Light-Front Hamiltonian and Path Integral Formulations of the Conformally Gauge-Fixed Polyakov D 1 Brane Action with a Scalar Dilation Field

Recently we have studied the instant-form quantization (IFQ) of the conformally gauge-fixed Polyakov D1 brane action with and without a scalar dilaton field using the Hamiltonian and path integral formulations in the equal world-sheet time framework on the hyperplanes defined by the world-sheet time 0 = = constant   . The light-front quantization (LFQ) of this theory without a scalar dilaton field has also been studied by us recently. In the present work we study the LFQ of this theory in the equal light-cone world-sheet time framework, on the hyperplanes of the light-front defined by the light-cone world-sheet time = ( ) = constant      , using the Hamiltonian and path integral formulations. The light-front theory is seen to be a constrained system in the sense of Dirac. The light-front theory is seen to possess a set of twenty seven primary second-class contraints. In the present work Hamiltonian and path integral quantizations of this theory are studied on the light-front.

In the present work, we study the LF Hamiltonian and path integral formulations of this action for the D1 brane in the conformal gauge (CG), in the presence of a scalar dilation field using the Dirac's front-form (FF) of dynamics.In the next section we briefly recapitulate some basics of this theory and then in Section 3, we study the LFQ of this theory in the presence of the scalar dilation field.The summary and discussion is finally given in Section 4.

  
 is a gauge parameter corresponding to the Weyl symmetry.The WSRI is defined by the first four equations involving the two gauge parameters   and the WI is defined by the last equation and is specified by the gauge parameter  (or equivalently by  ).Also the above theory being a gauge-invariant theory (possessing the local gauge symmetries including two WSRI and one WI sym-metries), could be studied under approriate gauge-fixing the way one likes.However, one could also use the above three local gauge symmeties of the theory to choose h  to be of a particular form [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] e.g., as follows: This is the so-called conformal gauge (CG).In this CG we have and the action S  in this CG now becomes: This is the CGFPD1BA.The IFQ of this action has been studied by us recently in Reference.This theory is easily seen to be an unconstrained system in the sense of Dirac [18].It may be important to remark here that an unconstrained system like this represents a gaugenoninvariant theory and is some what akin to a gaugefixed gauge-invariant theory which makes it a gaugenoninvariant system.In the presence of a scalar dilaton field the theory of course, becomes a constrained system in the sense of Dirac as shown in our earlier work [12].The above theory in the presence of a scalar dilation field  in a d -dimensional flat background h  reads as [13]: This theory is easily seen to possess two constraints [1]:  is a primary constraint and 2  is a secondary Gauss law constraint and P  and  here are the momenta conjugate canonically respectively to X  and  .The matrix of the Poisson brackets of the constraints 1

 and 2
 is seen to be nonsingular implying that the set of these constraints is second-class and that the theory is gauge-noninvariant (which does not respect the usual string gauge symmetries WSRI and WI).
The Hamiltonian and path integral formulations of this theory have been studied by us earlier [12].It may be worth mentioning here that the IF theory in the ab-sence of a scalar dilaton field [12], is not a constrained system in the sence of Dirac (implying that theory is equivalent to a gauge-fixed gauge-invariant theory) whereas the theory in the presence of a scalar dilaton field represents a constrained system in the sence of Dirac possessing a set of two second-class constraints where one constraint is primary and the other one is the secondary Gauss law constraint [12].A comparasion of the IFQ results of the theory with those of the present LFQ results is given in the last section.

Light-Front Quantization
In LFQ of the theory we use the three local gauge symmetries of the theory for choosing h  to be of a particular form as follows: This is the so-called conformal gauge (CG) in the LFQ of the theory.Also, in the LFQ we use the LC variables defined by [23,24]: The action S  in the above CG in the LFQ reads: This theory is easily seen to possess twenty six primary constraints [11]: where Demanding that the primary constraints 1 2 ,     is seen to be nonsingular implying that the theory is GNI and it does not respect the standard string gauge symmetries defined by the WSRI and the WI.The LF Hamiltonian and path integral formulations of the theory have been studied by us in our recent work [10,11] and the details could be found in Ref. [10,11].In the present work we study this theory in the presence of a scalar dilaton field  .
In the following we now proceed to study the LFQ of this theory in the presence of a scalar dilation field  defined in the LF coordinates by the action [13]: where (as before) = 10 d for the fermionic string and 26 for the bosonic string.In the present work we consider only the bosonic string.In the following we would study the LFQ of the above action 4 S (which describes the Polyakov 1 D -brane action in the LF coordinates).The canonical momenta , , P P    and i P conjugate respectively to , , X X    and i X obtained from ( 12) are [13]: The above equations imply that the theory possesses four primary constraints:   The canonical Hamiltonian density corresponding to We now treat the Lagrange multiplier fields , ,, u v w and i z as dynamical.The Hamiltons equations obtained from the total Hamiltonian: e.g., for the closed bosonic strings with periodic boundary conditions are now defined as: Demanding that the primary constraints i  be preserved in the course of time one does not get any secondary constraints.The theory is thus seen to possess only four constraints 1 2 3 , ,    and 4  .The first-order Lagrangian density of the theory is The matrix of the Poisson brackets of the constraints Here       is the Dirac distribution function.The matrix R  is seen to be nonsingular with the determinant given by   and the nonvanishing elements of the inverse of the matrix R  (i.e., the elements of the matrix   Now following the Dirac qunatization procedure in the Hamiltonian formulation [18], the nonvanishing ELCWST Dirac brackets of the theory described by the Polyakov 1 D brane action 4 S in the presence of scalar dilation field  are formally obtained as [18]: where the step function       is defined as In the path integral formulation, the transition to quan-tum theory is now made by writing the generating fucntional   4 i Z J for the theory in the presence of the external sources i J as [20][21][22]: where the phase space variables of the theory defined by the action 4 S are

 
, , , , , , , Z J is obtained as [20][21][22]: The LF Hamiltonian and path integral quantization of the Polyakov D1 brane action 4 S in the presence of the scalar dilaton field  is now complete.Now in the canonical quantization of the theory while going from equal WS-LC time (ELCWST) Dirac brackets of the theory to the corresponding ELCWST commutation relations one would encounter here the problem of operator ordering [29] because the product of canonical variables of the theory are involved in the classical description of the theory (like in the expressions for the constraints of the theory) as well as in the calculation of the Dirac brackets.These variables are envisaged as noncommuting operators in the quantized theory leading to the problem of so-called operator ordering [29].This problem could, however, be resolved [29] by demanding that all the string fields and momenta of the theory are Hermitian operators and that all the canonical commutation relations be consistent with the hermiticity of these operators [29].
It is important to mention here in our work we have not imposed any boundary conditions (BC's) for the open and closed strings separately.There are two ways to take these BC's into account: a) one way is to impose them directly in the usual way for the open and closed strings separately in an appropriate manner [1,2], b) an alternative second way is to treat these BC's as the Dirac primary constraints [30] and study the theory accordingly [30].

Summary and Discussion
In this work we have studied the LF Hamiltonian and path integral quantization of the CGFPD1BA in the presence of the scalar dilation field under the conformal gauge in the absence of boundary conditions (BC's).The action under this gauge-fixing becomes GNI as expected.Also because this is a (conformally) gauge-fixed action, the theory is therefore gauge noninvariant as expected and the associated constraints of the theory form a set of second-class constraints.It is important to recap here that the original Polyakov D1 brane is defined by the action S  in a curved background and it is gauge-invaraint possessing the three well known local gauge symmetries defined by the 2-dimensional WSRI and the WI.On the other hand, the theory under our present investigation defined by the action 4 S is a conformally gauge-fixed theory and consequently gauge-anomalous and gaugenoninvariant as it should be.We have studied this conformally gauge-fixed gauge anomalous (and GNI) theory in the presence of a scalar dilation field in the LF formulation using the ELCWST framework on the hyperplanes of the world-sheet defined by: LC world-sheet time The problem of operator ordering occurring here while making a transition from the Dirac brackets to the corresponding commutation relations can be resolved as explained in the foregoing by demanding that all the string fields and momenta of the theory are Hermitian operators and that all the canonical commutation relations be consistent with the hermiticity of these operators [29].
Polyakov D1 brane action action possesses three wellknown local gauge symmetries given by the two-dimensional world-sheet reparametrization invariance and the Weyl invariance.When the action is considered under the conformal gauge-fixing it looses the above said string gauge symmetries as expected.In a very recent paper [12], we have studied the CGFPD1BA with and without a scalar dilaton field in the usual instant-form (IF) of dynamics, using the equal world-sheet-time framework, on the hyperplanes defined by the WS-time . The LFQ of the theory without the scalar dilaton field has also been studied by us recently [10,11].In the present work, the CGFPD1BA in the presence of scalar dilaton field is studied on the LF (using the front-form of dynamics) in the equal light-cone worldsheet time (ELCWST) framework on the hyperplanes of the LF defined by the light-cone world-sheet time 13,23,24].The LF theory is seen to become a constrained system in the sense of Dirac [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and it is seen to possess a set of 26 primary second-class constraints when considered without the scalar dilaton field [11], and possessing a set of 27 primary second-class constraints when it is considered in the presence of the scalar dilaton field as is seen in the present work.For a comparative study, it may be im-portant to mention here that the present theory when considered in the IFQ without the scalar dilaton field is seen [12] to be an unconstrained system in the sence of Dirac (implying that it is equivalent to a gauge-fixed gauge-invariant theory) and the same theory when considered in the presence of the scalar dilaton field in IFQ implies that the theory becomes a constrained system in the sence of Dirac possessing a set of two second-class constraints [12] where one constraint is primary and the other one is a secondary Gauss law constraint [12].The LF theory with or without the scalar dilaton field could now in principle, also be used to construct the corresponding equivalent gauge-invariant theory using the techniques of constrained dynamics (albeit constraint quantization) which is however, outside the scope of the present work.
The LF theory is quantized using the standard constraint quantization techniques in the Hamiltonian and path integral formulations.It is needless to say that the LF quantization (LFQ) has undisputedly several distinct advantages [23,24] over the usual IF quantization (IFQ).One of the most important advantages of the LF framework e.g., is that the LF theory provides the largest number of kinematical generators of the Poincare transformations in Hamiltonian dynamics.For a recent review on LFQ of field theories we refer to the work of Brodsky, Pauli and Pinsky [24].Also, we like to make a few comments about further solving the LF theory.It is possible to write down the solutions of the LF theory on the reduced hypersurface of the constraints of the theory where one implements the constraints of the theory strongly and this could be achieved in the Hamiltonian as well as in the path integral formulation of the theory.This is however, outside the scope of the present work.One well known example of this concerns the Batalin-Fradkin-Vilkovisky quanization of a gauge-noninvariant theory where one en-larges the phase space of a classical theory or the Hilbert space of the corresponding quantum theory by introducing some additional fields in to the theory by modifying the second-class constraints of the theory in such a manner that each of the second-class constraint of the theory becomes a first-class constraint.This in principle, could be done with the present LF theory because its constraint structure is known.


be preserved in the course of time one does not get any secondary constraints.The theory is thus seen to possess only twenty six constraints 1 2 ,   and i  .Matrix of the Poisson brackets of the constrains j  namely,