high-pressure systems cause frequently inversions [14].Valleys and fjords often experience inversions under weak synoptic forcing [15] [16] [17].The resulting stable stratifications suppress vertical mixing of the polluted air close to the ground with the usually cleaner air aloft.Consequently, primary and secondary pollutants accumulate in the urban atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) [16] [17] [18].
Extremely low temperatures mean high per-capita energy consumption, large numbers of heating-degree days, motor-vehicle inefficiencies, high vehicle emissions due to cold-engine starts, and driving of short distances.Due to limited or lack of solar insolation, trace gases like dinitrogen pentoxide (N 2 O 5 ), NO 2 , or O 3 , which would photo-dissociate under sufficient light conditions, accumulate in the urban ABL.The relative long residence time enables transport over hundreds of kilometers even in the ABL.
Gas-phase and aqueous-phase chemistry, aerosol physics and chemistry, and contaminant removal processes (e.g.wet and dry deposition) depend on temperature, humidity, precipitation, and actinic fluxes.Due to the even in summer often low temperatures, peroxyacyl nitrates (PAN) serve as reservoir for nitrogen oxides (NO x = NO + NO 2 , where NO is nitric oxide).PAN can be transported over long distances, until the air warms up and PAN transfers to NO x [19].Then, chemical processes may occur in pristine areas far away from emission sources [20].Indirect impacts of the harsh weather conditions exist due to the temperature-dependency of biogenic emission fluxes, as well as the frequency of wildfires, windy or stagnant situations, and convection that lifts pollutants in the free troposphere.
In summer, many Arctic cities experience seasonal exposure to smoke from Boreal wildfires; in late summer/early fall, Arctic shipping contributes to coastal Arctic communities' air pollution [3].According to WRF/Chem simulations, ship emissions along the Norwegian coast, for instance, enhanced the 15-day-averaged near-surface concentrations of SO 2 , NO x , O 3 , and PM 2.5 about 80%, 80%, 5%, and 10% at coastal sites [21].
In spring and fall, O 3 precursors (e.g.CO, NO x , PAN), VOC, and aerosols emitted in mid latitudes are transported into the Arctic [22] [23] [24].This transport causes a peak of total aerosol mass concentrations in winter/spring-known as Arctic haze [22] [25].Arctic haze forms from swelling of sub-micrometer non-sea-salt sulfate particles and sea salt with small amounts of ammonium, nitrate, dust, trace elements of combustion, and residuals of particulate organic matter.From a thermodynamic aspect, fog and ice-fog formation weaken the strength of surface-based inversions.However, at high latitudes, ice fog often lacks the sufficient thickness to destroy the inversion [26].DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004Open Journal of Air Pollution N. Mölders, G. Kramm Regional climate and weather differ among Arctic cities depending on their location with respect to the semi-permanent high-pressure systems, major storm tracks, elevation above sea level, local topography, distance to the coast, the presence or absence of temperate ocean streams and/or seasonal sea-ice.During daylight hours, the high solar albedo of sea-ice, snow and Arctic haze may enhance actinic fluxes thereby triggering photochemistry [20].During summer, high Sun elevation, long daylight periods, and dark surfaces favor shortwave forcing of local weather under weak synoptic conditions; in winter, snow/ice covered surfaces and low solar insolation, or even darkness favor the longwave exchange between the ground and atmosphere, and radiative forcing governs local weather under calm wind conditions [14].
Despite of these substantial differences of chemistry and meteorological conditions compared to mid or low latitude cities, only few studies addressed Arctic urban air quality; typically they focused on issues of one individual city and species.For instance, in Fairbanks (32,751 inhabitants, 64.843611N, 147.723056W) observed daily means of PM 2.5 concentrations are higher during the wildfire season than in the shoulder seasons [27].Between November and February observed daily means frequently exceeded the United States (US) 24-h National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 35 μg•m −3 under calm wind, extremely low temperature (≤−20˚C) and moisture (water-vapor pressure < 2 h Pa) conditions during multiday inversions [17].Mobile measurements in the broader Fairbanks metropolitan area revealed appreciable differences in PM 2.5 concentrations between residential neighborhoods, downtown, and business districts as well as neighborhoods with wood and diesel oil as major heating fuels [28].
Some Arctic urban air-quality studies assessed the potential benefits from local emission-control measures.According to WRF/Chem results for the Fairbanks nonattainment area, replacing wood-burning by gas or exchanging old wood-stoves by more efficient ones would reduce the 5-year center-year averaged annual 98 th percentile 24-h average PM 2.5 concentrations by 13%, and 5% [29].Use of low-sulfur fuel in oil-fired furnaces and facilities would reduce total SO 2 and PM 2.5 -emissions by 23 and 15%, respectively, and reduce PM 2.5 concentrations by 4%.Concurrent exchange of woodstoves and introduction of low-sulfur fuel would reduce SO 2 and PM 2.5 -emissions by 36 and 19%,respectively,and PM 2.5 concentrations by 12%.Emission-control measures reducing precursor gases are most sensitive to meteorological conditions.Air-quality benefits of multiple emission-control measures fail to add up as the sum of benefits gained by the respective single emission-control measures [29].At Kuopio, Finland (112,158 inhabitants,62.8980N,27.6782E),increased use of biofuels in traffic, local heat and power plants, increased residential wood heating, and improved energy efficiency of residences could reduce annual mean PM 2.5 concentrations by 4% [30].
The goals of our study are: 1) to establish an urban air-quality inventory for the Arctic based on public available data of SO 2 , ammonia (NH 3 ), NO  cating that all data are missing.Leaving out days without observations can provide wrong impressions on the representativeness of the observations for the period as it under-reports the actual amount of missing data.However, like for model-evaluation applications, establishing climatology requires a continuous dataset in time to determine means.Thus, an important aspect of our data processing encompassed examination of measurements for being in continuous daily order to ensure comparison of data from different sites and of different species at the same site.We converted all data to continuous datasets marking days with missing data as such.We discarded corrupt or bad quality data and marked them as missing.No interpolation was made for missing data.

Experimental Design and Methodology
We aggregated/disaggregated the observations to daily means; i.e. daily means were calculated from hourly data, and the values of weekly means were assigned to all days of the week, for which the mean was given.Analogously, 3-in-1 data were assigned to their respective period.

Compilation of an Arctic Urban Air Quality Inventory
Obviously, the overall data situation prohibits investigations of air quality at the process scale, discussions of individual events and/or changes in air quality at scales larger than a year.Between 1972 and 2016, emission standards changed [32].The consequent changes in emission amounts as well as shifts in the ratios of emitted species altered the concentrations.Due to altered concentration ratios, different paths of reactions may be favored with further impact on concentrations.Consequently, observed concentrations have changed with changes in emission standards.Since many emissions, chemical reactions, transport, and atmospheric removal of pollutants are sensitive to the meteorological conditions, variations within a climatology period always occur [33].Too few observations exist in Arctic cities to construct two independent climatology periods that would permit change analysis.
To establish an Artic urban air-quality inventory, and baseline climatology under various aspects, we considered the available data as a sample following [34].For each site and all species, we calculated annual means, and their standard deviations.For sites with more than one year of observations, we calculated the mean annual course based on all available data for each day in the annual course.Following [35], the temporal standard deviations were assumed as interannual variability.

Determination of Arctic Regional Urban Air-Quality Climatology
Hydro-meteorological, geographic, and other conditions affect urban air quality.Therefore, we grouped the available data by city size (number of inhabitants), Köppen-Geiger climate classification, elevation, insolation (function of latitude), and emission standards (Scandinavia vs. North America).We calculated daily and annual means, mean annual courses, and their standard deviations based on data of all sites belonging to the same group.In the following, cities with less than 1000, 1000 to 10,000, and more than 10,000 inhabitants are called small, mid-size and large cities, respectively.

Assessment of Arctic Urban Air-Quality
In analyzing the Arctic urban air-quality inventory, we focused on identifying common features in the (mean) annual courses, (mean) daily concentrations and annual means among sites.Analysis of Arctic urban air-quality climatology focused on elaborating differences in urban air quality among groups.
Exceedance limits have differed among the eight Arctic countries (Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, US), and changed over time [32] due to regular re-evaluation.Currently, most NAAQSs are more restrictive in the EU than in the US [32].In the EU, for instance, current daily mean SO An overall assessment of Arctic urban air quality requires common pan-Arctic air-quality standards.Therefore, we used the World Health Organization [36] guidelines for annual means in the assessment of Arctic urban air quality.For the same reasons, we examined concentration-frequency distributions to assess overall urban air quality rather than the number of exceedances.
We calculated the distance between cities and their closest rural site.When this distance was less than 150 km, the rural site was considered as the city's proxy for "background concentrations".Note that the rural site is not necessarily upwind of the closest city all the time.The distance threshold was chosen because of the sparse data availability in the North American Arctic.In Scandinavia, the closest rural site was typically within much less than 100 km of the city.
For cities having their closest rural site within 150 km, we determined the background (B) to urban (U) ratios of daily mean concentrations (B/U) for periods with concurrent observations of the same species.These ratios can provide insight in the contributions from local sources C local [37] [38].Under the assumptions U ≥ B and U = B + C local , the fraction from local emission is C local /U =1 − B/U.Multiplication with 100% gives the percentage.For U < B, it is assumed that the rural site is in the downwind of major sources.In this case, the equation provides a negative value.Multiplied by −100%, it gives the percentage by which rural daily means exceeded those observed in the city.
We analyzed these ratios in their annual courses to assess the impact of urban emissions.Low ratios of background-to-urban PM 10 concentration indicate strong contribution of local urban sources to the urban pollution and vice versa.Differences between urban and background concentrations were examined for statistical significance at the 95% confidence level using a two-tailed t-test [39].We used the word "significant" only within this context.DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004 Particulate matter has natural (e.g.sea spray, desert and soil dust), and anthropogenic sources, and can form in air by gas-to-particle conversion from precursor gases [20].Thus, PM is a composite of different species of different mass.
On the contrary, SO 2 is a specific marker of pollution from coal combustion.NO emitted by traffic and other combustion processes may oxidize in the atmosphere to NO 2 .To further assess sources, we examined the correlations between NO 2 and PM, as well as SO 2 and PM at sites with concurrent measurements of these species.Again, we tested results for statistical significance.
Near-surface O 3 can stem from downward transport of stratospheric O 3 or by photochemistry.In the presence of sunlight and chemical precursors like NO x and VOC, photochemical processes form O 3 in the atmosphere; reactions with NO, NO 2 and O 3 photolysis, deposition on the ground, and aqueous chemistry are sinks for O 3 .In the lower troposphere, photolysis of NO 2 produces NO and ground state oxygen atoms (O).Reaction of O with two-atomic oxygen molecules and a third molecule M leads to O 3 and M. In the presence of NO, O 3 reacts with NO to rebuild NO 2 .In the absence of CO or organic compounds, O 3 is recycled (Null cycle), i.e. concentrations remain constant (photo-stationary state).Photolysis of O 3 produces additional radicals which react with CO or organic species to produce additional O 3 .One of the O 3 photolysis processes produces an excited oxygen atom of which most are deactivated by collisions and contribute to O 3 formation.The remaining excited oxygen atoms react with hydroxyl (HO) radicals, the "detergents" of the atmosphere.Reactions of HO with CO and organic compounds produce peroxy radicals.Peroxy radicals compete with O 3 in oxidizing NO to NO 2 .The initial reaction of an organic chemical and a HO produces two O 3 molecules and a carbonyl species under high enough NO x concentrations.The carbonyl compounds may react with HO or photolyze thereby leading to more peroxy radicals, which further react to produce more O 3 .Formation of peroxides removes NO 2 and HO to form nitric acid (HNO 3 ).Since HNO 3 reacts slowly and is rapidly removed by dry and wet deposition, NO x returns are marginal.Peroxides and HNO 3 may photolyze to recycle HO x radicals.
To assess the origin of urban O 3 , we examined the ozone budget in its simplest expression (O x = NO 2 + O 3 ) for sites with concurrent NO 2 and O 3 observations.Typically, O 3 accounts for over 90% of O x , for which the budgets of O 3 and O x can be viewed as equivalent [40].Over short time periods, O x is a conservative quantity due to the fast interconversion of O 3 , NO, and NO 2 as described above.Thus, frequency distributions of O x can serve to examine the representativeness of a site.Comparison of the distributions permits assessment of the amount of O 3 loss from NO titration [41].Large differences between the O 3 and O x distributions would indicate local NO x emissions.
Unfortunately, at many sites, only PM or one species was observed during a period (cf.Table A1).Consequently, impacts of chemical reactions on observed concentrations cannot be quantified, but still can be discussed qualitatively under consideration of knowledge from the literature and model studies performed DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004 in some areas using WRF/Chem.Similar is true for pollutant removal and emissions.Therefore, we discussed mean annual courses of daily species and PM concentrations in the sense of climatology using existing knowledge of atmospheric, physical and chemical processes, as well as human and technical behavior (e.g.heating, cold start emissions, low load engine behavior).
Since at many sites, no meteorological measurements were available, we used the Köppen-Geiger climate classification [42] and composites of National Centers of Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis [43] as proxy for discussion of local weather climatology related impacts on air quality.

Results and Discussion
In the following, we discussed the compiled urban air-quality inventory, site air-quality climatology, and urban air-quality climatology determined for the aforementioned groups concurrently to avoid redundancies.Since only few sites have concurrent measurements of various species and PM, we discussed our results by species and PM-size.Analysis of concurrently observed species followed after both species were discussed.
Figure 1 shows the solar insolation at the top of the atmosphere in the annual course as a function of latitude; the Köppen-Geiger classification, the mean summer and winter climatology as determined for 1972 to 2016 from NCEP reanalysis data, and the site locations.Table A1 lists species and years of availability at the sites.In the following, we use the symbol of the trace gas X instead of the trace gas concentration [X] for ease of readability.

Arctic Weather Regimes
The Köppen-Geiger classification uses a three-letter coding except for polar In the Arctic, Cfb and Cfc climates exist close to warm ocean currents (Figure 1(b)).In these regions, the polar front governs the weather year-round leading to variable, often humid and cloudy conditions.In western Scandinavia, the annual range of monthly mean temperatures amounts only 5 to 15 K (e.g. Figure 2(a), Figure 2(b)) due to the warm Gulf Stream.Thus, the western and northern Scandinavian coasts remain sea-ice free in winter, which contributes to humid conditions year-round.
On the contrary, the Baltic Sea freezes annually in the upper Gulf of Bothnia, and along the coasts of the lower Gulf of Bothnia and the Gulf of Finland.Thus, in eastern Scandinavia with increasing distance to the warm Gulfstream waters and glacier-covered mountains (that may cause Föhn, i.e. warming, in their downwind), the annual range of mean monthly temperatures is 20 to 30 K (e.g. Figure 2(c)).
Most of the low-pressure systems passing north of Scandinavia have storm tracks over the eastern Gulfstream, Newfoundland, and Lofat Strait.Storms originating from Greenland cross the Scandinavian Ridge.These storms advect polar maritime air, but occur less frequently than storms with other tracks.Storm tracks thru the mid Baltic Sea affect the weather in Finland.
Tiksi is the only Siberian site for which free data were found (Figure 1(e)).Like Barrow (Figure 2(f)), Tiksi is located at the Arctic Ocean where seasonal sea-ice occurs.Both cities have ET climate.Typically, in Tiksi, the Siberian High and thermal lows govern winter and summer weather, respectively.The difference between annual minimum and maximum temperatures exceeds 60 K. Siberian wildfires affect air quality in summer.
Precipitation can remove dissolved SO 2 and its aqueous phase reaction products [14] [20].Consequently, SO 2 concentrations remain low on annual mean.At Scandinavian sites in ET and EF climates, advection of SO 2 from non-local sources can influence the annual means.
On average over all cities, annual mean SO 2 concentration was 2.3 ± 40.47 μg•m −3 vs. 1.3 ± 11.76 μg•m −3 for the average background concentrations (Table 1).The high standard deviations indicate that urban (and background) air Table 1.Annual mean concentrations and standard deviation of species for selected indicators.The symbol -.-indicates no data available for species in that category.The first line lists the WHO [36] recommended annual limits that we used as a common Pan-Arctic standard for urban air-quality assessment. 1 Estimated baseline level.Daily mortality increases about 0.3% -0.5% for every 10 μg•m −3 increment in 8-h mean ozone concentrations above this estimated baseline level [36].
quality vary over a wide range in the Arctic.Indeed, high and low annual SO 2 concentrations occurred at both urban and rural sites alike (Figure 3(a)).Nevertheless, some general as well as distinct regional features exist.Generally, annual means of SO 2 decreased with increasing latitude due to the decrease of anthropogenic sources in numbers and size.On average over all sites, annual mean SO 2 was nearly 1.9 times higher in the North American than Scandinavian Arctic (Table 1).  the means reported in [34] for European (12 μg•m −3 ) and North American (13 μg•m −3 ) non-Arctic cities.They are all below the WHO guideline of 50 μg•m −3 [36] (Table 1).On average, annual means of SO 2 were lowest for small, and Yellowknife, the annual course of daily SO 2 means showed higher values in summer than winter at 52 nd Ave, while at 2 nd Street the opposite was true (Figure 4).
Huge differences over short distance also occurred among rural sites.In Spitsbergen, for instance, SO 2 was observed at three locations.At Zeppelin Mt.
and Nordpolhotellet, annual means were about half of the value at Gruvebadet that is close to the emissions from combustion for Ny-Ålesund research station heating and power generation.Here, cruise-ship traffic is another source from April to September [46].At Akraberg, marine traffic is a major SO 2 source year-round [47].There were three major types of mean annual courses of daily SO 2 concentrations (Figure 4, Figure 5).At Hummelfjell, Hurdal (Figure 5), Karpdalen, Svanvik, and Yellowknife 2 nd Street (Figure 4), and rural Akraberg, Gorniak, and Gulsvik, no distinct annual course existed.Instead, daily SO 2 means varied depending on sources in their immediate upwind.At Virolahti (Figure 4), Bjørnøya, Bredkälen, Høylandet, Jokionien, Øverbygd, Pingea, and Puumala, daily means of SO 2 peaked in February, decreased over summer with a minimum in late summer/early fall.A similar behavior was found at rural Jergul, Pallas Matorova, Kårvatn, Ny-Ålesund Gruvebadet, and Northpolhotelet.Karasjok (Figure 4) and Nausta showed major and minor peaks in daily means in February and May and a minimum in October.At Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (Figure 4) and Norman Wells, daily SO 2 means had a weak annual course with higher summer than winter means.Irafoss is a rural site with similar behavior.
The Norwegian cities Svanvik and Karpdalen, for instance, experience transboundary transport of pollution from the Murmansk-Norslik region on the Kola Peninsula.Here mining, briquette production, and metal processing industries cause high emissions of SO 2 , sulfate and other pollutants [48].The 2009-2012 annual SO 2 means were 87 ± 2.3 μg•m −3 , 89 ± 20.6 μg•m −3 , 7.3 ± 0.5 μg•m −3 and 17.7 ± 3 μg•m −3 at Zapoliarny (~25 km south of Karpdalen), Nikel (8 km southeast of Svanvik) (Table A2), Svanvik and Karpdalen, respectively [49].In this Norwegian-Russian border region, the 1972-2016 reanalysis wind climatology showed a distinct seasonal pattern (Figure 1(c), Figure 1(d)).In winter, winds from the south occurred more than half of the time.In summer, winds came from all directions, but those from south and north-east were pronounced, on average.Calm wind conditions occurred more often in winter than summer.Thus, emissions from Nikel caused elevated SO 2 concentrations at Karpdalen during periods dominated by southeasterly winds.While the influence of the Murmansk-Norslik region's emissions was visible in the annual cycle at Svanvik (Figure 4), their overall impact on air quality was less than in The mean annual course of daily rural-to-urban SO 2 ratios showed long periods with higher concentration at rural Kårvatn than at urban Hurdal (Figure 4).The same was true for Kårvatn and Tjeldbergodden.Daily means of SO 2 at Tjeldbergodden correlated significantly with those at Kårvatn (Table 2).These sites are downwind of the shipping lane.Ships emit huge amounts of SO 2 [21] [50].While Tjeldbergodden is at the water, rural Kårvatn is in a valley at the end of a fjord.In fjords, inversions can cause accumulation of pollutants [51].Hurdal is located on the other side of the Scandinavian Mountains, i.e. farther Table 2. Correlation coefficients (R) of daily means of species measured concurrently at a city and its closest rural site, their distance from each other, and annual mean fractional contribution from local emissions to the total urban concentrations (positive values).Negative fractions indicate that background concentrations exceeded those in the city due to being in the downwind of major pollution sources.The absolute value of negative fractions gives the percentage by which background concentrations exceeded those in the city.Bold values indicate significant correlations (95% confidence).downwind of the shipping lane, but it is in the downwind of Oslo under southern winds.These differences and Hurdal's large distance to Kårvatn explain the low, but still significant correlation of the SO 2 concentrations at these sites (Table 2).

Analysis of NH3 Climatology
Ammonia is mainly a primary basic gas, and a precursor for PM.Annual means of NH 3 decreased with increasing latitude (Table 1).On average over all cities, annual mean NH 3 was about 34% (0.073 μg•m −3 ) higher than the

Analysis of Nitrogen Dioxide Climatology
During daylight hours, NO 2 photolysis occurs [20] which is stronger in summer due to the long daylight periods and higher solar insolation than in winter with short daylight periods and low insolation (if at all) (Figure 1(a), Figure 1(b)).
When still or again enough sunlight exists, photolysis occurring in the pores of the upper layers of the snowpack can lead to NO x fluxes into the atmosphere [57].
In fall and early spring, the still high albedo of snow [58] can enhance photolysis rates close to the snow-surface as well [59].

Differences in urban NO 2 climatology between the North American and North
European Arctic result from different population density, vehicle fleet, and emission standards.The North American Arctic has a lower population density than the European Arctic.North America's vehicle fleet has a larger fraction of diesel engines, and stronger engines than the Scandinavian vehicle fleet.Emissions from cold starts are higher [60] and cold starts occur more frequently due to the colder winters in the North American than Scandinavian Arctic (Figure     Annual mean concentrations of all NO 2 sites correlated 52% (R = 0.72) with population (Table 1).Generally, NO 2 increased exponentially with increasing population (not shown).On average over all urban and rural sites, annual mean The mean annual course of daily NO 2 concentrations followed a sinus-like curve with highest and lowest concentrations in DJF and JJA, respectively for the cities of Virolahti (Figure 7), Hurdal (Figure 5), Bredkälen, Nordmoen, Osen, Whitehorse, and rural Esrange, and Oulanka.In winter, emission from cold-starts at low temperatures [60], and combustion for heating are high.The low to no solar insolation (Figure 1(a)) means low to no photolysis of NO 2 .Rural Esrange and Oulanka are about 45 km and 50 km east of Kiruna (18,148 inhabitants, 67.8558N, 20.2253E) and north of Kuusamo (15,673 inhabitants, 65.9646N, 29.1887E), respectively.The dominating southwesterly winds (Figure 1(d)) may advect pollutants from these cities to these rural sites leading to elevated NO 2 concentrations.
Yellowknife (Figure 7), Inuvik, Norman Wells, Svanvik, and rural Kårvatn, Pallas Sammatunturi, and Trustervatn had their highest and lowest daily NO 2 concentrations in November to February, and May, respectively.The spring onset of NO 2 decrease can be due to the return of sunlight, high albedo of snow and enhanced photolysis in the presence of snow [57] [58] [59].After summer solstice, solar insolation (Figure 1(a)) and hence photolysis rates decrease and NO 2 concentrations slowly increase as summer progresses.
At Karasjok (Figure 7) and rural Janiskoski and Jergul, which are all located north of the Arctic Circle (66.34N), daily NO 2 means were lower in the warm (May to September) than cold season (October to April).Here solar insolation (Figure 1(a)) and hence photolysis is absent for an elongated period in winter, and gradually increases and decreases in spring and fall, respectively.On the contrary, at the Spitsbergen sites, which are also north of the Arctic Circle, daily means of NO 2 tended to be higher in summer than winter (not shown).In summer, cruise ships berth at Ny-Ålesund thereby emitting NO x among other pollutants [61].In winter, sea-ice prohibits ship traffic (Figure 1(e)) and station personal is down to about five.
Daily means of NO 2 at Karasjok correlated significantly (R = 0.68) with those at rural Jergul (Table 2).Svanvik's daily means of NO 2 correlated weakly, but significantly with those at rural Janiskoski (R = 0.17  7).
The ratios of rural-to-urban NO 2 determined for Kårvatn and Hurdal, indicated dominance of urban sources in spring and fall, higher rural concentrations in summer and December.In winter, west wind and in summer southwest wind dominated (Figure 1(d)).Thus, Hurdal was often not in the downwind of Kårvatn.
Nevertheless, annual O 3 means were higher at sites above 100 m above sea level than at sites below that level.On average over all cities, annual mean O 3 concentration was about 2% lower than for the annual mean over all rural sites.Large cities had about 7% lower concentrations than medium size cities.On average, small cities had 18% higher O 3 concentrations than cities with over 1000 inhabi- Typically, annual means of O 3 in Scandinavia exceeded those in North America (Table 1).It seems that the different dominant weather patterns are major reasons.In Scandinavia, the frequent Atlantic storms can promote downward transport of upper tropospheric O 3 .Cut-off lows can cause tropopause folding and subsequent intrusion of stratospheric O 3 into the troposphere [62].On the contrary, most of the North American O 3 sites are north of the major storm tracks.
For the Arctic sites examined here (Table A1), mean annual courses of daily O 3 showed three distinct shapes.At Summit in Greenland, daily O 3 means peaked in summer and were lowest in winter (not shown).The high elevation (3216 m) and insolation (Figure 1(a)) are responsible for this pattern.Photolysis rates namely increase with height in the troposphere [63].Due to the high albedo in the solar range, the Greenland ice shield may increase photolysis rates during daylight.
At the sites in Karasjok (Figure 8), Bredkälen, Ft. Liard, Ft. Smith, Hurdal, Inuvik, Lerwick, Norman Wells, Osen, Svanvik, Tangen, Tjeldbergodden, Vindeln, Voss, Whitehorse, and Yellowknife, the sites' respective mean annual courses of O 3 peaked in April and had a minimum in late summer/early fall.The mean annual courses at rural sites with similar geographic characteristics (e.g.Denali, Esrange, Kårvatn, Nordmoen, Snare Rapids, Zeppelin Mt.) looked similar.This finding suggests that solar insolation (Figure 1(a)) rather than local emissions governed the O 3 concentrations in those Arctic cities.As solar insolation increases in spring, still present snow leads to increased photolysis rates.Consequently, O 3 went up (e.g.Karasjok in Figure 8).Once snowmelt sets on, albedo decreases [58].Thus, photolysis rates decrease near the surface until summer solstice despite of the increasing insolation.Thereafter, solar insolation (Figure 1(a)) and daily means of O 3 decreased (e.g. Figure 8).In summary, daily means experienced a minimum in late summer or early fall depending on latitude.Peaks occurred later, and minima occurred earlier with increasing latitude for these sites.Upon onset of snow, daily O 3 means increased again.
At Barrow (Figure 8), Tiski, Iqaluit, and rural Alert, the mean annual courses of daily O 3 means were W-shaped with minima around equinox and a peak in spring.As aforementioned, photochemistry is weak close to the surface in winter due to the low or lack of solar insolation north of the Arctic Circle (Figure 1(a)).During the dark nights, near-surface O 3 stems most likely from downward transport of stratospheric air.In spring, as solar insolation increases again, sea-ice and snow can enhance near-surface photolysis rates.Thus, the spring minimum can be due to O 3 depletion by bromine, active halogen photochemistry from halogen-atom precursors emitted from snow, ice, and/or aerosol surfaces [64], and onset of NO 2 and N 2 O 5 photochemistry [20].
No significant correlation existed between O 3 concentrations at Norman Wells and its closest rural site Snare Rapids (Table 2).Daily mean O 3 correlated significantly between Tjeldbergodden and Kårvatn (R = 0.85), Yellowknife 52 nd   Ave and Snare Rapids (R = 0.44), Ammarnäs and Tustervatn (R = 0.90).On average, background O 3 contributed 85% to the urban totals at Tjeldbergodden, but daily contributions varied appreciably (Figure 8).At Ammarnäs, daily O 3 means were 6% lower than at Tustervatn.Except Pinega, for all cities with concurrent NO 2 and O 3 measurements, NO 2 and O 3 were anti-correlated (Table 3) indicating an O x balance.This finding suggests that-in addition to direct emission from traffic-chemical reactions between NO and O 3 may produce NO 2 .Statistically significant anti-correlation at the 95% confidence level existed for these cities except Ft.Liard airport and Inuvik Bompas Road.However, at these two sites, sample sizes were low and may be misleading.At Pinega, NO 2 and O 3 showed statistically significantly positive correlation (Table 3) indicating traffic as major cause for NO 2 .In summer, VOC emissions from the surrounding taiga may affect O 3 concentrations as well.

Particulate Matter
Particulate matter has natural sources like dust, sea spray, volcanic ash, wildfires, and anthropogenic sources like residential, commercial and industrial combustion processes, all kind of traffic, agricultural biomass burning, plowing.Furthermore, particles can form from precursor gases by gas-to-particle conversion, which depends on the thermal and chemical conditions of the atmosphere [14] [20] [65].Swelling by water-vapor uptake and shrinking by evaporation/sublimation can shift particles from the fine to the coarse mode and vice versa.Sedimentation and scavenging by precipitation can remove PM from the atmosphere.Typically, large particles grow faster and are removed faster than small ones.Moreover, PM may increase by resuspension.Since most sites had no complete set of observed precursor gases plus PM 2.5 and PM 10 (Table 3) we discussed PM climatology with knowledge of general PM processes in mind.Since PM 10 includes PM 2.5 , at a site with PM 2.5 , but no PM 10 observations, PM 2.5 can serve as an estimate of how much PM 10 must have at least been present.

Analysis of PM2.5 Climatology
In Dfc climate, annual means of PM 2.5 tended to be highest (Table 1).On average over all sites with the same Köppen-Geiger classification, annual means of DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004 in Cfb climate may be major reasons for the former and latter air-quality conditions, respectively.Generally, annual means were higher in North America than Scandinavia.This finding is in line with the higher concentrations of precursor gases (NO 2 , SO 2 ) in the former than latter region (Table 1).

N. Mölders, G. Kramm
Overall, urban annual mean PM 2.5 concentration was about 2.6 times the rural annual mean (Table 2).Highest annual mean PM 2.5 concentrations occurred in cities, but were unrelated to their population numbers (see also Figure 9(a)).
Nevertheless, annual means of PM 2.5 were about 2.2 times higher for cities with more than 1000 inhabitants than small cities.Large cities had on average 16% less PM 2.5 than medium size cities.(Figure 10).These sites are downwind of the shipping lane under northwest wind conditions.Comparison of the mean annual course of PM 2.5 with those of precursor gases (Figure 5) suggests that advection of PM 2.5 may play a dominant role, while gas-to-particle conversion may be only a minor contributor to urban concentrations.The results suggested that about 47% of the annual mean PM 2.5 concentration at Hurdal was due to local emissions (Table 1).However, as aforementioned, Kårvatn fails to be in the upwind of Hurdal for substantial periods.
Daily means of PM 2.5 and SO 2 correlated significantly in Bredkälen, Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (Figure 11), Norman Wells, Ft.Liard, Hurdal, and Inuvik Bompas Rd (Table 3).This finding suggests combustion from local heating and power generation as major contributors to PM 2.5 concentrations.At the National Park site Pallas Matorova, PM 2.5 and SO 2 had significant correlation (20%; Table 3).
Here transboundary transport may occur from the Murmansk industrial complex under the dominant east-northeast winds (Figure 1(d)).
In Inuvik, PM 2.5 and SO 2 showed significant anti-correlation at Kingminya Rd, but significant correlation at Bompas Rd (Table 3).Examination of google satellite data showed that Bompas Rd is at the outskirts where residences are comparably far apart from each other.Kingminya Rd is in the city center with business The high concentrations at Kenai are most likely due to uptake of glacier silt from dry meltwater riverbanks.
In cities downwind of industrial complexes (e.g.Svanvik), the mean annual course of PM 10 concentrations showed no distinct shape.Since periods of PM 10 advection differed among years, polluted and less polluted events canceled out.PM 10 varied notably around a straight line.This behavior occurred for Hurdal (Figure 5), Svanvik, and Virolahti (Figure 12) as well as rural Karpdalen.
Large boreal forest fires led to temporarily high daily means of PM 10 in cities of Interior Alaska and the Canadian Arctic in summer.Agricultural biomass burning in Russia [54] and Siberian wildfires [66] may affect urban air quality in Eurasia in summer.
Inuvik, Yellowknife (Figure 12), Bredkälen, Ft. Liard, Ft. Smith, Hyytiälä, Norman Wells, Trapper Creek, and the background sites Denali, Denali HQ, Gates of the Arctic, Kårvatn, Kenai, and Tuxedni showed higher daily mean PM 10 concentrations in summer than winter.At Kenai, the winter snow-cover prohibits uptake of glacier dust.At Tuxedni and Trapper Creek, enhanced winter storm activity may remove particles fast from the atmosphere in winter.
In Vindeln, Yellowknife (Figure 12), Bute, and Whitehorse, daily PM 10 means peaked in spring and early fall with slightly higher summer than winter concentrations.In general, from fall to spring, heating and power production can be major sources of PM 10 .In Bute and Yellowknife, dirt roads are ice and snow-covered in winter prohibiting particle uptake, while in summer, traffic may yield substantial airborne PM 10 .In spring and fall, uptake of particles by wind from fields without vegetation may contribute to elevated concentrations in Vindeln that is surrounded by agricultural land.
In Interior Alaska, seasonal wildfires affected rural and urban air quality from end of May to onset of snowfall.Typically, June and July saw the strongest impacts from wildfires.The peaks in these months were due to the 2004 and 2005 fire seasons.These peaks dominated due to the short length of record (see Table A1).The sites of the Fairbanks metropolitan area showed distinct winter maxima due to local emissions and accumulation of pollutants under the frequent inversions.
Daily means of PM 10 correlated significantly between Svanvik and Karpdalen (Table 2) with typically higher concentrations (8% on annual mean) at rural Karpdalen.This finding confirms [49] that dust plumes from tailing dumps in Russia can cause airborne PM pollution at those sites.
Comparison of annual courses of PM 10 at the Fairbanks State Office Building and Denali headquarter sites revealed urban sources as notable contributors to the buildup of PM 10 concentrations in winter.During the summer wildfire season, background concentrations gained influence on urban air quality.Occasionally, they exceeded contributions from local sources by manifolds.
Daily means of SO 2 and PM 10 correlated weakly, but significantly in Yellowknife (52 nd Ave), Norman Wells, Bredkälen, and Hurdal (Table 3) indicating combustion for heating as a major source for PM 10 .Weak, but significant anti-correlation occurred at Ft. Liard and Inuvik Kingminya Rd.In winter, heating and power production were major sources for SO 2 .
At Hurdal, PM 10 and NO 2 showed no significant correlation (Table 3).At Whitehorse (1 st St), NO 2 -PM 10 correlation was positive and significant, i.e. traffic was a major cause of PM 10 .Note that the Alcan-the highway connecting Alaska and the contiguous US-is unpaved near Whitehorse.Daily means of NO 2 and PM 10 were significantly anti-correlated in Ft.Liard, Inuvik (Bompas Rd, Kingminya Rd), Norman Wells, and Yellowknife (52 nd Ave).Judging by google satel-lite data, at Ft. Liard and Inuvik Kingminya Rd, PM 10 most likely stemmed from uptake of silt from the banks of the Liard River and dried parts of the Mackenzie River's sloughs and bogs, respectively in summer.
At Hurdal (Figure 5), Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (Figure 12), Ft.Liard, Ft. Smith, Norman Wells, Whitehorse 1 st St, and Inuvik Kingmingya Rd significant correlation occurred between PM 2.5 and PM 10 (R ≥ 0.68).This finding indicates that the coarse mode fraction of PM 10 was small compared the fraction of PM 2.5 .

Conclusions
Freely available data of SO 2 , NO 2 , NH 3 , O 3 , PM 2.5 and PM 10 observed in cities and at rural sites north of 59.99N between 1972 and 2016 were downloaded.We compiled them into a homogenized dataset considered as air-quality samples collected in different regions for limited periods.The goal was to 1) establish a baseline inventory of Arctic urban air quality, 2) identify urban air-quality climatology for regions of common features, as well as 3) analyze and assess Arctic urban air-quality based on a common standard and current knowledge.Such air-quality climatology and air-quality inventory are necessary steps towards understanding of Arctic urban air-quality related health issues.
Since for most sites no concurrent measurements of the full suite of precursor gases, particulate matter size and meteorology existed, urban air-quality climatology was discussed in the sense of climatology.Annual means of SO 2 and NO 2 concentrations ranged from 0.08 to 9.6 μg•m −3 and 0.2 to 43.12 μg•m −3 , respectively, and were typically lower for small than large cities.Nevertheless, these annual means varied more than an order of magnitude even over short distance within a city depending on a site's distance to local sources.On average, annual means of SO 2 showed no severe issues with respect to the WHO annual threshold for the Arctic cities examined here.
Urban annual means of O 3 ranged from 27 to 131 μg•m −3 .In coastal cities with seasonal sea-ice, mean annual courses of O 3 showed distinct W-shapes with a spring minimum and a fall secondary minimum.On the contrary, all other examined Arctic cities had distinct spring O 3 maxima and fall minima.On average, urban annual means of particle pre-cursors and PM were higher in the North American than Scandinavian Arctic, while the opposite was true for O 3 .Annual means of observed PM 2.5 and PM 10 ranged from 1.6 to 21.2 μg•m −3 , and 2 to 18.2 μg•m −3 , respectively.Not all sites with PM 2.5 observations had also PM 10 observations.However, since PM 10 includes PM 2.5 , annual means PM 10 concentrations must have been at least 21.2 μg•m −3 or larger.
A major finding is that urban air-quality in the Arctic shows a wide range.Concentrations in the mean annual course show similar features in regions of same Köppen-Geiger class.Coastal cities with seasonal sea-ice, for instance, showed similar O 3 annual courses among each other.However, their annual course differed distinctly from coastal cities without sea-ice.This means that Arctic urban air quality sees a diversity of climatology depending on their local weather climatology and geographic location.
Theoretically, cities in Dfc and Dfb climates and cities in steep fjords have huge likelihood for inversions and reduced vertical exchange.Our analysis showed typically higher annual mean pollutant concentrations for cities in these climates than for other Arctic cities.Except for periods of smoke transport from wildfires, PM concentrations were low in Interior Alaska in summer due to more efficient washout, and the northward retreat of the polar front.Cities in Cfb and Cfc climates experience frequent frontal passages that remove pollutants by scavenging and wet deposition.Based on the results of our assessment, we have to conclude that Arctic urban air quality tends to be better in temperate than in cold climate regions.
In Interior Alaska, seasonal wildfires affected rural and urban air quality.
Typically, June and July saw the strongest impacts from wildfires.Extreme fire years dominated daily means when mean annual courses were determined from short records (see Table A1).Thus, in areas with seasonal wildfires or frequent advection of wildfire smoke, long-term monitoring will be needed for air-quality related health impact studies.
It is well known that when background concentrations contribute only small fractions to the urban total concentration, municipalities can improve their air quality by introduction of emission-control measures.Thus, communities have to estimate the fractional contributions of their urban emissions to their urban totals.Assessment of impacts from urban local emissions to the total urban concentrations requires information about the upwind background conditions.These conditions depend on contributions from long-range transport, chemical reactions, and removal processes.
Ideally, assessment of contributions from transport would require at least eight sites around a city to cover the major wind sectors (NNW-NNE, NNE-ESE, …, WNW-NNW).However, only few cities had an urban site within 150 km radius, at which the same species was measured during the same period.Furthermore, the cities were not in the downwind of that rural site for the entire time.Often the rural site was just a proxy for ambient, non-urban conditions.Nevertheless, for some pairs of rural and urban sites, contributions from urban and distant sources could be pin-pointed.Rural-to-urban ratios of species pointed, for instance, to seasonal transport of pollutants from wildfires, shipping, and the Kola Peninsula mining area at some sites in Interior Alaska, western and northern Norway, respectively.
Ideally, the full suite of PM and O 3 precursor gases should be measured to identify sources in urban air.The few sites with concurrent measurements of SO 2 and PM, or NO 2 and PM, for instance, permitted identification of traffic, or combustion as major contributors to observed urban totals of SO 2 , and NO 2 , respectively.In cities with high O 3 , measuring at least NO 2 and O 3 would help to distinguish between O 3 formed locally and O 3 from downward transport.
Estimating the impacts of chemistry and weather to urban total concentrations would need measurements of the full suite of precursor gases including VOC, PM 2.5 and PM 10 as well as wet and dry deposition at all these sites includ-ing the urban site(s).Such monitoring networks, however, are expensive to maintain on long-term, especially under the harsh Arctic winter weather conditions and in complex terrain.However, our results showed that over a couple of years, such measurements may permit identification of causes for low air quality.
Based on our findings one has to conclude that Arctic municipalities could use monitoring to assess their air-quality situation for a targeted approach for mitigation.As demonstrated in our study, analysis of even short-term (several years) monitoring of relevant species could reveal major sources and/or reasons.This information would empower municipal policy makers to decide whether they can implement mitigation strategies in the framework of their own responsibility or in collaboration among cities.In both cases, they could work on solutions at the community level, rather than waiting for solutions from national laws, and/or international complex, politically difficult, and lengthy policy negotiations.
Our results suggest that in the North American Arctic, for instance, urban air quality with respect to PM can be improved by municipal emission-control measures.Here cities are islands in a waste environment, where local emissions, weather, and season govern PM concentrations.Especially, summer concentrations of PM 10 could be reduced, for instance, by paving city streets with high traffic volume, and highways in the urban outskirts.
On the contrary, in Scandinavia, several cities have few options to improve their air quality by introducing emission-control measures at the municipal scale.
Transboundary advection of pollutants from the Murmansk Industrial Complex, for instance, affected air quality at (rural and) urban sites in Lapland (e.g.Svanvik).However, municipal representatives in cities of the Murmansk Industrial Complex could introduce responsible emission-control measures to improve their own air quality, and hence also that of cities in their downwind.Given the climatology of the major wind directions, municipal decision makers of upwind and downwind cities could address their common air quality issues by collaboration on the community scale.
Our results suggest that ship emissions and upwind emissions from oil and gas production influence air quality in cities along the Norwegian coast.Emissions from oil and gas production and shipping, however, are beyond municipal control except ship emissions in ports.Here installing cold-ironing facilities and then mandating cold-ironing are an option.Emissions from power plants are cleaner than emissions of ships' auxiliary engines at low-load.
Based on the observations for Norwegian coastal cities, we may conclude for coastal communities along the Alaskan Arctic Ocean that besides their own local sources (e.g.traffic, power generation, residential and commercial combustion), offshore oil and gas production year-round, and in summer, Arctic shipping may contribute to urban concentrations at least for limited periods of time.Offshore ship-emission control measures, however, are responsibility of the International Marine Organization.Emissions of oil and gas platforms in national waters are subject to national permits and regulation.
Our analysis suggests that North American cities north of the Arctic Circle could be unique testbeds to study pollutant-related health issues without the confounding effects of multiple pollutants air quality.During the dark winter days, negligible quantities of O 3 exist/form.Thus, high PM 2.5 concentrations occur due to combustion and traffic without confounding effects of O 3 .In summer, natural wildfires frequently created PM concentrations well exceeding levels deemed "unhealthy" against a background of clean air.During the white summer nights, PM and O 3 effects may occur simultaneously.Thus, the impact of confounding effects can be examined for the same population.Collectively, these cities provide an environment that could permit examining the impacts of high vs. low concentrations, and single vs. multipollutant effects on health with concentrations similar to large cities in mid and low latitudes.Table A2.Annual mean concentrations for Arctic cities as found in [34] [36] [49] [67] [68].Coordinates refer to the city when no information on site location was available.

2 concentrations
are not to exceed 125 μg•m −3 on more than 3 d/yr, while annual means of NO 2 must not exceed 40 μg•m −3 ; O 3 is not to exceed a maximum daily 8-h mean of 120 μg•m −3 on more than 25 d/yr.Annual mean PM 2.5 must not exceed 25 μg•m −3 ; daily mean PM 10 must not exceed 50 μg•m −3 on more than 35 d/yr.

Figure 1 .Figure 2 .
Figure 1.Study area and air-quality related characteristics: (a) Annual evolution of incoming solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere (TOA); (b) Köppen-Geiger classification; Reanalysis data based 1972-2016 climatology of mean near-surface air temperature (color shades), sea-surface pressure (contour lines), wind speed and direction (curly arrows) for (c) June-July-August (JJA), and (d) December-January-February (DJF); (e) Location of sites considered in this study.Red, green and blue symbols indicate cities, research stations/labs and background sites.For discussion of Köppen-Geiger classification see Section 3.1.
highest for large Arctic cities.Out of the rural sites, Karpdalen and Brekkebygda had the highest(7.43± 161.83 μg•m −3 ) and lowest (0.05 ± 0.01 μg•m −3 ) annual means (Figure3(a)).The Arctic urban air-quality inventory (Figure3(a)) shows that annual urban mean SO 2 can vary a factor 7 or so even over short distance depending on the vicinity of local emission sources.In both Yellowknife and Inuvik, for instance, two SO 2 sites existed.At these sites annual means of SO 2 differed by about 86% (8.25 μg•m −3 ) and 24% (0.33 μg•m −3 ) in Yellowknife and Inuvik, respectively.In

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Mean annual courses of daily means of SO 2 for Virolahti (red), Karasjok (blue), Svanvik (green), Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (brown), and Yellowknife 2 nd St (purple), and ratios of daily mean SO 2 concentrations at rural Kårvatn to those in Hurdal (black).See text for cities (and rural sites) with similar annual courses.Y-axis labels differ among panels.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Annual courses of daily means of maximum possible incoming solar radiation (red), and mean annual courses of observed daily means of O 3 (blue), NO 2 (green) SO 2 (brown), PM 2.5 (purple), and PM 10 (black) at Hurdal.

3 (
annual mean background concentration.Vehicle traffic may be a contributing factor for this finding.Annual means of NH 3 in Arctic cities ranged from 0.112 to 0.529 μg•m −3 , while rural annual means ranged from 0.005 to 0.774 μg•m −Figure3(c)).For all sites, daily NH 3 means peaked in summer and were lowest during the cold season (Figure6).The summer peak suggests emissions from natural sources and fertilizer as contributing sources.Ratios of Kårvatn to Hurdal daily means of NH 3 exceeded 1 which may indicate NH 3 advection to Hurdal.While at Kårvatn, the summer peak suggests contributions from rural sources, the year-round higher concentrations may be due to Kårvatn's closer vicinity to ship emissions than Hurdal.In winter, west winds dominated (Figure1(d)).They may push pollutants up the nearly west-east orientated fjord, in which Kårvatn is located.Here, inversions may lead to pollutant accumulation.Due to missing data, ratios of Kårvatn to Tjeldbergodden daily means of NH 3 could only be determined for mid-October to December (not shown).Both higher and lower daily means of urban than rural NH 3 concentrations occurred during this period.In Tjeldbergodden, berthing ships are local emission sources contributing to the urban NH 3 concentrations.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Mean annual courses of daily means of NH 3 for Karasjok (red), Virolahti (blue), Osen (green), Svanvik (brown), Hurdal (purple), and ratios of daily mean NH 3 concentrations at rural Kårvatn to those in Hurdal (black).See text for cities (and rural sites) with similar annual courses.Y-axis labels differ among panels.

NO 2
concentrations amount 5.7 ± 65.7 μg•m −3 and 0.5 ± 0.61 μg•m −3 , respectively.Whitehorse Main St/1 st Ave had the highest annual mean(43.12μg•m −3 ) (Figure3(d)) and maximum (219.96μg•m −3 ) NO 2 concentration.Minimum concentrations remained always below the annual mean background concentration averaged over all rural sites except the three NO 2 sites in Whitehorse (1.9, 1.9, 3.8 μg•m −3 ).Most of Whitehorse is surrounded by mountains.Thus, inversion may be a cause for the high urban minimum concentrations.Depending on vicinity to major traffic routes, annual mean NO 2 concentration varied appreciably even over short distance in cities (Figure3(d)).In Whitehorse, for instance, observed annual means of NO 2 reached 43.12 μg•m −3 at a high traffic site, while only 3.38 μg•m −3 at a suburban site.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Mean annual courses of daily means of NO 2 for Virolahti (red), Karasjok (blue), Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (green), and ratios of daily mean NO 2 concentrations at rural Kårvatn to those at urban Hurdal (brown), and at rural Janiskovski and urban Hurdal (purple).See text for cities (and rural sites) with similar annual courses.Y-axis labels differ among panels.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Mean annual course of daily means of O 3 for Barrow (red), Karasjok (blue), and ratios of daily mean O 3 concentrations at rural Kårvatn to those at the site in the city of Tjeldbergodden (green), and rural Snare Rapids to those in the city of Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (brown).See text for cities (and rural sites) with similar annual courses.Y-axis labels differ among panels.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Inventory of annual mean urban concentrations of (a) PM 2.5 , and (b) PM 10 (red) Concentrations at rural sites (blue) are given for comparison.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Mean annual courses of daily means of PM 2.5 for Fairbanks (red), Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (blue), Inuvik Kingminya Rd (green), Bredkälen (brown), and ratios of daily mean PM 2.5 concentrations at rural Denali to those at the State Office Building in Fairbanks (purple), and rural Kårvatn to those in urbanHurdal (black).See text for cities (and rural sites) with similar annual courses.Y-axis labels differ among panels.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Mean annual courses of daily correlations of NO 2 and O 3 in Osen (red) and Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (blue), SO 2 and PM 2.5 in Bredkälen (green) and Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (brown), SO 2 and PM 2.5 in Hurdal (purple) and Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (black).
buildings and close distances between residences.Kingminya Rd is close to DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004annual means of PM 10 in Arctic cities exceeded those at rural sites (Figure 9(b)).

Figure 12 .
Figure 12.Mean annual courses of daily means of PM 10 for Vindeln (red), Virolahti (blue), Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (green), Inuvik Bompas Rd (brown), and correlations of daily mean PM 2.5 and PM 10 at Yellowknife 52 nd Ave (purple), and Hurdal (black).See text for cities (and rural sites) with similar annual courses.Y-axis labels differ among panels.
2 , O 3 , PM2.5and PM 10 on the internet; 2) identify air-quality climatology for regions of common features; as well as 3) analyze and assess Arctic urban air-quality based on current knowledge.Such air-quality climatology and air-quality inventory are necessary steps towards understanding of Arctic urban air-quality related health issues.

2.1. Data Sources and Processing
surement (CABM) Program.Hereafter, this area and the cities therein are called Arctic and Arctic cities, respectively.Between 1972 and 2016, SO 2 was measured at 20 urban and 29 rural sites.NH 3 was observed at 16 sites, seven of them were urban.NO 2 data exist for 17 urban and 12 rural sites.Ozone was recorded at 24 urban, five research stations, and 12 rural sites.There were 11, 12, 8, and 8 sites with concurrent NO 2 and PM 10 , NO 2 and PM 2.5 , SO 2 and PM 10 , and concurrent SO 2 and PM 2.5 observations, respectively.Canada, Russia, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Sweden use mass per volume, while the US reports gases in parts billion (ppb).Since at most sites, the measurements of gaseous and particulate matter were not accompanied by adequate meteorological observations, standard conditions (ppb•molecular mass (in g•mol −1 ) per molar volume (L) = 2.62, 1.88 and 1.96 μg•m −3 for SO 2 , NO 2 , and O 3 , respectively, at 1 atm and 25˚C) were assumed to convert data reported in ppb to μg•m −3 .Error propagation analysis showed that the error for 1 ppb due to this approximation remains less than 0.002 μg•m −3 at temperatures above −50˚C and air pressures between 960 and 1040 hPa.In this pressure range, errors are less than 0.0002 μg•m −3 at temperatures between 15˚C and 35˚C.This means uncertainty due to the above approximation is less than the typical measurement accuracy, even at high concentrations.Since the data were collected with different purposes in mind, data cover periods of varying lengths and at different periods of time.Some data, for instance, were collected to assess violations of national ambient air quality standards.Ofmeans, 3-in-1 data, daily means, and even hourly means.Unfortunately, many databases still use the practice to just leave out dates of days, for which no observations are available instead of listing the date and indi-DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004 On annual and Köppen-Geiger class mean, concentrations of NH 3 were highest in Cfc climate, followed by Dfb and Dfc climate (Table1).At coastal sites in Cfc and Cfb climates, large amounts of NH 3 can stem from ship emissions along the Scandinavian coast.Annual means of NH 3 were lowest in ET climate.Here, in summer, reindeer herds are potential local sources in the Scandinavian Arctic.

Table
sover the year in temperate (C) than continental (D) climate as in the latter the temperature range is much larger with consequences for emissions from heating and traffic.
son (index f), cold summers (index c) mean more cloudiness, reduced actinic fluxes and less photolysis leading to lower annual means of near-surface NO 2 than found for warm summers (index b).Furthermore, NO 2 means varied les-DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.71004 Krammtrial complex, which is east-southeast of Svanvik.On the Kola Peninsula, southerly winds dominated in winter (Figure1(d)).On average, advection of pollution affected Svanvik less than rural Janiskoski (Figure ). Background NO 2 contributed 4% to the daily means at Karasjok, i.e. urban emissions made up about 96% of the annual total.At Svanvik, NO 2 was 12% lower on annual average than at Janiskoski.Under east wind, Janiskoski is downwind of the Murmansk indus-DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2018.7100469 Open Journal of Air Pollution N. Mölders, G.
(d)), annual O 3 means were on average below 56 µg•m −3 (Table 1).Annual mean O 3 exceeded 61 µg•m −3 in Cfb, Cfc, and Dfb climates.No notable correlations existed between annual mean concentrations of O 3 and population numbers, latitude, or elevation (Table

Table 3 .
Correlation of daily means at sites with concurrently measured species.Cities are set in italic.Significant correlations (95% confidence) are set in bold.SO 2 :PM 2.5 SO 2 :PM 10 NO 2 :PM 2.5 NO 2 :PM 10 PM 2.5 :PM 10 2.5 were lowest in Cfb climate.Frequent inversions and cold winters in Dfc climate, and removal of precursor gases and PM 2.5 by the strong cyclone activity PM Negative longitude values indicate W, positive E. All latitudes are N.