Age, Gender Pattern and Liver Function Markers in Hepatitis B and C Seropositive Participants Attending a Health Facility in Yaba-Lagos, Nigeria

Background: Individuals with sero-positivity for Hepatitis B and C have been reported. Most seropositive individuals appear healthy. Liver function markers such as AST, ALT, ALP, Bilirubin and total protein levels are markers for assessing liver impairment. This study (i)assessed seroprevalence of HBV, HCV and both HBV and HCV (ii) HBV and or HCV seropositivity and age or gender, (iii) assess gender and liver function markers and (iv) update data on liver function and simple diagnostic markers. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, cross sectional study of asymptomatic individuals presenting at the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory of Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR), Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria from January 2018 to August 2020. Markers of liver function were investigated on hepatitis B and or C sero-positive and negative participants using TC Matrix Chemistry analyser (Teco Diagnostics, USA) and Biobase reagent Kits. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Out of 475 participants, 60.4% were males and 39.6% females. 53% of males and 32.5% of females were sero-positive for HBV while 32.5% of males and 14.5% of females were sero-positive for HCV. 75.3% and 76.1% of Age group 20 40 years were sero-positive for Hepatitis B and C respectively. Mean AST levels of 17.49 ± 13.69, 33.46 ± 93.42 and 19.82 ± 12.54 respectively among those sero-positive for HBV, HCV, and both HBV and HCV. Mean ALT levels of 17.68 ± 14.32, 40.26 ± 13.86 and 20.04 ± 12.78 respectively for HBV, HCV and both HBV and HCV sero-positive cases. Mean ALP levels were 77.52 ± 34.0 for HBV sero-positive cases, 82.04 ± 38.45 in HCV and 77.95 ± 30.48 in both HBV and HCV sero-positive cases. Mean Total Bilirubin levels of HBV, HCV and both How to cite this paper: Raheem, T., Orukpe-Moses, M., Akindele, S., Wahab, M., Ojerinola, O., Akande, D., Ochacha, I.A. and Aniedobe, M. (2021) Age, Gender Pattern and Liver Function Markers in Hepatitis B and C Seropositive Participants Attending a Health Facility in Yaba-Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 9, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2021.97007 Received: June 2, 2021 Accepted: July 12, 2021 Published: July 15, 2021 Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access


Introduction
The Liver is the main internal organ, weighing about 1200 -1500 g. This has more functions than any other organ, and it can support life even though only 10% -20% of the liver tissue is functioning. The significant role of the liver includes purification, synthesis of proteins and cholesterol; inactivation of hormones and the regulation of the amount of testosterone in the blood; and storage of sugars, fats and vitamins. There are several causes for liver inflammation, such as toxin, biochemical, bacterial, pharmacology, or immune-mediate attack on liver. For non-specific symptoms or screening purposes, usually LFT is performed [1] [2].
Infections of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are significant public health issues worldwide. An estimated two billion people worldwide have evidence of past or current HBV infection, and 350 million are chronic HBV surface antigen carriers (HBsAg) [1]. Age-specific HBsAg seroprevalence varies greatly by geographic area, with the highest prevalence (>5%) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), East Asia, parts of the Balkan region, Pacific Islands, and South America's Amazon Basin. In regions such as Central America, North America and Western Europe, incidence is below 2% [1]. Over 50 million people in Africa are chronically infected, with a mortality risk of around 25%.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, carrier rates of the virus range from 9% -20% [3]. Nigeria has been documented as highly endemic to HBV infection and about 75 percent of its population are likely to have been exposed to the virus at one time or another in their lives and about 18 million Nigerians were infected [4]. Port Harcourt registered a prevalence rate of 4.3% [5]; Ilorin 5.7% [6], Maiduguri 11.6% [7] and Zaria 8.3% [8]. A seroprevalence of 23.3% among patients attending all clinics at the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH) had been reported [9]. A recent systematic analysis reported that 170 million people [10] chronic viraemic infection [11]. The prevalence of Sub-Saharan Africa is moderate (1.5% -3.5%) and Nigeria is 1.1% [11].
Dual HBV and HCV infection in the same host varies from 9% -30%, depending on the geographical area [10]. These numbers can underestimate the true number of people with HBV/HCV co-infection since there is a well-known entity of occult HBV infection (i.e., patients with negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) but detectable serum HBV DNA) in patients with chronic hepatitis C [10]. The estimated global prevalence of co-infection with HBV/HCV in HBsAg positive patients is approximately 5% -20% and in HCV positive patients is 2% -10%.
Epidemiological research has long indicated an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with dual HBV/HCV infection and evidence indicates that HBV may trigger neoplastic cycle, while HCV may serve as a promoter, and that the two conditions could be synergistic in contributing to the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [13].
The different functions of the liver are expressed by liver function markers. Bilirubin, total protein, albumin, globulin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyl, transaminase alanine (ALT), and transaminase aspartate (AST) are generally included. Abnormality in liver function markers provides an idea of the liver function and its enzymes are usually elevated in hepatic abnormality with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more specific to the liver [14].
Liver disease constitutes a significant health burden and viral infections are responsible for significant numbers of liver diseases. Most common of these are HBV and HCV infection [15].

Hepatitis B Infection
Hepatitis B virus is an enveloped DNA virus, and a member of the family Hepadnaviridae hepatotropic DNA viruses. Hepatitis B virus transmission results from an exposure to infected blood or body fluids. Possible forms of transmission include, but are not limited to, unsafe sexual blood transfusions, reuse of infected needles and syringes, and vertical mother-to-child transmission during childbirth. Without action, a mother who is positive for HBsAg is at 20% risk of passing the infection to her offspring at the time of birth.
If the mother is also positive for HBeAg (Hepatitis B envelope antigen), this risk is as high as 90 per cent. The HBV infection can be transmitted within households between family members, likely through contact with non-intact skin or mucous membrane with HBV-containing secretions or saliva [16]. Nonetheless, an established risk factor cannot be associated with at least 30 per cent Journal of Biosciences and Medicines of identified adult hepatitis B [17]. Transmission trends are different in many developed countries (e.g. those in Western Europe and North America) from the ones described above. Currently, most diseases in these countries are spread through sexual activity and the injection of drug use during young adulthood. HBV is a major occupational hazard contagious to health care staff [18]. HBV is not transmitted by infected food or water, and cannot be easily distributed in the workplace. The normal incubation period for the virus is 90 days but can range from around 30 to 180 days [19]. HBV can be detected within 30 to 60 days of infection and persists for widely variable periods.
Hepatitis infection could be acute or chronic. Initial phases of this infection stage are characterized by the presence of HBsAg, elevated serum HBV DNA, HBeAg, and normal serum aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and minimal or negligible inflammation of the liver biopsy [20].
Chronic infection occurs as an early stage progression of the acute HBV infection due to the failure of the host to mount the requisite immune stimulus to ensure complete viral clearance and consequent disease resolution. This is serologically characterized by relative increase in anti-HBcAg IgG serum, absence or lower anti-HBsAg IgG titers, and either mild or severe damage to the liver as shown by ultrasonography [18]. This stage of the disease can also be characterized by normal or elevated levels of serum transaminases (aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT)) and other hepatic integrity markers [19].
HBeAg's serological presence is constant at all phases of the infection. The presence of this antigen in combination with increased viral load (HBV DNA > 10 3 copies/ml) and higher ALT (>60 IU/l) is a clear indicator of viral infection, replication and infectivity [18]. Patients suffering from these symptoms are placed on retroviral. HBeAg seroconversion is a central occurrence in the natural history of HBeAg-positive CHB patients [21]. Seroconversion of HBeAg to HBeAb is believed to be accompanied by cessation of HBV replication and hepatic remission. Several studies have shown that seroconversion with a marked reduction in HBV replication in the majority of patients is correlated with biochemical and histological remission of inflammatory activity [22].

Hepatitis C Infection
HCV infection varies in their distribution in different parts of the world. There are four primary transmission routes: health-associated transmission, drug-injection, mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), and sexual transmission. In low-and middle-income countries, HCV infection is most generally associated with unsafe injection procedures, and invasive procedures with insufficient infection management measures such as renal dialysis and unscreened (or inadequately screened) blood transfusions in health care facilities [23]. Persons who received untested blood products prior to the implementation of HCV blood screening in (high income countries) are also at risk, and reports from the WHO indicate that 39 countries still do not regularly screen blood transfusions  [23]. Most HCV infections occur among people in middle-and high-income countries, especially among those who use unsterile equipment to inject drugs. People who inject drugs have a high global infection prevalence of around 67% [24]. Of the estimated 16 million people who actively inject drugs in 148 countries, 10 million have serological evidence for HCV infection [24]. There is a moderate risk of HCV MTCT that is higher in mothers with HIV co-infection (10% -20%) [25]. The risk of HCV sexually transmitted is also higher in HIV-positive individuals, particularly homosexuals [26], but is low among HIV-uninfected heterosexual couples [27]. Certain routes of blood-borne transmission include health-care staff acquisition, cosmetic procedures (such as tattooing and body piercing), scarification and circumcision [28] and intranasal drug usage. The hepatitis C virus induces both chronic and acute infections. Acute HCV infection is defined as the presence of certain HCV infection markers within six months of HCV exposure and infection, and is characterized by the appearance of HCV RNA, HCV core antigen (p22 Ag), and subsequently HCV antibodies which may or may not be associated with viral clearance. HCV antibodies develop as an integral part of an acute infection and persist throughout life. Acute infection is typically clinically silent, and is associated only very rarely with life-threatening illness. Spontaneous clearance of acute HCV infection usually occurs in 15% -45% of infected individuals in the absence of treatment within six months of infection, but this varies by area and population [29]. Nearly all other 55% -85% of people who do not clear up HCV within six months are identified as having chronic HCV infection. Chronic HCV infection if left untreated, can lead to liver cirrhosis, liver failure and HCC. Of those with chronic HCV infection, the chance of liver cirrhosis within 20 years is 15% -30% [30]. The chance of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is around 2 -4% per annum and infection clearance, whether spontaneous or as a result of antiviral therapy, does not offer a lasting defense against reinfection [31].

Materials and Method
Study Area, Period, and Design This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted from January 2018 to August 2020 at the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria. A total of 475 patients who attended the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory, NIMR were enrolled in the study. Study Population; The study population included all the patients who tested positive for HBV, HCV and HBV and HCV co-infection. Patients who were negative for both types of hepatitis served as negative control. Structure questionnaires were administered to capture socio-demographic variables such as age, sex, religion, ethnicity, marital status, profession and work experience.
Blood sampling; Five ml whole blood samples were collected from participants under aseptic conditions after obtaining their informed consent. The blood sample was divided into two parts: one part was transferred to a tube with Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), while the other part was transferred to a plain tube and left undisturbed for 30 -60 minutes. Serum was then collected after centrifugation of the blood and immediately stored at -20˚C until analysed.
Hepatic studies and serological tests for HBV and HCV: Markers of liver function assessed for all participants in the study. These were aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total protein and albumin concentrations. Markers of liver function were assayed using automatic blood chemistry analyzer (TC MATRIX Automated Chemistry Analyzer, USA). HBsAg and anti-HCV antibodies were determined using rapid diagnostic kits (LabAcon and Triple H Rapid Test Kits) as described by the manufacturers. For Hepatitis B, about 100 µL blood was placed on test cassette using micropipette. The results were recorded after 20 min. The presence of two red lines at both the test and the control bands were reported as positive results. The presence of only one line at the control band was reported as sero-negative results. For Hepatitis C, about 10 µL blood was placed on sample area of the cassette using micropipette and four drops of assay diluent were added. The result was recorded after 5 -20 min. The presence of two red lines at both the test and control bands were reported as sero-positive results while those with one red line at the control band only were reported as sero-negative results.
Statistical analysis: Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20. The Student t test was used for comparison between seropositive and control groups. The results were considered to be statistically significant when p values were <0.05 using Chi-square test.
Ethical Considerations: Informed consent was obtained from participants. Unique identifiers were used for participants' samples and assay results to prevent identification by unauthorized person (s) and maintain confidentiality of participants' information.
T. Raheem et al.   Those 40 years and below showed significant difference in level of conjugated bilirubin than those sixty years and above [p = 0.039] (Table 5). However, no significant difference in levels of liver function markers in those seropositive for hepatitis B, C or both seropositivity in those 40 years and those above 40 years.
There was no significant difference between age and levels of liver function markers (p > 0.05) (   Table 1 showed that out of the total 475 participants, 30% were seropositive while 70% were seronegative for hepatitis B, C and both B and C. Table 2 showed hepatitis B, C and both B and C sero prevalence of 51.8%, 32.6% and 15.5% respectively in the 141 seropositive participants. Distribution of positive cases in Hepatitis among gender indicated that 44 (53%) males were positive to HBV, 27 (32.5%) males were positive to HCV and 12 (14.5%) males were positive to both HBV and HCV. Positive cases among females indicated 29 (50%) females were positive to HBV, 19 (32.8%) females were positive to HCV and 10 (17.2%) females were positive to both HBV and HCV (Table 3).
Age group 20 -40 years had 74.3% hepatitis B seropositivity, 76.1% hepatitis C seropositivity, while 85.7% had both hepatitis B and C seropositivity. Participants with age group 41 -60 years had 20.3%, 21.7% and 14.3% for hepatitis B, C and both B & C seropositivity respectively as shown in (Table 4). Table 5 showed no significant difference between hepatitis B and C seropositivity and liver function markers in both male and female. Table 6 showed that only conjugated bilirubin showed significant difference between liver function markers and age in both male and female participants (p = 0.039). There was no significant difference between other liver function markers and age in both male and female HBV, HCV and both B and C dual seropositive participants (p > than 0.05). Table 7 showed significantly elevated AST and ALT liver function markers in hepatitis C seropositivity (p = 0.009). The mean AST levels of HBV, HCV, and both HBV and HCV were 17

Discussion
Infections of hepatitis B and C are prevalent from region to region and from one population to another in a country or region in various parts of the world [32]. According to our study, the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and both HBV and HCV were 51.8%, 32.6% and 15.6% respectively. Our study appeared to be similar to that of [15] where a prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HBV and HCV dual positivity of 75%, 23%, and 2%, respectively were reported. However, the 2% seropositivity for HBV and HCV dual sero status was far lower than the 15.6% in our study. The reason for this could be due to differences in the geographical locations of the different studies. Though the prevalence of hepatitis seropositivity in this study was high, we are of the opinion that the high prevalence could be due to being a health facility-based study.

T. Raheem et al.
The finding of seroprevalence of 51.8% was recorded for HBV and 32.6% for HCV in this study showed that HBV, HCV are both endemic in the study location. WHO in 2010, defined low prevalence of hepatitis to be <2%, moderate prevalence as 2% -8%, and high prevalence as >8% HBsAg positivity.
Our study shows that among HBV, males were 53% and females were 50%, among HCV males were 32.5% and females were 32.8% while among both HBV and HCV males and females were 14.5% and 17.2%, respectively, which is comparable to the study of [33] [34]. A previous study reported significant association between age and HBV and HCV seropositivity in Abeokuta, Nigeria [35].
Our study showed that both HBV and HCV co-infection rates were highest among individuals in the age group of 20 -40 (85.7%), followed by the age group of 41 -60 years (14.3%), which was similar to a previously published study in the United States [44]. A higher prevalence in the 20 -40 years age group may be associated with increased exposure to risk factors for HBV/HCV co-infection.
Our present study supports this report because higher HBV and HCV prevalence was found among age group 20 -40 years than in other age groups. Age of peak infection in this study is in consonance with reports from previous studies [35] [36]. The socio-economic implication of this finding more in the age group 20 -40 years is imperative. This age group is economically and sexually active age group. The possibility of higher spread of HBV and HCV in this age group via sexual activities and reduction of productivity due to liver dysfunction is high. More males were HBV/HCV sero-positive compared to females. This finding agreed with the reports of [37] [38] [39] done in Nigeria and also agrees with the earlier reports of [40] from Southeastern Turkey. However, the findings are contrary to those of other researchers who reported higher prevalence in females than males [41]. Preponderance of male sero-positivity in this study may be due to the tendency of increased level of sexual activities among males than females reported in some studies in Nigeria [42]. Higher HBV sero-positive status in males can be attributed to the fact that males are less likely to clear HBV compared to females [42]. The reason for a higher frequency of HBV/HCV co-infection among male patients could be a result of a higher level of exposure to risk factors associated with co-infection, including drug abuse, higher and unprotected sexual activities [43].
In our study, the levels of AST and ALT were significantly higher in HCV single infections than in HBV or both HBV and HCV participants. It has been reported that chronic hepatitis C is associated with variable ALT levels, ranging from normal to high and that persistently normal levels of ALT have been associated with a lower progression and occurrence of cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis [45]. This study however, disagreed with the work of [46], where higher levels of liver enzymes were reported in HBV/HCV co-infected patients compared to those having HBV or HCV single-infection. The difference may be due to difference in geographical locations of the participants or possibly due to other comorbid conditions in the participants.

Conclusions
High prevalence of HBV, HCV and both HBV and HCV (51.8%, 32.6% and 15.6%) respectively was observed in this study. HBV and HCV seropositivity was found to be significantly high among 20 -40 years while it was least among 41 -60 years and above. Hepatitis B single seropositivity was highest, followed by There was no significant difference between gender and liver function markers (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between hepatitis B and C seropositivity and liver function markers. However, the study showed significantly elevated AST and ALT liver function markers in hepatitis C seropositivity (p > 0.009). Consequently, this study updated data on serological epidemiology of hepatitis in the study facility. It also further affirms the need for at least AST and ALT as markers of liver function in all hepatitis suspected patients especially in poor resource setting where laboratory diagnostic capacities are not available or unaffordable for effective care and management of viral hepatitis.