Mobile Phone Antenna with Reduced Radiation into Inner Ear

Health hazards are of great concern to cellular phone users. One important measure of the effect of electromagnetic radiation into human body is the specific absorption rate (SAR). If the human body is exposed to electromagnetic radiation, the amount of power absorbed by its tissues per mass volume should be limited and not to exceed a maximum SAR value. The cellular phone radiated through its antenna in all directions a certain amount of electromagnetic energy. This energy is concentrated in the near field region, where the user’s head is located during the call. The closest organ that is very sensitive to temperature change is the inner ear (it is just under the cellular phone antenna) where it contains a controlled viscosity liquid. In this paper we devise a twoantenna design to generate a low radiation in the direction of user’s head while using the cellular phone. By creating a null in the radiation pattern in the direction of user’s head we minimize the risk of hazards on the user. We optimize the null steering such that the device maintains a good connection to its base station and keeps the SAR level under the allowed maximum value using Lagrange method. To implement the analytical solution in real time simulated annealing (SA) algorithm is used. Results showed that we could steer the radiation pattern to optimize the radiated power in the direction of base station under the limited SAR level constraint. Simulated annealing algorithm is adopted to find the near optimal delay value to steer the antenna radiation pattern since it finds the global optimal point. It shows that a real time processing on the mobile unit can be performed to solve for the best null direction while the device is active.


Introduction
The design of antennas for wireless personal communication systems is the subject of much research that is mo-tivated by size, efficiency and health issues.In addition to maximizing the antenna radiated/accepted power of the handsets, the effects on the antenna performance from surrounding objects such as the human body must be considered.On the other hand the effect of radiation on the human body must be also considered.The closest human sensitive part to the handset in calling position is the human brain and ear in most mobile models or at least close enough to cause harmful effects.The tissues of these organs are mostly nerves plus liquid and hence, they carry electrical signals that might be affected by electromagnetic radiation from the wireless device [1]- [9].
The RF energy is scattered and attenuated as it propagates through the tissues of the head, and maximum energy absorption is expected in the more absorptive high water-content tissues near the surface of the head.Inner ear (that contains high water-content) is just under the mobile phone and it will be subject to the strongest radiation from the mobile unit as shown in Figure 1.
The electromagnetic (EM) penetration into human head causes permanent damage to tissues that are exposed to high density EM energy.This could cause some organs to malfunction or at least a disturbance in their functionality.The amount of exposed energy that can be handled by human tissues is measured by the specific absorption rate (SAR) that is given by [10]- [15]: where E is the electric field intensity, σ is the tissue conductivity and ρ is the tissue density.The depen- dency of σ on frequency is the result of interaction between the EM waves and the tissue material, such that the existence of ions will increase the conductivity and will change the permittivity of the tissue.The complex nature of the permittivity reflected into changing the conductivity of the tissue.
The effect of radiation in the inner ear has two folds: the effect on the neural tissues (hearing) and the effect on the filling liquid (balance).The radiation devices must be compliant to the SAR standard IEEE C95.1.The IEEE exposure criteria are based on a determination that potentially harmful biological effects can occur at an SAR level of 4 W/kg as averaged over the whole-body.Appropriate safety factors were then added to arrive at limits for both whole-body exposure (0.4 W/kg for "controlled" or "occupational" exposure and 0.08 W/kg for "uncontrolled" or "general population" exposure, respectively) and for partial-body (localized SAR), this might occur in the head of the user of a hand-held cellular telephone [9].
The nature of the tissues in the inner ear makes its relative dielectric permittivity in the order of (41.5 + j17.98 at 900 MHz and 40.0 + j13.98 at 1.8 GHz) and its conductivity (0.97 at 900 MHz and 1.4 at 1.8 GHz).The problem with the inner ear arises from the fact that its inner liquid heat dissipation is not suited to dissipate heat generated from high radiation near the ear.This will maximize the risk of losing balance and/or changing the physical characteristics of the inner ear and hence, hearing impairment might occur [10] [12].
This paper presents an antenna design to minimize radiation in the inner ear direction and at the same time produce an acceptable radiation pattern that can be used to communicate with base stations.

Antenna System Description
The proposed antenna system in this paper consists of ground plane and two H shaped PCB tracks on the other side that is using a coaxial feeder as shown in  reduce the SAR in the human head and maintains the communication with the base station.
The two antenna elements proposed here will have an H shape each as shown in Figure 5.The near field radiation pattern for each element as seen from Figure 3 is close to Omni directional.Therefore, the electric field can be expressed in mathematical form as [16]- [18]: where ( ) , , E x y z is the electric field radiated from the antenna in the near field and o E is constant in all di- rections.
To steer the radiation pattern, a variable delay element is introduced in the feeding circuit of one of the elements.Assuming that it is required to steer the radiation pattern main beam in θ direction and steer the null is β direction (that is usually in the normal direction to the front plane of the cellular phone) then the delay τ is found by: 2π where δ is the equivalent phase shift in radians and T is the carrier period.To find the optimal δ that maximises the radiation pattern in the base station direction and at the same time minimize the radiation pattern in the human head direction to maintain acceptable SAR value, we solve the following equations: And 2 1 e SAR 2 The electric field to the base station direction is given by: Then to find the optimal δ we maximize: The above example shows that there are several solutions for Equation (7).This is due to the existence of nulls in the dominator of the equation.As both θ and β get close to each other the optimization becomes less efficient and the maximum value for SAR     Direct maximization of Equation ( 7) yields to solution where the SAR in the dominator of the equation is very small and hence any value for the electric field in the base station direction will maximize the equation.This happens when π n β δ − ≅ and any value of the r E will maximize SAR r P .To solve this problem, we use a constraint optimization technique, such that we impose the constraint not to exceed a certain value of SAR and maximize the received power in the direction of the base station.Lagrange multiplier method can be used to find the optimal value of δ , such that we maximize the radiated energy in the base station direction under the con- straint not to exceed a maximum value for the SAR.The cost function can be written as: max 1 e 1 e SAR 2 where λ is the Lagrange multiplier.
( ) ( ) Solving for λ we find that: And from the constraint: From Equation ( 10) we find that: The function ( ) g λ is assumed here since analytical result is hard to get.A good approximation yields to: J. S. Rahhal Solving for δ as a function of λ and substituting in Equation (11).Then finding the value of λ from Equation ( 11) that satisfies the constraint and substituting it in Equation (10) to get the optimal value of opt δ .
( ) ( ) Note that the analytical solution is hard to get since Equations ( 10) and ( 11) are not linear.We need a numerical technique to find opt δ such that, the solution can be found fast and the mobile device can determine the optimal delay in real time.We propose to use an iterative technique based on simulated annealing (SA) method to solve for the optimal delay [19]- [22].This technique will result in a sub-optimal value for opt δ but it should converge to a solution in real time.Equation ( 10) has more than one solution depending on the values of θ and β , some of them are local optimal values.We need to find the global optimal value, and therefore, simulated annealing algorithm is selected since it converges to the global optimal point (or near optimal).Starting from the cost function defined as: ( ) An approximation of this cost function is given by: ( ) ( ) The devised system need to know the base station direction as well as the SAR direction ( ) , β θ , these angels should be known each optimization update.The SAR angle is easy to obtain since it is always normal to the speaker of the phone as shown in Figure 10.θ is usually unknown and need to be estimated on real time.To estimate the arrival angle many techniques may be used.Here we may use simple method to measure θ , such that, by using the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) of the device when on receiving mode and sweeping the delay between the elements to get maximum RSSI.
The simulated annealing algorithm does not require derivative information; it needs to be supplied with a cost function for each trial solution it generates.The algorithm simulates a small random displacement of an atom that results in a change in energy.If the change in energy is negative, the energy state of the new configuration is lower and the new configuration is accepted.If the change in energy is positive, the new configuration has a higher energy state; however, it may still be accepted according to the Boltzmann probability factor given by:

J. S. Rahhal
Using simulated annealing we solve the same example as shown in Figure 12.Here the global optimal δ is found to be at 18.66˚ after 10 iterations.
In the second example for 45 θ =  and 40 β =  .Figure 13 shows a numerical calculation of the cost func- tion given in Equation (17).A gain, the optimal δ has more than one solution at the zero crossing points one of them is the global minimum cost solution.
Using simulated annealing we solve the same example as shown in Figure 14.Here the global optimal δ is found to be at −57.27˚ after 6 iterations.The simulated annealing algorithm in both examples arrives in few iterations at the global optimal solution.Next we discuss the results obtained for the whole devised system.

Discussion of Results
The proposed system uses two H shaped patch antennas with delay element to steer the radiation pattern of the resultant array in a way that ensures the safety of the user and at the same time maintain the connectivity with

Figure 2 .Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Mobile phone radiation into human head showing the inner ear location.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5.The two elements antenna geometry.

PFigure 7 .
is the received power from base station and K is a constant.This equation is represented graphi- cally as shown in Figure6and it can be maximized analytically.For example if 45 θ =  and 20 β = −  in the y-z plane.Here the optimal δ has more than one optimal value The radiation pattern in the near field for the two elements at 3 δ =  is shown in Figure8.
r P becomes less for example for 45 θ =  and 40 β =  the optimal δ has more than one optimal value

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.The geometrical representation of the performance equation.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Near field radiation pattern for two antenna elements.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. SAR r P vs the phase shift δ for 45 θ =  and

Figure 13 .
Figure 13.The cost function vs δ for