Is Cancer Still the Villain, Even during COVID 19 Outbreak?

Background :Anxiety and depression are two common psychiatric conditions 
encountered in cancer treatment. Prevalence rate and risk factors show wide variations 
in different countries and the environment. COVID 19 outbreak has increased psychological 
disorders in general public and health workers. Whether this pandemic has increased 
the psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients needs to be addressed for planning strategies. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department 
of Radiation Oncology, a tertiary cancer centre in the state of Kerala, India. The 
aim was to assess hospital prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression 
among cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic. Patients on treatment for cancer 
and willing for the study were recruited. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale 
(HADS), a self-assessment 
valid tool for screening both anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) are used. 
HADS-A & D were calculated 
separately & categorized as normal, borderline and abnormal with a score of 
0 - 7, 8 - 10 & 11 - 21 respectively. 
Separate structured questionnaire for COVID19 related questions and patient master 
file for patient & treatment 
characteristics were used in risk assessment. Data were entered in an Excel sheet 
and SPSS version 22 for statistical analysis. Findings: 208 patients were included in this study. The overall 
prevalence rate of anxiety was 7.2%, with borderline cases 4.3% and abnormal cases 2.9%. The 
overall prevalence of the rate of depression was 5.3% (3.4% borderline & 1.9% abnormal). 
Risk factors like age, sex, socioeconomic status, primary site, stage of the disease 
and default of disease had no statistical significance. Interpretation: The prevalence rate of anxiety and depression among cancer 
patients in this study is one among the lowest ever reported. COVID 19 outbreak 
has not brought any impact in the rate of psychological distress in our patients 
and the low rate may be due to the robust medical care including mental health interventions 
and reassurance by the Government.


Introduction
Anxiety and depression are the two common psychiatric conditions encountered in cancer treatment. Studies have shown that the prevalence of these two is high among cancer patients but in most instances, it goes unnoticed or undiagnosed.
In India, studies have shown that the cancer patients have psychiatric morbidity either in the form of depressive disorder or in the form of generalized anxiety disorder as high as 43% -46% [1] [2]. The diagnosis of cancer itself is stressful and it can have a substantial impact on the mental health of the patient. The concern about the toxicity of treatment, uncertainty about the cure of the disease, economic burden, social stigma, isolation by the family are all the other contributing factors for anxiety and depression. Depression and anxiety may hinder cancer treatment and recovery, as well as the quality of life and survival.
We argue that more research is needed to prevent and treat comorbid depression and anxiety among people with cancer and that it requires greater clinical priority [3]. The pandemic has affected people of all nations, continents, races, and socioeconomic groups. The strategies adopted for containment of COVID 19, such as lockdown of the entire communities, quarantining, social isolation, the closing of schools etc. have drastically changed daily life. Kerala, a state in south-west India, has a population of approximately 3.48 crores and there is pride among a large section of people in Kerala that the state's social indicators are at par with those of Nordic countries. This state has once again become a model in the health care battling COVID 19. The early strategic move by the Government has reflected in low case fatality rates and high recovery rates, which is 0.59% and 96.03% respectively after 100 days of the outbreak in the state.
COVID 19 pandemic occurring during the treatment of cancer is as if being between Scylla and Charybdis. Common reactions to this disease are the worry about protecting from the virus, because they are at more risk of infection and mortality, concern about the routine cancer care or community-based services which may be disrupted due to treatment, facility closures or reductions in ser- we aim to evaluate whether anxiety and depression have increased and whether this pandemic is a real concern for our cancer patients.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised 30 years ago by Zigmond and Snaith to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients [4]. It is a self-assessment questionnaire comprising seven questions each for anxiety and depression, which is scored separately and hardly need 2 -5 min to complete. For both the scales, a score of ≤7 is Normal, 8 -10 is borderline and 11 -21 is abnormal. This tool is used in our study.

Methods
This study was conducted in the Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology of This is a single institutional cross-sectional prospective study of cancer patients who were diagnosed to have cancer from October 2020 to Dec 2020. This study period represents an immediate 3 month period before COVID 19 outbreak was confirmed and the study participants were on treatment during the study. The study was conducted in April/May 2020. These selection criteria were made to make sure that these patients had their cancer diagnosis before COVID 19 and to assess how this outbreak might have influenced them psychologically.
All consecutive patients reporting for treatment during this period and willing to participate in the study were recruited. Patients with a previous history of psychiatric illness and those not on any active cancer treatment were excluded. Illiterate patients and patients who are unable to read and comprehend the local language Malayalam were also excluded.
After getting informed consent from the patients, the HADS questionnaire in the local language was distributed to the participants, face to face, in the waiting room of the OPD clinic. It was confirmed that the individual understood all the questions before answering them. If they did not understand a question, then it

Findings
A total of 208 patients satisfying the selection criteria were included in this study (Tables 1-6).

Interpretation
Of the total 208 cancer patients recruited for the study, the major share 132 (63.5%) patients were female. The mean age of the study population was 56.2 yrs with Standard deviation 10.9. Majority of the patients (72.1%) were below the poverty line and remaining belonged to the above poverty line socio economic category. As the department caters adult population, almost 98% of the participants were married and they all have a proper care taker. It is alarming to observe that more than three fourth (72.6%) of individuals this study are diabetic whereas prevalence rate of diabetes is only 16% -20% in the general population in Kerala [5]. This is same with the case of hypertension also, which is 78.8% in the study group while in general population it is 54.5% [6]. The high rate of hypertension and Diabetes mellitus in the study group may be because majority of the patients are middle aged and elderly.
Breast cancer was the most common type of cancer (43.8%) followed by lung     Table   7.
Our study is having one of the least prevalence rates. In this context, it may be noted that the rates vary with respect to the evaluation tool used, tumour site studied, ethnicity, the status of the population at the time of study viz. whether it is the time of diagnosis or during treatment or follow up.
Our study population is from the state of Kerala in India, where health indicators are at par with that of a developed country. All patients were evaluated during their treatment period. Another study from Kerala has shown that the prevalence rate range between 19% -20% [7] and from other states in India as 28% -37%. Data from other countries also show varying data, as low as 7% to as high as 48%. We have addressed the issue of psychological distress in our cancer patients specifically in COVID pandemic period, with a hypothesis of increased prevalence. But our results reveal that the rate is comparatively low.
This probably is due to two main reasons. First of all, during COVID outbreak as a part of COVID containment strategies, the health sector is in full swing.
Government has taken steps to make sure that all patients are taken care even at the grass-root level and it may also be noted at this juncture that the primary health care in Kerala is strong. This protective feel of patients on the robust health system of Kerala might bring down the anxiety of patients. For example, were devised to manage stress and other mental health concerns arising from the outbreak. These strategies taken by the Government seems a step ahead and a recent article by Prof Emily et al. [12] stresses the need for such strategies for timely mental health care in a pandemic.
The second aspect may be the fact that this set of patients are in the cancer treatment period, hence they have already made multiple visits to Oncologist.
Hence, the assurance and the feel of the patient that they are getting a definitive treatment will again decrease the tension.
We have not included patients on pure palliative treatment and not on oncological treatment. The mental makeup of a patient getting a palliative treatment may be different. This may be another reason for a low rate in our study compared to the studies which have incorporated this group of patients.
Risk factors for anxiety and depression were also evaluated in our study. Variables like age, sex, socioeconomic status, primary site, stage of the disease and default of disease were examined for risk association and none had a statistical significance.
An evaluation was done to see whether COVID19 outbreak is a contributing factor for anxiety and depression. All the participants were asked what worries them the most whether "Cancer" or "COVID 19" or "both" or "none". 189 (90.9%) said it is the "cancer" that worries them the most, 17 (8.2%) opined that "both cancer & COVID" and 2 (1%) said it is "COVID". None of the patients who had anxiety as per the HADS criteria has opined that "COVID" is a worrying factor. Two patients with depression said that "both" are worrisome and for all others again "Cancer". Thus "COVID 19" is not a reason for anxiety in this study group. This lack of impact of "COVID 19" on the psychological aspect of the study group may be because, in Kerala, at the time of the conduct of this study, COVID 19 pandemic is well contained, R0 (R nought) 0.45 and the case fatality is one of the lowest in the world.

Conclusion
The prevalence of anxiety and depression among cancer patients varies among patients regionally and may be multifactorial. Cancer disease per se is the most worrisome factor and a pandemic like COVID19 though dreadful for the public; the psychological influence of it on cancer patients has not increased on the contrary. Interventions taken by Government to foster collective solidarity in beating COVID might have positively prevented the increase of this psychologi-