Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Vol.7 No.8(2017), Paper ID 78112, 11 pages

DOI:10.4236/ojog.2017.78083

 

Low-Dose Misoprostol versus Vaginal-Insert Dinoprostone for At-Term Labor Induction: A Prospective Cohort Study

 

Laura Emilia Muñoz Saá, María Dolores Martín Ríos, María Rosario Noguero Meseguer

 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Department of Preventive Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain

 

Copyright © 2017 Laura Emilia Muñoz Saá, María Dolores Martín Ríos, María Rosario Noguero Meseguer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

How to Cite this Article


Muñoz Saá, L. , Martín Ríos, M. and Meseguer, M. (2017) Low-Dose Misoprostol versus Vaginal-Insert Dinoprostone for At-Term Labor Induction: A Prospective Cohort Study. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 824-834. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2017.78083.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.