Investigation of the Electro-Mechanical Behavior of Hybrid Polyaniline / Graphene Nanocomposites Fabricated by Dynamic Interfacial Inverse Emulsion Polymerization

This paper describes a study on electrical resistivity under loading of polyaniline (PANI)/graphene nanocomposite powders and compacts. The composites were prepared by an in-situ interfacial dynamic inverse emulsion polymerization technique under sonication of aniline in the presence of graphene sheets in chloroform. During polymerization the graphene nanoplatelets are coated with PANI and are well dispersed both in the polymeric suspension and then in the dried polymer matrix as evidenced by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM) and high resolution scanning microscopy (HRSEM). The presence of graphene nanoplatelets lowers the electrical resistivity of the polyaniline by two orders of magnitude for both the powder and the compact composites as demonstrated by their electrical resistance measurements conducted under loading. The lowest measured electrical resistivity values were 5 Ω∙cm for 33% wt. graphene powder and 8 Ω∙cm for 41% wt. graphene compacted composites. Cyclic electrical measurements under loading showed a distinct reproducible dependence of the bulk resistivity vs. applied pressure. This repetition is a key component for electro-mechanical sensors. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first report on polymerization of aniline in presence of graphene by the in-situ interfacial dynamic inverse emulsion polymerization technique and also the first report on cyclic electrical measurements under pressure of PANI/graphene nanocomposites.


Introduction
Fillers, or additives, are commonly used to modify polymer properties and often upgrade their performance [1] [2].Incorporation of nano-sized fillers, in polymers is commonly referred to as nanocomposites.Nanocomposites have attracted great interest due to their wide possible range of applications and commercial opportunities [3]- [7].
One of the most promising nanofillers is graphene [8]- [10].Graphene is a flat monolayer of carbon atoms tightly packed into a two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice [8].Graphene offers excellent properties such as: electrical conductivity, good mechanical properties and flexibility [1] [11].Thus, graphene is widely used as an interesting alternative for carbon-based nanofillers in developing new nanocomposites [12].
Polyaniline (PANI) is one of the most studied intrinsically conductive polymers (ICP) [13] [14].It possesses unique properties such as high electric conductivity, thermal transport and environmental stability, but yet it is simple to produce [15].PANI can be produced in an organic, or an aqueous phase, using stirring [16] or sonication [17], static interfacial [18], emulsion [19] and inverse emulsion [20] polymerization methods.
The combination of the unique physical properties of graphene incorporated into polymer matrices and PANI has been a focus of research in a wide variety of applications, including: a novel electrode material for high performance super-capacitors [21], electrochemical sensing [22] and bio-sensing [23].
Graphene sheets have a high tendency to agglomerate due to strong van der Waals and π-π interactions.Many approaches have been discussed in the literature to reduce agglomeration such as covalent [24] and non-covalent [25] chemical functionalization, attachment of surfactants [26] and grafting polymers onto the graphene nanoplatelets [27].A successful approach for agglomerates breakdown is in-situ polymerization of monomers in the presence of nanoparticles [7].Emulsion polymerization is a common technique for such reactions which usually comprise a micelle-forming surfactant, a water-soluble initiator in combination with a water insoluble monomer.In this technique the monomer is dispersed, with the aid of a surfactant, within organic micelles which are well dispersed in the continuous aqueous phase.When adding the initiator, reaction occurs and the product is usually a stable latex, a submicron dispersion of polymer particles in water [28] [29].Inverse emulsion polymerization is less common, but well known polymerization technique.This technique comprises a continuous organic phase with dispersed water droplets.Inverse emulsion polymerization can be used for various monomers, including aniline [13] [30].
The mechanical properties of confined compressed powders have drawn much attention for the production of pharmaceutical products, mainly in the development of formulations [31], metallurgy science [32] and sensors [33] [34].The ability to estimate the volume reduction or density change of powders as a result of applied pressure, or shock waves, is of significant industrial importance.Kawakita et al. [35] have suggested an empirical model to predict the volume reduction of the powdered particles under compression as a function of the applied pressure.
Sensors are used to convert a measured physical dimension into a change of an electrical property that can be transmitted electrically meaning they create a coupling between mechanical and electrical energy [36].Electromechanical sensors transmit the applied mechanical force into an electrical signal.Such sensors are of high importance in non-destructive testing.
Carbon nanotubes (CNT) and graphene are promising candidates for electromechanical sensors.Both materials exhibit a piezoresistivity behavior in tensile and compression loading, when present in a polymer matrix [37] or fabricated as free standing hybrid sheets [38].In addition, cyclic tensile loading experiments for CNT/ Al 2 O 3 /epoxy [39] and CNT/vinyl ester [40] composites have also demonstrated self-sensing capabilities.
This work describes a novel technique for fabrication of PANI/graphene nanocomposites by an inverse emulsion polymerization technique under sonication, of aniline in a presence of graphene nanoplatelets.Polyaniline coats the graphene surface, resulting in a good dispersion.The addition of graphene sheets lowers the composite electrical resistivity.Cyclic loading experiments of the compacts have shown consistent, direct and reproducible connection to resistivity, demonstrating that the composite can be used as a sensing material.This paper describes a unique novel approach for the production of an active element for electro-mechanical sensors based on hybrid nanocomposites PANI/graphene prepared by using the inverse emulsion polymerization technique.

Materials
Aniline monomer (Aldrich, USA) was used after purification.Dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid (DBSA) (Zohar, Israel) was used as received without further purification.Chloroform (Bio Lab LTD., Israel) was used as a solvent.A selected grade of graphene AO-3 with average flake thickness of 12 nm and average particle size of 1.5 -10 µm (Graphene Nanopowder, USA) was studied.Ammonium peroxydisulfate (APS) was used as received (Riedel de-Haën, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany).Ethyl-alcohol (Gadot, Israel) was used for a precipitation procedure of the dispersions and also for washing residues.Vibracell VCX 750 (Sonics & Materials Inc., USA) ultrasonic liquid processor was used to disperse the graphene sheets prior to polymerization.

Preparation of Nanocomposites
The inverse emulsion polymerization procedure of aniline in organic solvents was performed as previously reported [7] [20] [29].A certain amount of the dopant (DBSA) is dissolved in 200 ml chloroform using magnetic stirring.Distilled aniline is added and mixed until a clear solution is formed.The graphene nanoparticles are added to the solvent and sonicated for 5 min to disperse the graphene sheets.Graphene concentration is typically in the range of 0.05% -0.7% wt. of the dispersion.APS dissolved in 10 ml distilled water, is added to the solvent/aniline solution followed by sonication at 4˚C for 15 min.The molar ratio of aniline:dopant:APS is 1:1:0.25.
The resulting PANI/graphene dispersions were used for the formation of nanocomposites using a precipitation-filtration technique.A typical precipitation-filtration procedure is performed as follows: The dispersion is precipitated in ethyl-alcohol followed by gravitational filtration.The formed nanocomposites are washed with distilled water, the wet composites are dried in an oven at 80˚C for 3 hr followed by additional drying under vacuum at 80˚C overnight.
Two forms of samples were prepared from the resulting powdered composites.A certain amount of the resulting composites was ground to achieve a fine powder for further characterization as powder sample.Another amount of the powder was compressed under pressure of ~6 MPa during 10 min to achieve powder compacts which were also studied.
Reference samples, without graphene, were prepared using the same procedure.

Characterization
The structure of the PANI/graphene nanocomposites and their dispersion quality were investigated by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM) as described by Talmon et al. [41].The TEM micrographs were obtained for ultra-fast cooled vitrified Cryo-TEM specimens prepared under controlled conditions at 20˚C and 100% relative humidity.Specimens were examined in a Philips CM120 Cryo-TEM operating at 120 kV, using an Oxford CT3500 cooling-holder system at about −180˚C.Low electron-dose imaging was performed with a Gatan Multiscan 791 CCD camera, using the Gatan Digital Micrograph 3.1 software package.The morphology of the PANI/graphene nanocomposites was studied using a high resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM, Zeiss Ultra Plus), equipped with a high-resolution field emission gun (FEG), operated at a 4 kV accelerating voltage in a 3 -5 mm working distance, and an in-lens detector of secondary electrons.The compacts were freeze-fractured in liquid nitrogen and carbon sputtered prior to observation.The composites obtained were further characterized by dripping a small amount of PANI/graphene dispersion on SiO 2 wafer.After solvent evaporation, the sample was dried under vacuum for 24 hr at 60˚C.FTIR spectrometer was used to characterize chain interactions.Absorbance infrared Fourier-transform spectra were recorded using a thermo 6700 FT-IR equipped with a Smart Itr diamond ATR device.Each spectrum was recorded at a resolution level of 4 cm −1 .
Samples were analyzed using a TA 2050 Thermal Gravimetric Analyzer (TGA).Samples were heated under air, at a heating rate of 20˚C/min., monitoring their weight loss as a function of temperature.
Surface area of the PANI/graphene nanocomposites was studied by the BET method.Mechanical properties were evaluated using an Instron (5568) universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 3 mm•min −1 .Compression measurements were carried out using a round chamber, 5 cm diameter, under maximum a load of 1.6 MPa.Electrical measurements were recorded simultaneously using a Keithley (6510) instrument.
Bulk resistivity measurements of the compressed compact composites were done using a Keithley 175A instrument.1(a)) exhibits typical spherical particles with mean diameter of ~100 nm.A good dispersion of the graphene sheets in the PANI dispersion is shown in Figure 1(b).Thus, it is suggested that since PANI is partially miscible in chloroform, it coats the graphene sheets and well disperses them.A similar behavior was reported by Suckeveriene et al. [7] and KIM et al. [42] with carbon nanotubes (CNT).3(c) demonstrate well dispersed graphene sheets within the PANI matrix at two concentrations as marked by the arrows, and are well imbedded within the PANI matrix.Thus, the graphene is well dispersed in both the solvent and in the dry composites in agreement with Suckeverine [20].Figure 3(d) depicts the graphene sheets mostly arranged in parallel planes orientation and stacked together.

Results and Discussion
Table 1 shows the surface area, measured using the BET technique, dependence on graphene content.Graphene surface area is 113.8 m 2 •g −1 while neat PANI exhibits a lower value of 21.8 m 2 •g −1 .Since the surface area of samples with higher graphene contents (23% and 41%) is similar to the neat PANI, it further supports the conjecture that PANI efficiently covers and coats the graphene nanoplatelets' surface (as previously seen in Figure 2 & Figure 3).Figure 4 depicts FTIR spectra of neat graphene, neat PANI and PANI with 5% wt.graphene.Graphene has a characteristic FTIR peak, as reported elsewhere [44] at ~1509 cm −1 which is attributed to the skeletal vibration of graphene nano sheets.The PANI spectra presents characteristic FTIR peaks at ~1530 cm −1 and ~1390 cm −1 , which correspond to C=N stretching vibrations of the quinonoid ring and C-N bond in the quinonoid-benzenoid, respectively.PANI/graphene exhibits similar peaks as the neat PANI and graphene, thus confirming that the inverse emulsion polymerization in the presence of graphene has resulted in PANI/graphene nanocomposites.
Figure 5 depicts TGA thermogram in air of neat PANI, PANI with 10% wt.graphene and PANI with 20% wt.graphene.The TGA curves show, as expected, that as graphene content increases the thermal stability of the composite is higher since graphene is significantly more stable than PANI.Furthermore, the addition of graphene also produces a char barrier effect that prevents oxygen from reaching the material and thus lowering the burning rate and increasing thermal stability [45] [46].Figure 6(a) depicts the volume resistivity of powders under compression up to a value of ~1600 kPa.The volume resistivity significantly decreases down by two orders of magnitude from ~79 Ω•cm for neat PANI to ~0.8 Ω•cm for PANI with 33% wt.graphene in PANI at the end of the compression process.Furthermore it can be seen that the resistivity consistently decreases with the addition of graphene sheets.The higher graphene content resulted in lower resistivity values i.e., the graphene sheets significantly contribute to the increasing charge mobility of the composite by creating pathways for electric current conduction.In addition, with pressure increase the resistivity decreases, mainly due to better particles' contact [47] until a pseudo-plateau is obtained.The behavior observed for all samples, indicates that the powders are densified to highly compacted arrangements.A decrease in resistivity is demonstrated with the increase of the graphene content, similar to Figure 3.This trend is kept for the various concentrations, as density increases the resistivity decreases due to particle rearrangement and better contacts [47].Also, since graphene sheets are significantly more rigid than the neat PANI matrix [48] [49], they are less densified than neat PANI at the same applied pressure (1600 kPa).The final density of neat graphene and neat PANI is ~0.55 g•cm −3 and ~0.79 g•cm −3 , respectively.
Figure 7 depicts resistivity dependence on graphene content for the powder compacts comprssed under a load of 6 MPa.Resistivity values significantly decrease, by 2 orders of magnitude, from ~550 Ω•cm for the neat PANI down to ~8 Ω•cm for PANI with 41% wt.graphene.As previously suggested, an increase in graphene concentration results in better contacts and pathways for current flow.At a graphene content of ~10% wt. the trend of the graph is reaching a plateau.It can be concluded that this is approximately the maximum graphene concentration needed to produce contact points between graphene sheets embedded in the PANI matrix.
Figure 8 depicts the applied stress (Figure 8(a)), mechanical strain (Figure 8(b)) and the measured electrical resistivity (Figure 8(c)) in the cyclic measurments.In these measurements of the PANI/graphene powder nanocomposites, the following were studied: I) Neat PANI, II) PANI with 5% wt.graphene, III) PANI with 23% wt.graphene, IV) PANI with 33% wt.graphene and V) Neat graphene.A strong dependence of the applied stress, the measured strain and the electrical resistivity is shown.There is a direct, consistent and reproducible connection between the mechanical properties and the electrical resistance.
Figure 8(a) depicts the stress dependence on time.Stress is applied on the powder until a value of ~1600 kPa is reached, subsequently the stress is slowly removed until it is completely relieved and the cycle is then completed.
Figure 8(b) depicts the strain dependence on time.When stress is at a maximum value the strain is also in a maximum value and vise versa, as expected.It can be seen that the amplitude values of strain, after the particles are rearranged and a compacted sample is formed, remains approximately 2% -3% for all concentrations.It is suggested that this mechanical similarity behavior is determined by geometric parameters such as particle size and thus, are not intrinsic material properties.The strain values for the neat graphene are significantly higher than for the neat PANI and the other nanocomposite concentrations.The initial void fracture for graphene is much higher than in the other samples as shown in Figure 3(d), resulting in a higher strain and higher degree of compaction.
Figure 8(c) depicts the electrical resistivity dependence on time.As previously seen in Figure 6, the resistivity significantly decreases by the addition of graphene sheets.A decrease of two orders of magnitude for neat PANI and neat graphene is found.The addition of graphene lowers the resistivity, and further supports the suggestion that the graphene sheets create pathways for electric current conduction.
Figure 9 depicts a representative correlation of the experimental data for a 9% wt.graphene composite with   In summary, this paper presents a novel sensing material prepared from PANI/graphene nanocomposites.The composites are prepared using the inverse emulsion polymerization method resulting in both a good dispersion of the graphene sheets in the PANI matrix and encapsulating the graphene sheets with PANI.The electrical resistivity is significantly lowered, by two orders of magnitude, for both the powder and the compacted powder samples by addition of graphene sheets.Cyclic measurements of applying/removing the stress on the nanocomposite specimens have shown a direct and clear dependence of strain and electrical resistivity.The PANI/graphene nanocomposites' volume reduction is well correlated to the Kawakita model which predicts volume reduction as function of applied pressure in compression experiments.Gauge factor values for the nanocomposites vary from ~2.5 to ~2 for the neat PANI and PANI with 41% wt.graphene, respectively.

Conclusion
This paper describes an in-situ inverse emulsion polymerization method of aniline in the presence of graphene sheets under sonication, resulting in PANI/graphene nanocomposite dispersions.The graphene sheets are well dispersed in the PANI matrix and are actually coated with PANI.One can conclude from the electrical measurements that the graphene sheets significantly lower, by two orders of magnitude, the electrical resistivity of the composites of both the powder and the compacted samples.With the increase of graphene content, the resistivity decreases.Cyclic experiments show that when pressure is applied the resistivity decreases, and when removed the resistivity increases and approximately resumes the former value.This result repeats itself consistently for all graphene contents demonstrating a principle that can be used as a sensing component for electromechanical sensors.

Figure 1
Figure 1 depicts cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM) images of: Figure 1(a) neat PANI and Figure 1(b) PANI with 0.5% wt.graphene dispersions in chloroform.Neat PANI (Figure 1(a)) exhibits typical spherical particles with mean diameter of ~100 nm.A good dispersion of the graphene sheets in the PANI dispersion is shown in Figure 1(b).Thus, it is suggested that since PANI is partially miscible in chloroform, it coats the graphene sheets and well disperses them.A similar behavior was reported by Suckeveriene et al.[7] and KIM et al.[42] with carbon nanotubes (CNT).Figure 2 depicts HRSEM micrographs of dry: Figure 2(a) neat PANI, Figure 2(b) PANI with 20% wt.graphene dispersions deposited on SiO 2 wafers.Neat PANI, shown in Figure 2(a), depicts spherical particles (similar to Figure 3(a)) which are typical of neat PANI.Figure 2(b) demonstrates a well polyaniline coating of the graphene nanoplatelets as marked by the arrow, PANI completely covers the entire graphene sheets.Similar PANI coating of carbon nanotubes was reported by Suckeveriene et al. [7].The polyaniline coating is attributed to the fine graphene dispersion.

Figure 2
Figure 1 depicts cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM) images of: Figure 1(a) neat PANI and Figure 1(b) PANI with 0.5% wt.graphene dispersions in chloroform.Neat PANI (Figure 1(a)) exhibits typical spherical particles with mean diameter of ~100 nm.A good dispersion of the graphene sheets in the PANI dispersion is shown in Figure 1(b).Thus, it is suggested that since PANI is partially miscible in chloroform, it coats the graphene sheets and well disperses them.A similar behavior was reported by Suckeveriene et al.[7] and KIM et al.[42] with carbon nanotubes (CNT).Figure 2 depicts HRSEM micrographs of dry: Figure 2(a) neat PANI, Figure 2(b) PANI with 20% wt.graphene dispersions deposited on SiO 2 wafers.Neat PANI, shown in Figure 2(a), depicts spherical particles (similar to Figure 3(a)) which are typical of neat PANI.Figure 2(b) demonstrates a well polyaniline coating of the graphene nanoplatelets as marked by the arrow, PANI completely covers the entire graphene sheets.Similar PANI coating of carbon nanotubes was reported by Suckeveriene et al. [7].The polyaniline coating is attributed to the fine graphene dispersion.

Figure 2 (
Figure 1 depicts cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM) images of: Figure 1(a) neat PANI and Figure 1(b) PANI with 0.5% wt.graphene dispersions in chloroform.Neat PANI (Figure 1(a)) exhibits typical spherical particles with mean diameter of ~100 nm.A good dispersion of the graphene sheets in the PANI dispersion is shown in Figure 1(b).Thus, it is suggested that since PANI is partially miscible in chloroform, it coats the graphene sheets and well disperses them.A similar behavior was reported by Suckeveriene et al.[7] and KIM et al.[42] with carbon nanotubes (CNT).Figure 2 depicts HRSEM micrographs of dry: Figure 2(a) neat PANI, Figure 2(b) PANI with 20% wt.graphene dispersions deposited on SiO 2 wafers.Neat PANI, shown in Figure 2(a), depicts spherical particles (similar to Figure 3(a)) which are typical of neat PANI.Figure 2(b) demonstrates a well polyaniline coating of the graphene nanoplatelets as marked by the arrow, PANI completely covers the entire graphene sheets.Similar PANI coating of carbon nanotubes was reported by Suckeveriene et al. [7].The polyaniline coating is attributed to the fine graphene dispersion.

Figure 3
Figure 3 depicts freeze fractured compacts HRSEM micrographs of: Figure 3(a) neat PANI, Figure 3(b) PANI with 5% wt.graphene, Figure 3(c) PANI with 23% wt.graphene and Figure 3(d) neat graphene.The images are perpendicular to the pellet's plane.Neat PANI, shown in Figure 3(a), depicts spherical particles typical of aniline polymerization with DBSA [43]. Figure 3(b), Figure 3(c) demonstrate well dispersed graphene sheets within the PANI matrix at two concentrations as marked by the arrows, and are well imbedded within the PANI matrix.Thus, the graphene is well dispersed in both the solvent and in the dry composites in agreement with Suckeverine [20].Figure 3(d) depicts the graphene sheets mostly arranged in parallel planes orientation and stacked together.Table1shows the surface area, measured using the BET technique, dependence on graphene content.Graphene surface area is 113.8 m 2 •g −1 while neat PANI exhibits a lower value of 21.8 m 2 •g −1 .Since the surface area of samples with higher graphene contents (23% and 41%) is similar to the neat PANI, it further supports the conjecture that PANI efficiently covers and coats the graphene nanoplatelets' surface (as previously seen in Figure2& Figure3).Figure4depicts FTIR spectra of neat graphene, neat PANI and PANI with 5% wt.graphene.Graphene has a characteristic FTIR peak, as reported elsewhere[44] at ~1509 cm −1 which is attributed to the skeletal vibration of graphene nano sheets.The PANI spectra presents characteristic FTIR peaks at ~1530 cm −1 and ~1390 cm −1 , which correspond to C=N stretching vibrations of the quinonoid ring and C-N bond in the quinonoid-benzenoid, respectively.PANI/graphene exhibits similar peaks as the neat PANI and graphene, thus confirming that the inverse emulsion polymerization in the presence of graphene has resulted in PANI/graphene nanocomposites.Figure5depicts TGA thermogram in air of neat PANI, PANI with 10% wt.graphene and PANI with 20% wt.graphene.The TGA curves show, as expected, that as graphene content increases the thermal stability of the composite is higher since graphene is significantly more stable than PANI.Furthermore, the addition of graphene also produces a char barrier effect that prevents oxygen from reaching the material and thus lowering the burning rate and increasing thermal stability[45] [46].

Figure 3 (
Figure 3 depicts freeze fractured compacts HRSEM micrographs of: Figure 3(a) neat PANI, Figure 3(b) PANI with 5% wt.graphene, Figure 3(c) PANI with 23% wt.graphene and Figure 3(d) neat graphene.The images are perpendicular to the pellet's plane.Neat PANI, shown in Figure 3(a), depicts spherical particles typical of aniline polymerization with DBSA [43]. Figure 3(b), Figure 3(c) demonstrate well dispersed graphene sheets within the PANI matrix at two concentrations as marked by the arrows, and are well imbedded within the PANI matrix.Thus, the graphene is well dispersed in both the solvent and in the dry composites in agreement with Suckeverine [20].Figure 3(d) depicts the graphene sheets mostly arranged in parallel planes orientation and stacked together.Table1shows the surface area, measured using the BET technique, dependence on graphene content.Graphene surface area is 113.8 m 2 •g −1 while neat PANI exhibits a lower value of 21.8 m 2 •g −1 .Since the surface area of samples with higher graphene contents (23% and 41%) is similar to the neat PANI, it further supports the conjecture that PANI efficiently covers and coats the graphene nanoplatelets' surface (as previously seen in Figure2& Figure3).Figure4depicts FTIR spectra of neat graphene, neat PANI and PANI with 5% wt.graphene.Graphene has a characteristic FTIR peak, as reported elsewhere[44] at ~1509 cm −1 which is attributed to the skeletal vibration of graphene nano sheets.The PANI spectra presents characteristic FTIR peaks at ~1530 cm −1 and ~1390 cm −1 , which correspond to C=N stretching vibrations of the quinonoid ring and C-N bond in the quinonoid-benzenoid, respectively.PANI/graphene exhibits similar peaks as the neat PANI and graphene, thus confirming that the inverse emulsion polymerization in the presence of graphene has resulted in PANI/graphene nanocomposites.Figure5depicts TGA thermogram in air of neat PANI, PANI with 10% wt.graphene and PANI with 20% wt.graphene.The TGA curves show, as expected, that as graphene content increases the thermal stability of the composite is higher since graphene is significantly more stable than PANI.Furthermore, the addition of graphene also produces a char barrier effect that prevents oxygen from reaching the material and thus lowering the burning rate and increasing thermal stability[45] [46].

Figure 6 (
Figure 6(b) demonstrates the nanocomposites powders volume resistivity dependence on density.A decrease in resistivity is demonstrated with the increase of the graphene content, similar to Figure3.This trend is kept for the various concentrations, as density increases the resistivity decreases due to particle rearrangement and better contacts[47].Also, since graphene sheets are significantly more rigid than the neat PANI matrix[48] [49], they are less densified than neat PANI at the same applied pressure (1600 kPa).The final density of neat graphene and neat PANI is ~0.55 g•cm −3 and ~0.79 g•cm −3 , respectively.Figure7depicts resistivity dependence on graphene content for the powder compacts comprssed under a load of 6 MPa.Resistivity values significantly decrease, by 2 orders of magnitude, from ~550 Ω•cm for the neat PANI down to ~8 Ω•cm for PANI with 41% wt.graphene.As previously suggested, an increase in graphene concentration results in better contacts and pathways for current flow.At a graphene content of ~10% wt. the trend of the graph is reaching a plateau.It can be concluded that this is approximately the maximum graphene concentration needed to produce contact points between graphene sheets embedded in the PANI matrix.Figure8depicts the applied stress (Figure8(a)), mechanical strain (Figure8(b)) and the measured electrical resistivity (Figure8(c)) in the cyclic measurments.In these measurements of the PANI/graphene powder nanocomposites, the following were studied: I) Neat PANI, II) PANI with 5% wt.graphene, III) PANI with 23% wt.graphene, IV) PANI with 33% wt.graphene and V) Neat graphene.A strong dependence of the applied stress, the measured strain and the electrical resistivity is shown.There is a direct, consistent and reproducible connection between the mechanical properties and the electrical resistance.Figure8(a) depicts the stress dependence on time.Stress is applied on the powder until a value of ~1600 kPa is reached, subsequently the stress is slowly removed until it is completely relieved and the cycle is then completed.Figure8(b) depicts the strain dependence on time.When stress is at a maximum value the strain is also in a maximum value and vise versa, as expected.It can be seen that the amplitude values of strain, after the particles are rearranged and a compacted sample is formed, remains approximately 2% -3% for all concentrations.It is suggested that this mechanical similarity behavior is determined by geometric parameters such as particle size and thus, are not intrinsic material properties.The strain values for the neat graphene are significantly higher than for the neat PANI and the other nanocomposite concentrations.The initial void fracture for graphene is much higher than in the other samples as shown in Figure3(d), resulting in a higher strain and higher degree of compaction.Figure8(c) depicts the electrical resistivity dependence on time.As previously seen in Figure6, the resistivity significantly decreases by the addition of graphene sheets.A decrease of two orders of magnitude for neat PANI and neat graphene is found.The addition of graphene lowers the resistivity, and further supports the suggestion that the graphene sheets create pathways for electric current conduction.Figure9depicts a representative correlation of the experimental data for a 9% wt.graphene composite with

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Volume reduction of PANI with 9% wt.graphene, comparison of experimental data with the Kawakita model.the Kawakita model [35].The experimental results are well correlated to the model i.e. the model could be used to estimate the pressure needed to achieve a certain volume reduction for the PANI/graphene nanocomposites.This prediction along with the results of Figure 4 could link the applied pressure on the powder nanocomposites and the electrical resistivity of these nanocomposites via the change in volume or density.In summary, this paper presents a novel sensing material prepared from PANI/graphene nanocomposites.The composites are prepared using the inverse emulsion polymerization method resulting in both a good dispersion of the graphene sheets in the PANI matrix and encapsulating the graphene sheets with PANI.The electrical resistivity is significantly lowered, by two orders of magnitude, for both the powder and the compacted powder samples by addition of graphene sheets.Cyclic measurements of applying/removing the stress on the nanocomposite specimens have shown a direct and clear dependence of strain and electrical resistivity.The PANI/graphene nanocomposites' volume reduction is well correlated to the Kawakita model which predicts volume reduction as function of applied pressure in compression experiments.Gauge factor values for the nanocomposites vary from ~2.5 to ~2 for the neat PANI and PANI with 41% wt.graphene, respectively.