Antibacterial Activities of the Ethanolic Extract of Crateva adansonii DC. (Capparidaceae) Harvested in Dassa-Zoumè in Central Bénin

Objective: The present was initiated to study the antibacterial properties of the Crateva adansonii DC extract on germs commonly identified in skin and digestive infections in Benin as well as the reversion of resistance to these aforementioned germs. Method: The bacteria’s sensitivity test to extracts was carried out by the microdilution method in liquid medium as well as the MIC and the reversion of bacterial resistance. For the determination of the MBC, this technique is used coupled with spreading on agar medium. Results: The results show an antibacterial activity of the extract with MICs between 0.625 5 mg/ml. The CMB of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 is 2.5 mg/ml while that of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis CIP 8039 is 5 mg/ml. The reversion of bacterial resistance has shown a synergy of action between our extract and conventional antibiotics.

medicine as a first line for primary health care [3] [4]. Despite this strong propensity for folk medicine coupled with recent advances in modern medicine, infectious diseases constitute a serious public health problem in view of their frequency and severity OCDE [5]. It should be emphasized that the antibiogram known as the most effective way to deal with this microbial invasion is facing a bacterial resistance [6]. Crateva adansonii DC, of the capparidaceae family, is a medicinal plant used by traditional healers in Benin for multiple therapeutic virtues, notably antibacterial properties. It is used in the treatment of many conditions including abscesses, sores, bacterial infections, high blood pressure, diabetes and rheumatism.

Plant Material
These are exclusively samples of leafy stems of Crateva adansonii DC. ssp. adansonii harvested in Dassa-Zoumè in central Benin. This plant material was authenticated at the national herbarium of Abomey Calavi University under the number YH 269/HNB.

Biological Material
The microorganisms used in this study are reference strains, namely Escherichia coli (CIP 53126), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Staphylococcus epidermidis (CIP 8039), Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin, Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CIP 82118) and two hospital strains of urinary and digestive origin, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli isolated from biological samples from the microbiology laboratory of the Center Hospitalier Universitaire National/Hubert Koutoukou Manga (CNHU/HKM). These germs were preserved by subculturing on an agar medium.

Preparation of the Ethanolic Extract
The samples dried under laboratory conditions (θ = 22˚C ± 3˚C) were reduced to powder. 100 g of powder were brought into contact with 500 ml of ethanol with mechanical stirring for 24 hours. The extract was decanted, filtered and then evaporated in vacuo. The extract obtained was dried in an oven at 40˚C before being stored in pill organizers at 4˚C.

Preparation of Culture Media
Müller Hinton Agar (MHA) was obtained by dissolving 38 g of the agar medium in 1 L of distilled water (pH = 7.5 ± 0.2). Müller Hinton broth was obtained by dissolving 21 g in 1 L of distilled water. Each medium was sterilized in an autoclave at a temperature of 121˚C for 15 min.

Preparation of the Bacterial Inoculum
The bacterial inoculum is prepared by introducing an aliquot of a 24-hour bacteri- (OD 600 nm) of the solution is read using a spectrophotometer (UV-1600PC).
The optical density of the inoculum is adjusted to 0.156 for Escherichia. coli, P. aeruginosa and 0.3 for the strains of Staphylococcus. These optical densities correspond to 108 CFU/ml [7]. A dilution of 1/100 th of this inoculum made it possible to obtain the final inoculum (106 CFU/ml) used for the tests.

Sensitivity Test
The purpose of this test is to eliminate extracts having no activity at a concentration of 10 mg/ml. The bacteria sensitivity test to extracts was carried out by the micro-dilution method in liquid medium in 96-well plates [8]. 100 μl of bacterial inoculum at 106 CFU were added to 100 μl of extract prepared at 20 mg/ml. The acetone-water mixture (50:50) was used as a negative control. The plates were shaken using a mixer to make the reaction medium homogeneous and then incubated at 37˚C. After 18 h of incubation, 40 μl of a 2% aqueous solution of INT (SIGMA-ALDRICH) were added to each well. The appearance of red or pink coloring in a well indicates bacterial growth in the well.

Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The MIC was determined by the microdilution method recommended by CLSI The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been defined as the lowest concentration of extract capable of inhibiting any growth visible to the naked eye in 24 hours [8]. The negative control was sterile broth (BMH).

Determination of Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)
The MBC is determined by spreading 10 μL of the content of each tube of concentration greater than or equal to the MIC on solid medium. Indeed, concentrations of the extract, greater than or equal to the MIC, were prepared in sterile tubes. Finally, 100 μl of the bacterial suspension at 1.106 CFU/ml in BMH were added to the extracts so as to obtain the MIC and concentrations of 2xMIC and 4xMIC. These tube media were incubated at 37˚C. After twenty-four hours, 10 μl of the contents of the tubes will be inoculated on MH agar and placed in the oven for 24 hours. From the MIC, the smallest concentration, which allows only 0.01% of the bacteria in the starting suspension to survive in 24 hours, corres-

Determination of the Kinetics of Action of the Extract
The kinetic index of the reaction time of the extract of Crateva adansonii is determined as described by Ara et al. [12] reviewed and adapted to the conditions of the Laboratory of Biochemistry and Natural Bioactives substances (LBSNB).
The objective of this test is to know the duration of the bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect of the extract.

Principle:
The inocula used are fresh cultures of 24 hours. A 106 CFU inoculum was used for the various tests. The extracted inoculum mixture is made volume to volume in sterile tubes and placed in the oven at 37˚C. The optical densities are read at T0, then at 4 hour intervals until 36h, against a blank consisting of an MH mixture and of extract diluted to the concentrations of the various tests. The curves are plotted on the basis of the variance of the turbidity during the duration of the experiment.

Reversion of Bacterial Resistance
The main objective of this test is to determine the synergy of action between the extract and the conventional antibiotics Amoxicillin (AMX), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Ampicillin (AMP), Erythromycin (ERY), Erythromycin (ERY), Cotrimoxazole (SXT). Enterococcus faecalis and, Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been used because of their multidrug resistance [13]. It consisted in finding the MICs of conventional antibiotics and those of the combination of antibiotics and extract in order to calculate the fractional inhibitory concentration (CFI). According to the Antibiotic Committee of the French Microbiology Society reported by [14], there are four levels of interpretation, namely: • synergy (CFI ≤ 0.5) • addition (0.5 < CFI ≤ 1) • antagonism (CFI > 4).

Sensitivity Test
The result of the sensitivity test by the plate microdilution method is shown in Table 1.
Of the eight germs selected for this study, seven were sensitive to the ethanolic extract of Crateva adansonii. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated was resistant to contact with the extract. The inhibition diameters vary from 06 -11 mm.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The revelation of the various plates made it possible to determine the MICs of each germ in contact with the ethanolic extract of Crateva adansonii. Table 2 shows the MIC results specific to each germ tested.
The analysis in Table 2 reveals that the MICs determined are between 0.625 -5 mg/ml. The MIC of isolated Escherichia coli is more than 5 mg/ml while that of isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa is not determined.  Table 3 shows the results of the CMBs specific to each germ tested as well as the characterization of the antibacterial power of the extract. Table 3

Determination of Antibacterial Kinetics
The result of the action kinetics of the extract for the bacterial strains used is shown in Figures 1-3 below. Figure 2 shows the kinetics of action of the extract on P. aeruginosa. Figure 3 shows the kinetics of action of the extract on E. faecalis.   It results from Table 5, the characterization of the antibacterial power of the classic extract + antibiotic combination which is presented in Table 6 below.         The combined extract-ATB effect has been shown to be synergistic (FIC < 0.5) for germs only for Amoxicillin, and Ciprofloxacin. As for other antibiotics, the effect is additive (0.5 ≤ FIC ≤ 1) or indifferent (1 ≤ FIC ≤ 4).

Discussions
The purpose of using reference strains in this manipulation is to validate our technique. To evaluate the antimicrobial activity, the ethanolic extract was chosen. This choice is justified by the fact that this solvent has no action on the growth of the germs tested [15]. It is also important to remember that the extraction solvent was evaporated and the extract dried before the start of the tests.
We opted to do biological dilution tests. ference in result could be explained by the diversity of the extracts used but also by the diversity of the origins of the bacterial strains used. In contrast, Agboke et al. [18] obtained higher concentrations on the germs: E. coli (MIC: 12.5 mg•ml −1 ), S. aureus (12.5 mg•ml −1 ) and K. pneumoniae (25 mg•ml −1 ) with the methanolic extract of Crateva adansonii leaves. This is probably due to the difference in solvent used.
The action of the extract on the germs is done according to a certain dynamic that is interesting to know. The general analysis of the graphs (Figures 1-3 [20]. This is explained by the fact that this plant has a high antibacterial power because the MIC of the various germs exposed to the Z. F. Mignanwandé et al. effect of its ethanolic extract vary between 125 and 250 µg while that of Crateva adansonii is largely above (1250 µg/ml). This confirms the works of Adounkpe [21]. Nounagnon et al. [22]; Lagnika et al. [17]; and of Agbankpe et al. [19] who underlined the inhibitory antibacterial power of Crateva adansonii.

Conclusion
This study revealed that Crateva adansonii, a medicinal plant commonly used by the population, has antibacterial activity on the germs responsible for skin and digestive disorders, in particular Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus feacalis. In addition, the ingenious initiative to combine the ethanolic extract of Crateva adansonii with conventional antibiotics has revealed a reversal of the bacterial resistance of many germs.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.