Influence of Machining Parameter on Tool Life While Machining Hybrid Metal Matrix Composites

A metal matrix composite constitutes a continuous metallic matrix and a discontinuous phase known as reinforcement. The 
hybrid metal matrix composites (Hmmcs) have been used to manufacture 
drive shafts, disc brake rotors, brake drums, connecting rods pistons, engine 
block cylinder liners for automotive and rail vehicle applications. The Hmmcs 
castings of diameter 120 mm and length 300 mm were prepared through sand mould 
technique following stir casting methodology. The cast components further 
subjected to evaluation of physical properties and machining tests using two 
grades of coated inserts and PCD inserts. The experiments were carried out 
following ISO 3685 standards. The coating thickness of the TiN coated and TiAlN 
coated inserts were measured using Kalo testing method; the results of the test show that the interface of 
the substrate and coating was free from the porosity, and the coating thickness 
of TiN coating was 4.84 microns and TiAlN coating was measured 4.6 microns. The 
results of the experiments show that performance of the PCD insert was better 
than coated inserts at 0.1 mm/rev feed; however at 0.2 mm/revolution feed PCD insert failed 
by micro chipping of cutting edge while machining Hmmcs. When TiAlN coated 
inserts were used to machine Hmmcs the coated inserts failed by gradual wear 
and BUE formation.


Introduction
Advanced materials are possessing excellent physical and mechanical properties having higher wear resistance are preferred for automobile, aviation and machine building applications. The aluminium matrix composites which are of lower density and higher performance tailored cast materials [1] [2] [3]. Aluminum alloy is preferred in aerospace application, owing to its properties such as high specific stiffness, specific strength and ease with which it can be fabricated [4]. The aluminum alloys will cover a wide usage in the areas such as subzero temperature, moderate and elevated temperature range applications [5]. The mmcs containing 5 wt% and 7 wt% reinforcement of B 4 C particles are casted at 750˚C temperature following stir cast method incorporating two-step additions [6]. The composites possess huge potential since, composites can be tailored to meet the requirements of the end user; however, the use of the composites is limited owing to increased manufacturing cost which is due to the specialized processing methods followed in the fabrication of the composites [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. The aluminum alloy can be fabricated using different reinforcements such as silicon carbide, fly ash, cenosphere, graphite [12] [13] [14] [15]. The increased hardness of the Al 2 O 3 and SiC particles significantly enhances wear resistance of the composite material and hence affects machinability [16] [17] [18] [19] [20].
The above review revealed that a limited number of research works was done on the study of machinability pertaining to aluminum Hmmcs composites. The aim of the research work is therefore to investigate the influence of machining parameter on tool life using coated carbide inserts and PCD insert during turning of aluminum Hmmcs composites at varied cutting speed and feed using single point cutting tool.

Experimental Details
The details of materials used to carry out the research work and the methods followed to carry out machinability study are briefly discussed in this part. The details of hybrid composite material fabrication and stir casting methodology are also described.

Work Materials
The matrix material used for the research work was Al6061 grade aluminum alloy. Figure 1 shows the Al6061 ingots used for the preparation of the composite. Table 1 and Table 2 show the physical and mechanical properties and also chemical composition of Al6061 grade aluminum alloy respectively.

Reinforcement
The Reinforcements used to fabricate hybrid metal matrix composites are flyash  Table 3 and Table 4 show the physical properties and chemical composition of FA respectively. The chemical composition of the SiC particles is presented in Table 5. The density of the Gr measures 2.26 g/cm 3 . The Gr contains mainly carbon as revealed by the chemical composition analysis. Table 3 and Table 6 show the physical properties and chemical composition of Gr respectively.

Preparation of Composite Material
The Al6061 Hmmcs reinforced with FA, SiC and Gr were fabricated using liquid metallurgy route. The matrix material was melted using stir casting process at a controlled temperature and the desired quantity of reinforcements was added to the molten aluminum alloy.
The molten aluminum alloy and reinforcements were stirred continuously to create a vortex to force the reinforcement particles in to the melt as shown in Figure 2. Stirring continued to disperse the reinforcement particles as uniformly as possible.

Hardness Measurement of Work Material
The Hardness measurement of newly fabricated Al6061-FA, SiC and Gr particles reinforced Hmmcs was carried out on Brinell hardness tester following ASTM standards. The Brinell hardness tester is shown in Figure 3. The specification of Brinell hardness tester is presented in Table 7.
The experimental results pertaining to the influence of reinforcement on the hardness of the Al6061 grade aluminum reinforced with FA, SiC and Gr particles are presented in Table 8.

Density of the Composites
The density of the aluminum alloy of grade Al6061 and its composites containing FA, SiC and Gr were measured following experimental technique and also calculated using Rule of mixtures. Further the density value of measured and theoretical are almost align with each other. Thus indicating the method adopted for the fabrication of the composite material is reliable. The density of the Hmmcs measured using experimental methodology and also calculated using RoM is presented in Table 9.

Scanning Electron Microscopy
Microstructural examination was carried out using Scanning electron microscopy to examine the microstructure of the samples at a much greater resolution.
The Specification of TES CAN VEGA-3 LMU SEM is presented in Table 10.

Machine Tool
The machine tool used for the experiments was ACE designers make, Jobber XL CNC Lathe, and the machine is shown in Figure 4, and the specification of the CNC Lathe is presented in Table 11.

Cutting Tool
The cutting tool used for conducting experiments was Kennametal make positive rake angle turning tool holder. The tool holder modified to obtain 10˚ positive side rake angle. The nomenclature of the tool holder is tabulated in Table  12. The tool holder used for the experiments is shown in Figure 5.

Measurement of Coating Thickness
The tungsten carbide inserts preferred for machining these Hmmcs are coated with hard and wear resistant thin layer of Titanium carbide, Titanium nitrate, aluminum oxide, aluminum nitrate, zirconium carbo nitrate so on, using either physical vapour deposition or chemical vapour deposition coating methods. The quality of the coating is measured using various methods; one such method is subjecting the cutting tool surface to revolving spherical object, which leads to the formation of spherical dent on the surface of the cutting tool. By measuring the dent formed on the tool surface; the thickness of the coating applied on the cutting tool was measured. Figure 6 shows the cavity formed on the coated insert used for experiments. The coating thickness of the inserts is

Hardness Test
Measurement of BHN was carried out following ASTM E10 standard. The measured hardness values of matrix, composite and hybrid composite materials are presented in Figure 7. From Figure 7, it can be inferred that, hardness of the Al6061 is lower than its composites.      ing FA and Gr reinforcements is lower than the density of the matrix material, however the composite material containing SiC is marginally higher than matrix material. It is attributed to the fact that the density of the FA and Gr reinforcements are lower than the matrix material and density of the SiC is marginally higher than that of matrix matrial. Further the density value of measured and theoretical are almost align with each other. Thus indicating the method adopted for the fabrication of the composite material is reliable. Figure 9 shows the SEM microphotographs of the Al6061 grade aluminum alloy used for the experiments. Figure 9 shows the SEM microphotographs of the reinforcements FA, SiC, Gr. From, Figure 9, it is evident that the average diameter of the reinforcements FA, SiC, Gr particles were mesured below 53 microns. Further, from SEM microphotographs, we can observe that the FA, SiC, Gr particles are almost uniform.

SEM Analysis of Composite Material
Distribution of the FA, SiC, Gr particles in the Al6061 matrix was verified using VEGA-3, TES CAN make SEM, and the microphotographs are shown in Figure   10. SEM analysis of cast composite material with different filler materials was examined using JEOL model JSM 6380 Scanning Electron Microscope. Figure   10 shows

Tool Life Test
The tool life test of the composites containing varied combinations of reinforcements were carried out using coated carbide and PCD inserts of identical geometry. ISO 3685 standards were followed during continuous turning test. The combination of matrix & reinforcement used for the turning test is tabulated in Table 13. The combination of machining parameter and insert used for the experiment is tabulated in Table 14 and the Tool life obtained during continuous turning is tabulated in Table 15 and                 From Figures 14-16, we can infer that while machining Al6061 castings the tool life was higher, irrespective of the cutting speed at 0.1 mm/revolution feed. When aluminum matrix reinforced with fly ash & graphite particles, the tool life found better than aluminum matrix reinforced with Silicon carbide particles. From Figures 14-16, it is also clear that, the tool life of the PCD inserts are higher than TiN and TiAlN coated carbide inserts irrespective of the material and cutting speed used for turning. However performance of the TiAlN coated carbide inserts found better than TiN coated carbide inserts.
From Figures 17-19, we can infer that the tool life of the inserts during turning Al6061 and its composites as well as hybrid composite found lower irrespective of the material used for turning at 0.2 mm/revolution feed. From Figures  17-19, it is also clear that, the tool life of the PCD inserts are higher than TiN and TiAlN coated carbide inserts irrespective of the cutting speed used for turning. However performance of the TiAlN coated carbide inserts found better than TiN coated carbide inserts.
From Figures 20-22, we can infer that while machining Al6061 castings the tool life found higher, irrespective of the type of inserts used at 0.2 mm/revolution feed. When aluminum matrix reinforced with fly ash & graphite particles, the tool life found better than aluminum matrix reinforced with Silicon carbide particles at 0.2 mm/revolution feed. The slope of cutting speed on tool life found almost linear in case of Hmmcs when uncoated carbide insert and PCD insert was used for machining. While machining Al6061 castings the tool life found high when compared to other combinations between 300 m/min to 500 m/min cutting speed. The contact time of inserts found lower while machining Hmmcs castings when compared to all the combinations of matrix and filler material, which indicates the wear resistance of the Hmmcs is higher.

Conclusions
Aluminum hybrid metal matrix composites containing 3% FA, 3% silicon carbide and 3% graphite particles show higher wear resistance. From SEM micro-C. R. P. Rao et al. photographs it is evident that the average diameter of the reinforcements FA, SiC, and Gr particles was measured below 53 microns. SEM analysis reveals that, the morphological details of the FA, silicon carbide, and graphite particles and also even distribution in the matrix. Good retention of fly ash, silicon carbide, graphite particles was observed in the SEM microphotograph. The hardness of the composite material having composition Al6061 + 3% FA + 3% SiC + 3% graphite measured highest, this may be due to the reason that higher hardness of reinforcement content, that is Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , Si, C and Fe 2 O 3 . The density of measured and theoretical values is almost aligned with each other. Thus demonstrate the characterization and the approach for the fabrication of the composite.
We can infer that as cutting speed increases the contact time of the insert reduces irrespective of the work material. We can conclude that as feed/revolution increases the contact time of the insert reduces irrespective of the work material.
The contact time of inserts found lower while machining Hmmcs castings when compared to all the combinations of matrix and filler material, which indicates the wear resistance of the Hmmcs is higher. Built-up edge and built-up layer formation found high with matrix material when compared to Hmmcs containing 3% flyash, 3% silicon carbide and 3% graphite particle at all cutting speeds for identical machining conditions. At 500 m/min cutting speed while machining Hmmcs material using PCD insert; the built-up edge formation was negligible.