Role of the Reference Frame in Angular Photon Distribution at Electron-Positron Annihilation

The reasons of angular photon distribution occurrence at electron-positron annihilation are considered. It is shown that angular photon distribution is consequence of Doppler’s effect in the reference frame of the electron and positron mass center. In the reference frame bound with moving electron the angular photon distribution is absent. But it is replaced by the Doppler’s shift of photons frequencies. The received results are applied to the analysis of a positron-emission tomograph work.


Introduction
The analysis of angular distribution of flying out photons at annihilation a positron and electron has great importance for designing positron-emission tomographs (PET). PET is the advanced diagnostic device used for search new growth at the earliest stages of their occurrence.
Unfortunately the mechanism of annihilative process of the electron and positron is unknown. P. Dirac has been offered model of this process.
According to Dirac [1] [2] for the annihilation it is possible to present as transformation of the electron from a state with positive energy to the state with negative energy. According to the Dirac theory vacuum holes, the positron is holed in the field of vacuum. Interaction of the electron and positron i.e. the annihilation is a filling vacuum hole by the electron. Thus energy as two quantums of electromagnetic radiation is allocated.

The Angular Photon Distribution at Electron-Positron Annihilation
Quantum-electrodynamical calculations of the annihilative process have been carried out enough for a long time. They were repeatedly checked and rechecked, including authors of the article.
As a result of these calculations two formulas for the differential effective section of electromagnetic radiation quantums scattering in a solid angle dΩ have been found.
The first formula on time has been found by Heitler [2]. This formula looks like: cos cos The formula is written in designations [3] where there is its detailed deduction. The so-called rational system of units which speed of light and Planck's constant are equal to unit 1 c = =  is used. In this system the units of energy, impulse and weight have the same dimension.
In the formula (1) e there is electron charge (or positron with an opposite sign), 0 k -the photon energy, p -the electron impulse, θ -the angle between impulses of the electron and one of the radiated photons. Formula (1) is found under condition of summation on all directions of photons polarization.
At the deduction (1) the reference frame connected to the center of mass interacting the electron and positron is used which the impulses of electron and positron are equal on the module and are opposite on the direction 1 2 = − = p p p. Impulses of photons also are equal on the module and opposite on the direction 1 . We shall note that in this reference frame of the condition of both photons supervision are identical.
The second formula has been offered a little later by Feynman [4]: The formula (2) is written down in designations [4]. As well as in the previous variant (1) the rational system of units is used.
In the formula (2) 1 e and 2 e there are individual vectors of photons polarization radiated at annihilation, 1 ω and 2 ω -the frequencies of the radiated photons, m -the mass of electron (or positron), + p -the module of the positron impulse, E + -its energy.
The formula (2) is similar to Klein-Nishina formula for Compton effect [4] [5]. The main difference there are before the third and fourth addends in the square brackets the signs are changed on opposite.
The major distinctive condition of Formula (2) deduction is use of other reference frame in comparison with Formula (1) deduction. Formula (2) was deduced in the reference frame in which electron is at rest, and positron moves.
This reference frame as a whole is equivalent to the reference frame connected with PET. Therefore we shall name this reference frame-laboratory. The electrons in the object researched in PET basically are in the bound state. Positrons are result β -positron radioactive decay of elements. Therefore electrons in laboratory reference frame it is possible to assume motionless (if to exclude chaotic thermal movement of molecules).
Both formulas (1) and (2) were deduced with the help of standard diagram technique of Feynman and diagrams of the perturbance theory of second order. However results of the deductions essentially differ.
First, the formula (1) assumes rather complex angular distribution of annihilative photons. And this distribution is connected only to the electron impulse. The angle θ is present only at the complex with impulse p . In Formula (2) the angular distribution of photons is absent.
Second, Formula (2) assumes the opportunity of photons various energy at annihilation that is forbidden by Formula (1) deduction owing to 1 2 = − k k . Therefore, first of all, there is a question what nature of angular distribution of the annihilative photons in (1)? Whether this distribution with annihilative process i.e. transformation "substance-energy" is connected or that is defined by other effects? Whether the given angular distribution of photons will be kept at transition to other reference frame, for example, bound with PET?

The Reason of Photons Angular Distribution
For research of the angular dependence reason of differential effective section (1) we shall consider intermediate expression of the deduction which is not summarized yet on directions of the photons polarization [3]: k k pe pe k e e pe pe e e pk pk pk pk pk pk pk where 1 k and 2 k there are impulses of photons. Variables in square brackets: an impulse of electron, impulses of photons, unit vectors of photons polarization are written down as 4-vectors.
Formula (3) is simple for transforming to the kind: pe pe e k e e pk pk pk pk pk Let's transit in (4)  Transiting to three-dimensional vectors, and also taking into account absence contravariance components at polarizing 4-vectors 0 0 e = the expression (4) it is possible to present as: pe pe e e pk pk pe pe e e pk pk (5) At the deduction (5)  where V -speed of electron. In result we shall receive: Let's transit in (6) to the laboratory reference frame offered in [4], and bound with electron. In this case 0 = p , and V it is possible to examine as speed of a positron movement. The same there concerns and to value p in factor before brackets. In the given reference frame the formula (6) becomes simpler: 1 cos We research an auxiliary task. The observer 1 who are taking place in "motionless" (connected with the Earth) reference frame, Figure 1, examines some particle 2 moving with a speed V which in certain moment of time radiates two opposite directed quantums. At 0 V = the quantum frequency is 0 ω . The angle between speed of the particle and direction of one quantum propagation is equal θ . In the observer direction the particle has a component of speed cos V θ . Due to Doppler's effect the quantum moving in the observer direction will have the increased frequency [6]: For the quantum moving in an opposite direction so-called the "red displacement" of frequency will be observed: Let's note that distinction in frequencies of quantums in an examined task is determined by distinction in conditions of these quantums supervision: one quantum moves to the observer another leaves from him.
In Formula (7) the considered auxiliary task is actually realized. Thus the moving particle is meant as a positron, and the observer is on "motionless" electron. Therefore substituting (10) in (7) Let's note that at use of Formula (10) we have actually refused the condition 2 1 = − k k . If in factor before brackets in Formula (2)   cos Substituting (13) in (12) we shall receive: where it is designated 2 1 ω ω ω ∆ = − . On By the number of the quantums which are flying in different directions the process it is spherical-symmetrically. Therefore the density of detectors in the ring 1 should be uniform. However the quantum frequencies and consequently also their energy depending on the detector direction (observer) due to Doppler's effect can differ on size 2 1 ω ω ω ∆ = − .

Conclusions
By results of the carried out analysis we can draw the following conclusions. Formulas Heitler (1) and Feynman (2) it is adequate in different reference frames to describe scattering photons at annihilation of electron and positron. In the laboratory reference frame bound with electron the angular distribution of number photons is absent however due to distinction in conditions of quantums supervision there is a distinction in frequencies of the radiated quantums (owing to Doppler effect).
At transition in the reference frame bound to the center of mass of electron and positron the distinction in frequencies of the radiated quantums is reduced in angular distribution of photons which is also consequence of Doppler's effect.
In the laboratory reference frame bound to the positron-emission tomographs radiation of the annihilative quantums by number is spherical-symmetrically however it is necessary to take into account some distinction of the opposite radiated photon frequencies.