Materials Sciences and Applications

Vol.9 No.7(2018), Paper ID 85466, 18 pages

DOI:10.4236/msa.2018.97043

 

Comparing Design Void Content with Actual Void Content of Laboratory Prepared Pervious Concrete

 

Anthony Torres, Cristián Gaedicke, Jiong Hu, Rupesh Bejugam, Sarah McMasters

 

Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA
California State University, Hayward, CA, USA
The Peter Kiewit Institute, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha, NE, USA
Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA
Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA

 

Copyright © 2018 Anthony Torres, Cristián Gaedicke, Jiong Hu, Rupesh Bejugam, Sarah McMasters et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

How to Cite this Article


Torres, A. , Gaedicke, C. , Hu, J. , Bejugam, R. and McMasters, S. (2018) Comparing Design Void Content with Actual Void Content of Laboratory Prepared Pervious Concrete. Materials Sciences and Applications, 9, 596-613. doi: 10.4236/msa.2018.97043.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.