Hypercoagulability in the Context of Pre-Eclampsia: Case-Control Study at the Laquintinie Douala Hospital (Cameroon)

Introduction: Preeclampsia is one of the major causes of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in the world. The complexity of its etio-pathogenesis involves, among other things, hypercoagulability, which alone accounts for about 15% of his deaths. Our objective was to study the parameters of coagulation (prothrombin level, activated cephalin time) in pregnant women with preeclampsia and non-preeclampsia at Laquintinie Hospital in Douala. Methodology: We carried out an analytical cross-sectional case-control study from November 01 st , 2018 to May 31 st , 2019, in the gynecology and obstetrics department of Laquintinie Hospital in Douala. We included preeclampsia and non-preeclampsia pregnant women with a gestational age greater than or equal to 20 weeks amenorrhea. The variables of interest were age, pregnancy, likely to develop hypercoagulability than pregnant women without preeclampsia (OR 4.89; CI 2.34 - 10.20; p = <0.001). In linear regression, preeclampsia was significantly associated with PL (correlation coefficient 0.07; p = 0.008). We did not find risk factors associated with hypercoagulability in preeclampsia. Conclusion: Our study confirms the existence of hypercoagulability associated with preeclampsia, in particular in relation to an increase in the level of prothrombin.


Introduction
Preeclampsia is defined as the onset of arterial hypertension (HTN) associated with proteinuria after 20 weeks of amenorrhea in a previously normal pregnant woman [1] and occurs in 2% to 7% of pregnancies [2]. According to WHO, it is a major cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in the world (14%) and especially in developing countries [3]. It is the third leading cause of maternal mortality, after postpartum hemorrhage and infections in Cameroon [4]. Although the exact cause of preeclampsia is not fully understood, it can be attributed to some factors including changes in placental perfusion, endothelial dysfunction, fibrin deposition, inflammation, and hypercoagulability [5] [6]. Hypercoagulability is an imbalance between coagulation and fibrinolysis activities leading to the development of multiple thrombi and the rapid consumption of platelets, prothrombin, fibrinogen and other coagulation factors [7] [8] and is thought to be responsible for around 15% of maternal deaths due to preeclampsia [9].
Abnormal enhancement of coagulation activity is implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, as suggested by the increased frequency of venous thromboembolic events, thrombotic placental abnormalities and thrombin generation in this population [10] [11]. This state of hypercoagulability is described in the literature as being more important in preeclampsia compared to normal pregnancies [12] [13] [14]. In France in 2013, a study found the level of prothrombin higher in preeclampsia during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum [12]. In China, Han et al. in 2014 found that during the third trimester, pregnant women with preeclampsia exhibited a state of higher hypercoagulability with the prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thrombin time (TT), increased D-dimer and mean platelet volume [13]. In Sudan, Husham et al. in 2016 found that women with severe preeclampsia had significantly higher levels of thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) 1, and a significantly lower level of PAI-2 [14].
In Cameroon, several studies have been done on preeclampsia, but data on hypercoagulability and preeclampsia are scarce. In order to improve the know-ledge and the management of hypercoagulability associated with preeclampsia in Cameroon, we conducted a preliminary study whose aim was to evaluate the coagulation of pregnant women with preeclampsia at Laquintinie hospital in Douala through the level of prothrombin and the activated cephalin time.

Methodology
1) Type of study: This was a cross-sectional analytical case-control study. 2) Period, Duration and Place of Study: Our study took place from November 01 st , 2018 to May 31 st , 2019 (i.e. 07 months) in the gynecology and obstetrics department of Laquintinie Hospital in Douala.
3) Study population: It consisted of preeclampsia and non-preeclampsia pregnant women received during our study period. a) Inclusion Criteria We included in our study pregnant women from our study population who gave their informed consent without distinction of age, pregnancy or parity.
Preeclampsia group Pregnant women with moderate or severe preeclampsia without distinction of gestational age.
Non-preeclampsia group • Absence of preeclampsia • Gestational age greater than or equal to 20 weeks of amenorrhea.

b) Exclusion Criteria
Were excluded from our study; Common exclusions: smoking, chronic renal failure, chronic liver disease, blood crass disorders, treatment with anti-vitamin K.
Specific exclusions: Non-preeclampsia group: risk factors for preeclampsia (previous diabetes, chronic hypertension, anti-phospholipid syndrome, lupus, history of preeclampsia), gestational hypertension. 4) Sampling: We performed a convenient, consecutive and non-exhaustive sampling given the lack of data on the prevalence of increased prothrombin levels and activated cephalin time in both preeclampsia and normal pregnancies. 5) Procedure a) Administrative procedures The study protocol had been submitted to the Institutional Research Ethics Committee for Human Health at the University of Douala. An ethical clearance N˚1727 CEI-Udo/02/2019/T was issued to us before the start of data collection for our study. This was done with respect for confidentiality, with collection sheets that were anonymous and the results used for scientific purposes. We also obtained the authorizations from the director of Laquintinie Hospital. b) Collection of data After obtaining informed consent following the explanations of the study, the data was collected using a structured data sheet. The variables of interest were; 1) Socio-demographic: Age, marital status (single, married,), gestational age in week of amenorrhea, gestation and parity.
2) Medical (History): Hypertension, diabetes, addiction to tobacco, thromboembolic disease, preeclampsia, autoimmune disease, hematological conditions, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, anticoagulant use. The positivity or negativity of this history was made on the basis of documentation at the medical record level.
3) Physical: a) Anthropometric and hemodynamic parameters. • Weight (kg), measured using a CAMRY brand scale (Hong Kong, China); the patient standing and barefoot, upright on the scale.
• Height (in cm), measured with a measuring rod, the patient with bare feet standing upright with his head horizontal.
• Blood pressure (in mmhg): after 10 minutes of rest, it was measured in both arms. This measurement was made using electronic blood pressure monitors from OMRON (Kyoto, Japan). Anyone with BP ≥ 140/90 mm hg was considered hypertensive. b) Urinary dipstick (for proteinuria testing): It was done using MISSION brand urine strips LOT no.: URS8060151 only in non-preeclampsia patients. Proteinuria was said to be significant from two crosses. 4) Biological data: a) parameters of hemostasis: We explored the coagulation phase of hemostasis through quick time (QT), prothrombin level (PL) and activated cephalin time (ACT).
The activated cephalin time (ACT) consists of activating the intrinsic pathway of coagulation and explores the factors of the contact system (FXll and FXI, high molecular weight kininogen, prekallikrein), of the anti-hemophilic complex (FIX, FVll 1), of the complex prothrombinase (FX, FV), prothrombin (FII) and fibrinogen (ex-FI).
The Prothrombin time (PT) consists in measuring the time elapsed until fibrin formation after addition to citrated plasma of an excess of calcium thromboplastin containing tissue factor, phospholipids and calcium. It is customary to express the prothrombin time as a percentage after calibration. The test is improperly called prothrombin level (PL). PT explores factors VII, X, V, II and fibrinogen.
a) Place of sample collection Samples were taken in obstetrical emergencies, in antenatal care, or in the pathological pregnancy department by venipuncture at the fold of the elbow. b) Sample collection and analysis For each patient, 5 ml of blood was taken in 01 citrated tube for the determination of QT, PL, INR and ACT. And the analysis was carried out within 2 hours, after centrifugation at most 15 minutes after sampling, to obtain a plasma poor in platelets by a semi-automatic coagulometer of the BIO SOLEA 2 brand, Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

6) Statistical analysis
The data collected was recorded, entered and analyzed using Epi Info 7, Excel 2013 and the software Epi Data 3.1 (Lauritzen, Denmark). Quantitative variables were grouped together as a mean with standard deviation. Qualitative variables in the form of numbers and percentages. The comparison of the qualitative values was made using the Chi-square test and the quantitative variables using the student t test. The calculation of the odds ratios and their 95% confidence interval was only done when comparing the biological parameters of the two groups during univariate analysis. Multiple linear regression models were performed, in which PL and ACT levels were dependent variables and age, parity, gestational age, BMI, and preeclampsia were the independent predictors of interest. The p-value was significant if it is less than 0.05.

General Characteristics of the Study Population
The ages varied from 16 to 40 years old. The mean age of preeclampsia was 27.80 ± 5.80 and 29.05 ± 5.29 in non-preeclampsia patients without a statistically significant difference. Preeclampsia and non-preeclampsia drugs were more represented in the 25-30 years age group, respectively 32% versus 37% without statistically significant difference. Singles were in majority in both groups, 68% in preeclampsia and 62% in non-preeclampsia patients without statistically significant difference (Table 1).  The mean gravidity was 2.66 ± 1.45 in the preeclampsia and 2.82 ± 1.76 in the non-preeclampsia patients without a statistically significant difference, with the extremes of 1 and 8. The paucigravid were the most common in preeclampsia (40%) and primigravid in non-preeclampsia patients (34%). The mean parity of the preeclampsia was 1.26 ± 1.30 and 1.37 ± 1.42 in the non-preeclampsia, without a statistically significant difference, with the extremes of 0 and 5. The nulliparas were majority in both groups ( Table 2).
The mean gestational age in preeclampsia patients was 36.16 ± 3.41 and 33.43 ± 5.61 in non-preeclampsia patients with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.047).
The mean body mass index in preeclampsia patients was 31.16 ± 4.71 and 30.23 ± 4.73 in non-preeclampsia patients without a statistically significant difference. Pregnant women with grade 1 obesity were predominant among those with preeclampsia (40% versus 16%) with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). Grade 2 obesity affected 21% of non-preeclampsia versus 6% of preeclampsia patients with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.018) ( Table 3).

Biological Parameters
A high PL was found in 22% and a normal PL in 78% of pregnant women without preeclampsia. The ACT of pregnant women without preeclampsia was 100% normal (Figure 2 and Figure 3).    The ACT of non-preeclampsia pregnant women was 100% normal. Pregnant women with preeclampsia had a low PT of 8%, a normal PT of 34% and a high PT of 58%. Pregnant women with preeclampsia had normal TCA 88% and elevated TCA 12% (Figure 4 and Figure 5).  Pregnant women with preeclampsia were 4.89 times more likely to have hypercoagulability than normal pregnant women (Table 4) and 2.68 times more likely to have hypercoagulability in the general population (Table 5).

Comparison of Coagulation Parameters in the Two Groups and Risk Factors for Hypercoagulability
1) Comparison of biological parameters in the two groups Pregnant women with preeclampsia were 4.89 times more likely to develop hypercoagulability than normal pregnant women (Table 4).
Pregnant women with preeclampsia were 2.68 times more likely to develop hypercoagulability in the general population (Table 5).
In linear regression, preeclampsia was significantly associated with prothrombin levels ( Table 6).
2) Risk factors associated with hypercoagulability We did not find any risk factors associated with hypercoagulability in preeclampsia (Table 7).       [17]. The 25 -30 age group corresponds to the optimal period for human procreation.

Obstetric History 1) Gestation
The mean pregnancy was 2.66 ± 1.45 in the preeclampsia and 2.82 ± 1.76 in the non-preeclampsia patients without a statistically significant difference. These results are identical to those found by Namavar et al. in 2009 in Iran [16]. Pauci-gravids were the most prevalent in preeclampsia (40%) and primi-gravids in non-preeclampsia patients (34%). These results are contradictory to those found by Nirmala et al. in 2015 in India [17] including 61% of primi-gravids among preeclampsia. The high number of previous miscarriages in our study may be the explanation.
2) Parity The mean parity of the preeclampsia was 1.26 ± 1.30 and 1.37 ± 1.42 in the non-preeclampsia patients without a statistical significant difference. These results are identical to those found by Awolola et al. in 2016 in Nigeria [7]. Nulli-paras were the majority in the two groups, contrary to Han et al.

in 2017 in
China [13] which found only nulli-paras. This difference can be explained by a conjunction of facts: on one hand the limitation of birth in China due to their overpopulation and our mores on the other hand.

Gestational Age
The mean gestational age in preeclampsia patients was 36.16 ± 3.41 and 33.43 ± 5.61 in non-preeclampsia patients with a statistically significant difference.  [17]. This can be explained by the fact that pregnant preeclampsia included were predominant at term.

The Body Mass Index
The mean BMI in the two paired groups was 31.16 ± 4.71 in the preeclampsia and 30.23 ± 4.73 in the non-preeclampsia patients without a statistically significant difference. Our results are contradictory to those reported by Han et al. in 2017 in China [13] who found an average BMI of 23.8 ± 0.8 in preeclampsia and 23.4 ± 1.2 in non-preeclampsia patients. This difference can be attributable to the racial stature of these studies.

Normal Pregnant 1) Prothrombin Time/Prothrombin Level
The mean PT was 12.53 ± 0.84, this result is identical to that found by Namavar et al. in 2009 in Iran [16] and higher than that found by Chen et al. in 2017 in China [15]. This difference seems to be related to the size of Chen's sample (n = 188). We found a low PT (high PL) of 22% which is in the same line with those found by Joly B et al. in 2013 [18] and Rosenkranz et al. in 2008 [19]. These results support the physiological hypercoagulability of normal pregnancy. However, these studies did not report the prevalence of increased prothrombin levels in this population.
2) Activated cephalin time The mean ACT was 32.98 ± 3.47; this result is identical to that found by Namavar et al. in 2009 in Iran [16] and superior to that found by Chen et al. in 2017 in China [15]. This difference seems to be related to the size of Chen's sample (n = 188). All ACT were normal in our study; our finding is contradictory to the result reported by Thornton et al. in 2010 in Canada [20] who reported a shortening of activated cephalin time due to increased coagulation factors during normal pregnancy. The racial component can explain this difference.  [17]. Prolonged ACT can be explained by the onset of DIC which is one of the complications of preeclampsia resulting in increased consumption of coagulation factors which appears after a phase of decompensated hypercoagulability.

Comparison of Coagulation Parameters
The major hormonal changes in pregnancy are accompanied by changes in the parameters of hemostasis, leading to hypercoagulability [18]. which did not be reported by the authors aroused. This difference can be explained by the fact that they did not look for pregnancy as a potential risk factor for hypercoagulability in pregnancy. What makes this finding an important contribution.

Conclusion
At the end of this work, we can conclude that there is hypercoagulability associated with pre-eclampsia, particularly in relation to an increase in the level of prothrombin. The elevated prothrombin level was 58% in preeclampsia and 22% in non-preeclampsic patients. The low prothrombin level was 8% in preeclampsia and 0% in non-preeclampsia.

Limitation of the Study
The sample size that was not calculated due to a lack of available data may therefore lack statistical power. The hemostasis parameters used, although not negligible and accessible, seem to us insufficient to assess hemostasis. The particularities of the population studied as well as the individual predisposition to coagulopathy can have a significant impact on the results obtained as well as on their interpretation; and these can explain the different rates between studies and justify their heterogeneity by location. This is the case with some of our findings with respect to those of other authors. This therefore means that beyond the thesis-anti thesis approach, it is necessary to consider the racial component sometimes not in phase with certain so-called referential and predominantly Caucasian data. We recruited, consecutively but not exhaustively, 150 pregnant women, including 50 preeclampsia matched with 100 non-preeclampsia.

Contribution of the Authors
Essome designed the study, collected the data, wrote the manuscript and co-directed the study; Ngaba co-supervised the study, read and corrected the manuscript; Ndom as well as Nana,