Antibacterial Effects of Extracts of Two Types of Red Sea Algae

Introduction: Intestinal bacteria are exposed many external influences, including drugs, causing the emergence of strains resistant to the effects of antibiotics. Consequently, the discovery of new antibiotics that affect resistant strains is required. Marine algae offer a source of renewable natural compounds with antimicrobial effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to detect some of these compounds and examine their impact on enteric bacteria. Methodology: Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, Shigella dysenteriae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter aerogenes were tested with extracts of Turbinaria triquetra and Halimeda opuntia extracted with methanol, ethanol, petroleum ether, or dimethyl formamide solvents. We measured bacterial growth inhibition, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), and potassium leakage, and analyzed the bacterial cells with scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Results: The T. triquetra extract produced with methanol strongly affected the bacteria tested. When the results for T. triquetra and H. opuntia were compared with those of omacillin, the T. triquetra and H. opuntia extracts in most solvents were more effective than the antibiotic. Differences in the bacterial growth inhibition and MICs depended on the type of alga and the solvent used. At the end of the incubation period, potassium leakage had increased by 62.98% for E. coli, 61.24% for S. typhi, 61.32% for S. dysenteriae, 64.02% for K. pneumoniae, and 63.10% for E. aerogenes when treated T. triquetra. Conclusion: Turbinaria triquetra extracted with methanol strongly affected the growth of the bacteria tested. Therefore, it is a potential source of natural antibacterial compounds.

high concentrations of salt, sunlight, and oxygen, which may foster the production of natural compounds and components that can be used as antimicrobial agents.Algae are also exposed to serious photodynamic damage during their metabolism, which implies that their cells have developed protective mechanisms and compounds [1]- [4].Macroalgae in the Red Sea are adapted to living in an environment with specific demands.The temperature is often above 35˚C, and the specific nutrients available define their cellular compositions.Marine organisms are under persistent threat of infection by resident pathogenic microbes, including bacteria, and in response, they have evolved complex organic compounds with antibacterial activity, synthesizing them from a diverse set of biological precursors.Macroalgae express highly bioactive compounds that may be exploitable as antimicrobial agents to support both human and animal health.The isolation and identification of new compounds with potential health or pharmaceutical and medicinal activities have attracted intensive research efforts [4] [5].
According to studies that have evaluated the effects of cephalothin, fluoroquinolones, and trimethoprim on E. coli, the use of antibiotics as antimicrobial treatments is not always optimal.The results indicated that trimethoprim should not be used as antibiotic, and that the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to ampicillin and penicillin has decreased [9]- [10].From January 2002 to December 2004, Vibrio cholerae, Shigella spp., and Salmonella spp.were shown to be resistant to ciprofloxacin [11].
In this study, we investigated the potential antimicrobial activity of different bioactive compounds in macroalgae against the pathogenic bacteria E. coli, S. typhi, S. dysenteriae, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter aerogenes.The effects of these macroalgal extracts were compared with those of the antibiotic omacillin, a 4-hydroxyl analogue of ampicillin that is a member of the semisynthetic penicillin group and has a wide spectrum of action.This antibiotic displays active bactericidal activity against aerobic Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus spp.(except strains producing penicillinase) and Streptococcus spp., and aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis, E. coli, Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., and Klebsiella spp.[12].

Study Algae and Preparation of Extracts
The macroalgae were collected from the Red Sea coast between 42˚W and 20˚S, and were identified by Prof. Hanan Hafez Omer.The algae were washed with seawater and transferred to the laboratory, where they were washed several times with distilled water.They were then spread on plates and dried at 40˚C.The dried algae were ground and solubilized with the solvents methanol, ethanol, petroleum ether, and dimethyl formamide at concentrations of 10 g/100 ml.The mixtures were incubated at 30˚C for 24 h with shaking at 120 rpm, filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and dried under reduced pressure at 40˚C.The thick deposits produced were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at concentrations of 1 g/ml.The algae identified were Turbinaria triquetra (Phaeophyta) and Halimeda opuntia (Chlorophyta).

Antimicrobial Assays
The antimicrobial activity of each crude macroalgal extract was determined in vitro against the five Gram-negative bacteria.Their activities were measured with disc diffusion and broth dilution methods, as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) [13].
Each thick extract deposit was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 2 µg/ml, and filtered through a 0.22 µm-pore filter (Millipore, Billeria, MA).The antibacterial activities of each extract were then investigated by disc diffusion, using filter-paper discs (1 mm diameter, impregnated with 100 µl of extract), which were placed on a preinoculated agar surface.Negative controls were prepared using the solvents, and omacillin (1 mg/ml) was used as the positive control.The plates were incubated at 37˚C for 24 h, and then the zone of inhibition for each disc was measured.All tests were performed in triplicate and the antimicrobial activities were expressed as the mean inhibition diameter (mm) produced by the macroalgal extract.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)
The MICs of the extracts that inhibited the growth of the tested bacteria were determined with an agar-dilution method.The bacteria were cultured overnight on Mueller-Hinton agar and then suspended in 1 ml of Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid CM 405) at 100 cfu/ml.The agar-dilution analysis was according the NCCLS [14]- [16].Each extract was serially diluted with Mueller-Hinton broth to final concentrations between 0.25 and 128 µl/ml, and then applied to plates inoculated with the test bacteria and incubated at 37˚C for 24 h.After incubation, the plates were evaluated for the presence or absence of microbial growth.The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of an extract that allowed no visible bacterial growth [17].

Determination of Potassium Leakage
Overnight nutrient broth cultures of E. coli ATCC 8239, S. typhi ATCC 13289, S. dysenteriae ATCC 2022, K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883, and E. aerogenes were centrifuged and the cells washed three times in deionized water.The cells were resuspended in 5 ml of sterilized deionized water and treated with 50 µl of T. triquetra or H. opuntia extracted with methanol.They were then incubated at 37˚C for 30, 60, 90, 120, or 180 min, and the levels of K + ions were determined with a potassium-ion-selective electrode [17] [18].

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDAX) Analyses
For SEM and EDAX observations, a thin film of cells treated with methanol extracts (50 µl) of T. triquetra or H. opuntia was smeared on a silver stub.The samples were coated with gold by cathodic spraying (Polaron gold), and then dried under a mercury lamp for 5 min.The morphologies of the E. coli, S. dysenteriae, and K. pneumoniae cells were observed with a scanning electronic microscope (Quanta FEG 450) [19]- [21].

Statistical Analysis
The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using the SPSS 21 statistical software to compare the mean values of each treatment.The results are expressed as means ± SE.Probability levels of less than 0.01 were considered highly significant.

Antimicrobial Assays
The results in The results for T. triquetra and H. opuntia were compared with those for omacillin.The effects of T. triquetra and H. opuntia in most solvents were greater than those of the antibiotic, which has an inhibition of growth (13 mm, 11 mm, 11 mm, 14 mm, and 12 mm, respectively) compared with the increase inhibition of methanol extracts (19 mm, 14 mm, 14 mm, 18 mm, 17 mm, respectively for T. triquetra txtract, and 14 mm, 12 mm, 13 mm, 16 mm, 15 mm, respectively for H. opuntia extract).

Potassium Leakage
The effects of the addition of the

SEM and EDAX Analyses
The results of an SEM study of the changes in the bacterial morphology and structure in response to the methanol extracts of T. triquetra or H. opuntia are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Treatment with the methanol extracts of T. triquetra and H. opuntia resulted in cavity in cells, shrinkage, aggregation, rupture, and partial deformation of E. coli and K. pneumonia, while the effect on S. dysenteriae was not high in the cell wall structure.The EDAX analysis of E. coli clarified the different elemental compositions of the methanol and ethanol extracts of T. triquetra and H. opuntia are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.Both methanol-based algal extracts contained chlorine, sodium, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur, with additional molybdenum, niobium, zirconium, copper, palladium, and calcium in the T. triquetra extract and a zirconium in the H. opuntia extract.The ethanol extracts of both algae contained niobium and phosphorus, whereas the T. triquetra extract contained sodium and aluminum and the H. opuntia extract contained chlorine, silicon, and potassium.

Discussion
The environments of seaweeds are harsh because they are exposed to both light and high oxygen concentrations.These factors can lead to the formation of free radicals and other strong oxidizing agents.However, seaweeds rarely experience any serious photodynamic damage during their metabolism.These facts indicate that seaweed cells have evolved protective mechanisms and compounds [22].Natural products play a valuable role in drug    firm their ability to produce metabolites with highly complex and remarkably diverse pharmacological and biological properties [23]- [27].
The bioactive compounds that have been investigated most extensively include those from marine algae and plants.Over 15,000 natural products have been identified.Research into drugs from natural products suggests that algae are a promising group in which to discover new biochemically active substances [28].
Many antibiotics are no longer effective in the treatment of mutant bacterial strains.An evolutionary study of antimicrobial resistance to treatment with several antibiotics in strains of E. coli in Dakar [9] suggested that trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole can no longer be used as empirical treatments for community-acquired urinary tract infection (UTI).
The differences in the antibacterial effects of the algal extracts against E. coli, S. typhi, S. dysenteriae, K. pneumoniae, and E. aerogenes may be attributable to differences in the active compounds that persist in the algae after their extraction with different solvents.In a study of Irish seaweeds, L. digitata, L. saccharina, H. elongata, P. palmata, C. crispus, and Enteromorpha spirulina, found that the potency of the extracts from the different species depended on the solvents used.Methanol was a good solvent for the extraction of brown seaweeds, whereas acetone was better for red and green species [6].The results of the present study are consistent with the results of a study in which methanol extracts of five lyophilized brown algae at concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 mg/disk were investigated in vitro for antimicrobial activity, and inhibited the growth of all tested microorganisms, including E. coli ATCC 29998 and S. typhimurium CCM 583 [29].The antibacterial activities of Calendula officinalis and Cladostephus spongiosus f. verticillatus from the Aegean Sea have also been studied.A methanolic extract of C. officinalis showed good activity against E. aerogenes, E. coli, and Enterococcus faecalis [30].The different antibacterial effects of T. triquetra and H. opuntia may be attributable to their secondary metabolism and differences in the natural compounds in T. triquetra (Phaeophyta) and H. opuntia (Chlorophyta).Our results are also consistent with those of with Salvador et al. [31], who reported that the family Phaeophyceae had the highest percentage (84%) of antibacterial activity; Cystoseira was also active against Gram-negative bacteria.In contrast, Kandhasamy et al. [32] observed that E. coli was resistant to methanol extracts of all algae except Sargassum teneerimum.They attributed this difference to the production of bioactive compounds, the season, the method and organic solvents used for extraction, and differences in assay methods.Another study reported that the maximum activity levels were found in the Chlorophyta, and that Flabellia petiolata, Caulerpa prolifera, and Halimeda tuna were the most active species [33].
The observations of the present study indicate that the relationships between the diameters of the inhibition zones and the MIC values varied and may depend on the type of solvent used and the bioactive compounds involved.A possible explanation is that some constituents of the crude extracts influence the diffusion properties of the active compound [6].
Potassium leakage from the E. coli, S. typhi, S. dysenteriae, K. pneumoniae, and E. aerogenes cells after treatment with the methanol extracts can be explained by damage to cellular regulation.This damage can be seen in the electron micrographs and the elements present in the algal extracts, which may attributable to the osmotic stress on the cells or the failure of cell membrane regulation.Other studies have reported the effects of K + on the bacterial outer and cytoplasmic membranes, the regulation of cell transport, and the regulation of the cytoplasmic pH.The major buffer anions are phosphate groups, but cells must use several monovalent cations, and K + is the major cellular cation.One of the parameters that control the movement of K + is the cytoplasmic pH.In E. coli, two activities are involved in this control, which vary in the pH ranges over which they are active, one functioning in alkaline environments and the other in acidic environments [34].The influx of K + into E. coli is essential for the recovery of its turgor, and is required for growth after an osmotic challenge, whereas glutamate levels increase only slightly after osmotic shock.The transporters that mediate K + uptake seem to be controlled by turgor, but the systems involved in K + acquisition in osmotically stressed cells have not yet been identified at the molecular level [35].A fraction of the total K + concentration is balanced by other small counterions, providing significant osmotic activity.The primary charge separation required for the rapid influx of K + into E. coli is provided by endogenously synthesized glutamate [36].Viejo-Diaz et al. [37] demonstrated that natural antimicrobial peptides, such as kaliocin-1, probably initially attach to the highly anionic lipopolysaccharides on the outer membrane of E. coli and gain access to the cytoplasmic membrane by a process called "self-promoted uptake".Another study of the anion balance during the inhibition of E. coli growth by weak acids [38] found that there was no significant difference in the concentrations of free or bound K + in treated cells compared with untreated cells.This suggests that acetate completely replaces the pools of other anions that normally balance the free K + .A reduction in the pools of these anionic metabolites may be why acetate causes growth inhibition at higher pHs.The slow recovery of growth in E. coli cells may be related to these altered pools and possible subsequent changes in enzymatic activities.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Potassium leakage from bacteria treated with 50 ml of T. triquetra or H. opuntia methanol extract during incubation at 37˚C.

Figure 2 .Figure 3 .Figure 4 .
Figure 2. SEM image of E. coli (a) K. pneumoniae (b) and S. deysenteriae (c) treated with T. triquetra methanol extracts.discovery.Therefore, the search for novel algal natural compounds should open promising areas of pharmaceutical study.Many reports of biologically active compounds extracted from algae have been published, and con-

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. EDAX analysis of E. coli treated with T. triquetra (a) and H. opuntia (b) extract's with ethanol solvent.

Table 1
Methanol extracts showed the greatest inhibition of the test bacteria, with inhibitions of 19 mm, 14 mm, 14, mm, 18 mm, and 17 mm, respectively, for T. triquetra; whereas the ethanol and dimethyl formamide extracts had the greatest effects on K. pneumoniae with 16 mm and 17 mm inhibition, respectively, for T. triquetra and 19 mm and 15 mm inhibition, respectively, for H. opuntia.The petroleum ether extract of H. opuntia had the lowest effect on the test bacteria, except K. pneumoniae (with 13 mm inhibition), whereas the petroleum ether extract of T. triquetra did not inhibit S. typhi at all.
show the antibacterial effects of T. triquetra and H. opuntia in different solvents on E. coli, S. typhi, S. dysenteriae, K. pneumoniae, and E. aerogenes.

Table 1 .
Inhibition of bacterial growth (mm) 24 h after treatment with 100 µl T. triquetra or H. opuntia extract in different solvents.
The MICs are shown in Table2.The extracts of T. triquetra and H. opuntia displayed MICs of 1 µl/ml for E. coli in methanol solvent, 2 µl/ml in ethanol with T. triquetra, and 8 µl/ml in other solvents, whereas K. pneumoniae and E. aerogenes were less sensitive, with MICs of 8 and 8 µl/ml of H. opuntia in methanol, respectively, and the MICs increased to 64 µl/ml of H. opuntia in dimethyl formamide for both bacteria.Salmonella typhi and S. dysenteriae were more resistant to the antibacterial effects of T. triquetra and H. opuntia, with MICs of 8, 8, 32 and 16 µl/ml in ethanol, respectively, but these increased to 16, 16, ≥ 128 and 128 µl/ml in dimethyl formamide respectively.

Table 2 .
MIC (µl/ml) of T. triquetra and H. opuntia extracts in different solvents for different bacteria 24 h after treatment.Methanol Ethanol Petroleum ether Dimethyl formamide Methanol Ethanol Petroleum ether Dimethyl formamide