Applicative Study ( Part I ) : The Excellent Conditions to Remove in Batch Direct Textile Dyes ( Direct Red , Direct Blue and Direct Yellow ) from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption Processes on Low-Cost Chitosan Films under Different Conditions

In recent years the development of chitosan (CH) based materials as useful adsorbent polymeric matrices is an expanding field in the area of adsorption science. Even though CH has been successfully used for dye removal from aqueous solutions due to its low cost, no considerations have been made about, for example, the effect of changing the pH of chitosan hydrogelor about the dehydrating effect of Ethanol (EtOH) treatment of chitosan film on the dyes removal from water. Consequently in our laboratory we carried out a study focusing the attention, mainly, on the potential use of CH films under different conditions, such as reducing the intrinsic pH, increasing the hydrophobic character by means of ethanol treatment and neutralization of CH films to improve their absorption power. Textile anionic dyes named Direct Red 83:1, Direct Yellow 86 and Direct


Introduction 1.Dyes and Wastewater Treatments
Water represents the most very important human resource with economic, social, political and environmental importance throughout the world [1].Recently, different pollutants are inflowing aquatic systems since the rapid industrialization and urbanization [2].Considerable volumes of water were consumed by textile, paper, plastics and dyestuffs industries due to the use of very different chemical reagents during manufacturing and coloring of their products.Subsequently, they produce a considerable amount of polluted wastewater and among them color is the first contaminant to be recognized in wastewater and the presence of very small amounts of dyes in water is highly visible and undesirable [3].Thus, every year, tons of dyes are discharged from textile, pharmaceutical, packed food, pulp and paper, paint, plastics, petroleum, electroplating, and cosmetics industries into the environment worldwide [4].This together with a strict legislation on the discharge of these toxic products in the environment makes necessary to develop various efficient technologies for the removal of pollutants from wastewater [5] with the result that the treatment of wastewater becomes a matter of dominant importance.Efforts to develop processes for removing assorted pollutants have mainly attempted by researchers in the analytical, environmental and material sciences and more recently different technologies and processes are used.Extensively used technology for the removal of both inorganic and organic material could be classified in biological treatments, membrane processes, advanced oxidation processes, chemical and electrochemical techniques [6], and adsorption procedures [7].In spite of the availability of different proposed treatments, the physical adsorption by means of sorbent materials represents one of the most fashionable methods since proper design of the adsorption process will produce high-quality treated effluents.Physical adsorption is a well-known equilibrium separation process and since it is widely recognized that adsorption using low-cost adsorbents is an useful and economic method for wastewater decontamination, a number of materials have been extensively investigated [5].

Chitosan: A Low Cost Dyes-Bioadsorbent
Recently the attention has been focused on a variety of biosorbent materials [8] [9].Due to their low cost the use of adsorbents composed of natural polymers has attracted significant interest, and polysaccharides such as Chitosan (CH) and its derivatives have received great attention.CH is an effective adsorbent compared with activated carbons and other common adsorbents used in treatment of organic or inorganic contaminated water [10].It is a derivative of chitin, one of the most abundant natural polymers in the biosphere, that represent the main component of the exoskeletons of marine crustaceans (e.g., shrimps, crabs, krill), which are available in large amounts as a byproduct of food processing [11].Depending on the source and preparation procedure, the number of glucosamine residues (denoted as the degree of deacetylation) on the linear polysaccharidic chain of CH is above 60% [12].CH is considered a super high-capacity adsorbent for contaminant removal from water due to its ability of binding contaminants through hydroxyl and amino groups on the surface [13].In particular due to the protonation of the primary amino groups of CH by acidic media, it can strongly adsorb anionic dyes such as acid, reactive and direct dyes, by electrostatic attraction [14] [15] and also metal anions by ion exchange.Since pH variation leads to the difference in the degree of ionization of the adsorptive molecule and the surface properties of adsorbent, the pH of the medium is one of the most important factors affecting the capacity of adsorbent in wastewater treatment and consequently the efficiency of adsorption is strictly related on the media pH [16].It is worth noting that the amount of dye removal by means of adsorption processes is greatly related to the chemical nature [17] (For more details see Ref. [18]) and to the initial concentration of the dyes.Concerning this aspect several ways for classification of commercial dyes are known in literature and generally they can be classified in terms of chemical structure, color and application method [19].However, due to the complexities of the color nomenclature from the chemical structure system, the classification based on application is often considered more useful [20].A classification based on their particle charge upon dissolution in aqueous application medium such as cationic (all basic dyes), anionic (direct, acid, and reactive dyes), and non-ionic (dispersed dyes) has been used yet [18].Since the increasing number of review articles published on the use of CH and its derivatives as adsorbents for the removal of contaminants from wastewaters [6] in the present paper we summarize the ability of modified CH films in binding different textile dyes, in particular azoic ones, considered extremely toxic due to the presence of toxic amines as by-products in the effluent under varying conditions [18] [21]- [23].It has been shown the modified procedure to prepare CH films and the sorption mechanism related to the dye decoloration rate.The attention has been focused on three direct dyes, Direct Red 83:1 (DR), Direct Yellow 86 (DY) and Direct Blue 78 (DB), analyzing the pH effect both of the medium and of the film on dye uptake from aqueous solutions.Also the influence of neutralization and increasing hydrophobicity of CH films has been examined.The obtained results indicate that this novel modality of producing CH films allows the treatment of a large amount of wastewater which can be purified with an efficiency around of 100% in a very short period of time using less energy and low cost procedure.

Material and Methods
All the chemicals used were of analytical grade and samples were prepared using double distilled water.Commercial grade CH powder (from crab shells, highly viscous, with deacetylation degree ≥ 75%), Acetic acid (99.9%),Ethanol (EtOH) (99.9%) and glycerol (+99.5%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.Direct Red 83: Dye stock solutions with a concentration of 10 −4 M were prepared and dilutions were carried out with double distilled water to obtain different concentrations, 5 × 10 −5 M and 5 × 10 −6 M.
The pH of the various aqueous solutions has been adjusted using concentrated HCl and NaOH solutions.UV-Vis absorption spectra were recorded in the 200 -800 nm range, at a 0.5 nm/s scan rate, using a Shimadzu UV-Vis spectrophotometer mod.1601.

Preparation of Chitosan Films
The standard procedure used in literature to prepare CH films [24] [25] was adopted.In order to optimize the adsorption processes, pH medium effect and dehydration of CH films by means of EtOH were studied, too.CH powder was dissolved in 0.8% (v/v) aqueous acetic acid solution in order to obtain a 1% (w/v) chitosan concentration by constant continuous stirring for 24 hrs.200 μL of glycerol were added every 100 mL of CH acetic solution.Then the solution was filtered through a coarse sintered glass filter and degassed for 1 hr.After degassing, the CH solution was poured into a plastic Petri plate.This plate was maintained in an oven at 60˚C for 24 hrs.A thin CH membrane was obtained.In order to reduce the intrinsic acidity of CH hydrogel medium and to low the total cost to prepare CH films, a novel procedure was adopted modifying the standard procedure known in literature.In particular an excess of CH powder was used. 2 g were solubilized in 100 mL of known acetic acid solution (0.1% v/v) containing the same amount of glycerol (200 μL every 100 mL acetic solution).In this way the CH solution was almost completely neutralized and pH 6.2 was established.As indicated in the previous procedure, the solution was filtered, however in this case a great amount of CH powder remains insoluble, consequently could be recovered and potentially used to prepare new films reducing the total cost.Small amount of CH was required to realize the membrane.The obtained free standing films were sliced in order to obtain 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm films.
About the CH films obtained according to the standard procedure illustrated in Krajewska et al. [24] [25], the effect of film neutralization with a NaOH solution (0.2 M) and the effect of the dye solutions pH on dye adsorption processes, were studied too.Concentrated NaOH and HCl were employed to adjust the pH of dye solutions, establishing pH 12 and 2, respectively.
Neutralization of acid CH films was obtained immerging the film in the 0.2 M NaOH solution (40 mL) for 30 min.Successively the film was washed by immersion in double distilled water for six days changing water every day to ensure the complete neutralization.The effect of EtOH treatment was estimated immerging prepared CH films in EtOH (40 mL) for 24 h and 96 h.

Batch Experiments and Adsorption Isotherms
Adsorption kinetics were carried out by in batch technique.Batch experiments were carried out for determining the adsorption isotherms of dyes onto the various adsorbent CH films in a glass beaker.The dye aqueous solutions were magnetically stirred at a constant rate (140 rpm), allowing sufficient time for reaching adsorption equilibrium.It was assumed that the applied stirring speed allows all the film surface area to come in contact with dye molecules over the course of the experiments.In each experiment a fixed volume (40 mL) of dye aqueous solution at constant dye concentration (5 × 10 −5 M and 5 × 10 −6 M) was used.The study was performed at room temperature to be representative of environmentally relevant condition.All experiments were carried out in duplicate and the average value was used for further calculation.
For the adsorption kinetic study, sample aliquots were withdrawn from the flask at predetermined time intervals and the UV-Vis absorption spectrum was recorded.Measurements were carried out for several days until the equilibrium was reached, however to estimate the adsorption rate constants only data collect in the first 250 min were employed.According to the procedure used in Run Fang et al. [26], it is possible to evaluate the efficiency on equilibrium of adsorption process using the following decoloration rate equation (Equation ( 1)): where A 0 and A represent the intensity of the dye absorption band at a fixed wavelength, at time zero and at equilibrium time, respectively.The amount of adsorbed dye at a certain time t, q t (mg/cm 2 ) was calculated by Equation ( 2): where V represents the total volume of solution (herein 40 mL), A CH is the area of the analyzed CH films (obtained redoubling the geometrical area of the films), C 0 and C t represent the initial concentration and the concentration at time t for each dye.The A CH was calculated by the following formula (Equation ( 3)): ( ) in which d represent the size of the film side.In this case the film side measures about 2.5 cm, then the total superficial area is about 12.5 cm 2 .To calculate the mass of adsorbed dye in milligrams, the epsilon values used are reported in Table 1, expressed in M −1 ⋅cm −1 units.The time evolution of the dye adsorption was interpreted by means of a pseudo-first-order model described by Lagergren in the form: Kt q q q − = − where q e and q t are the adsorption capacity (mg/cm 2 ) at equilibrium and at time t (min), respectively; k (min −1 ) is the adsorption rate constant of pseudo-first-order and was calculated from the linear plot of log(q e -q t ) versus t [18].

Results and Discussion
The UV-Vis absorption spectra of all studied dyes recorded in aqueous solution at different pHs are reported in Figure 1.The absorption spectra are dominated by the classical absorption bands relative to the characteristics chromophore for each dye, result of the interaction between azo functionality (-N=N-) and attached aromatic moieties.In general there are weaker bands in the UV region attributable to the electronic transitions related to the aromatic rings, while in the visible range there are more intense and wider bands due to π→π * transitions of do nor groups, e.g. an aromatic nucleus containing an auxochromic group such as alkyl side chains, secondary amine, or OH group [27]- [29].The characteristic absorption bands in aqueous solution at pH7 are located at 605 nm for DB, at 365 nm for DY and at 527 nm for DR.The peak position changes varying the pH of aqueous solution only for DY and DR, while results to be unaffected by changing solution pH in the case of DB.In particular for acid and basic pH the DY absorption band shifts to 390 nm, whereas the DR absorption band at acid pH shifts to 553 nm and for basic pH is located at 535 nm.The decoloration rate has been evaluated monitoring the changes in time of the dye characteristic absorption bands in the visible range spectrum varying the CH film type and the dye solution properties.In general, for all examined cases, the efficiency of dye adsorption depends on the pH of the aqueous solution in which the CH film is immersed influencing not only the surface charge of the adsorbent (due to the presence of functional group such as NH 3 + group on CH film surface), the degree of ionization of the material present in the solution and the dissociation of functional groups on the active sites of the adsorbent, but also the solution dye chemistry [14] [18].
In method, and CH film (CH new), prepared with the new method, about the efficiency in bleaching dye solution for each dye is reported.Traditional CH films have the property to swell in a large way when immersed in aqueous acidic solution compared with the same CH films both when it is immersed in basic (pH 12) aqueous solution or in EtOH, and when it is neutralized by NaOH treatment [30].In particular CH films treated with an acid dye solution swell in large way because of the electrostatic repulsion among CH protonated NH 2 groups resulting in a reduced dyedecoloration rate which cannot be evaluated.Further it is known that an excess of acidity, considering a pH < 2, induces a strong competition of theanions, brought about by the dissociation of the acid used for pH control, and the sorption capacity significantly decreased [31].It is also possible to observe the precipitation of almost all examined dyes due to their lower solubility at acidic pHs [20].Consequently CH std and CH std film treated with an acid solution (CH pH 2) appear useless for all considered dyes.On the contrary better results were obtained for traditional CH films treated with basic solutions (CH pH 12), with EtOH (CH/ETOH) and neutralized with NaOH (CH/NaOH) solution.This behavior could be attributed to the complete or partial neutralization ofNH 3 + groups present on chitosan chains.Also the initial dye concentration is considered an important factor.The increase of the initial dye concentration determines an increase in the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent and this may be due to the high driving force for mass transfer at a high initial dye concentration [17].A plateau region is established after some time and this plateau becomes much more evident for concentrated dye solution.In Figure 2(a) and Figure 2(b) are reported the decoloration rates referred to DY for CH std and CH new films respectively, after equilibrium has been reached.Surprisingly in all examined case spectroscopic data show the almost complete uptake of dye onto the different CH film.Better results are obtained for neutralized and long time dehydrated films.About the effect of initial dye concentration, in general the observed behavior appears to reflect the classical trend in which the amount of the dye adsorbed onto chitosan film increased with the increase of the initial concentration of dye solution under the same adsorbent amount.The only system for which it was not possible to verify this trend was the CH std after one day of dehydration (CH/ETOH 1d), since the film did not reach any equilibrium condition.About the time required for reaching the highest DY decoloration efficiency there is a wide range of possibility from 7 hrs (relative to the neutralized CH film at the lower initial dye concentration) until to 17 days in the case of new type of CH film without any treatment.In general the new CH films (Figure 2(b)) seem to need a lower contact time with the exception of the CH film used without modification which reaches the equilibrium in 17 days.The effect of dehydration treatment of CH films, realized by immersion of the film in EtOH for different times, results to be very interesting.In this case in 1 or 2 day occurs the complete removal of dye from both concentrated and diluted dye solutions, respect to the 4 or 5 days necessary for CH std in the same conditions.However, in spite of the long equilibrium time (17 days and 3 days for concentrated and dilute dye solution, respectively) needed for CH new in dye solution, those films show exceptional results due to the absence of collateral effects such as, for example, the acidification of the stained aqueous solution which always occurs using CH std films.
Of course, in term of equilibrium time and 100% decoloration rate, treated CH new, in particular the film dehydrated 4 days (CH/ETOH 4d), appears to be the best in its ability to remove DY dye from dilute and concentrated solutions.Furthermore, although the better adsorption characteristic are shown by CH/NaOH films, the use of CH new films, dehydrated and not dehydrated with EtOH, result more interesting because no further water washing cycles or neutralization are required and the long term absorption time ensure anyway an efficient decoloration of dyed solution.
In the Figure 2(c) and Figure 2(d) results related to DB dye are reported.Generally speaking, the CH film behavior appear very similar to the that shown in presence of DY, even though shorter equilibrium time is experimented in obtaining the same decoloration efficiency.In the case of CH std film the maximum of decoloration rate is reached for the neutralized CH std film (CH/NaOH), for long term dehydrate film (CH/ETOH 4d) and for film in alkaline dye solution (CH pH 12).As occurs in the case of DY, also for DB the decolorationrate collapses in acidic medium and, for long contact time, a dye precipitation has been also observed both for untreated CH std film and CH std film immersed in acid dye solution.The results obtained for CH std film previously neutralized in NaOH solution appear interesting.Only few hours are needed to completely remove the dye from solution both for concentrated and dilute solution.In the Figure 2(d) the effect of CH new film has been shown and not surprisingly the long time dehydrate film seems the best in term of decoloration rate.Unlike the system DY/CH new film, in this case the untreated CH new film appears the worst and a strong reduction of the decoloration rate has been observed.About the initial dye concentration effect it can observe that, reducing the dye concentration, the equilibrium time for an efficient removal of DB increments for all analyzed films.This could be attributed to a decrease in the driving force of the concentration gradient with the reduction of the initial dye concentration [14].This effect is particularly evident for CH/ETOH 1d and 4d in which, decreasing the dye concentration, the time needed to efficiently remove the dye from aqueous solution increases very much passing from 2 days to 7 days for the CH film partially dehydrated and from 5 h to 3 days for the CH film completely dehydrate.However, as observed in the previous case, although the CH/NaOH film seems to be the best in terms of contact time and efficiency in decoloration rate for both DB aqueous solutions, the use of CH/ETOH 4d film results better avoiding the wash water cycle, which is time and water consuming, and the time needed to neutralize the film.In the panels e and f of the Figure 2 the results related to DR dye in presence of various CH films are reported.It is evident that the DR adsorption onto CH films is not so efficient for both examined film typologies (traditional and new method of film preparation) at high initial dye concentration.In particular only in the case of the standard CH film immersed in a pH 12 dye aqueous solution, the system appears to be able to adsorb the dye with a relatively good efficiency at an initial DR concentration of 5 × 10 −5 M. The standard CH pH 12 film can remove about the 60% of the dye, after 9 days.Conversely for diluted dye solutions good results have been obtained with an equilibrium time of 2 -3 days for both CH film typologies.Among the CH films prepared by means of the standard procedure, the CH film treated with NaOH seems to be the more functional system.While in the case of CH film prepared with the new method, the change in the film procedure preparation ensure the same efficiency after 2 or 3 days if CH new film was previously treated with EtOH.As in the case of DB and DY, new CH/ETOH films show an excellent performance in removing DR dye with a decoloration rate of 100% provide that the dye concentration is maintained under 10 −5 M.
As it is evident equilibrium time for reaching the highest decoloration rate is very different for the 3 studied dyes and it appears related to the dimensions and concentration of dyes, besides to the interactions between adsorbent film and dye molecules involving both electrostatic and Van der Waals interactions [26].Although in general, the adsorption capacity increases with time, at certain point the system reaches a state of dynamic equilibrium between the amount of dye being adsorbed onto the material and the amount of dye desorbed from the adsorbent, then it is important to optimize this contact time, considering the efficiency of desorption and regeneration of the adsorbent.In the case of DY and DB, increasing initial dye concentration the result seems to get better although long contact times are required.Instead, decreasing the initial concentration it is observed a decrease of equilibrium time, together with a efficiency reduction around the 90% in almost all the DY systems, while better results have been achieved for DB.Only in the case of standard CH/NaOH and CHnew/ETOH 4d the effect in term of decoloration efficiency appear to be unrelated with the dye concentration, for both dyes.This different behavior could be interpreted considering that, in general, during the adsorption process, the dye molecules progressively occupy the active sites present on the adsorbent surface, covering the film surface after some time and forming a monolayer dye coverage on the outer surface of the film.Obviously a large number of vacant surface sites are available for adsorption during the initial stage, and after a lapse of time, it is difficult to occupy there maining vacant surface sites due to repulsive forces between dye molecules adsorbed on the solid and those in the solution phase.Then after the dye adsorption from the solution to the adsorbent surface, the last stage of the adsorption process could be related to the diffusion of the dye-adsorbed molecules within the material.This last step can be strictly correlated to the sizes of the dye organic chains, to the amount and positioning of the sulfonate groups of the dyes and to the adsorption temperature [19] [31]- [33].About this aspect, the adsorption from lower dye concentration appears to be more efficient for almost all analyzed dyes indicating that probably the rate determining step in reaching the equilibrium time is a combination between the rate in the active site occupation, which is directly correlated to the initial dye concentration [19], and the adsorbed dye molecules diffusion into the film, which is correlated to the dye molecular size and number of charged groups able to electrostatically interact with charged group on chitosan film [34].
Concerning kinetic treatments, as already said, the effect of initial dye concentration depends on the direct relation between the concentration of the dye and the available sites on the adsorbent surface for both typologies of film (CH std and new) and for all analyzed dye.In general the behavior of the Direct Yellow and Direct Blue is quite similar, while Direct Red differentiates.In the Figure 3 and Figure 4 (panel a and c) the adsorption profiles of the DY (Figure 3(a) and Figure 3(c)) and DB (Figure 4(a) and Figure 4(c)) in relation to the contact time are reported considering the two typologies of CH films.It is clear that the dye molecules progressively occupy the active sites of various CH films and, increasing the initial concentration of dye solution the adsorption capacity of CH films increases with time due to the driving force of the concentration gradient at least in the case of the higher dye concentration [19].Furthermore it is also evident that equilibrium is reached in higher times for high  values of initial dye concentration.In the process of dye adsorption, initially the dye molecules have to be transferred at the adsorbent surface and then finally, they have to diffuse into the porous structure of the adsorbent [35].Therefore, dye at higher initial concentrations will take relatively longer contact time to attain equilibrium due to higher amount of dye molecules respect to the number of available surface adsorption sites that in time decrease.Further another important parameter, which could affect the contact time for reaching the equilibrium, is the dye diffusion rate into the adsorbent pores.Thus the removal of dyes depends on the dye initial concentration and on the chemical characteristics of the dye [19] [31] [33] [34].The amount of adsorbed dye at the equilibrium time reflects the maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbent under chosen operating conditions.In particular, in the case of CH std film (Figure 3(a) and Figure 4(a)), the q t results to be very high for CH/NaOH film and decreases diluting 10 times the solution for both dyes.About the CH new film the dye behavior differs more.In fact, while it is possible to individuate a marked difference in the trend of the q t at high and low initial dye concentration for DB (Figure 4(c)), in the case of DY the differences are less evident (Figure 3(c)).The untreated CH new film (CH) presents the highest dye uptake during the adsorption first phase for the DY (Figure 3(c)).For DB (Figure 4(c)), the CH/ETOH film shows the higher q t .This could indicate that, after an initial relatively rapid dye adsorption under the dye concentration gradient (initial dye concentration effect), the saturation of the CH film vacant sites takes place slowing down the further dye adsorption in function of different chemical structure of the two dyes.The rapid initial phase is different for the two analyzed dyes and it may last from several minutes to few hours, while the following slow stage may continue for hours or days reaching a plateau.The behavior of system CH film/dye appears very interesting at low dye concentration where the plateau is absent.This can be interpreted considering that at low dye concentration the ratio of initial number of dye molecules to the active sites on the adsorbent film is low and subsequently the fractional adsorption becomes independent from initial dye concentration.
Different results have been obtained in the case of DR.In Figure 5 (panels a and c) the adsorption profiles of the red dye in relation to the contact time for various CH films are reported.It is evident that there are no marked variation of the q t with the initial dye concentration for both examined film typologies, as already observed for the decoloration rate (panel e and f in Figure 2).For the CH std film type (Figure 5(a)), the CH film treated with ETOH for 1 day (CH/ETOH 1d) shows the highest dye uptake for a dye concentration of 5 × 10 −5 M. While, for the same dye concentration, CH film without further treatment (CH in Figure 5(c)) results to have the highest adsorption capacity within the CH films prepared with the new method.No significant differences have been observed for the other film types in function of the initial dye concentration indicating that the effect of mass transfer could be considered irrelevant for the system DR/CH film.In order to investigate the mechanism of adsorption, a pseudo-first order and a pseudo-second order adsorption model has been used to test dynamical experimental data.The pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order kinetic models assume that the adsorption is a pseudo-chemical reaction.Many kinetic models have been developed with the aim to find intrinsic kinetic adsorption parameters [19].Traditionally, data on kinetics of adsorption are described following the expressions originally given by Lagergren, which has adapted the general Langmuir rate equation to special cases [36] [37].In Figures 3-5 (panels b, for CH std and d, for CH new) the trends of adsorption process calculated by means of the Lagergren model are reported for the different CH film typologies.An ideal adsorbent for waste water pollution remediation must not only present a large adsorbate capacity but also a fast adsorption rate.Therefore, the adsorption rate is another important parameter for selecting the adsorbent material and adsorption kinetics have to be considered since they explain how fast the chemical reaction occurs and also provides information on the factors affecting the reaction rate.About the kinetics of adsorption, differences in chitosan type, preparation, dyes and methodology examined makes any comparison of results difficult [19].Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 show the  values of the pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models together with the coefficient of correlation (R 2 ) and the average relative error for the three analyzed dyes in relation to the different types of CH films.Assuming a pseudo-first order kinetics, the calculated q e (q e,calc ) values are agree with the experimental q e values.This suggests that the adsorption of dye follows a first-order kinetics for all analyzed CH films.Good correlation coefficients have been also obtained for almost all examined dyes.In the case in which dye have been completely absorbed, the great efficiency shows by the used CH films is demonstrated by the comparison between the experimental q e,exp and the theoretical values of expected q e,th calculated applying the following equation: where q e,th (mg/cm 2 ) is the amount of adsorbed dye at the equilibrium, C 0 is the initial dye concentration spectro photo metrically evaluated, A CH is the geometrical area of the used CH film in cm 2 and V (L) is the dye solution volume.This equation derives from the application of Equation ( 2) to the calculation of the q e values hypothesizing that all the dye has been adsorbed onto the CH film, whereby the amount of dye present in solution at the equilibrium is null (C t = C e ≈ 0 M).More the calculated q e,th is closed to q e,exp , the greater is the efficiency of various typologies of analyzed CH film.Comparing the obtained q e,th values for DY and DB with the q e,exp (shown in Table 1 and Table 2), an excellent dye uptake for each employed dye concentration relative to different film treatment is suggested.
However, as already observed by the analysis of the decoloration rate (Figure 2), not all CH film treatments improve the adsorption efficiency.For example there is a very high difference between the q e,th and the q e,exp in the case of the untreated CH film prepared with the modified procedure respect to the adsorption of DB, indicating that this new typology of CH film, if it is not dehydrated by ethanolic treatment, presents a low affinity for that dye.The obtained kinetic constant values suggest the effect of mass transfer, the initial dye concentration and affinity of DB respect to DY towards CH films.Figure 5(b) and Figure 5(c) show the linear form of the pseudo-first to the DR/CH film system.Only for diluted dye, the obtained q e (Table 3) suggest an excellent dye uptake and kinetic constant values (Table 3) result to be in agreement with the q t values.Calculated q e,calc values are agree with the experimental q e,exp values, also in this case.
Concerning the obtained results, probably an explication of this behavior could be found considering the concept of the point of zero charge (pH pzc ), indicative of the surface adsorption ability and of the type of surface active centers, applied to CH film.In particular the point of zero charge (pzc) is the pH value at which the surfacecharge is zero and it is typically used to quantify or define the electrokinetic properties of a surface.Consequently due to the presence of functional groups on the surface of the absorbent material, cationic or anionic dye will be absorbed at pH > pH pzc or pH < pH pzc [19] The reported pH pzc value for chitosan is 6.6 [38] so that the adsorption of a cationic dye may be favored at pH > pH pzc , whereas anionic dye adsorption would be favored at pH < pH pzc where the CH surface becomes positively charged [18].In our case the maximum dye uptake has been observed for all examined textile dyes when CH films have been previously dehydrated with EtOH, when treated in alkaline medium and when neutralized.However the amino groups of chitosan are protonated under acidic conditions, whereas in alkaline medium and/or in ethanolic solution, they result mainly unprotonated or partially protonated [26].All employed dye are negatively charged and in an alkaline medium their charge density increases, further the parallel effect of EtOH is the increase of the hydrophobic character of CH films.This suggests that, in these dye/CH film systems, the electrostatic interactions are very weak and the adsorption processes are controlled mainly by physical forces such as Van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonds, polarity, dipole-dipole bonds, π − π interaction, etc [18].In fact the ethanolic treatment of CH film induces a reorganization of CH chains within the film in a more favorable thermodynamic conformation since CH is insoluble in EtOH.In particular ethanol treated CH films result partially protonated, containing anhydrous "annealed" polymorph of chitosan and "type II" crystals of chitosan acetate, due to the simultaneous, but incomplete removal of the residual acid and water molecules from the films by immersion in ethanol [26].The CH chain reorganization induced by EtOH favors the formation of hydrophobic domainsin chitosan [39].This behavior leads to think that dye adsorption process would be favored in acidic medium where CH is completely protonated, but probably the excessive swelling of CH films in this case determine too weak CH film/dye interactions.It was not excluded the role of the lower solubility of dye in this condition.The worst results have been obtained in the case of DR, where the presence of OH moieties in the dye structure obstacle hydrophobic interactions between dye and CH films, especially if dye is present at high concentration.The CH film saturation in this case is achieved faster than for DY and DB.The effect of EtOH ensures the presence of hydrophobic interaction between anthracene and benzene moieties, and polar effect OH groups working mainly in opposition.More detailed analysis about the interactions CH/dyes by means of FTIR-ATR, morphology and mechanism of desorption and recycle are in progress.Also elucidation of EtOH and NaOH effects will be considered.

Conclusion
In this study, the adsorption of three anionic dyes, Direct Red 83:1, Direct Yellow 86 and Direct Blue 78, onto different types of CH films has been investigated focusing on equilibrium and kinetic process.The adsorption experiments confirm that CH modified films are effective for the adsorption of basic dye from aqueous solution.The kinetic studies show that the adsorption onto the different typologies CH follows a first order kinetics and Langergren model has been successfully applied.The adsorption of dyes onto CH film results to be dependent on various parameters such as aqueous solution pH, contact time and initial dye concentration.In particular, for CH std type films, good results have been obtained when the film is neutralized with NaOH (it is immersed in alkaline dye solution), and when it is treated previously with an ethanolic solution for 4 days.However changing the method of CH film preparation there is a remarkable improvement, especially when the film is treated with EtOH.The new method developed for preparing neutral CH films allows avoiding many washing cycles reduc-ing the total cost of the process.Regarding the dye/CH film interaction DY and DB appear much more akin to CH films than DR, probably due to their ability in establishing hydrophobic interactions, which are prevented in the case of DR due to the presence of various OH groups.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.UV-VIS absorption spectra of aqueous solutions of dyes at different pH.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Amount of adsorption at time t, q t (mg/cm 2 ) versus time for DY in presence of CH std film (a) and CH new fil (c).Linearized first order plot for the absorption of DY in presence of CH std film (b) and CH new film (d).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Amount of adsorption at time t, q t (mg/cm 2 ) versus time for DB in presence of CH std film (a) and CH new fil (c).Linearized first order plot for the absorption of DB in presence of CH std film (b) and CH new film (d).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Amount of adsorption at time t, q t (mg/cm 2 ) versus time for DR in presence of CH std film (a) and CH new fil (c).Linearized first order plot for the absorption of DR in presence of CH std film (b) and CH new film (d).

Table 1 .
Comparison of the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order adsorption rate constants and calculated and experimental q e values obtained at different Direct Yellow 86 concentrations.

Table 2 .
Comparison of the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order adsorption rate constants and calculated and experimental q e values obtained at different Direct Blue 78 concentrations.

Table 3 .
Comparison of the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order adsorption rate constants and calculated and experimental q e values obtained at different Direct Red 83:1 concentrations.