Health
Vol.3 No.1(2011), Paper ID 3799, 10
pages
DOI:10.4236/health.2011.31011
Performance comparison between three intraoral image receptors of different technology at a variety of tube potential, tube current and exposure time settings using a stepwedge phantom
Elli Katsoni, Ioannis A. Tsalafoutas, Panagiotis Gritzalis, Evripidis Stefanou, Evangelos Georgiou, Emmanuel Yakoumakis
Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Medical Physics Department, Agios Savvas Hospital, Athens, Greece
Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Dental School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Dental School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Copyright © 2011 Elli Katsoni, Ioannis A. Tsalafoutas, Panagiotis Gritzalis, Evripidis Stefanou, Evangelos Georgiou, Emmanuel Yakoumakis et al. This is
an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to Cite this Article
Katsoni, E. , Tsalafoutas, I. , Gritzalis, P. , Stefanou, E. , Georgiou, E. and Yakoumakis, E. (2011) Performance comparison between three intraoral image receptors of different technology at a variety of tube potential, tube current and exposure time settings using a stepwedge phantom.
Health,
3, 56-65. doi:
10.4236/health.2011.31011.