Dyeability of Polyester and Polyamide Fabrics Employing Citric Acid

The employment of sustainable chemicals, such as citric acid, represents a possibility for the development of textile dyeing processes. This study aimed to analyze the possibility of replacement of acetic acid (commonly used in textile processing) by citric acid in polyester and polyamide 6 dyeing processes. The utilization of citric acid as leveling agent for disperse dyestuffs was also investigated. Dyeing processes in turquoise color for these fabrics were performed employing citric and acetic acid. Color differences between dyeing processes and color fastness to water were evaluated. All the color dyeing differences were not significant and there was no transference in color fastness tests (grade 5). Otherwise, the differences among polyamide dyeing processes could be related to the efficiency of citric acid solution as sequestering agent. Notwithstanding citric acid to be more expensive than acetic acid and the need of previous dissolution by stirring, it could be advantageous for some formulations.


Introduction
Textile industry involves processing or converting raw material into finished textile materials via several processes which consume large amount of water and generate polluting waste effluents containing nonbiodegradable and dissolved toxic substances [1]. Among the various processes, fabric dyeing releases large amounts of toxic chemical products, for both human health and environment, which results in a mixed wastewater composed of residual dyes, auxiliary chem-formic acid and ammonium sulfate can be used as well [17].
Citric acid is a weak organic acid that is found in many fruits and vegetables especially citrus. The compound is produced by fermentation and used primarily in the foods, beverages, pharmaceutical, chemical, textile and electroplating industries. This acid is widely used in food industry, but it also finds applications as a function of additive detergents, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and toiletries [18]. It contributes to the formulation of many foods as an acidulant, antioxidant, emulsifier or preservative and there is great world-wide demand for citric acid due to its low toxicity when compared with other acidulants. Thereby, citric acid is safer to the environment and public health [19]. It is biodegradable, ecofriendly, economical, safe and a versatile chemical for sequestering, buffering, wetting, cleaning and dispersing [20].
Thus, articulating the requirements for industrial application of sustainable chemistry, the use of citric acid in textile dyeing technologies can be a viable alternative. It is important to mention that in textile industry many employed empirical methods and practices have not been yet subjected to strict scientific studies and published in literature. In this way, despite of the employment of citric acid in textile processes is not novel; the present authors did not found reports in literature on the use of citric acid in polyamide dyeing. In this context, the present study reports the possibility of substituting acetic by citric acid in textile dyeing process. Considerations about employment possibilities and environmental impacts were accomplished according literature data.

Fabric Samples
The fabric samples were obtained from local market in Sao Paulo State: i) jersey knitted fabric-100% polyester previously scoured (Conformatec Textile Industry, Brazil) and ii) jersey knitted fabric-100% polyamide 6 previously scoured (Brazilian Service for Industrial Apprenticeship-SENAI, Brazil).

Complex Ions Formation
A 1 g sample of tested sequestering agent was dissolved in 80 mL of distilled wa-Journal of Textile Science and Technology ter and 10 mL of calcium carbonate solution 2%. The pH was adjusted to 11 with a sodium hydroxide solution 2%. The resulting solution was titrated with a solution of dihydrate calcium chloride 48.7 g/L. The determination of sequestering power was determined according to the Hampshire test [21] by the Equation (1)

Citric acid as Disperse Dye Levelling Agent
In this qualitative test, the dyeing process was carried out without textile substrate. The dyeing solution was prepared with turquoise disperse dye (Quimacron C-2GN-200, 3 g/L) and disperse dyestuff levelling (Setamol WS, 2 g/L). The pH of the dyebath was adjusted to 4.0 employing aqueous solutions of acetic or citric acid. The dyebath was heated until 130˚C and kept at this temperature for 30 min. Afterwards, the bath was cooled to 80˚C and the solution was vacuum filtered through a filter membrane of 0.45 µm pore size. The parameters are shown at Table 1.

Dyeing Processes
Dyeing experiments were carried out with polyester and polyamide fabrics in two types of dyebath: i) water with a hardness of CaCO 3 200 ppm and ii) potable water for public consumption (containing chlorine near 0.2 mg/L and fluorine 0.7 mg/L) [22]. The polyester fabric dyeing was performed in laboratory scale HT equipment (Mathis, ALT-1). Polyester dyeing was performed by raising the dyebath temperature to 130˚C at a rate of 2˚C/min, holding at this temperature for 40 min followed by cooling. Polyamide 6 dyeing was carried out by raising the dyebath temperature to 96˚C at a rate of 2˚C/min, holding at this temperature for 40 min followed by cooling [23]. After polyamide 6 dyeing, fixer agent (Nylofixan PAN, 4%) was applied. The parameters for both dyeing process are shown at Table 2.

Evaluation of Color Differences between Dyeing Processes and Color Fastness to Water
The colorimetric parameters of the dyed fabrics were determined by reflectance spectrophotometer VIS (Konika Minolta CM 3600 d) in order to check the possible color differences between the obtained results from dyeing experiments employing the CIELab system [24].    For the determination of differences between dyeing results, it is calculated the ∆E* value applying Equation (2): The equation allows to calculating de Euclidian distance between two colors in the CIELab space, described as: • a*-red/green axis-meaning if the value is positive the sample is redder, or negative, greener; • b*-blue/yellow axis-meaning if the value is positive the sample is yellower, or negative, bluer and; • L*-white/black axis-meaning if the value is positive the sample is clearer, or negative, darker.
Color fastness tests to water were carried out on turquoise dyed polyester and polyamide 6 fabric samples according the test method ABNT NBR ISO 105-E01: 2014-Textiles-Tests for color fastness Part E01: color fastness to water [25]. The results were assessed by spectrophotometry VIS (Konica-Minolta CM 3600 d) under illuminant D65, 10˚. The software grey scale has grades 1 to 5 and increases by half of grade (1, 1 1/2, 2, 2 1/2 and so on.) with value 5 being the highest and best evaluation.

Complex Ions Formation
The values for acetic, citric, lactic, malic and tartaric acid tested on the sequestering power evaluation of the Hampshire test were: zero; 366.71; 19.84; 54.06; and 17.28 mg CaCO 3 /(g of product) respectively. The results showed that acetic acid has no presented sequestering action whereas citric acid has a similar complexing action of the calcium ions as compared to the commercial sequestering agent tested (Ladiquest 1097) correspondent to 231.1 mg CaCO 3 /(g of product).

Citric Acid as Disperse Dye Levelling Agent
The experiments were carried out in order to simulate the normal conditions of polyester fabric dyeing solution preparation with the use of auxiliary chemicals in a process with a range of pH 4.5 -5.5. However, instead of being employed for Journal of Textile Science and Technology dyeing textile substrate, they were filtered. The dyebaths were vacuum filtrated in filter membrane of 0.45 µm pore size. The orifice marks formed in membranes upon filtration were circular with dark turquoise color. Dispersion test results represented by these orifice marks in membranes are presented in Figure  1. The best results were considered for funnel membrane orifices with higher definition (Figure 1(c) and Figure 1(d)), in which citric acid was present in composition. The other membranes (Figure 1(a) and Figure 1(b)) with acetic acid in composition exhibited slighter color orifice marks. Membrane control with no product was also carried out. These data showed that citric acid solution, compared to acetic acid solution, presents superior effectiveness. Additionally, citric acid solution showed a greater dispersant action than Setamol WS dispersant (BASF, Brazil), which is commonly employed in industrial textile processes. It is noteworthy that no scientific literature was found relative to quantitative analytical methods in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of dispersion of disperse dyes.

Color Difference Evaluation in Dyeing Processes
Color differences in dyed samples could not be observed accurately by visual comparison. In this way, separately for polyester and polyamide 6 analysis, spectrophotometry was utilized to measure the color parameters in three dyed fabric Journal of Textile Science and Technology samples (two verifications in each one), resulting in six color results. A reference sample containing only the dye and acetic acid solution (0.5 g/L) in dyeing process was used as control. For the determination of differences between dyeing results, ∆E values were calculated. Averages and standard deviations are presented in Table 3. The ∆E values up to 1.0 are commercially acceptable. According this criterion, all the colors variations achieved for polyamide 6 and polyester samples were acceptable, that is, these differences were commercially not significant (Table 3).
In Table 4 the obtained probabilities from a Student's test t (at 5% significance level) from comparisons of results from different dyeing processes were shown. The probabilities for polyester dyeing processes are mainly superior to 5%. Therefore, there was no statistically significant difference among the averages for polyester dyeing processes. In this case, it is important mention that polyester dyeing processes presented lower ∆E averages and standard deviations than polyamide dyeing processes (Table 3).
However, for polyamide 6 dyeing processes all probabilities for no difference among the averages were inferior to 5%, exception the comparisons between (2) public supply water with acetic acid 0.5 g/L and sequestering agent 0.5 g/L and (3) hard water (with CaCO 3 200 mg/L) with acetic acid 0.5 g/L (probability of 24.4%); and between (3) hard water (with CaCO 3 200 mg/L) with acetic acid 0.5 g/L and (5) hard water (with CaCO 3 200 mg/L) with acetic acid 0.5 g/L and sequestering agent 0.5 g/L (probability of 8.4%) ( Table 4). It is noteworthy that dyeing polyamide 6 processes in citric acid solution presented the lowest ∆E averages compared with the other ones in this substrate (Table 4). These differences among polyamide dyeing processes could be related to the efficiency of citric acid solution as a sequestering agent for calcium salt in dyebaths, improving the dyeing polyamide 6 processes.
Additionally, the visual observation of all samples (polyester and polyamide 6) has not found failures in the dyeing processes, as stains or fades, which could cause irreparable damage to the appearance of fabrics (data not shown). Table 3. Results of ∆E for polyester or polyamide 6 (calculated from the points correspondent to results of dyeing processes performed with public supply water and acetic acid 0.5 g/L). The results are expressed as average and standard deviation.

Color Fastness to Water Tests
As presented in Figure 2 and   in accordance with Miljkovic et al. [17] that found no significant differences in dyeing processes of polyester fabric with the use of acetic and citric acids solu-Journal of Textile Science and Technology tions. The present authors did not find data on scientific literature in order to compare the obtained results for polyamide 6 dyed fabric presented in Figure 2.

Considerations about Environmental Impacts
Both acetic and citric acid are biodegradable. However citric acid (COD = 0.75 g In adsorption experiments, the affinity of citric acid to soil adsorption sites was greater than acetic acid and this is relevant to the biodegradation of organic pollutants [27]. Furthermore, present acetic acid in textile wastewater has a sig-

Considerations about Occupational Health Impacts
The textile industry consists of several processes including dyeing in which due to the nature of the work and its exposures, workers may frequently complain about respiratory symptoms. Studies indicated that system respiratory of textile-dyeing workers presented acute and chronic respiratory symptoms more prevalent [29]. The utilization of less harmful products can contribute to improving the working environment. The main toxic acids employed in synthetic textile mills are acetic, formic, oxalic and sulfuric acid [30].
Diluted acetic acid, such as in the same degree of vinegar (near 5%), is not harmful. However, the acetic acid for textile industry is marketed, stocked and handled before and during dilution in glacial form (<99.5%), which is harmful In this way, it is evidenced that the alternative employment of citric acid in textile industry could reduce the toxicity and insalubrity associated to the exposure and handling of other toxic and harmful chemicals.

Considerations about the Commercial Viability of Citric Acid Use
Textile industry employs generally commercial grade reagents. In this way, respect the comparison of commercial grade citric and acetic acid prices, citric acid is from one-third to one-half more expensive [39] [40].
At the same time, probably much more significant than the cost difference, there are other resistance aspects related to the plain conventionality (without considering the possible options) of the employment of acetic acid solution in textile processes and, in the case of alternative employment of citric acid, the necessity of previous dissolution of this acid from the solid state to a liquid solution by agitation. However, it should be pointed that, despite of easier dissolution, acetic acid need be also diluted before its employment in these processes.
On the other hand, notwithstanding additional cost and the need of previous dissolution by stirring, citric acid could be advantageous for some formulations.
Furthermore, doubtless citric acid is safer regarding work occupational health and environmental aspects.
However, it is noteworthy that, despite of these preliminary considerations, only the analysis of real and representative industrial scale results could validate the cost and other possible advantages provided by the use of citric acid.

Conclusion
The results of present study showed that citric acid could be a promising alternative to chemical textiles, mainly, for acetic acid replacement in dyeing process.
Both ones, acetic and citric acid, can be utilized in adjustment of pH in dye bath.
The dyeing experiments showed that there were no significant commercial color differences between the fabrics of polyester and polyamide 6 dyed employing acetic or citric acid. There was no statistically significant difference among po-Journal of Textile Science and Technology lyester dyeing processes. Otherwise, the differences observed for polyamide 6 dyeing processes could be related to the efficiency of citric acid as a sequestering agent, meanwhile, the insurance on the accuracy and repeatability of the data about complex ion formation, disperse dye levelling and sequestering action should be confirmed in future studies mainly taking in account industrial scale up. Citric acid is a product of easy commercial acquisition. However, citric acid employment in textile processes is economically more expensive than acetic acid.
On the other hand, notwithstanding additional cost and the need of previous dissolution by stirring, citric acid could be advantageous for some formulations.