Studies on Land Resource Inventory for Agricultural Land Use Planning in Northern Transition Zone of India through Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques

Land suitability analysis is a prerequisite to achieving optimum utilization of available land resources. Hence, a study on land resource inventory for agricultural land use planning was conducted in the Northern Transition Zone of India to determine land capability and develop a suitability map for wheat and sorghum-based on physical and climatic factors of production using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Detailed soil survey information was used for this exercise. Four series (Singhanhalli, Mugli, Bogur and Venkatapur series) were identified and mapped into seventeen mapping units. Land capability classification showed that a greater portion of the study suitable. About 234 ha (31.6%) is moderately suitable, 494 ha (65.0%) marginally suitable and 10.2 ha (1.3%) permanently not suitable for wheat; while 78.5 ha (10.3%) is moderately suitable, 633.4 ha (82.3%) marginally suitable and 32.6 ha (4.3%) permanently not suitable for sorghum respectively. The moderate, marginal and permanent non-suitability was due to moderate, severe and very severe limitations respectively. However, it is possible to achieve potential yield of the crops in the study area if these limitations are addressed.


Introduction
Land use planning involves the evaluation of land for alternative land uses for the purpose of selecting the best land-use option from among multiple purposes including agriculture, pasture and forestry. Depending on the nature and properties of soils, land may be suitable for one or other uses. Based on the capability or limitations, lands are grouped into eight classes [1]. Among them, the first four classes (I -IV) of lands are used for cultivation of crops. These four classes are differentiated based on the extent of soil slope, erosion, depth, structure, soil reaction and drainage. The classes from V to VIII are not capable of supporting cultivation of crops but are however fit for other uses such as growing grasses, forestry and supporting wildlife and recreation. The classes V to VIII lands are normally delineated based on problems like streamflow, flooding, ponding, rocky nature, short growing season, snow cover, etc.
The land resources of Karnataka State Particularly Dharwad District are under severe threats due to competing demands of various land uses and increasing population pressure. According to [2] [3] [4], the increasing population and demand for food production and supply does not only lead to increased pressure on land per unit area but would cause further degradation [5]. Several studies on the land resources of Karnataka have been carried out [6]- [15] but most of information available is on a smaller scale, which cannot address site or location-specific issues. The generation of detailed site-specific soil and land resource information can help to identify the constraints and potentials of these scarce resources. This will help to provide suitable site-specific land use options, thereby helping to manage the scarce resources in a sustainable manner [16] [17] [18].
Information on soil and related properties obtained from the soil survey and soil classification can help in better delineation of soil and land suitability for irrigation and efficient irrigation water management. The performance of any crop is largely dependent on soil properties such as depth, drainage, texture, etc., as conditioned by climate and topography. The study of the soil-site characterization for predicting the crop performance of an area forms a part of land evaluation process. According to [19], land evaluation is the rating of soil for optimum returns per unit area. The yield influencing factors for important crops have to be evaluated and the results obtained may be applied for higher production of these crops through proper utilization of similar soils occurring elsewhere in similar agro-climate sub-region under scientific management practices [20]. Information on soil-site suitability evaluation for wheat and sorghum is not available for the study area. In view of this, the present study was carried out.

Description of Study Area
Singhanhalli-Bogur micro-watershed has an area of 760.6 ha (

Soil Survey and Mapping
A detailed soil survey of the study area was carried out using IRS P6 LISS-IV satellite image and Dharwad district Toposheet as per procedure outlined by [22], during which the area was intensively traversed and 20 pedon locations were fixed based on soil heterogeneity. At each pedon location, a fresh profile was opened and horizon-wise soil samples were collected and analyzed for important physical and physicochemical properties following standard analytical procedures. After the correlation of soil properties, soils were classified into four series according to "Keys to Soil Taxonomy" [23] and mapped into seventeen mapping units based on variation in texture, depth, slope and erosion. Soil-site suitability for wheat and sorghum was evaluated based on the criteria suggested by [25]. Land capability maps and soil-site suitability maps were pre-      from the soil map. The legend design and the kinds of mapping units for the study area were determined by the procedure and kind of survey as indicated by [26]. Singhanhalli series covers 78.5 ha (10.3%) of the study area and were classified as Typic Haplusterts. They are deep, moderately well-drained clay soils located on very gentle slopes found in lowlands, associated with moderate to rapid permeability and slight erosion. Mugli series which cover 22.1 ha (2.9%) were classified as Ultic Haplustalfs. They are moderately deep and moderately well-drained clay loam soils located on moderate slopes found in undulating midlands, associated with moderate to rapid permeability and moderate erosion. Bogur series covers 237.3 ha (31.2%) and were classified into three families, namely, Typic Ustorthents, Typic Calciusterts and Ultic Haplustalfs. The Typic Ustorthents were deep and well-drained sandy loam soils located on gentle slopes found in undulating midlands, associated with rapid permeability and moderate erosion. The Typic Calciusterts were very deep, moderately well-drained clay soils located on very gentle slopes found in lowlands, associated with slow permeability and slight erosion. The Ultic Haplustalfs were very deep, well-drained clay loam soils located on gentle slopes found in lowlands, associated with rapid permeability and moderate erosion.

Soil Map and Soil Mapping Units
Venkatapur series covers 406.6 ha (53.5%) of the study area and were classified into six families, namely, Typic Ustorthents, Typic Ustipsamments, Chromic Haplusterts, Typic Haplustalfs, Ultic Haplustalfs and Lithic Haplustalfs. The Typic Ustorthents were deep and well-drained sandy clay soils located on gentle slopes found in lowlands, associated with slow permeability and moderate erosion. The Typic Ustipsamments were deep and well-drained sandy loam soils located on steep slopes found in uplands, associated with rapid permeability and very severe erosion. The Chromic Haplusterts were deep and moderately well-drained clay soils located on very gentle slopes found in lowlands, associated with moderate to rapid permeability and slight erosion. The Typic Haplustalfs were shallow and well-drained sandy loam soils located on very gentle slopes found in uplands, associated with moderate to rapid permeability and slight erosion. The Ultic Haplustalfs were moderately deep to deep, moderately drained to well-drained clay loams and sandy clay loam soils located on very gentle to gentle and moderate slopes found in lowlands and undulating midlands, associated with moderate to rapid permeability and moderate to severe erosion. The Lithic Haplustalfs were shallow, moderately well-drained sandy loam soils located on moderate slopes found in uplands, associated with moderate to rapid permeability and severe erosion.

Land Capability Classification
Based on the soil-site characteristics of the study area, the soils were classified into four land capability classes (Table 4 and Figure 3 and    Note: SGH is Singhanhalli; BGR is Bogur; MGL is Mugli; VKP is Venkatapur; c is clay; cl is clay loam; sl is sandy loam; scl is sandy clay loam; d is depth; B is slope class B; C is slope class C; D is slope class D; E is slope class E; e is erosion; t is limitations relating to topography; s is limitations relating to soil conditions and f is limitations relating to fertility of the soil. Class II: Soils in this class are referred to as good cultivable lands, which have limitations that restrict their use [24] [25] [26]. These soils are limited by one or more of factors such as: 1) moderate limitations which reduce choice of crop, 2) gentle slope (1% to 5%), 3) moderate erosion hazards, 4) inadequate soil depth, 5) less than ideal soil structure and workability, 6) slight to moderate alkaline or saline condition, 7) somewhat restricted drainage, 8) require moderate conservation practices to prevent deterioration and 9) capable of sustaining less intensive cropping systems.
The result showed that 172.0 ha (22.6%) of the study area was occupied by land capability class II lands. These soils were moderate to rapidly permeable and moderately well-drained with slight limitations of slope, drainage, depth, texture, profile development, soil reaction, organic carbon and base saturation. In order to realize sustainable production of wheat and sorghum on these soils, the management practices may include terracing, strip cropping, contour-tillage, Journal of Geographic Information System rotation, etc.
Class III: Soils in this class are referred to as moderately good cultivable lands, which have severe limitations that restrict their use [24] [25] [26]. These soils are limited by one or more of factors such as: 1) severe limitations which reduce the choice of crops, 2) moderately steep slope (5% to 10%), 3) high erosion hazards, 4) very slow water permeability, 5) shallow depth and restricted root zone, 6) low water holding capacity, 7) low fertility, 8) moderate alkalinity and salinity and 9) unstable structure.
The result showed that 320.1 ha (42.1%) of the study area was occupied by land capability class III lands. These soils were moderate to rapidly permeable and moderately well-drained with moderate limitations of slope, erosion, depth, coarse fragments, profile development, organic carbon and base saturation.
These soils require special conservation practices in order to cultivate wheat and sorghum and special management practices are required in addition to the management practices listed above for the Class II soils.
Class IV: Soils in this class are referred to as fairly good cultivable lands suitable for occasional cultivation, which have very severe limitations that restrict their use [24] [25] [26]. These soils are limited by one or more factors such as: 1) severe limitations which reduce the choice of crops, 2) severe erosion susceptibility, 3) steep slope, 4) severe erosion, 5) shallow soils, 6) low water holding capacity, 7) poor drainage and 8) severe alkalinity and salinity.
The result showed that 242.2 ha (31.8%) of the study area was occupied by land capability class IV lands. These soils were moderate to rapidly permeable and moderately well-drained with severe limitation of slope, moderate to severe limitations of erosion and depth, profile development and base saturation; and moderate limitations of coarse fragments and organic carbon. For optimum production of wheat and sorghum on these soils, careful management practices are required.
Class VI: Soils in this class are referred to as non-cultivable lands located on steep slopes, highly erosion-prone with shallow soils [24] [25] [26]. They are limited by one or more factors such as: 1) extreme limitations of depth and slope and 2) severe erosion hazards, etc. The result showed that 10.2 ha (1.3%) of the study area was occupied by Class VI lands. These soils were very severe limitations of slope. These lands area is unsuitable for cultivation of wheat and sorghum and hence, their use could be restricted to forestry, wildlife, grazing and silviculture and other non-agricultural land uses.
There was no class I lands in the study area. Major proportions of the study area belonged to class IIItsf followed by class IIsf, IVts, IVs, IVt, VIt and IVtsf.

Soil-Site Suitability
In the present study, the mapped soils of the study area were evaluated to assess their suitability for wheat and sorghum production and presented in Table 5(a) and Table 5(b) and Table 6 and Figure 5 and VKP8-sl-d4/De3 S3e S3es Note: SGH is Singhanhalli; BGR is Bogur; MGL is Mugli; VKP is Venkatapur; c is clay; cl is clay loam; sl is sandy loam; scl is sandy clay loam; d is depth; B is slope class B; C is slope class C; D is slope class D; E is slope class E; S is suitability; N is not suitable; NTE is not to be evaluated for crop production; e is erosion; t is limitations relating to topography; s is limitations relating to soil conditions, f is limitations relating to fertility and n is limitations relating to alkalinity.     Figure 6).
It was observed that the major constraints that could limit sorghum produc-

Conclusion
The major portion of the study area is class III lands, which are marginally suitable for the cultivation of crops but very suitable for other uses like wildlife, forestry and grazing. However, these lands cannot be put under intensive and very intensive cultivation. The second-largest area is occupied by class IV lands which are fairly suitable for cultivation. These lands can be used for limited cultivation, but are most suitable for wildlife, forestry and grazing. Next are the class II lands, which can be used for all types of cultivation (except for very intensive cultivation) in addition to wildlife, forestry and grazing. However, since class II lands are limited, they should be reserved purely for the cultivation of wheat and sorghum. Class VI lands occupy only a very small area. Because of the very severe limitations of slope in these lands, they are recommended for wildlife, forestry and grazing. The soil suitability ranged from moderately suitable to permanently not suitable. The soils were more suitable for wheat than sorghum.