Open Access Library Journal
Vol.06 No.09(2019), Article ID:95072,13 pages
10.4236/oalib.1105604
On Standard Concepts Using ii-Open Sets
Beyda S. Abdullah, Amir A. Mohammed
Department of Mathematics, College of Education for pure Sciences, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Open Access Library Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Received: July 15, 2019; Accepted: September 14, 2019; Published: September 17, 2019
ABSTRACT
Following Caldas in [1] we introduce and study topological properties of ii-derived, ii-border, ii-frontier, and ii-exterior of a set using the concept of ii-open sets. Moreover, we prove some further properties of the well-known notions of ii-closure and ii-interior. We also study a new decomposition of ii-continuous functions. Finally, we introduce and study some of the separation axioms specifically ,.
Subject Areas:
Mathematical Analysis
Keywords:
α-Open Set, ii-Open Set, Separation Axioms
1. Introduction
The notion of α-open set was introduced by Njastad in [2] . Caldas in [1] introduced and studied topological properties of α-derived, α-border, α-frontier, α-exterior of a set by using the concept of α-open sets. In this paper, we introduce and study the same above concepts by using ii-open sets. A subset A of X is called ii-open set [3] if there exists an open set G in the topology of X, such that: , and , the complement of an ii-open set is an ii-closed set. We denote the family of ii-open sets in by . It is shown in [4] that each of and is a topology on X. This property allows us to prove similar properties of α-open set. Also, we define ii-continuous functions and we study the relation between this type of function and continuous, semi-continuous, α-continuous and i-continuous functions. Finally, we introduce a new type of separation axioms namely ,. We prove similar properties and characterizations of and .
2. Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, and (simply X and Y) always mean topological spaces. For a subset A of a space X, Cl (A) and Int (A) denote the closure of A and the interior of A respectively. We recall the following definitions, which are useful in the sequel.
Definition 2.1. A subset A of a space X is called
1) Semi-open set [5] if .
2) α-open set [2] if .
3) i-open set [3] if there exist an open set G in the topology of X, such that
i)
ii)
The complement of an i-open set is an i-closed set.
4) ii-open set [4] if there exist an open set G in the topology of X, such that
i)
ii)
iii)
The complement of an ii-open set is an ii-closed set.
5) int-open set [4] if there exist an open set G in the topology of X and such that . The complement of int-open set is int-closed set.
6) αo (X), So (X), io (X), iio (X), into (X) are family of α-open, semi-open, i-open, ii-open, int-open sets respectively.
7) , denote the family of all i-open sets and ii-open sets respectively.
Definition 2.2. [3] A topological space X is called
1) if a, b are to distinct points in X, there exist an i-open set U such that either and , or and .
2) if and , there exist i-open sets U, V containing a, b respectively, such that and .
Definition 2.3. A function is called
1) Continuous [6] , if is open in for every open set G of .
2) α-continuous [6] , if is α-open in for every open set G of .
3) Semi-Continuous [5] , if is semi-open in for every open set G of .
4) i-Continuous [3] , if is i-open in for every open set G of .
3. Applications of ii-Open Sets
Definition 3.1. Let A be a subset of a topological space . A derived set of A denoted by D(A) is defined as follows: . A point is said to be ii-limit point of A if it satisfies the following assertion: . The set of all ii-limit points of A is called the ii-derived set of A and is denoted by . Note that is not ii-limit point of A if and only if there exist an ii-open set G in X such that ( and ).
Theorem 3.2. For subsets A, B of a space X, the following statements hold:
1)
2) If , then
3) and
4)
5)
Proof. 1) Since every open set is ii-open [4] , it follows that .
2) Let . Then G is ii-open set containing x such that
(3.1)
Since we get , it implies that , from (3.1) we get .
Hence, . Therefore .
3) Since and , from (2) we get ,.
This implies to .
We shall prove that . Since ,, from (2) we get and . Therefore .
4) If and G is an ii-open set containing x, then . Let . Then, since and ,. Let . Then, for and . Hence, . Therefore, .
5) Let . If , the result is obvious. So, let, then for ii-open set G containing x, . Thus, or .
Now, it follows similarly from (4) that . Hence, .
Therefore, in any case, .
In general, the converse of (1) may not true and the equality does not hold in (3) of theorem 3.2.
Example 3.3. Let and . Thus, . Take the following:
1) . Then, and . Hence, ;
2) and . Then and . Hence .
Theorem 3.4. For any subset A of a space X, .
Proof. Since ,. On the other hand, Let . If , then the proof is complete. If , each ii-open set G containing x intersects A at a point distinct from x; so . Thus, , which completes the proof.
Definition 3.5. A point is said to be ii-interior point of A if there exist an ii-open set G containing x such that . The set of all ii-interior points of A is said to be ii-interior of A and denoted by .
Theorem 3.6. For subset A, B of a space X, the following statements are true:
1) is the union of all ii-open subset of A
2) A is ii-open if and only if
3)
4)
5)
6)
7) If , then
8)
9)
Proof. 1) Let be a collection of all ii-open subsets of A. If , then there exist such that . Hence , and so . On the other hand, if , then for some . Thus , and . Accordingly, .
2) Straightforward.
3) It follows from (1) and (2).
4) If , then and so there exist an ii-open set G containing x such that . Thus, and hence . This shows that . Now let . Since and . We have . Therefore, .
5) Using (4) and Theorem (3.4), we have
.
6) Using (4) and Theorem (3.4), we get.
7) Since and ,, we get .
8) Since and , from (7) we get ,. Therefore .
9) Since and , from (7) we get ,. Therefore .
Definition 3.7. is said to be the ii-border of A.
Theorem 3.8. For a subset A of a space X, the following statements hold:
1) where denotes the border of A
2)
3)
4) if and only if A is ii-open set
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
Proof.
1) Since , we have .
2) and (3). Straightforward.
4) Since , it follows from Theorem 3.6 (2). That A is ii-open .
5) Since is ii-open, it follows from (4) that .
6) If , then . On the other hand, since ,. Hence, .
Which contradicts (3). Thus .
7) Using (6), we get .
8) Using Theorem 3.6 (6), we have
9) Applying (8) and the Theorem (3.4), we have .
Example 3.9. Consider the topological space given in Example (3.3). If , then and . Hence, , that is, in general, the converse Theorem 3.9 (1) may not be true.
Definition 3.10. is said to be the ii-frontier of A.
Theorem 3.11. For a subset A of a space X, the following statements hold:
1) where denotes the frontier of A
2)
3)
4)
5)
6) if and only if A is ii-open set
7)
8)
9) is ii-closed
10)
11)
12)
13)
Proof.
1) Since and , it follows that .
2) .
3) .
4) Since , we have .
5) Since ,.
6) Assume that A is ii-open. Then , by using (5), Theorem 3.6 (2), Theorem 3.8 (4) and Theorem 3.8 (9).
Conversely, suppose that . Then . by using (4) and (5) of Theorem 3.6, and so . Since in general, it follows that so from Theorem 3.6 (2) that A is ii-open set.
7) .
8) It follows from (7).
9) Hence, is ii-closed.
10) .
11) Using Theorem 3.6 (3), we get .
12)
13) .
The converses of (1) and (4) of Theorem 3.11 are not true in general, as shown by Example
Example 3.12. Consider the topological space given in Example 3.3. If , then , and if , then .
Definition 3.13. is said to be an ii-exterior of A.
Theorem 3.14. For a subset A of a space X, the following statements hold:
1) where denotes the exterior of A
2) is ii-open
3)
4)
5) If , then
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
Proof. 1) It follows from Theorem 3.6 (1).
2) It is straightforward by Theorem 3.6 (6).
3) .
4) Assume that . Then , by using Theorem 3.6 (7).
5) Applying Theorem 3.6 (8), we get
6) Applying Theorem 3.6 (9), we obtain
.
7) Straightforward.
8) Straightforward.
9)
10)
Example 3.15. Let and . Thus, . If and . Then . and .
4. A New Decomposition of ii-Continuity
We begin by the following definition:
Definition 4.1. A function is called ii-continuous if is ii-open set in for any open set G of .
Theorem 4.2. Let be a function then:
1) Every continuous function is an ii-continuous,
2) Every ii-continuous function is an i-continuous,
3) Every α-continuous function is an ii-continuous.
Proof. 1) Let G be open set in . Since f is continuous, it follows that is open set in . But every open set is ii-open set [4] . Hence is ii-open set in . Thus f is ii-continuous.
2) Let G be open set in . Since f is an ii-continuous, it follows that is an ii-open set in . But every ii-open set is i-open set [4] . Hence is i-open set in . Thus f is i-continuous.
3) Let G be open set in ( ϭ). Since f is α-continuous, it follows that is α-open set in . But every α-open set is ii-open set [4] . Hence is ii-open set in . Thus f is an ii-continuous.
The converse need not be true by the following example.
Example 4.3. Let
,
and
,
and
,
.
Let be the identity function then ,,,. Then f is ii-continuous, but f is not α-continuous, since for the open set in , is not α-open in and f is not continuous, since for the open set in , is not open in . Now when be defined by ,,, we get f is i-continuous, but f is not ii-continuous, since for the open set in , is not ii-open in .
Theorem 4.4. Let be a function then every semi-continuous function is an ii-continuous.
Proof. Let G be open set in . Since f is semi-continuous, it follows that is semi-open set in . But every semi-open set is ii-open set [4] . Hence is ii-open set in . Thus f is an ii-continuous.
Definition 4.5. A function is called int-continuous if is int-open set in for any open set G in .
Theorem 4.6. Let be a function then:
1) Every continuous function is int-continuous,
2) Every ii-continuous function is int-continuous,
3) Every α-continuous function is int-continuous.
Proof. 1) Let G be open set in . Since f is continuous, it follows that is open set in . But every open set is int-open set [4] . Hence is int-open set in . Thus f is int-continuous.
2) Let G be open set in . Since f is ii-continuous, it follows that is an ii-open set in . But every ii-open set is int-open set [4] . Hence is int-open set in . Thus f is int-continuous.
3) Let G be open set in . Since f is α-continuous, it follows that is α-open set in . But every α-open set is int-open set [4] . Hence is int-open set in . Thus f is int-continuous.
The converse need not be true by the following example.
Example 4.7. Let , and , and ,. Let be the identity function then ,,. Then f is int-continuous, but f is not ii-continuous, since for the open set in , is not ii-open in and f is not continuous, since for the open set in , is not open in and f is not α-continuous, since for the open set in , is not α-open.
Definition 4.8. A subset A of X is called weakly ii-open set if A is ii-open set and .
Theorem 4.9. A subset A of a space X is α-open set if and only if A is weakly ii-open.
Proof. Let A be α-open set. Since and . Therefore , this implies that . Now, put where , then A is ii-open set. Therefore, A is weakly ii-open set.
Conversely, Let A be weakly ii-open set, then there exist an open set , such that satisfying and A is ii-open set. Since , this implies that and . Since A is ii-open set, using (2) from Theorem (3.6), we get . Therefore . Thus A is α -open set.
As a summary the following Figure 1 shows the relations among semi-continuous, ii-continuous, i-continuous, int-continuous, α-continuous and continuous.
Figure 1. Relations among semi-continuous, ii-continuous, i-continuous, int-continuous, α-continuous and continuous.
Corollary 4.10. A function is α-continuous if and only if it is weakly ii-continuous.
Proof. Clear from Theorem 4.9.
5. ii-Separating Axioms
In this section we define and spaces for ii-open sets and we determine them by giving many examples. Specially, we define , and spaces to compare them with space.
Definition 5.1. A topological space X is called
1) if a, b are to distinct points in X, there exists ii-open set U such that either and , and and .
2) if and , there exist ii-open sets U, V containing a, b respectively, such that and .
Example 5.2. Let , and are topological spaces.
1) ( ) there exists such that ,. Therefore is .
2) ( ) there exists such that ,. Therefore is .
Theorem 5.3.
1) Every -space is -space,
2) Every -space is -space,
3) Every -space is -space,
4) Every -space is -space.
Proof. (1), (2), (3) and (4) follow using the fact that every open set is ii-open [4] .
The converse needs not to be true by the following example.
Example 5.4. Let
, and .
and are topological spaces.
is not -space because, ( ) there is no open set G such that ,.
is -space because, ( ) there exists such that ,.
( ) there exists such that ,.
( ) there exists such that ,.
is not -space because, ( ) there exists such that ,.
is not -space because, ( ) there exists such that ,.
Theorem 5.5. Every -space is -space.
Proof. Let X be -space. Let a, b be two distinct points in X. Since X is -space there exist two α-open sets U, V in X such that ,,,. Since every α-open set is ii-open set [4] , U, V is an ii-open set in X. Hence X is -space.
Theorem 5.6. Every -space is -space.
Proof. Let X be a -space. Let a, b be two distinct points in X. Since X is -space there exist two ii-open sets U, V in X such that ,,,. Since every ii-open set is i-open set [4] , U, V is an i-open set in X. Hence X is -space.
The converse needed not to be true by the following example.
Example 5.7. Let , and.
. .
and are topological spaces.
is -space because, ( ) there exists such that , and ,.
( ) there exists such that , and ,.
( ) there exists such that , and ,.
is not -space because, ( ) there exists such that ,.
Theorem 5.8. A space X is if and only if for every pair of distinct points x, y of X.
Proof. Let X be a -space. Let such that , then there exists an ii-open set U containing one of the points but not the other, then and . Then is ii-closed set containing y but not x. But is the smallest ii-closed set containing y. Therefore and hence . Thus .
Conversely, Suppose for any with ,. Let such that but . If then and hence . This is contradiction. Therefore . That is . Therefore is ii-open set containing x but not y. Hence X is an -space.
Theorem 5.9. A space is -space if and only if the singletons are ii-closed sets.
Proof. Let X be -space and let , to prove that is ii-closed set. We will prove is ii-open set in X. Let , implies and since X is -space then their exist two ii-open sets U, V such that ,. Since , then is ii-open set. Hence is ii-closed set.
Conversely, Let then are ii-closed sets. That is is ii-open set clearly, and . Similarly is ii-open set, and . Hence X is an -space.
As a consequence the following Figure 2 shows the relations among ,,, and .
Figure 2. Relations among ,,, and .
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Abdullah, B.S. and Mohammed, A.A. (2019) On Standard Concepts Using ii-Open Sets. Open Access Library Journal, 6: e5604. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105604
References
- 1. Caldas, M. (2003) A Note on Some Applications of α-Open Sets. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 2, 125-130.
https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171203203161 - 2. Njastad, O. (1965) On Some Classes of Nearly Open Sets. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 15, 961-970. https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1965.15.961
- 3. Askander, S.W. (2016) Oni-Separation Axioms. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 7, 367-373. https://www.ijser.org
- 4. Mohammed, A.A. and Abdullah, B.S. (2019) II-Open Sets in Topological Spaces. International Mathematical Forum, 14, 41-48.
https://doi.org/10.12988/imf.2019.913 - 5. Levine, N. (1963) Semi-Open Sets and Semi-Continuity in Topological Spaces. The American Mathematical Monthly, 70, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2312781
- 6. Mashhour, A.S., Hasanein, I.A. and Ei-Deeb, S.N. (1983) α-Continuous and α-Open Mappings. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 41, 213-218.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01961309