Calculating tt g at Boundary of Start of Planckian Physics Due to 1 Million Relic Black Holes

Abstract We use the ideas of a million black holes, at the boundary of tt g  contribution to the shift from Pre Planckian to Planckian physics, as a summed up contribution from one million primoridial black holes. I.e. this is assuming a quantum bounce This is an extension of work done by the author as to explain the nature of a transition from tt g  being tiny to when tt g  becomes 1 in value. Taking this into account, this article is a way to delineate the physics,


Introduction
Dr. Sen, in 2016 [1] makes use of a simple black hole generation of entropy analogy which we write as, using Planck units for 3 + 1 dimensional geometry ( ) N, in this case, is a counting mechanism, for "particles" leaving the event horizon of a black hole and we will have more to say about an alleged counting mechanism later, while r, in this case, is a radial "distance" which is assuming a nonsingular treatment with r, in this case equivalent to an event horizon [2] [3].We will though for the sake of a model, state that we are fixing say 10 6 (a million) relic black holes, at the boundary of Pre Planckian to Planckian physics.And that we are when doing that, making the following transformation, as given by [4] 2nd-order-phase-transtion Planckian Pre-Planckian tt The idea of a 2 nd order transition in cosmology can be looked up in [5] [6] [7] but in fact what we are examining is due to [3], namely if we are looking at the generation of gravitational waves/gravitons from decay of the following mass via

&
Black-hole-life-time ~10 yr 10 sec Take about 1 million black holes behaving as given in Equation ( 3) and also assume, [8], i.e. a quantum bounce, with [8] 55 min ~10 a − And we will be using in Equation ( 2) In addition, from [9] we will be using the following for the inflaton, if ( ) ( ) Furthermore, Sciama, in 1982 [10] allows us to write the following, namely Sciama [10] in 1982 argued for the lifetime of a black hole, of mass M, that the following holds This would mean then 1 primordial black hole would produce, if the mass of a gra-viton is 10 −62 grams [11] ( ) Furthermore, we will be assuming, using for Graviton production, that For the remainder of this document we will be working with We will be working with Equation (13) to isolate out what we can extract from this, in terms of early universe conditions.The approximation for Gravitons and entropy is based upon, Ng, namely we will, as a start, incorporate Ng's infinite quantum statistics idea, of entropy being equivalent to a count of particles, i.e. by [12] ( ) entropy ~# gravitons S (14) All this will be elaborated upon in the main analysis leading to the change in inflaton values, next.

Isolation of the Value of the Inflaton, Using Equation (13), Equation (14)
Given the above, we can write, if we do the math, that we need to do a basic re normalization via Planck units of the above in terms of , if so then we have that we rewrite Equation ( 13) via ( ) ( ) Then if ( ) We get, then that i.e. the inflaton, nearly zero, in the Pre-Planckian regime, becomes enormously large, right after the phase transition, and we are assuming that the scale factor, ( ) (18).If so then there is a 10 255 increase in the inflaton, according to Equation (18).No one knows.It is a seminal question, but Equation ( 2) is a good imbedding of inflation.i.e. if one uses the Penrose Cyclic conformal cosmology as given in [4] in that references page 111 to page 112, we may be able to ascertain a description of our problem as one where the dramatic 10 255 increase in the inflaton, according to Equation ( 17), maybe due to the influx of new matter-energy as given in [4].Further details are to be checked as to [13]- [18].In particular, does this help us find relic gravitational waves?Check Corda's choices as to gravity, and its foundations in [17].We can examine if [13] is satisfied, by considering the initial conditions given in Freeze's article which leads to the 63 orders of e fold expansion, in inflation.References [14] [15] [16] give experimental constraints as to gravitation by LIGO which we need to consider, and of course [18] is a way of reformulating the issue of if there is a vacuum energy involved which can be mathematically calculated.

Conclusion
The final question to ask, is about the N in the right hand side of Equation ( 1).It can be viewed, as say the number of operations, for the Universe.i.e. in this sense is a counter point to the [19] of Seth Lloyd which has a power relationship of the entropy being 3/4 th the power of the computational bits.i.e. our suggestion is that perhaps there are many more N computations than was supposed in Seth Lloyds [19] reference.
value.Taking this into account, this article is a way to delineate the physics, inherent in the transition from  to E t ∆ ∆ ≥  which puts a premium upon the growth of the inflaton, 255 increase in magnitude.This increase in magnitude may be the driver of subsequent inflation.When tt E t g δ ∆ ∆ ≥  we have a pre quantum, especially if the inequality becomes an equali- the time is about 10 −44 seconds (Planck time), then 7 ~10 grams M − .If so, then, according to [2], Calmert, et al. about 0.1% of the energy emitted, in the traditional 4 dimensional black hole (3 + 1 dimensions) would be gravitons.Then, 7 ~10 grams M − becomes linked to Gravitons according to

−
we can rewrite the Equation(13).To read as follows.If the mass of a graviton is 10 −62 g, and the value of Planck mass is about 10 −5 g with Planck mass renormalized by Planck scaling to be 1, then in the Planck rescaling we have -phase-transition Boundary Pre-Planck,Planck 141 114 2nd-order-phase-transition Boundary Pre-Planck,Planck

:
Is the Increase of 10 255 for the Inflaton, a Driver of Inflation?
[4] for a million black holes about 10 58 gravitons and we would, do the following for change in energy, namely write, from[2], and using[4]