Current Trends in Clinical Practice for the Minimal Invasive Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is an early alternative surgical procedure for the unicondylar osteoarthritis or damaged knee joint with artificial prosthesis for the release of disabling painful condition and restoring the nor-mal knee functions. Minimally UKA is one of the recent and the majority successful procedures in modern orthopedics for the osteoarthritis which is spreading throughout the worldwide. Recently, many orthopedic surgeons are expanding their abilities in this field. However, it needs good knowledge and well experience for the successful clinical outcomes. The minimal invasive approach is more efficient for short hospital stay and faster postoperative recovery with low morbidity of the patients after UKA. The aim of this article is to emphasize the steps in UKA based on modern facts: function of knee joint, diagnosis, less invasive approach for medial condylar replacement, radiographic evaluation, and earlier recovery, selecting the patient and implant survivorship with review of surgery.


Introduction
The knee is the most common large joints which are affected by osteoarthritis. In 1950s, the concept of Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) was firstly initiated by MacIntosh and Mckeever, over hemiarthroplasty and useful as metal space maker [inflexible element] in unicondylar knee compartment [1]. Its attractiveness gradually increased superiorly as a minimal invasive approach, as an alternative choice to the total knee replacement for the local symptomatic knee osteoarthritis management [2] [3]. St. Georg and Marmor Knee introduced the former current single compartmental device in 1969 and 1972 respectively [4]. The purpose of this procedure was to amplify the post-operative improvement to lessen the hospital stay and speedy recovery to return back to regular daily activities with proper knee function [3]. Initially, the outcomes after this procedure were disagreed due to structure of poly-radial metallic femoral module and a flat tibial module prepared by polyethylene. Wear and polyethylene warp were the major troubles which led to the preamble of metal sustain tibial module. In 1980, Goodfellow, Tibrewal et al. [5], assumed a little dissatisfaction in the earlier materialization in the UKR, as it had suggested itself from weak patient assortment, shortage in prosthetic device development as well as operative procedure. In 1978, O'Connor primarily projected the utilization of a meniscal weight bearing device of knee prosthetic and fixed these designs for bi-compartmental tibio-femoral arthroplasty. The mainstream of modern advancement in UKA is the prospect to employ the arthroplasty utilizing minimum invasive surgical procedure skills. The Knee osteoarthritis frequently affects the medical compartment initially and later it gradually affects the lateral compartment. In its earlier stage, the alternative choices for surgical supervision are unicompartmental arthroplasty, valgus high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty [6]. Osteoarthritis is the most common reason leading to impairment and functional disability of knee and occurs mostly in elderly patients with simultaneous disruption of Hipknee-ankle load bearing ability. Varus and valgus are strongly related for the increased osteoarthritis, relaying on body mass index, age and sex [7]. Current two surgical approaches are most famous techniques for knee osteoarthritis treatment and both techniques have their own benefits. The principle of High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is adjustment of knee misalignment either Varus or valgus. The goal of UKA surgery is to replace the damaged bony surface of the knee. Also, patients who underwent UKA had a better functional outcomes rate than Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The long-term survival rate was low in UKA patients compared to TKA patients. UKA had lower rate due to device type, elevated body mass [obesity], age, unexplained pain, limb alignments, unicondylar implant's location and lack of the surgeon's skills [8].
The minimal invasive approach is capable to provide short hospital stay and postoperative faster recovery with low morbidity of the patients after UKA. The minimal blood loss and blood transfusion requirement, minimum opoids uses, early recovery and minimum complication rate, shorter stay in hospital, advancement in prosthetic design with low costs of implant and highly reassurance of the patient, gradual increasing popularity of surgical procedure, selection of patient and modification in implants variety along with its advantages and greater uses of UKA as minimal invasive process has served as an alternative choice to TKA for the localized degenerative knee osteoarthritis [5] [9] [10] [11] [12]. The aim of this article is to emphasize the steps in UKA based on modern facts: function of knee joint, diagnosis, less invasive approach for medial condy-lar replacement, radiographic evaluation, and early recovery, selecting the patient and implant survivorship with review of surgery.

Review of Literatures
Numerous reviews of the innovative articles were done highlight on current trend in unicompartmental osteoarthritis, minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and unicondylar knee arthroplasty. The articles seek out was done on individual search engine for example RESEARCH GATE, PUBMED, SCOPUS and GOOGLE SCHOLAR (Figure 1).
Approximately 90 articles associated to the knee joint surgery were studied of which 25 articles were extracted which were either related to current trend of UKA, minimally invasive UKA or unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Beyond 25 articles only 8 articles were extracted which were allied to minimal invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Among them 3 articles were excluded as they did not provide exact evidence for current trend in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Finally, we 5 articles which were focus on clinical trend in minimal invasive UKA, WOMAC and KSS scores.

Function of Knee Joint
The primary function is to keep up physical strength and walk more efficiently, providing leg stability and proprioception. It plays the role of shock absorber; supports the body in upright position without muscles having to work, helps in lowering and raising body balance especially in climbing, sitting and squatting. It works with the ankle joint as a powerful forward thruster for the body especially when running.

Diagnostic Principle
The major joints Osteoarthritis is mainly diagnosed in the assortment of medical condition of the body or presenting the symptoms. The diagnosis is performed by physical assessment, in addition to few special laboratory analyses as well as radiological studies such as X-ray with anteroposterior view Figure 2(a), skyline view Figure 2(c) and lateral view Figure 2(b) illustrates of knee joint. During the evaluation, at some point radiological modalities maybe performed to confirm or to rule out meniscus tear, Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury, fracture and degenerative diseases as well as to assess the efficacy of the possible treatment choice.
Traditional proposal and selection criteria for UKA by Kozinn  Images of the affected joints can be obtained during radiological examination. There is no cartilage on X-ray film, but the reduction of the knee bone space shows the loss of cartilage. An X-ray also shows bone spurs around the joint as the evidence of osteoarthritis before they experience any symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] uses radio waves of strong magnetic fields to generate bone images and details of surrounding soft tissues including cartilages. An MRI is not necessary for diagnosis of osteoarthritis, but it helps to provide more detailed information in complicated cases [22] [23] [24].
Laboratory test: Evaluation of blood or joint fluid tests can help diagnose and eliminate some additional sources of knee pain, such as rheumatoid arthritis. Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) is done to extract the joint fluid from the affected joint; then the reason of pain is analyzed and also checked for gout or if the presence of any infection of inflammatory origin [25] [26].

The Step by Step Minimal Invasive Approach for Medial UKA
The procedure was initiated either under epidural anesthesia or general anesthesia on the customary operation table via both leg receptacles, uses of compression bandage is as per surgeons demands. Now, aseptic draping is done in the customary fashion on 70 degrees angle flexed knee joint, carrying the incision through superficial layer of skin. Incision is carried on until seen the joint capsule and incise the joint capsule parapatellar midline. Incision is made approximately 2 -3 inches up to higher limit of the patella and extends distally close to the medial side of the tibial tuberosity, however finishing 1 inch below the joint line formerly positioned [27] [28]. A medial arthrotomy is executed as well as the joint is opened. Subsequently medial fat tissue [Fat pad] is excised for well visible of the ACL, femoral condyle as well as corresponding medial tibial plateau Figure 3(a) illustrates. Exploit the medial and lateral retractors for the fine exposure. It's significant to memo that the ideology of ligaments corresponding can be applied to a medial UKA and the collateral ligaments should be neutral or free. The knee is flexed at 60 degree to examine the osteophytes, ACL resistance and Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) with noting the position of both the patellofemoral joint and lateral compartments [ [32]. Then remove the over growth osteophytes in the intercondylar notch to circumvent impingement with ACL on the notch Figure 3(b) illustrates. The medial femoral condyle osteophytes should be removed, as these osteophytes will be helpful for the fine positioning the femoral components. In contrast as finishing the perpendicular tibial cut, it's important to recognize plus blot, the anterior touch dot connecting the tibial inhabitant tibial plateau as well as the anterior component of femoral condyle.

Tibial Cut
The three essential aims regarding to the tibial cut associated the applied anatomy of the medial compartment. The perpendicular an extramedullary tibial steer is positioned to evaluate the slope and valgus/varus alignment. Flexed the knee joint up to ninety degrees and the joint incision should be made through an anterior medial arthrotomy preliminary at the medial margin of the patella with finished at 3 cm underneath the tibia plateau. The opening is deepening during to pierce joint capsule and at proximal end the cut is extensive 1 -2 cm without damaging the Vastus medialis. The primary tibial excision should be least [2 -4 mm highest], since the ailment extreme frequently involve the femoral region. It's significant to maintain the deep tibial incision ultraconservative and improve the functional potential of the tibial cortex. Anterior tibia is exposed after the piece of Hoffa's padding is removed. Anterior Cruciate Ligament is scrutinized to see if the UKA prosthetic is appropriate or not. If not; then TKA is appropriate for it. The damaged and over growth osteophytes have been excised as well as the tibial resecting was implemented with an oscillating saw beneath the supervision of a jig, which is located as the anatomical and functional tibial tilt. Firstly, perpendicular incision was implemented subsequently Figure 3(c) illustrates and then the horizontal incision is executed meanwhile the lateral and medial collateral ligaments were preserved by Hohmann retractors Figure 3(d) illustrates. The resection of plateau size releases the gap for a tibial module as well as meniscus component as a minimum 4 mm. The resected plateau scrutinized the advanced reporting flanked by implant and the passion for determining the size of the plateau.

Femoral Cut
The flexion of knee at 45 degrees the hole is willing into intramedullary channel of femur by 5 mm awl which is located at 1 cm anterior to antero-medial part of intercondylar indentation. Introduce the intramedullary rod awaiting rod hawker is stopped up opposed to the bone Figure 4(a) illustrates. Applying the femoral drills steers and drill 4 mm morsel is drilled in the superior outlet into bone up to stop then left in place as the guide. As soon as alignments are established a 6 mm make a hole in it then drilled throughout the inferior hole in the guide Figure 4(b). When completed, all the instruments from the distal femur are taken out and femoral saw wedge is introduced again in the drilled holes. Subsequently, in these moments some miscellany of osteophytes and medial Open Journal of Orthopedics illustrates. Make sure that implants surfaces are free from the cement and polymer sits well in its groove. After that incised tissues are closed deep layer to superficial layer respectively.

Indication for Patient Selection and Contraindication for UKA
Patient assortment is significant paces of the practice for UKA and instruction from the history remain very informative since UKA include several particular modes of failure. The causes of UKA failure were evaluated from our inventive sequence of unicompartmental prosthesis tracked for previous several years. The failure causes loosening of implant, gradually progression of knee osteoarthritis in the replaced compartment and or unreplaced compartment [33] [34] [35]. Rheumatoid arthritis is one of the most contraindication of UKA where it was relatively undiagnosed or relay on over correction of abnormality. Body mal-alignment or mal-position of the implant associated with Loosening. Lastly, the majority of the patients modified for polyethylene wear enclosed a novel polyethylene thickness < 8 mm, which is currently recognized designate the lowest thickness to use for smooth polyethylene introduce [32].

Clinical Evaluation
The clinical assessment needs to ensure a minimum range of motion of 90 degrees of perioperative flexion, and to insert the femoral prosthetic components through a small incision. Patellofemoral joints is also necessary for experimental assessment to support the expression of some unexplained anterior knee pain in daily activities such as stair hiking, downhill and crouching patients [23] [33] [37] [38]. It is of great significance to evaluate the stability and strength of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament evaluating via Lachman test, pivot shift test, anterior and posterior drawer test and the condition of the collateral ligaments [32]. The single chamber implants bind the space preserved by the damaged cartilage, and pull the collateral ligament to the natural pressure after the end of the action process.

Radiological Evaluation
Utilization of the MRI, CT-scan contains potential to localize the radiological pattern of disease and supportive guidance to precision or pre-operative arthroscopy has specific consign during our clinical sense choice to achieve UKA [22] [23] [41]. Conversely, the ultimate judgment might be used in various case intra-operative assessments of the conflicting section plus tender grip on the ACL. Most of case utilize complete load bearing outlooks the extremity in bipodal or unipodal posture. This observational assess the overall tibio-femoral viewpoint with measurement of the angle among femoral anatomical axis and extremity perfunctory alliance to brief potential to the distal femoral incise [9] [33]. It will power to estimate whichever extra-articular skeletal abnormality, which can't be approved via Unicondylar implant moreover investigate in favor of femoral hip stem and required the utilization of a short intra-medullary fe-  [44]. The stress analysis executes in varus for the medical compartment and utilized to confirm the indication of Unicondylar substitution with full cartilage thickness loss in the medial exaggerated compartment. In valgus, stress vision confirms the total thickness of cartilage in the unchanged lateral compartment with complete rectification of the anomaly to normal. In the event of incomplete or excessive modification, the visualization of stress will indicate the absence of collateral balance of the ligament, and then the total replacement of the knee is performed [32]. The lateral view of the joint will corroborate the anterior deficiency of tibial conversion > 10 mm referring to the posterior boundary of the tibial plateau and will demonstrate that tibial erosion is inadequate for the frontal and middle segments of the tibial plateau [13] [24] [29]. Axial patellofemoral inspections will authenticate the adequate cartilage thickness of the patellofemoral joint. The incidence of osteophytes peri-patella may not be a contraindication for unicondylar replacement that can still be highlighted by minimal incision. Some authors claim that patellofemoral joint is not a model of adequacy and some authors state that complete loss of patellofemoral cartilage is currently contraindication to unicondylar replacement performance [7] [42] [45].

Current Trends
The patient's expectations for knee replacement surgery have changed through the main surgical pathway strengthening, enhancement in the implants design, multiple pain strategies, enhanced surgical techniques and the implementation of the same-day surgery program. Ensuring a simpler, faster functioning and faster recovery activation process, primarily for isolated knee compartment osteoarthritis [46], can lead to a significant increase in UKA frequency. At present, some additional indicators have been extended to achieve excellent clinical results [ [48]. Long-term supervision provides an extension of the encouragement of the implants currently available and the continued existence of surgery, and the published statistics suggest that the use of Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs) is safe and effective for same-day surgery. In recent, the Medicare centers and Medicaid Services has denoted UKA as an outpatient technique as well as provide adequate indications for hospitalization for more than 23 hours [49] [50]. The increased the survival rate and reduce the revision rate in minimal invasive UKA can be contributed as the good improvement of knowledge and well experience of surgeon for the well defined patient selection criteria, enhancement in surgical technology, approach and enhancement of implants designs. The survivorship rates are comparable to individuals achieved with a typical open approach but the functional outcomes are better in minimal invasive UKA. Complications: Numerous authors have inveterate the admirable radiologic and clinical outcomes and survival rate of minimal invasive UKA as mention on Table 1 and Table 2 respectively. However malalignment, pain, instability, stress fracture of   WOMAC Index is commonly used index for the assessment of knee which was introduced by Bellamy et al. [52]. The WOMAC score contain pain scores, stiffness scores and function scores. Where this score presents a subjective assessment of the knee. The WOMAC questionnaire is extensively applied for evaluating knee OA. This score has been measured as good index for OA assessment [53]. These scores contain 24 questionnaires which are separated into 3 fragments: 5 questions for pain, 2 questions for stiffness, and 17 questions for function. The WOMAC score consist of 0 -100 scale. The outcome is specified as an arithmetic standard of the significant questions. Outcome range from 0 -100, whereas 0 specify no pain, stiffness, and functional limitation and 100 specify the severe painful, highly stiffness, and strictly limited function.
Another one is the Knee Society Score [KSS] is also extensively applied in scoring system for assessment after UKA/TKA. The KSS consist of the knee scores and also function scores [54] [55]. Judgment of the knee joint itself for knee pain, range of motion and strength is completed via the knee scores. The functional scores assist to evaluate the patient's ability to walk and to climb stairs, utilize of ambulatory supports. The score is support on the 75% of subjective plus 25% objective measurement.
Hospital for Special Surgery Knee score [HSS] [20] is another form of evaluation which contains of Knee Pain, range of motion, function of the knee, muscle strength, flexion deformity, and instability and subtraction apparatus. HSS contains questionnaires as 100 points at full mark, with best condition equaling 100 points [Excellent ≥ 85, Good = 70 -84, Fair = 60 -69, Poor ≤ 60]. Based on this criteria, the studied by Zhou Xinhua et al. [56], the HSS knee score was enhanced from 50.33 ± 11.60 to 90.06 ± 3.07 [P < 0.001], representing good outcome subsequent UKA.

Conclusion
Current trends in clinical practice as minimal invasive approach have significant advantages and are capable to provide shorter hospital stay and rapid postoperative recovery with low morbidity of the patients after UKA. Improvement of pain scores, early recovery, and improvement in better knee functions with bet-