Impact of Ionic Liquid 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Acetate Mediated Extraction on Lignin Features

This study aims at investigating the impact of ionic liquid extraction on lignin structure by studying the mechanism of lignin depolymerization in 1-ethyl3-methylimidazolium acetate EMIM[OAc]) and comparing it with that of organosolv and milled wood methods. Ionic liquid mediated lignin (ILL) using EMIM[OAc]), ethanol organosolv lignin (EOL) and milled wood lignin (MWL) were isolated from Typha capensis (TC) and subjected to several analytical characterizations. Experimental data shows that ILL exhibited a relatively lower degree of condensation, lower aromatic C-C structures and a higher aliphatic OH with values of 0.42/Ar, 1.94/Ar and 1.33/Ar moieties compared with EOL values of 0.92/Ar, 2.22/Ar and 0.51/Ar moieties respectively. The ILL was depolymerized under mild conditions giving relatively higher β-aryl ether linkages content, higher molecular mass, and exhibited closer structures and reactivity to native lignin than EOL. These insights on TC lignin depolymerization in EMIM[OAc]) acetate may contribute to better value-addition of lignocellulosic biomass.

EMIM [OAc] treatment led to high lignin solubility but low wood flour solubility, and also enabled the disruption of the chemical integrity and provided a lignin extraction yield of 4.4 g/kg IL [6].Furthermore, lignin extracted by EMIM [OAc] from poplar wood resulted in lower S/G ratio, reduction of molecular weight and more uniform fragments, compared to the MWL counterpart [12].
The functional-group, rather than the size of the anion of ILs, controls lignin fragmentation and the anion plays a much larger role in lignin depolymerization [13].With EMIM [OAc] pretreatment of biomass, deacetylation of xylan and acetylation of lignin units occurs [14]; these processes contribute to swelling, followed by dissolution, disintegration and derivatization of wood [15].
While chemical and physico-chemical characterizations of ethanol organosolv lignin from different feedstocks have been widely reported, little work has been done in this regard for ionic liquids lignins from EMIM [OAc].An earlier report by Kim et al. characterized EMIM [OAc] lignin from poplar, a wood plant, in comparison with the MWL [12].Most other studies on ionic liquid for lignocellulosic fractionation emphasized identifying efficient ionic liquids and optimizing the conditions for increased delignification and improved enzymatic hydrolyzability of cellulose rich residues to fermentable sugar [5] [9] [16] [17] [18].
In the current report, the purpose is to study the chemical structure of lignin isolated by EMIM [OAc] IL from Typha capensis (an herbaceous plant) and compare it to the (1) well-known chemistry of ethanol organosolv lignin, and (2) milled wood lignin (MWL) structure, which is a reference point in lignin studies as lignin isolates closest to the intact lignin from the plant material.To that aim, lignins were extracted from Typha capensis using EMIM [OAc] and ethanol organosolv methods as well as the classical MWL method, and the isolated lignin samples were subjected to an array of analytical procedures, including high performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAE-PAD), elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), 13 C and 31 P nuclear magnetic resonance ( 13 C & 31 P NMR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and wet chemistry procedures for functional groups determination.
Typha capensis sample was uprooted from canals in Kura village, Kano State, Nigeria.The protocol edited by Hames et al. [19], was used for sample preparation.The freshly harvested TC was cut to ≤2 cm and sun dried for 4 days, packed in cellophane and brought to Germany.Samples were further dried in an oven at 40˚C for 48 h, milled to obtain particle size ≤0.4 mm and designated as raw TC (TC raw ).The TC raw was sequentially and exhaustively extracted using a Soxhlet Extraction apparatus with water, ethanol and dichloromethane (DCM), refluxed for 16 h, 16 h and 8 h respectively to obtain extractive free TC (TC extracted ), and kept until further use [20].3 lignin isolation methods were performed, Figure 1.

MWL Isolation
The procedure by Bjorkman as modified by Obst and Kirk [21] and Rencoret et al. [22] was used to process MWL from TC [21] [22].Details are provided in supplementary information.

Ionic Liquid Mediated Lignin Extraction
The procedure published by Sun et al. with slight modification was used [5].
Briefly, 1 g of TC extracted was weighed in a 100 mL conical flask and 20 g of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate was added and reacted at 110˚C in an oil bath with magnetic stirring for 16 h.The reactant was cooled to room temperature and poured into a 400 mL beaker containing 150 mL acetone/water (1:1, v/v) solution and briskly stirred with a tuning fork.The precipitated cellulose rich residue was separated by filtration through Whatman filter paper using a Buchner funnel under reduced pressure.The residue was washed 3 times with 50 mL of acetone/water solution and filtered again.All the filtrates were joined together, placed in an open beaker and magnetic stirred overnight under the fume hood to evaporate the acetone.The liquid fraction containing lignin, water and IL was cooled overnight in a refrigerator at 4˚C and lignin was separated by centrifugation at 4700 rpm for 20 minutes.The lignin was lyophilized and then oven dried overnight at 40˚C.With the IL being recyclable, water in the liquid fraction could be evaporated to recover IL under reduced pressure for recycling.Purification step was performed by Soxhlet extraction of this lignin using ethanol, ethyl acetate and n-hexane refluxed for 8 h sequentially [23] but was not efficient.
Washing with 0.1 M HCl was more effective in obtaining a relatively pure ILL.

Autohydrolysis Pretreatment and Sulfuric Acid Catalyzed Ethanol
Organosolv Lignin Extraction Autohydrolysis was performed as follows: 20 g dry matter of the TC extracted sample was loaded into a 0.6 L stainless steel pressure Parr reactor equipped with Parr 4842 temperature controller (Parr Instrument Company, Moline IL) and was supplemented with deionized water to a solid to liquid ratio of 1:9.Content was reacted at 150˚C with continuous stirring for 8 h, after which it was quenched in ice water.The liquid phase was separated by filtration using Whatman filter paper no. 4. The solid residue was washed with hot water, ca 70˚C (3 × 50 mL).
The recovered autohydrolyzed residue (TC auto ) was oven dried at 40˚C.For the ethanol organosolv lignin isolation, the oven dried TC auto sample was weighed and loaded into the Parr reactor and an ethanol/water solution-65:35 (v/v) containing 0.5% sulfuric acid (w/w)-was added to obtain a solid to liquid ratio of 1:9.The mixture was then reacted at 170˚C for 1 h.After cooling at the end of the reaction, the solid phase was recovered by filtration using Whatman filter paper number 4 and the residue was washed three times using warm (60˚C) ethanol/water (4:1 ratio, v/v) at a volume of ca 2 mL per gram of pretreated sample.The filtrates were combined and deionized water added.The mixture was cooled overnight in a refrigerator at 4˚C then centrifuged at 4700 rpm for 20 minutes to precipitate the ethanol organosolv lignin (EOL).The recovered EOL was further washed with deionized water and oven dried at 40˚C for approximately 12 hours.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
Infrared spectra were acquired from FT-IR spectrometer 65 (Perkin Elmer, USA) in transmittance mode of 64 scans, resolution of 4 cm −1 spanning 4000 to 400 cm −1 band using KBr pellets containing 1% of finely ground sample.Baseline correction and normalization was done with a zero baseline taken from a common point at 1900 cm −1 and with a maximum range of 4000 -900 cm −1 .An internal standard was selected by having bands normalized as a ratio of each absorbance to the absorbance at 1510 cm −1 [24] [25].The selected band at 1510 cm −1 is assigned as reference, being a typical stretching of aromatic rings which has relatively constant intensity [24].

TGA
Thermogravimetric analysis was conducted using Pyris 1 (Perkin Elmer, USA) and heated from 20˚C to 900˚C at the rate of 10˚C min −1 under constant air flow.

13 C and 31 P NMR
Quantitative solution state 13 C and 31 P NMR analysis were conducted on a Bruker Avance-400 NMR spectrometer and the data was analyzed using 3.2 topspin Bruker software.150 mg of the sample was dissolved with slight heating and stirring in 0.38 mL DMSO-d6 and 20 µL of 0.25 mg/mL chromium acetylacetonate in DMSO-d6 as a relaxation agent and placed in an NMR tube to acquire 13 C NMR data.
Between 24 -25 mg of dried samples were each dissolved in 400 µL solvent mixture of pyridine/chloroform (1.6/1; v/v) and 150 µL of 3.6 mg/mL chromium III acetylacetonate (relaxation agent), 4.0 mg/mL cyclohexanol (internal standard) solution in pyridine/chloroform solvent mixture was added and vigorously stirred to dissolve.The phosphitylation reaction has been observed to be unstable, therefore, addition of the TMDP (50 µL) was done just at the start of the NMR experiment.
Briefly, a 10 mg sample was weighed in a 50 mL round bottom flask and 2.3 mL of acetic anhydride was added.The content was reacted at room temperature with magnetic stirring for two hours.0.25 mL of acetyl bromide was then added and stirring continued for two hours.Acetic anhydride and acetyl bromide were evaporated using rotary evaporator.The acetylated samples were then freeze dried then dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at concentration of 4 mg/ml.The solution was filtered using a syringe filter (PTFE, 0.45 µm pore size).Samples were injected into the GPC system at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 22.5˚C and 280 nm wavelength using THF as an eluent.The GPC system used includes an isocratic pump, a preparative autosampler, a UV detector and an SDV column combination.Data was acquired using narrow standard polystyrene calibration standard [27].

Functional Groups Determination Using Wet Chemistry Procedure
To provide complementing information, established wet chemistry procedures for functional groups determination were applied to obtain the methoxy, carbonyl, carboxyl, phenolic and aliphatic hydroxyl contents of the lignin isolates [28] [29] [30] [31] [32].As proof of the methoxy and carbonyl methods, vanillin was analyzed alongside each method.No significant differences between experimental and theoretical values were found for vanillin in each method, indicating the robustness of these procedures.Benzoic acid was used as a blank to prove the presence of phenolic OH and carboxyl group.A detailed procedure for determination of the functional groups is provided in supplementary documents.

Process Efficiency and Samples Compositions
Table 1 depicts the compositions of raw TC (TC raw ), extractive free TC (TC ex- tracted ) and the lignins -MWL, ILL and EOL, determined by two stage sulfuric acid hydrolysis and sugar analysis of the resulting hydrolysates using HPAE-PAD.
TC raw consists of 18% extractives and structural components include 39% glucan, 19% hemicellulose sugars (xylan, arabinose, fructose, rhamnose, mannose) and 23% lignin, (Table 1(a)).Other components in small quantities include galacturonic and glucuronic acids.Carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur content were determined using elemental analysis procedure, oxygen values were obtained by differences, results in supplementary document as Table S1.EOL had  the least values of impurities compared to ILL and MWL, Table 1(b).Elemental analysis of the lignin samples reveals that there are no significant differences in values of carbon and hydrogen for the 3 samples.
However, ILL had significantly high values of nitrogen, while 2% sulfur was detected in EOL compared to 0% in MWL and ILL and 0.4% in the extractive free TC.
Yields of lignin extraction in this study reflect the extent of the disruption of the chemical integrity of the TC system and solubilisation of lignin, with the highest yield obtained from a more severe reaction conditions (temperature and acid catalysis) [33].The mild reaction condition of MWL had the lowest yield of 1.5% followed by the ILL with a value of 5%, extracted at 110˚C, while the highest yield of 10% was obtained from the EOL process, extracted at 170˚C under dilute sulfuric acid catalyst, Table 1(b).Low yield of the MWL has been an issue, especially with herbaceous plant materials like TC, so the values agree with literature [34].

FT-IR Spectra
FT-IR full spectra are presented in Figure 2(a) and band assignments are presented as supplementary documents in Table S2 based on previous publications 3.2.2. 13 C, 31 P NMR Further structural properties of the lignin isolates were studied via 13 C and 31 P NMR.The broad acquisition spectrum and quantitative option of 13 C NMR presents the opportunity to acquire more structural components and bonding information, and the quantification of the various functional groups.Figure 3 and Figure 4 show 13  , where a value of 6.12 was taken to represent the six aromatic carbons and a contribution of 0.12 per 100 aromatic units from side-chain carbons of coniferic and coumaric moieties.Thus, the integral value divided by 6.12 is equivalent to Figure 3. 13 C Spectra of acetylated lignin isolates.reference is in Table 2 imply increasing hydrolysis of p-coumarate, which is in the order of hash conditions.

Functional Groups by Wet Chemistry Process: Comparison with
Data from NMR Table 2(c) shows values of the functional groups obtained from wet chemistry procedures.In comparison to 13 C and 31 P NMR, the phenolic OH yielded the closest absolute values between the methods in each sample.However, significant variation was observed for aliphatic OH, especially for ILL, where wet chemistry procedures gave a value of 5.1 g/mol, compared to the value of 1.55 g/mol by quantitative 31 P NMR.Carboxyl values were generally higher in wet chemistry compared to NMR.Carboxyl groups have the lowest value of all the functional groups determined in all the 3 lignin species, examined in both wet and 31 P NMR methods.This agrees with literature, as several structural studies indicate that carboxyl groups in native lignin exist in extremely low concentration [30]  Geiger and Fuggerer demonstrated the formation of C=O containing structures from etherified p-hydrocinnamyl alcohol substructures during lignin treatment with phloroglucinol in concentrated HCl acid [46].In addition to cinnamaldehyde type conjugated carbonyls, spruce MWL was found to contain conjugated carbonyl and possibly non-conjugated (α-carbonyl) groups as well as quinone keta structures [47].
We observed obvious differences in aliphatic OH between the NMR and the wet the chemistry procedure for ILL.The acetylation and hydrolysis reactions involved in the wet chemistry used to determine aliphatic OH may have proceeded in more than one way due to the numerous types of structural elements in ILL [44].

Molecular Weight Distribution Analysis GPC
Table 3 shows the weight average (Mw), the number average (Mn) molecular weights and the polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) of the 3 lignin isolates estimated from the GPC curves using polystyrene as a calibration standard and observed by the UV detector.The GPC curves are presented under supplementary documents as Figure S1.Based on the results, the EOL species is more depolymerized with molecular weights, in the order EOL < ILL < MWL.Also, EOL had a more narrowed molecular distribution, with the lowest polydispersity index value of 1.7, followed by the ILL, with a value of 1.9, while the MWL recorded a broader molecular distribution, with a value of 2.8.

Thermo-Physical Properties
Thermo-physical properties were analyzed by the thermal degradation of lignin isolates, conducted under air atmospheres to achieve maximum degradation, Figure 6(a) and Figure 6(b).Results revealed a peak at the range of 80˚C -180˚C corresponding to moisture elimination.This was followed by two broad peaks: between 200˚C -400˚C, during which cleavage of the functional groups and formation of lower molecular weight products occur, then at the temperature range of 440˚C -630˚C, where the structural arrangement of products occur, followed by a long tail beyond 700˚C.Various oxygen functional groups and many aromatic rings, with various branches and activity of chemical bonds in lignins exhibit differing thermal stability, thereby scission occurs at different temperatures [48] [49].Hence the broad temperature ranges (200˚C -700˚C) for thermal degradation of these lignins.The TG curves of the lignin decomposition Table 3. Effects of the processing method on molecular weight distribution in TC lignins.reveal a gentle sloping baseline and flat peaks that makes it difficult to determine an activation energy for the reaction.ILL exhibited very close thermal properties to the MWL, revealed in the two decomposition stages (Td1: 270˚C -365˚C and Td2: 545˚C -630˚C), Table 4.Further similarity between the MWL and ILL is revealed, as both decomposed completely with zero residues whereas 11% residue remained in EOL from 700˚C to the final temperature of 900˚C.

Discussion
IL treatment results in some chemical breakdown of the extracted lignin.In the present study, the chemical modification of lignin during IL extraction was studied and we compared with EOL and MWL.
Compared to MWL, the ILL had a higher extraction yield and purity, but lower molecular weight.The EOL exhibited less impurities, with hemicelluloses sugars and nitrogen as the major contributors to ILL impurities.The origin of nitrogen impurity in ILL was likely from the imidazole component of the 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate.A purification effort was performed and although significant reduction in nitrogen impurities was achieved, it was not completely removed from the ILL.Elemental analysis data showed a value of 0.34% nitrogen in the cellulose rich fraction of ILL extraction, compared to 0.71% in TC extracted and 2.78% in the ILL fraction after the purification step, indicating preferential attachment of imidazole to the lignin.Strong affinity of the imidazole to lignin could be attributed to attractive forces between the cation component of the ionic liquid and the OH groups of the lignin, leading to strong bonding.A similar contaminant that originated from 1-butylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate, which was used for lignin extraction was observed, and despite purification steps, it was never completely removed from the lignin [50].
In this study, the spectroscopic and chromatographic data obtained from the analysis of lignins demonstrated the following features: • phenolic OH content : EOL >> ILL ≈ MWL

• molecular masses: EOL < ILL < MWL
A lower proportion of β-O-4 structures in EOL was observed by 13 C NMR. Scission of β-O-4 linkages and deconstruction of β-β' and β-5' linkages at higher temperatures may have led to the lower molecular weight in EOL.In addition, the higher carboxyl content detected in EOL in wet chemistry, quantitative NMR and FTIR methods, is in accordance with the formation of Hibbert's ketones, due to the acid-catalyzed solvolytic cleavage of aryl-ether linkages.Reduction in the aliphatic hydroxyl groups observed in EOL could be attributed to dehydration reactions on the lateral chain that occurred in view of the acidic conditions.
All these observations are rationalized by lower aryl-ether bond cleavage rate in ILL and MWL, due to milder conditions.According to George et al., when using imidazolium-based ionic liquid, the α-aryl ether linkages cleavage is due to dehydration reaction, catalyzed by the EMIM anion basicity and its affinity towards water [13].Furthermore, rather than acting as nucleophiles or a catalyst to cleave β-O-4 linkages, acetate anion in EMIM acts as weak nucleophile to remove OH groups from guaiacyl-β-guaiacyl ether-like linkages to form more stable vinyl ether linkages.
The 13 C NMR and thermo-physical analysis also revealed that the ILL is less condensed than EOL.This observation is based on the degree of condensation value of 0.42/Ar for ILL compared to 0.92/Ar in EOL, and the higher thermal stability of EOL.This is consistent with literature, as severe acidic conditions should lead to higher condensation [51].Although EOL processing was catalyzed by mild dilute sulfuric acid -at high temperatures, cleavage of acetyl groups from hemicelluloses leads to the formation of acetic acid and carboxylic acids, thereby making the condition more acidic [52].Similar observations of the high value of the degree of condensation was made by Granata and Argyropoulos in steam exploded lignins and was attributed to the scission of β-O-4 bonds, leading to the release of the syringyl monomer [26].This is in consonant with the fact that guaiacyl is more involved in the recondensation reaction, therefore while G decreases, S is increased.This also correlates with the highest value of the syringyl unit exhibited by EOL as reflected in 31 P NMR data.At the temperature range of 440˚C -630˚C, where DTGmax occurred for the lignin samples, thermal degradation in this zone involved fragmentation of inter-unit linkages, releasing monomeric phenols into the vapor phase and decomposition of some aromatic rings [53].Beyond this temperature range, the ILL and MWL revealed differing behavior, compared to EOL, by exhibiting complete decomposition, while EOL had about 11% of material remaining un-volatilized, indicating the formation of highly condensed aromatic structures [53] in EOL.Conversely, there were very low C-C linkages at this zone for ILL and MWL, resulting in more thermal degradation, where volatilized monomeric fragments were released into vapor phase, leading to complete decomposition.Moreover, inorganic salts and acids are known to act as flame retardants in pyrolysis and combustion, leading to an increase in ash yields [54]

Conclusion
The cleavage of ether linkages is primarily responsible for lignin breakdown in both ionic liquid and organosolv methods.hour by heating to 140˚C in an oil bath.At the end of 1 hr boiling, the apparatus was decoupled and content of the reaction chamber quantitatively transferred into an Erlenmeyer flask containing 1.5 g sodium acetate dissolved in a little water.The reaction chamber was rinsed into the Erlenmeyer flask several times with total of about 150 mL deionized water.Then formic acid was added dropwise until the solution became fully discolored.The content was kept for about 5 minutes and 3 drops of methyl red added followed by 10 mL of solution of potassium iodide (10 g in 100 mL deionized water) and 5 mL dilute H 2 SO 4 acid (50% v/v) added.The solution was then titrated using sodium thiosulphate standard solution with 1% starch solution as an indicator.
Methoxy content was calculated by the relationship: ( ) where c is the concentration of Na

Determination of total hydroxyl contents
Hydroxyl content consisting of phenolic and aliphatic hydroxyl was determined using acetylated lignin samples based on procedure by Chen [5].The technic is based on acetylation and cleavage of the acetate to produce acetic acid, obtained acetic acid is then titrated using NaOH.To obtain the concentration of TnBAH, 0.15 g benzoic acid was weighed into a titration vessel and 30 mL DMF added and stirred for 30 minutes.This was followed by titration using the standard solution to stop at about 30 mL titer value from which TnBAH concentration was determined using equation: where 0.12212 benzoic acid factor (molar mass of benzoic acid [g/mol]/1000).
At least two replications of each sample was analyzed by weighing 0.35 g of the sample and 0.07 g p-hydroxybenzoic acid in Erlenmeyer flask, then 30 mL DMF added and stirred for 30 minutes.This was followed by titration using the standard solution to about 65 mL titer value when the inflection points were recorded.
Theoretical consumption a, assigned to the internal standard (p-hydroxybenzoic acid) in mL is given by equation: Carboxyl content in mmol•g −1 is obtained by: ( ) where V x is titer value up to the first inflection point (mL), a is the theoretical consumption as calculated, N(TnBAH) is the concentration of TnBAH in mol/L, and m is lignin sample weight in g.
The phenolic hydroxyl content in mmol•g −1 is calculated using the equation: where V x and V y are the titer values up to the first and second inflection points (mL) respectively, a is the theoretical consumption of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, N(TnBAH) is the concentration of TnBAH in mol/L, m is the lignin sample weight in g.

Determination of Carbonyl content
The procedure based on oximation of carbonyl groups using hydroxylamine hydrochloride was applied in this process [4] [7].Triethanolamine is added which reacts with the released hydrochloric acid to shift the equilibrium of the reaction to oxime formed and the excess base is titrated with standard solution of hydrochloric acid.Reactions involved are as below: Sample analysis was carried out by weighing 80 mg of dry lignin in a test tube, then 2 mL DMSO was added and mixed thoroughly to dissolve.5 mL of solution two was added and thoroughly mixed.The tube was placed in water bath at 80˚C for 5 minutes then sealed with rubber stopper and heating continues for 2 h.
This was followed by quantitatively transferring the solution into a beaker and titrated using 0.05 N HCl to pH 3.3.The procedure was repeated for blank without lignin sample.
Carbonyl content in mmol•g −1 was calculated using the relation:
C NMR spectra of the acetylated lignin isolates and the expanded aromatic region.In the aromatic region (162 -103 ppm), the signals of the residues of syringyl (153.8 ppm, 105 ppm), p-hydroxyphenyl (130 ppm, 121 ppm) and guaiacyl (151, 136, 120, 119, 112 ppm) indicate that the lignin species are SGH type, as expected.However, compared to ILL and EOL, higher concentration of G-residue was observed in the MWL implied by more intense signals of the guaiacyl residue.The presence of ferulic acid was reflected by signals at 169.0 (CO) and 127.3 ppm (C-1) in all the 3 lignin isolates with a signal at 111.6 (C-2), peculiar to MWL and ILL, while signals at 148.8 (C-3) and 150 (C-4) ppm were only observed in MWL.The various structural groups were estimated by integration of the regions of interest, referenced to the aromatic region (160 -103 ppm)
[45].Significant variation in carbonyl content was observed in this order EOL > MWL > ILL, with values of 3.0, 1.5 and 0.2 m•mol•g −1 lignin respectively, obtained only by wet chemistry procedures.This result indicates significant cleavage of αand β-aryl ether bonds in EOL much more than in MWL & ILL.
[55].The presence of sulfates from any of the metallic substances earlier observed in EOL may have influenced the ash yield exhibited.With a relatively lower degree of condensation, lower aromatic C-C structures and higher aliphatic OH than EOL, the ILL displays a chemical structure closer to that of MWL.Consequently, ILL could be useful in areas requiring high quality lignin with high ether contents and low C-C structures.Consequently, ILL could be useful in areas requiring high quality lignin with high ether contents and low C-C structures, for instant, for further depolymerization by chemical, enzymatic or thermal methods for the production of aromatic monomers.
The solvent's properties and treatment conditions influenced the depolymerization and functionalization of the lignin isolates from TC.The ILL from TC demonstrated higher aliphatic OH but low condensation because of low dehydration reactions and low C-C bonds but β-O-4 structures compared to EOL.By and large, ILL exhibited closer structures and reactivity to the MWL counterpart than EOL.At the moderate condition of 110˚C, with no acid catalysis for ILL treatment, compared to the more severe condition of 170˚C, under dilute acid catalysis in EOL, lignin extraction using EMIMOAc IL looks promising as a greener technology, especially in view of the low energy requirement in its isolation and the possibility of recovery and reuse of the IL.In addition, there are possibilities to use ILL in applications requiring high quality lignin with high ether contents and low C-C structures.In addition, there are possibilities to use ILL in applications requiring high quality lignin with high ether contents and low C-C structures, for example, aromatic monomers could be produced from ILL by further depolymerization using chemical, enzymatic or thermal methods.Findings revealed in the current study may provide valuable insights on the impact of ionic liquid mediated extraction on lignin depolymerization and may instigate further investigations in this direction towards identifying better techniques for utilizing lignocellulosic biomass.
60 mg of samples were weighed in a 50 mL double necked flask, 4 mL H 2 SO 4 acid (50%, v/v) added and magnetic stirring rod inserted.The flask was coupled to reflux condenser and second neck closed with stopper, all joints sealed with grease that have been tested to be blank.The mixture was heated with stirring to its boiling point in an oil bath at 120˚C for 1 hour.The mixture was then relieved from the oil bath and 10 mL deionized water added from the top of the reflux condenser.The mixture was then boiled again for 10 minutes, relieved from the oil bath and left to cool down for 10 minutes.The reflux condenser was rinsed with deionized water into the flask and the flask was decoupled from the reflux condenser and coupled to a short path distillation apparatus with a thermometer and a 100 mL round-bottom flask as receiver flask.The second neck was rinsed and replaced with dropping funnel without pressure compensator.The mixture was heated to begin distillation and deionized water gradually added using the dropping funnel each time the temperature drops below 100˚C.When about 70 mL distillate is obtained, the distillation is stopped and distillate quantitatively transferred into an Erlenmeyer flask and 3 -5 drops of phenolphthalein added followed by titration with 0.1 N NaOH.Blank is performed with unacetylated lignin.Total hydroxyl content was calculated using the formula below.the concentration factor of the standard solutions, V is the titer value obtained by the difference between the sample and blank titer values, 170 is a factor (c[NaOH][mol/L] * M(OH)[g/mol] * 100[%], m is weight of sample and 4.2 is the factor from (c[NaOH][mol/L] * (M{OC-CH 3 }[g/mol]-M(H)[g/mol])Determination of carboxyl and phenolic contentsCarboxyl groups are determined based on acidity of this group by a neutralization process of the carboxylic acid using a potentiometry to detect the titrimetric end point[6].Concurrently, the weakly acidic phenolic hydroxyl groups can be determined.The procedure entails non-aqueous potentiometric titration of lignin with tetra-n-butylammoniumhydroxide in the presence of p-hydroxybenzoic acid as internal standard.The procedure outlined by Dence[6]  with slight modification was used to determine the phenolic and carboxylic groups.A specialized equipment for this is the automated Titroline Alpha by Schott with Pt 6280 electrode consisting of an input keyboard, a pumping device connected to the standard solution tank for titration, a magnetic stirrer and a PC for data acquisition.Titer values for lignin samples, blank and internal standard have been optimized, so specified range of titer values for stopping the titration have been documented during which the required inflexion points for calculations may have been acquired.First, standard solution was prepared by weighing 62.5 g tetra-n-butylammonium hydroxide (TnBAH) into a 3 L chemical bottle and 2 L isopropyl alcohol was added and mixed thoroughly to obtain 0.05 M of TnBAH standard solution.
m is the weight of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, 0.13812 is the molar mass of p-hydroxybenzoic acid [g•mol −1 /1000], N(TnBAH) is the concentration of TnBAH solution as calculated in equation earlier.
Two solutions were prepared.Solution one -1.2g of triethanolamine was weighed in 50 mL volumetric flask and volume made up to the mark using undenatured 96% (v/v) ethanol and stirred.Solution two was prepared by weighing 0.7 g hydroxyammonium chloride into 50 mL volumetric flask and dissolved by adding 5 mL deionized water then 25 mL of solution one added and volume made up using un-denatured 96% (v/v) ethanol.
c is the concentration of HCl (mol•L −1 ), V is the volume of HCl obtained from the difference of titer values of samples and that of the blank, τ is the HCl concentration factor, and m is weight of sample.

Table 1 .
Composition of raw & extractive free TC and lignin isolates.Values in g/100g biomass (%), dry basis.(a) Composition of raw TC; (b) Extractive free and lignin isolates composition.

Table 2 .
Functional groups data.(a) Determined from spectral regions of 13 C NMR; (b) Determined from spectral regions of 31 P NMR; (c) Determined by wet chemistry procedure.
. Further evidence of the lateral chain dehydration reaction was seen in values of aliphatic hydroxyl, where EOL had the lowest values, implying that it was more depolymerized.An intense syringyl OH signal around 142.8 ppm was observed in EOL, giving a value of 1.08 mmol/g lignin, compared

Table 4 .
Thermal decomposition profiles of the 3 lignin isolates.
2 S 2 O 3 [mol•L −1 ], V is the volume of Na 2 S 2 O 3 required [mL], 6 is the ratio of n(OCH 3 )/n(Na 2 S 2 O 3 ), τ is the factor of Na 2 S 2 O 3 , and m is the sample's weight [g].

Table S1 .
Elemental composition of TC extracted , lignin isolates and IL CR, values in %.Extractive free TC; IL CR -cellulose rich fraction from ionic liquid procedure; a value after purification steps.
0.90 0.52 C-O stretching of primary alcohols 835 -834 0.23 0.17 0.16 C-H out of plane in positions 2, and 6 of S, and in all positions of H units