Reactive Alloys of IIA Metals: Gas Sorption and Corrosion as One Process

The present work summarizes the results of previously known, as well as the latest sorption measurements, which were carried out on IIA metal alloys in the form of films, powders and macrobodies with a monolithic structure. Analysis of these data made it possible to construct an empirical sorption model, according to which the corrosive decomposition of reactive alloys is one of the driving forces of the sorption process. This model provides a qua-litative description of the sorption behavior of these alloys in a gas environment and can be useful in solving practical problems in the field of vacuum and gas technologies.


Introduction
Alkaline earth metals and their alloys actively trap gases at ambient temperatures, forming non-volatile chemical compounds. In the capturing of gases, not only the surface is involved here, but also the volume, which explains the multiple superiority of these alloys in specific sorption capacity over other gas sorbents [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Let us note also that IIA metals are widespread in the earth's crust, and their production does not require high costs. All this stimulates the development of sorption technologies based on these metals.
Meanwhile, the experience of the very first steps in this direction shows that all those techniques and norms that were proposed and built earlier for adsorbents are not applicable to IIA metals due to their high reactivity [6]. This reactivity creates serious problems if one follows the generally accepted practice for adsorbents of dispersing the sorbent material and then transferring it to the working position. In the case of IIA metal alloys, it is clear that a different organization of the sorption process and other sorption equipment are required [7] [8].
For example, in the field of gas purification, triboreactors with alloy IIA metal ingots [9] [10] claim to replace the usual sorption columns with getters adsorbents [11] [12] [13]. Such a replacement promises unprecedented consequences for sorption technologies: controlled kinetics of this process, simplification of sorption equipment, minimization of costs for the production of purification material, as well as reaching the theoretical limit for specific sorption capacity.
The prospects for IIA metal alloys are no less promising in the field of vacuum technologies, where a high sorption capacity of the getter material is a priority requirement. This is especially true in the case of vacuum windows with thermal insulation [5] [14], vacuum MEMS devices [15], vacuum insulated pipes, etc.
The deficiency of internal space in such chambers forced the search for an alternative to mechanical activation, and the corrosive decomposition of reaction ingots was used [10] [14] as such an alternative.
The driving force of sorption in this case is the destruction of the structure of the ingot by the very gases that are to be captured. The initial body of the alloy decomposes in the course of corrosion into fragments and particles, which separate from it and in this way increase the area of the surface accessible to gases by orders of magnitude in comparison with the initial one. The law, according to which the ingot disintegrates, is pre-set at the stage of its casting and during post casting treatment [14], when the microstructure of the ingot is formed, and defects are formed and allocated in its body.
An analysis of the experimental data accumulated to date on the behavior of IIA metal alloys in a gaseous medium under isothermal conditions is given below. Our goal is to build a preliminary picture of the interaction between gases and these materials, which we named getters reactants in accordance with [16].

Getters Reactants
The ability of alkaline earth metals and their alloys to capture large amounts of gases is well known [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]. This process is based on a chemical reaction, and its products are compounds in which there can be several gas atoms per metal atom. For example, these can be not only oxides, hydrides, nitrides and other binary compounds, but also more complex ones, such as hydroxides, IIA metal salts, etc.
Such an advantageous quantitative ratio between the sorbing material and the gas in the products of their interaction is unthinkable when adsorbents are used, no matter how large their specific surface area is. Even hypothetically, none of the carcass structures such as zeolites or MOFs (metal organic frameworks) [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] is capable of approaching such a ratio, especially since there is also a mandatory requirement for these structures to have the necessary reserved me-chanical strength. Moreover, getters adsorbents of the NEGs type (non-evaporable getters) based on transition metals cannot compete with alloys of IIA metals [3] [5] [21] [27] [28].
The question of the production cost of the considered sorbents, adsorbents, on the one hand, and getter reagents, on the other, is also clear. While adsorbents are highly porous, gas-permeable bodies that must be activated before starting the sorption process, getter reagents are conventional ingots of IIA metal alloys, ready for direct use.
Let us also consider the question of time dependence of characteristics of an isothermal sorption process with the participation of getters reactants. It is known from experience that in air, cast samples of IIA metals and their alloys are quickly covered with a layer of products that slow down the sorption process. It is this behavior of getters reactants that is recorded in the experimental curves of the sigmoid shape ( ) m t m ∆ (Figure 1), obtained using the weight method in the ordinary atmosphere [10] [14]. Here m is the initial mass of the getter reactant, found by weighing it in air, ( ) m t ∆ is the current mass gain (mass of the captured gas), and t is time.
Usually, several minutes pass before measurements start and during this time the samples are covered with a layer of products that slow down the further course of the process. This time delay in gas sorption appears on the graph as an almost horizontal segment 0 d t − (Figure 1). At this stage (stage I), the reactant is practically not consumed, which can be used for practical purposes. However, after the point d t , the reaction of the gas with the alloy resumes and goes into the mode of an intensive sorption process (stage II). In the end, having passed point f t the reaction reaches stage III, exceeding any adsorbents in specific sorption capacity by many times.

The Chemical Reaction as a Sorption Process
The chemisorption of gases by IIA metals, as mentioned above, is not limited only to the surface, but goes deeper, capturing the volume of the material. Mostly such processes were studied on films [  on bulk monolithic bodies. In those cases, when the object of study was monolithic bodies or the products of their coarse grinding, the procedure of sorption measurements was stopped as soon as the sorption rate decreased by about 100 times compared to the initial one [21] [27] [28].
Such actions of the authors of these works are explained by the recommendations of the ASTM [33], but they turned out to be incorrect when applied to reactive monolithic bodies. Therefore, the results of works [21] [27] [28] are not final and need to be reconsidered. At first glance, the data [21] [27] [28], obtained by the dynamic sorption method, and the data [10] [14], obtained by the weight method, have little in common. However, Figure 2 puts everything in its place, combining both groups of these data.
Indeed, a 100-fold decrease in the rate of sorption of getters reactants, contrary to the position of ASTM [33], is not the evidence of the end of the sorption process, but only indicates a temporary respite in the reaction of the gas with the ingot. This sorption pause indicates the transition of the ingot to the state of "quasi-passivation", when the cover layer of the reaction products reaches a certain critical thickness h ∆ , which temporarily stops the reaction of the gas with the metallic surface. As is shown in Figure 1,  The measurements were carried out on samples of the mass from 0.200 g to 0.600 g with weighing accuracy of ±0.001 g. The size of the symbols on the graphs fully included the measurement error. Gray points are the averaged results of [21] [27] [28]. successive parts of a single sorption process, the formation of a cover layer of products in air and subsequent sorption phenomena described by the curve ( ) m t m ∆ ( Figure 1). In other words, in Figure 2, the nearest to the origin of coordinates horizontal segment corresponds to the sorption pause 0 d t − shown in Figure 1, and the initial branch of the curve from point (0,0) to this horizontal segment corresponds to the growth of the cover layer (gray dots).
The question of "sewing together" the data [21] [27] [28] with the data [10] [14] can be solved by estimating the thickness of the covering layer of the products h ∆ in both cases. As can be seen from Figure 2, a sorption pause occurs here at a level of about 0.5% along the ordinate . Since the average linear size of the samples d was ~5 mm, according to the calculation method [10] [14], we get a value of ~4.2 μm for the thickness of the covering layer.
The results obtained from the data [21] [27] [28] are close to this. Thus, based on the data [27] [28], we come to the conclusion that particles of a barium alloy with a size from 1 to 4 mm by the end of measurements are covered with a layer of products with a thickness of 4 to 7 µm, and following the measurement data [21], where particles of Ba alloys reached a size ~0. 25 (Figure 2), taking them as a typical graphic image of all those processes, in which the countdown of the mass of the sample begins from the initial value of 0 m . In [21] [27] [28], the cover layer h ∆ was formed during the time from several minutes to several tens of minutes, but under the conditions when the pressure of the gas phase was by five orders of magnitude lower than atmospheric. Therefore, the data of these works after transferring to Figure 2 describing the processes in air turn into an almost vertical fragment of the curve near the ordinate axis (gray dots).    Li Sr intermetallic compound in air. Micrographs of a particle with mass m = 0.201 g. According to chemical analysis, the reaction products are oxides and nitrides of alloy components.  Figure 1). This decay becomes a generator of a fresh surface, feeding the reaction in the gas/ingot system with new areas of the metal surface at the places of ingot fracture. A new situation arises with clearly positive prospects for sorption applications. Let us consider the mechanism of this disintegration in order to see how we can influence the disintegration of the ingot and with it the kinetics of the sorption process. Figure 6 schematically shows a cross section of a cast sample of IIA metals alloy, where 1 is the surface of the alloy, 2 are microcracks, and 3 are grain boundaries. These three structural elements of the ingot serve as a chemical sink for atmospheric gases, each with its own mechanism of interaction. Let's start with the surface 1. As soon as the alkaline-earth metal alloy comes into contact with atmospheric gases, it begins to be covered (in full accordance with the Pilling-Bedworth criterion [39] [40]) with a loose layer of reaction products, which makes it difficult for gases to directly access the metal surface ( Figure 6(b)). In this case, the transport of gases through this slowing, but not insulating layer becomes the limiting stage of the sorption process.

Corrosion Decomposition as a Sorption Process
By the time when the sorption rate decreases by about two orders of magnitude, the thickness h ∆ of the product layer reaches a value of several microns [10] [14] and this moment can be taken for a conditional start of the incubation stage, which goes on up to the point d t (Figure 1). The length of this stage depends both on the chemical nature of the gas/alloy pair and on the degree of development of the structural elements of ingot 2 and 3 ( Figure 6(a)). Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering The processes of gas capturing by microcracks 2, intercrystalline boundaries 3 and surface 1 start simultaneously. However, the rate of filling the microcracks with gases and the rate of their diffusion along the intercrystalline boundaries are relatively low, in particular, due to the small area of the inlet section of these sinks, when compared with the total surface area of the ingot. And yet, it is these structural elements 2 and 3 that are responsible for the sharp rise in the ( ) m t m ∆ curve after the point d t (Figure 1). However, their influence on the sorption rate is realized through mechanical destruction of the ingot. As is known, the growth of microcracks in the presence of tensile stresses and an aggressive medium has an intermittent character [44] [45] [46]. Until a local embrittlement zone is formed in front of the crack tip, there is no noticeable crack movement. However, with the appearance of such a zone, a rapid destruction of the material occurs within this zone. Then these actions are repeated and repeated until a complete fracture of the sample with its falling into separate parts takes place. This last phase of the ingot decomposition is accompanied by the appearance of a noticeable region of fresh surface.
A stepwise shape is inherent in all sorption curves   In the same cases, when the sorption curve looks smooth, such as the curves of the intermetallic phase CaMg 2 in Figure 11, Figure 13, it is enough to increase the scale of values along the ordinate axis and then the step-like nature of this curve is immediately manifested (Figure 9).
Each curve is the sum of the sorption effects produced by all those cracks that originate, grow and end their life as a fracture during measurements in the tested sample. The horizontal segments of these curves, i.e., steps, are those states when all microcracks in the sample are in the incubation stage, and sharp jumps from step to step are associated with the intensive growth of the sorption layer on that fresh surface that appears as a result of the corresponding fracture. Figure 6(a) shows that whatever the geometry of the residual forces in the sample is, there will always be a sufficient number of surface microcracks, which are oriented perpendicular to these forces or some of their components. In our case, there is also a second necessary condition for the development of microcracks, this is the embrittlement of their walls due to chemical reactions between Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering the metal and gases entering the crack.
One of the efficient ways of filling microcracks with gases is their capillary condensation, e.g., condensation of water vapor or water together with carbon dioxide. This condensate reacts with IIA metals, which leads to hydrogen embrittlement of the material surrounding the crack tip and to additional pressure on the walls of the microcracks. Such consequences were observed in the case of magnesium alloys repeatedly [47] [48] [49], and the accelerated destruction of cast getters reactants under the influence of moisture was also recorded in our experiments ( Figure 10).
The third chemical sink for gases is intergranular boundaries 3 in the ingot ( Figure 6(a)). Here, the alloy undergoes a gas attack through the boundaries, which, as a result of the reaction with gases, lose their metallic nature; and this leads to a sharp decrease in the cohesion forces among the grains. Accordingly, the ability of the reactive material to withstand tensile stresses weakens and this brings the time of its destruction closer. The effect of intercrystalline corrosion decomposition on gas sorption by getters reactants is shown in Figure 11 and   CaMg 2 with a coarse-grained structure, are compared in Figure 11, and the sorption curves of the CaLi 2 intermetallic compound in its two forms, coarse-grained and fine-grained, are compared in Figure 12. It can be seen that in both cases the samples of the material with a developed network of intercrystalline boundaries have a noticeable superiority in sorption kinetics.

Lithium and Its Role
The most active of the IIA metals, barium, is toxic and therefore undesirable in many alkaline earth metal applications. If we exclude barium from the composition of getters reactants, then lithium is a good substitute for it. In this case, four metals become the element base of getters reactants: Mg, Ca, Sr and Li, where lithium can be used both as an alloying metal and as a base metal. Unlike other alkali metals, lithium easily alloys with IIA metals in any proportions, forming with them solid solutions, eutectics, and intermetallic compounds [50]. Also, lithium is not inferior to IIA metals in chemical activity, and reacts with gases to the end under normal conditions as well [51] [52] [53] [54].
A striking illustration of the influence of the chemical factor on the sorption process is Figure 13 with its sorption curves ( ) m t m ∆ for the intermetallic compounds Li 2 Sr 3 and CaMg 2 . It can be seen that after a 14-hour exposure of the samples in an ordinary atmosphere, the first of them managed to capture a gas mass 100 times greater than the second one. Here we see not only the higher activity of strontium than that of Ca and Mg, but also the ability of lithium to accelerate the corrosive decomposition of the reactant.
Confirmation of this role of lithium can be found in Figure 14 and Figure 15. It can be seen that the addition of lithium to the intermetallic phase CaMg 2 as well as to the eutectic Ca 0.7 Mg 0.3 accelerates the decay of both of them.
Presumably, the course of the sorption process in these cases can be described    by the relatively small size and high mobility of its atoms. When lithium atoms leave the bulk of the grains, vacancies appear in them, while in the reaction zone, where the gases are located, new products are formed, which increases the pressure on the walls from the inside. These two events contribute to the destruction of the crystalline body, accelerating the sorption process.

Empirical Process Model
Let us try to generalize these new facts with those known earlier in order to obtain a unified picture of the sorption behavior of reaction alloys in atmospheric gases under normal conditions. As can be seen from the above, the similarity of the curves Each segment of this kind is the next incubation stage, separated from neighboring segment by fracture acts, which are accompanied by an abrupt increase in the amount of gas m ks h ∆ = ∆ on the exposed clean surface of area s. According to the mentioned scheme, the sorption of the bulk of the gas occurs when the capture of gas by the getter reactant is localized within the narrow time vicinity of each fracture act. Immediately after such an act, the next incubation stage begins, the lifetime of which is incomparably longer than the time of the fracture.
All these facts lead us to two fundamentally important conclusions that have both theoretical and practical significance for sorption technologies.
The first conclusion concerns sorption kinetics. It was shown above that this characteristic of getters reactants is completely limited by the kinetics of the phenomena that take place at the incubation stages of the entire sorption process. In essence, these are questions of the initiation and propagation of cracks inside a crystalline body.
The second conclusion refers to the specific sorption capacity. This characteristic of getters reactants in atmospheric gases at ambient temperature reaches its theoretical limit by the time when the initial ingot decays completely. In this context, complete disintegration means the situation when the average linear Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering size d of the products of corrosion destruction approaches twice the thickness of the slowing layer h ∆ . After that, the completion of the sorption process is a matter of just a few minutes. The described picture of the interaction of monolithic samples of a reactive alloy with ambient gases forms a simple sorption model, the central place in which is taken by two processes, the formation of a slowing layer of products h ∆ on the surface of a solid and the subsequent corrosive decomposition of the ingot, which increases manyfold the total area of the metal surface reacting with gases (Figures 6(c)-(e)). Formally, this model is based on two terms, a slowing layer h ∆ and corrosive destruction of the material, including the thesis about the enormous kinetic superiority of processes on a metal surface over those in the bulk of an ingot.
Meanwhile, the given model can also be presented graphically as a certain sequence of curves , which vary with changes in the structural elements of the ingot in question ( Figure 16). With this approach, a clear relationship emerges between the structure of the alloy and its sorption behavior, which can be characterized by two quantities, the incubation pause 0 d t − , which measures the resistance of the given alloy to air, and the slope of the sorption curve to the t axis, which measures the rate of gas sorption. This relationship helps to formulate and solve problems with adjusting the properties of the getter material to practical needs. A cover layer of the thickness ~5 µm equates reactive cast materials with conventional materials when performing auxiliary operations in air. By selecting the optimal shape and size of the reactive product, it is possible to minimize its loss at the stage of introduction into the workplace [9] [10] [14]. Thus, in the case of 1 mm thick plates or ribbons of getter material, these losses do not exceed 1% of the initial mass, and in the case of bulk cylindrical ingots with a diameter of ~2 cm, the losses decrease to 0.1%.

Application Aspects
K. Chuntonov et al.
The sorption model described in Section III can also provide some assistance in solving sorption problems. In accordance with it, any reactive alloy of a set composition can be associated with its graphic image of the type shown in Figure 16, a sort of its "personal passport". With a change in the composition of the alloy, something in this "passport" changes, but not the general law of the behavior of this alloy. This law is that an increase in the number of microcracks on the surface of an ingot and/or a decrease in the grain size inevitably leads to a decrease in the incubation time and to an increase in the sorption rate ( Figures  16(a)-(d)). The mentioned regularity endows this model with an operational function that prompts the steps for improving the working characteristics of the getter material.
The practical interest in the length of the incubation stage and in the slope of the sorption curve in the region after the point Not less important for practice is the slope of the sorption curve, which determines the gas sorption rate. Here it is necessary to bring two values closer together, the required sorption rate and that which the getter material is capable of. Taking into account the content of Section III, it is obvious that the advantages will be in the alloy with high reaction kinetics, i.e., in fine-grained alloys with many structural defects (curve (d) in Figure 16).
The question of matching the values of , d i t and E t looks more complicated.
Theoretically, two options are possible here, either , If the first inequality holds, then some of the active material will be lost still at the loading stage. This is unacceptable and a way out of this situation is possible provided that the receiving party, i.e., the developers or manufacturers of reactors or vacuum chambers, find a way to reduce the time E t of the loading procedure at the expense of their technical resources.
The second option, that is, the ratio ,   Figure 13 shows how strong the sorption effect can be with radical changes in composition, while Figure 14 and Figure 17 give an example of milder consequences.

Chemical Composition of Getter Reactants
The data accumulated in the field of sorption studies show that the best material base for getters reactants is two-, three-and four-component alloys containing Ca, Mg, Sr, and Li. Two families of these alloys can be distinguished. One of them is alloys ( ) . In Figure 18 this area of eutectic alloys is highlighted by hatching. On the whole, these alloys with Mg concentration from 25 to 67 at% give all the possibilities for efficient use of the sorption selectivity of alkaline earth metals.
In the case of vacuum technologies, where the main driving force of the sorption process is the corrosive decomposition of the ingot, the internal readiness of the material for destruction by gases is important. So here it is enough to restrict ourselves to the family of alloys with eutectic structure ( )  When applied to vacuum chambers, these eutectic alloys become one of the main pillars of the described technology, along with the two that have already been considered above, namely, with a slowing cover layer Δh on the surface of the ingots and with the corrosive decomposition of the alloy. This significance of the indicated eutectic is due not only to its developed microstructure, which increases the rate of decomposition of the alloy in gases, but also to its composition, which is characterized by a successful combination of the plastic solid solution Ca Sr Mg − . By changing the shape of the mold and the temperature regime of solidification, it is possible to control the level of residual stresses in the reaction ingot, while additional mechanical treatment of these ingots by forging, cutting, rolling, etc., endows the final product with a special texture that expands its sorption capabilities in vacuum applications. The main task of the eutectic in vacuum applications is to ensure the disintegration of the ingot into particles with an characteristic size 2 d h ≤ ∆ .

Tribochemical Reactors
Mechanical activation of getters reactants in a gas environment expands the capabilities of sorption technologies. The design of the triboreactor can be very simple ( Figure 19): a conventional high-pressure cylinder 1 with the processed gas, alloy ingots inside and a pressure gauge 3 attached to it is rotated around its longitudinal axis in a horizontal position.
The rotation of the cylinder 1 ( Figure 20) sets the ingots 3 in motion, so that they are mutually grinded, freeing from the outer layers 4 that have reacted with the gas 2.
The continuously renewing alloy surface captures gases by orders of magnitude faster than a surface with a layer of reaction products. Let us pay attention Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering Figure 19. Rotating triboreactor with a pressure gauge [10]. 1-high pressure cylinder, 2-actuator, 3-pressure gauge, 4-signal receiver, 5-electronic converter. to two positive facts. The first is the dependence of the gas sorption rate on the number of cylinder revolutions per time unit, which makes the tribochemical method of gas treatment controllable. The second fact is the continuous monitoring of the state of the gas/ingot system thanks to the pressure gauge 3 ( Figure  19).
The data on the gas pressure inside the cylinder is transmitted wirelessly to a remote receiver 4 with subsequent processing of the received signal by the converter 5 into the sorption characteristics of the process [10]. Both producers of pure gases and developers of sorbent materials are interested in this kind of information.
Tribochemical gas purification has a number of advantages over other gas purification technologies. Let us point out the simplicity of the equipment, low costs in servicing the purification process, and low costs in the production of reaction ingots. The energy consumption here is small at least because IIA metal alloys are mechanically fragile, the products of their reaction with gas are a brittle material with a loose structure, and the process of abrasion of ingots is also supported by their corrosive decomposition.
At the end of the purification process, the operation of separating the solid reaction products and gas is performed. The standard method uses metal filters, although other solutions are possible, such as bubbling a gas stream through an inert, non-volatile liquid, or using a centrifuge (centrifugal separator). The centrifugal separator is especially effective when purifying gases with low atomic mass, for example, when the final product of purification is hydrogen or helium.
However, a triboreactor with a pressure gauge can have other applications, in-cluding serving as a tool for testing reactive alloys in various gas media with pressures ranging from vacuum to hundreds of bar. The results of such studies can deepen our knowledge of the mechanical activation of solids, which in the case of IIA metal alloys turns out to be not so much a source of high-energy excitation of the material as a generator of a fresh sorbing surface. An important application of triboreactors with getters reactants can be capturing of toxic vapors or gases, which is essential for many industries where the by-product contains chlorine, sulfur, selenium, tellurium, nitrogen, phosphorus, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, thallium, lead, etc. (Appendix A). At the end of this kind of a process, it is enough to transfer the final solid product from the triboreactor into a regular container for subsequent storage in a sealed form.

Vacuum Insulated Windows
Currently, getter materials with a high sorption capacity are in demand from such products as vacuum windows, vacuum MEMS devices, vacuum insulated pipes, double gas pipes for laying in northern latitudes, etc. All of them are designed for long-term operation, they all use nondetachable types of hermetization and all have a specific vacuum cavity in the form of a geometric figure, in which one of the three dimensional parameters is incomparably smaller than the other two. Vacuum chambers of this kind experience all the weaknesses and disadvantages of getters adsorbents of the NEGs class, their low sorption capacity and dependence on thermal activation.
The sorption capacity of the getters adsorbents is the higher the larger their specific surface area, i.e. the smaller the average size of the getter particles.
However, the smaller these particles are, the less benefit from their thermal activation due to the growing ratio (volume of the passivated film)/(volume of the particle core) [59]. Besides, heating the getter in a sealed chamber with a narrow vacuum gap inevitably involves the walls of the chamber in this heating, which increases the gas load on the getter due to degassing of the wall.
Nevertheless, the main problem of vacuum chambers with a narrow internal gap, but a large total surface area, is the low specific sorption capacity of the adsorbents. It is proposed to solve this problem by using getters reactants with their outstanding sorption characteristics.
What vacuum windows are, how they are assembled, and what problems are holding back their mass production, are described in detail in a number of reviews [60] [61] [62] [63]. As shown in Figure 21, two glass plates 4 and 5 are hermetically connected at the edges with seal material 1, keeping these plates from collapsing with pillars 3. It is known that when a gap 6 between the plates is ~0.2 mm, a high level of window thermal insulation is guaranteed if in the cavity a vacuum of the order of ~10 −3 mbar is maintained. The task of the getter material is to maintain the specified pressure inside the window for many decades.
In the general case, the assembly is carried out in the following way ( Figure  21). Getter material 2 is installed on plate 4 in normal atmosphere (Product 1), Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering and then plate 5 is installed and the window is sealed along the edges. Alternatively, the getter is introduced into the window through detachable chamber 7 under vacuum (Product 2). In both cases, the assembly process ends with the sealing of the exhaust hole in the upper plate 5 with a plug 8 under vacuum. Examples of Product 1 are windows with getters of NEGs type and/or Ba EGs [64], and examples of Product 2 are windows with getters reactants in granular form [5]. Windows with hybrid getters adsorbents [65] adjoin Product 2 according to the assembly scheme, but according to their properties, which are determined by the nature of the getter, they should be assigned to Product 1.
The disadvantages of Product 1 are the disadvantages of NEGs getters, their need of thermal activation and negligible sorption capacity. Product 2 does not have these drawbacks; however, transporting the active metal material along the lines of the vacuum system is a risky operation. Therefore, the class of getters reactants was expanded due to macro-bodies with a monolithic structure, which have a temporary resistance to air, but further decompose under the action of gases to small particles already inside the window (Product 3).
A new technological option is to seal the window at the edges in air, without using vacuum pumps (Product 4). Due to their extremely high sorption capacity, IIA metal alloys are able to replace the vacuum pump, chemically binding all gases except argon, which remains in the cavity between the plates as a residual gas at a pressure of about 10 mbar. Following the assembly diagram for Product 4, one can replace the air between the plates with CO 2 before connecting them and seal the window around the edges with carbon dioxide inside. Upon completion of the reaction between CO 2 and the getter reactant, this window becomes an analogue of Product 3. You can go further and, before joining the plates, use a mixture of CO 2 and air in any given ratio to fill the cavity 6, which will allow regulating the Ar pressure in the gap according to the composition of the given gas mixture.
From the above, it can be seen that getters reactants give a chance to transform vacuum windows into a mass product with a long lifetime at low production costs. However, alloys of alkaline earth metals can also be used as getters in argon-filled windows [66] [67]. The quality of windows of this type is improved, and their service life increases when the standard desiccants based on zeolites are replaced with new desiccants with the addition of reactant getters (Appendix B).

Concluding Remarks
The present review discloses the sorption mechanism of getters reactants and provides an analysis of their prospects in the field of sorption technologies, based on the latest experimental data [10] [14]. As known, alloys of IIA metals in the form of highly porous bodies, powders and films are the most advantageous getter products in respect of sorption capacity. However, transferring such a highly active material from the place, where it is produced to the position, where it is used, is a technically challenging and a rather costly task. For getters of this class, even a short-term contact with air is unacceptable.
The problem was solved after numerous attempts, and not with the help of design or procedural developments, but quite unexpectedly by expanding the dimensional and structural boundaries of getters reactants, namely, by simply replacing films, powders, or porous bodies with the same reactive alloys in the form of macro-bodies with monolithic structure. This solution follows directly from the results of the studies.
According to the obtained data, the surface of cast samples of the reactive alloy in a gas medium is covered with a layer of products several microns thick, which stops the chemical reaction with gases and transfers the process to the incubation stage. This gives rise to the idea of a sacrificial layer, which greatly simplifies all operations for transferring and loading the getter product, which are now carried out in air.
At the same time, the main indicator of the sorption process, which is the degree of involvement of the getter material in the reaction with gases, is determined by the rate of corrosion decomposition of the reactive ingot. This decay is a new phenomenon in getter practice, and it was also discovered and recruited for positive purposes in the mentioned works for the first time [10] [14]. Let us especially note that this corrosive decomposition, which feeds the sorption process with a fresh metal surface, proceeds in a gaseous medium not very fast and not very slowly, but within the very boundaries that allow it to be used in solving traditional sorption tasks.
The fact that the time law of corrosion destruction of an ingot depends not only on the gas load, but also on the composition of the ingot, its microstructure and the concentration of defects in it, deserves special mention. These three characteristics of the ingot are put into it at the production stage and can be pre-selected in such a way as to achieve the optimal agreement with the gas load.
So, a new modification of getters reactants in a form of macro-bodies with a monolithic structure is entering the arena of sorption technologies. These materials free us from the conventional production scheme, based a priori on highly porous materials with a carcass structure, which creates many problems due to their initial structure and conventional way of employing them. The new production order, established with the arrival of modified getters reactants, is simpler in implementation and more economical, and most importantly, more efficient in terms of sorption.