Can Vaginal Washing Fluid Urea , Creatinine and Qualitative β-hCG Diagnose Suspected Premature Rupture of Membranes ?

Several markers have been studied to diagnose PROM but there is still limitation with a gold standard test for the diagnosis [1]. Objective: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of urea, creatinine and hCG in vaginal fluid washing for diagnosis of PROM and to determine cut off levels. Type of the study: Prospective study performed on pregnant women in their third trimester who are coming to Kasr El Ainy maternity outpatient clinic with history of fluid leakage. Patients and methods: 150 patients between 26 40 weeks were included in the study. Group I included 50 patients with clinically confirmed ROM, group II included 50 with unconfirmed ROM and 50 controls with no complaints (group III). All patients were subjected to speculum examination for amniotic fluid pooling, nitrazine paper test, vaginal fluid washing for measurement of creatinine, urea and β-hCG, and ultrasound examination. The results were compared as regards the 3 study groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference among the 3 study groups as regards age, parity BMI, nor gestational age. There was a statistically significant difference in creatinine level among confirmed, suspected and control groups. Urea levels showed also a statistically significant difference among the three groups. There was a positive correlation between vaginal creatinine and urea and gestational age in the 3 groups (r = 0.43, and 0.51 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between vaginal fluid wash urea and creatinine levels and β-hCG as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy for urea and creatinine were all 100% and for qualitative β-hCG 83%, 100%, 100%, 85.6%, and 91% respectively. Conclusion: Urea and creatinine in vaginal washings can be accurately used in diagnosing suspected PROM and are more accurate than β-hCG. O. M. Osman, M. Elghazaly


Introduction
Several markers have been studied to diagnose PROM but there is still limitation with a gold standard test for the diagnosis [1].
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is defined as rupture of membranes before 37 weeks of pregnancy.It complicates 2% to 4% of all singleton and 7% to 20% of twin pregnancies.It is the leading cause of preterm labor and accounts for 18% to 20% of perinatal deaths and 21.4% of morbidity [2].
Diagnosis of PROM is easy when the rupture is obvious but difficult and indeed impossible when the rupture is minimal.Therefore any biochemical test used to establish a correct diagnosis must be reliable, simple and rapid [3].
Correct diagnosis of PROM has a great importance because failure of diagnosis can lead to unwanted obstetric complication like chorioamnionitis and preterm birth.On the other hand, over diagnosis can lead to unnecessary intervention like hospitalization and induction of labor [4].
History is reliable in 10% to 50% of cases [4].Although inspection of fluid leakage from the cervix was the traditional method to diagnose PROM, it is associated with 12% -30% false negative results [5].Nitrazine test can also show false positive or negative results due to contamination by urine (alkaline), blood or meconium, vaginitis, cervicitis or antibiotic use.Ferning test has also 5% -30% false positive and 13% -30% false negative [3] [4].It should be performed on a sample collected from the posterior fornix or lateral vaginal sidewall to avoid cervical mucus, which may also give a false positive result [6] [7].
Urea and creatinine may be helpful in diagnosing PROM because fetal urine is the most important source of amniotic fluid (AF) in the second half of pregnancy.Creatinine concentration in AF increase gradually between 20 and 32 weeks of gestation and more rapidly thereafter, when they were two to four times higher than maternal serum [6].In addition, β-hCG has been evaluated as a possible predictor of preterm labor and as a marker for PROM [9].
The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of urea, creatinine and hCG in vaginal fluid washing for diagnosis of PROM and to determine cut off levels.

Patients and Methods
Our study is a prospective study performed on 150 pregnant women in their third trimester (28 -40 weeks) who were coming to Kasr El Ainy maternity outpatient clinic, 100 complaining of fluid leakage and 50 normal uncomplicated pregnancies.Exclusion criteria were twins, congenital anomalies, vaginal bleeding (spontaneous or traumatic), meconium, presence of uterine contractions, placenta previa, patients with medical complication indicating termination of pregnancy.An informed consent was taken for all patients after the ethics committee of Kasr Al Ainy Hospital agreed to conduct the study.
All patients were subjected to full history taking, general and abdominal examination and sterile Cusco speculum examination.A cotton tip applicator was inserted in posterior vaginal fornix and immediately transferred on nitrazine paper.Alkaline pH changed yellow paper to blue.Patients who had positive pooling and nitrazine paper test were considered confirmed PROM (group I).Patients with pooling negative and/or nitrazine paper test negative were considered as suspected PROM (group II).
Samples for urea, creatinine and hCG were taken from the posterior fornix which was irrigated with 5cc saline using a sterile syringe then aspirated using the same syringe and sent to the lab immediately for: 1) Measuring creatinine and urea: 3 ml were quantitatively tested for creatinine assay (Ektachem Clinical Chemistry slides, Johnson and Johnson).Urea analysis was done using a spectrometer.
2) β-hCG: After shaking the syringe, 2 drops of the collected sample were applied on QUPID plus one step pregnancy (Tabio laboratory Boerne, Texas, USA).
Trans abdominal ultrasound for gestational age, AFI, placental site and congenital anomalies was then performed.

Statistical Analysis
Was done using statistical program for social science version 12 (SPSS).
Description of quantitative variables was presented as mean, standard deviation (SD) and range, qualitative data as numbers and percentage.Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables between groups.Unpaired t-test was used to compare 2 groups as regard quantitative variable in parametric data.Mann Whitney Wilcoxon test was used to compare two groups as regard non-parametric data.
ROC (receiver operator characteristic) curve was used to find out the overall predictivity of urea and creatinine and to find out the best cut off value.p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results
The demographic data for each group is represented in Table 1.
There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups as regards patient age, parity, and BMI and gestational group (p > 0.05).
There was a statistically significant difference in creatinine level between the 3 groups (Table 1).With a cut-off level of >0.23 mg/dl (ROC curve) for detection of creatinine, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were all 100% (Table 2).
There was a statistically significant difference in urea level between confirmed, suspected and control groups (Table 1).The cut off level for detection of urea was >0.41 mg/dl.Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were all 100% (Table 2).There was an increase in creatinine, and urea levels with increased gestational age) (r = 0.43, 0.51 respectively, p < 0.05).
Patients who had a positive β-hCG had higher levels of creatinine than patients who had negative β-hCG.

Discussion
Diagnosis of PROM is easy when the rupture is obvious, but difficult and indeed impossible when the rupture is minimal.Several markers have been studied to diagnose PROM but there is still limitation with a gold standard test for the diagnosis [1].Therefore, any biochemical test used to establish a correct diagnosis must be reliable, simple and rapid [3].
Regarding urea and creatinine levels in vaginal fluid, there was a statistically significant difference between confirmed, suspected and control groups (p < 0.05).The mean vaginal fluid creatinine concentration of confirmed group was 1.11 mg/dl, 0.31 mg/dl in the suspected group, which was, and 0.09 mg/dl in the control group (p < 0.05).
Our results were in concordance with Kafali H and Okuzler C, 2007 [7] who also studied 3 groups and showed a statistically significant difference among all groups regarding creatinine levels.They found the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of creatinine all to be all 100% at a cut off level 0.6 mg/dl.We had the same results but at a cut off level of 0.23 mg/dl.Gurbuz et al., 2004 [6] studied only 2 groups (54 cases and 34 controls).A cut-off value of 0.12 mg/dl was proposed for creatinine and sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were all 100%.They concluded that vaginal fluid creatinine was cheaper and faster than other methods to establish accurate diagnosis.
Li and Chang, 2000 [10] also studied 2 groups (10 cases and 10 controls).They compared between cases of PROM and controls as regards creatinine, β-hCG and AFP.The median levels of creatinine in vaginal fluid were 0.95 mg/dl in cases and 0.05 in controls (p = 0.0001).The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of creatinine were 90%, 100%, 100%, 90.9% and 95% respectively.Creatinine was more accurate than the other tests.Kariman et al., 2010 [11] also studied 2 groups to compare vaginal fluid urea and creatinine in confirmed cases and normal controls.They found the mean level of vaginal fluid urea and creatinine in the PROM group to be significantly higher than in the control group.Kariman et al., 2013 [12] studied 60 confirmed PROM patients, 66 suspected and 53 controls.They concluded that creatinine had higher sensitivity and specificity than urea and that it could be the gold standard for diagnosing PROM.
Creatinine values increase with increased gestational age due to glomerular filtration and maturation of tubular function.A concentration of 1.75 mg/dl or more correlates with a gestational age of 37 weeks or more.
Similar to Olivera et al. 2000 [13] we also observed an increase in creatinine levels with increased gestational age.
We found the mean vaginal fluid urea concentration of confirmed group to be 1.87 mg/dl, which was higher than the suspected group (0.32 mg/dl), and the control group (0.11 mg/dl) (p < 0.05).The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of urea were all 100% with a cut off value of 0.41 mg/dl.Kafali and Okuzler, 2007 [7] found the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of urea to be 100% but at a cut off level of 12 mg/dl.The difference in the cut-off levels between the different studies may be attributed to the different number of patients included, the different inclusion criteria and the different gestational age of studied patients.
As a normal pregnancy progresses, the mean level of β-hCG in maternal blood increases to approximately 54,000 mIU/ml at 8 -12 weeks of gestation.It then declines rapidly to around 12,000 mIU/ml and remains at this level up to the end of the pregnancy.Beta hCG is also present in amniotic fluid at concentrations ranging from 2000 -70,000 mIU/ml.In addition, it is secreted by cervical glands and is present in the vaginal secretions [14] [15].
There was a statistically significant difference between the studied groups as regards the AFI.AFI was ≤5 in 38% of GI, in 12% of GII and in 2% of GIII (p < 0.05).
We used speculum examination, Nitrazine test, AFI and vaginal fluid urea, creatinine and β-hCG for diagnosis of PROM and we studied 3 groups of patients and compared them.
We used strict exclusion criteria (twins, congenital anomalies, vaginal bleeding meconium, presence of uterine contractions, placenta previa, patients with medical complication).Weaknesses included not comparing those tests with Amnisure (approved by the WHO) and the use of the bedside pregnancy test as the study was self-funded.

Conclusion
Our study showed that vaginal fluid washing urea and creatinine levels in vaginal fluid washing were very accurate, simple tests for diagnosis of PROM.Furthermore they were more accurate than β-hCG.

Disclosure
There was no conflict of interest.
The study was self funded.

Table 1 .
Demographic data for the studied groups.

Table 3 .
Relationship between creatinine level and β-hCG among GI.