Open Access Library Journal
Vol.06 No.08(2019), Article ID:94131,8 pages
10.4236/oalib.1105605

An Extreme Problem for a Volterra Type Integral Inclusion

M. A. Sadygov

Baku State University, Baku, Azerbaijan

Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Open Access Library Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: July 16, 2019; Accepted: July 30, 2019; Published: August 2, 2019

ABSTRACT

In the work, we have studied the dependencies of the solutions to integral inclusions from perturbation and investigated an extremal problem for integral inclusions. We obtained necessary and sufficient minimum conditions for extremal problems of Volterra type convex inclusions. We also studied a nonconvex extremal problem for the Volterra type inclusion. We obtained a high order necessary condition in the extremal problem for the Volterra type inclusion.

Subject Areas:

Mathematical Analysis

Keywords:

Integral Functional, Normal Integrant, Volterra Type Inclusion, The Multivalued Mapping

1. Dependence of the Solution to the Integral Inclusion from Perturbation

Let R n be the n-dimensional Euclidean space. The set of all nonempty compact (convex compact) subsets in R n we will designate as c o m p R n ( c o n v R n ) ; k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n is the continuous matrix function, wherewith M n being the set of all square n × n matrices of real elements ( b i j ); z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function; F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n the setvalued mapping.

Assume that if a vector is multiplied by a matrix, then the vector is a row vector, if a matrix is multiplied by a vector, then the vector is a column vector.

Let us consider a problem for inclusion

u ( t ) F ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) (1)

The function u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] satisfying (1) we will call the solution to problem (1) (see [1] ).

Let a = max t , s [ t 0 , T ] k ( t , s ) = max t , s [ t 0 , T ] i = 1 n j = 1 n | k i , j ( t , s ) | , if k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n is the continuous matrix function.

Theorem 1. Let k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n be the continuous matrix function, z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function, F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n the multivalued mapping, t F ( t , x ) is measurable on t, and there exists a summable function M ( t ) > 0 such that ρ x ( F ( t , x ) , F ( t , x 1 ) ) M ( t ) | x x 1 | for

x , x 1 R n . Moreover, let ρ ( ) L 1 [ t 0 , T ] and u ¯ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] be such that

d ( u ¯ ( t ) , F ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) ) ρ ( t ) for t [ t 0 , T ] . Then there exists such a solution u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] to problem (1) that

| t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s | a t 0 t e m ( t ) m ( s ) ρ ( s ) d s ,

| u ( t ) u ¯ ( t ) | ρ ( t ) + a M ( t ) t 0 t e m ( t ) m ( s ) ρ ( s ) d s

for t [ t 0 , T ] , where m ( t ) = a t 0 t M ( s ) d s .

2. On Subdifferential of the Integral Functional

Let f : [ t 0 , T ] × R n ( , + ] is the normal convex integrant (see [2] ).

Let consider a subdifferential of the integral functional

J ( u ( ) ) = t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t

in L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Theorem 2. If k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n be the continuous matrix function, z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function, f : [ t 0 , T ] × R n ( , + ] is the

normal convex integrant and function f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) + x ) is

summable for x R n , | x | δ , where u ¯ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] , then J ( u ¯ ( ) ) is nonempty and υ * L n [ t 0 , T ] belongs to J ( u ¯ ( ) ) if and only if, there exist

u * ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] , u * ( t ) f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) , such, that υ * ( s ) = s T k ( t , s ) t u * ( t ) d t , where k ( τ , t ) t is the transpose of the matrix k ( τ , t ) .

Theorem 3. If k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n be measurable bounded matrix function, z : [ t 0 , T ] R n be measurable bounded function, f : [ t 0 , T ] × R n ( , + ] is

the normal convex integrant and function f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) + x ) is

summable for x R n , | x | δ , where u ¯ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] , then J ( u ¯ ( ) ) is nonempty and functional υ * L n [ t 0 , T ] belongs to J ( u ¯ ( ) ) if and only if,

there exist u * ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] , u * ( t ) f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) , such, that υ * ( s ) = s T k ( t , s ) t u * ( t ) d t .

3. On Subdifferential of the Terminal Functional

Let k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n continuous matrix function, z : [ t 0 , T ] R n continuous function, φ : R n ( , + ] proper convex function in R n . Consider a subdifferential of the terminal functional F ( u ( ) ) = φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) in L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] , where z ( ) C n [ t 0 , T ] .

Theorem 4. If φ -proper convex function in R n and continuous in the

point t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( T ) , then

F ( u ¯ ( ) ) = { b k ( T , s ) : b φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) } .

4. Convex Extremal Problem for Integral Inclusions

Let k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n be the continuous matrix function, z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function. Hereafter we will assume that f : [ t 0 , T ] × R n ( , + ] is the normal convex integrant, φ : R n ( , + ] the convex function. Let t 0 < T , F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n { } is the multivalued mapping.

The problem of minimization of the functional

J ( u ) = φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t (2)

is considered under the following constraints

u ( t ) F ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) , (3)

where t [ t 0 , T ] , u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Introducing the notation ω ( t , x , z ) = { 0 , z F ( t , x ) + , z F ( t , x ) we have that problem (2) and (3) is equivalent to the minimization of the functional

J 1 ( u ) = φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t + t 0 T ω ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t

among all functions u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Let the mapping t g r F t = { ( x , y ) : y F ( t , x ) } be measurable on [ t 0 , T ] , the set g r F t be closed and convex for almost all t [ t 0 , T ] and F ( t , x ) be compact for all ( t , x ) . From here it follows that ω ( t , x , z ) is a convex normal integrant on [ t 0 , T ] × ( R n × R n ) .

Let us consider the following functional

S ( u , υ ) = φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t + t 0 T ω ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) + υ ( t ) ) d t ,

where υ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] . Let h ( υ ) = inf u L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] S ( u , υ ) . The problem (2) and (3) is called stable, if h ( 0 ) is finite and function h is subdifferentiable at zero (see [3] ).

Lemma 1. Let F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n { } ; the mapping t F ( t , x ) be measurable on [ t 0 , T ] ; the mapping x F ( t , x ) be closed and convex for almost all t [ t 0 , T ] , i.e. g r F t be closed and convex for almost all t [ t 0 , T ] ; there exist such a summable function λ ( t ) that F ( t , x ) λ ( t ) ( 1 + | x | ) for x R n ; there exist a solution u 0 ( t ) to the problem

u 0 ( t ) F ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u 0 ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) such that x 0 ( t ) = t 0 t k ( t , s ) u 0 ( s ) d s + z ( t ) belongs to d o m F t = { x : F ( t , x ) } coupled with some ε tube, i.e. { x : | x 0 ( t ) x | ε } d o m F t ; f : [ t 0 , T ] × R n ( , + ] the normal convex integrant; φ : R n ( , + ] the convex function and inf u L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] J 1 ( u ) is finite; the function f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u 0 ( s ) d s + z ( t ) + y ) be summarized for y R n , | y | < r , where r > 0 , and function φ ( ) be continuous at the point t 0 T k ( T , s ) u 0 ( s ) d s + z ( T ) . Then the function h is subdifferentiable at zero, i.e. problem (2) and (3) is stable.

Let υ R n . Assume

ω 0 ( t , x , υ ) = inf z R n { ( z | υ ) + ω ( t , x , z ) } = inf { ( z | υ ) : z F ( t , x ) } ,

where inf = + .

Theorem 5. Let F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n { } ; the mapping t F ( t , x ) be measurable on [ t 0 , T ] ; the mapping x F ( t , x ) be closed and convex for almost all t [ t 0 , T ] ; f be the normal convex integrant on [ t 0 , T ] × R n ; φ the convex function on R n ; k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n the continuous matrix function; z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function. For the function u ¯ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] to minimize the functional (2) among all the solutions to the problem (3), it is sufficient that there exist u 1 * ( ) , u 2 * ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] and b R n such that

1) u 1 * ( t ) f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) ,

2) b φ ( z ( T ) + t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s ) ,

3) u 2 * ( t ) ω 0 ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , t T k ( τ , t ) t ( u 1 * ( τ ) + u 2 * ( τ ) ) d τ + K ( T , t ) t b ) ,

4) ω 0 ( t , z ( t ) + t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s , t T k ( τ , t ) t ( u 1 * ( τ ) + u 2 * ( τ ) ) d τ + K ( T , t ) t b ) = ( u ¯ ( t ) | t T k ( τ , t ) t ( u 1 * ( τ ) + u 2 * ( τ ) ) d τ + K ( T , t ) t b ) + ω ( t , z ( t ) + t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s , u ¯ ( t ) ) ,

and if for u 0 ( t ) = u ¯ ( t ) the condition of lemma 1 is satisfied, then conditions 1) - 4) become necessary.

5. Nonconvex Extremal Problem for Integral Inclusions

Let k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n be the continuous matrix function; z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function, i.e. z ( ) C n [ t 0 , T ] . Hereafter we will assume that f : [ t 0 , T ] × R n × R n ( , + ] is the normal integrant and φ : R n ( , + ] is the function. Let t 0 < T , F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n be the multivalued mapping.

We consider the following problem of minimization of the functional

J ( u ) = φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t , (4)

under the following constraints

u ( t ) F ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) , (5)

where t [ t 0 , T ] , u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Let ψ ( s , x , y ) = inf { | z y | : z F ( s , x ) } and consider the minimization of the functional

J r ( u ) = φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t + r t 0 T ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t

among all the functions u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Theorem 6. If u ¯ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] is the solution to the problem (4) and (5), F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n { } and t F ( t , x ) are measurable on t, x ¯ ( t ) = t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , there exist k ( ) L 1 [ t 0 , T ] , M ( ) L 1 [ t 0 , T ] ,

k 1 > 0 , k 2 > 0 and α > 0 such that B ( x ¯ ( t ) , α ) d o m F t = { x R n : F ( t , x ) } at t [ t 0 , T ] and

| φ ( z ) φ ( u ) | k 2 | z u | ,

| f ( t , x 1 , y 1 ) f ( t , x 2 , y 2 ) | k ( t ) | x 1 x 2 | + k 1 | y 1 y 2 | ,

ρ X ( F ( t , x 1 ) , F ( t , x 2 ) ) M ( t ) | x 1 x 2 |

for z , u B ( x ¯ ( T ) , α ) , x 1 , x 2 B ( x ¯ ( t ) , α ) , y 1 , y 2 R n . Then there exist a number r 0 > 0 such that u ¯ ( t ) minimizes the functional J r ( u ) in D for

r r 0 , where D = { u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] : u ( ) u ¯ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] α β } , β > ( 1 + a ( e m ( T ) + a e m ( T ) t 0 T M ( t ) d t ) ) ( a t 0 T M ( t ) d t + 1 ) + a , m ( t ) = a t 0 t M ( s ) d s .

Theorem 7. Let the condition of the theorem 6 be satisfied and the function u ¯ ( t ) among all solutions to the problem (5) minimizes the functional (4). Then there exists u * ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] and b R n such that

1) ( u * ( t ) , t T k ( τ , t ) t u * ( τ ) d τ K ( T , t ) t b ) C ( f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) + r ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) ) ,

2) b C φ ( z ( T ) + t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s ) ,

where C g ( x ¯ ) is Clarke subdifferential of the function g at the point x ¯ (see [4] ).

6. A Higher Order Necessary Condition in the Extremal Problem for the Volterra Type Inclusion

Consider the problem (4) and (5), where f ( t , x , y ) = f ( t , x ) . Assume

ψ ( s , x , y ) = inf { | z y | : z F ( s , x ) } .

We consider the following problem of minimization of the function

J r ( u ) = φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t + r ( ( t 0 T ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t ) β + u ¯ ( ) u ( ) L 1 n β ν ( t 0 T ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t ) ν )

among all functions u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Let u ¯ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] be the solution to the problem (4) and (5). Let x ¯ ( t ) = t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) .

Theorem 8. Let F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n be the multivalued mapping, the mapping t F ( t , x ) be measurable on [ t 0 , T ] ; f be the normal integrant on [ t 0 , T ] × R n ; φ the function in R n ; k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n the continuous matrix function; z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function, and there exists a summable function M ( t ) > 0 such that ρ x ( F ( t , x ) , F ( t , x 1 ) ) M ( t ) | x x 1 | for x , x 1 R n ; there exist k 1 ( ) L 1 [ t 0 , T ] , k 1 ( t ) > 0 and number k 2 > 0 such that

| f ( t , x 1 ) f ( t , x 2 ) | k 1 ( t ) | x 1 x 2 | ν ( | x 2 x ¯ ( t ) | β ν + | x 1 x 2 | β ν )

for x 1 , x 2 R n ,

| φ ( x ) φ ( y ) | k 2 | x y | ν ( | y x ¯ ( T ) | β ν + | x y | β ν )

for x , y R n (see [5] ). If the function u ¯ ( t ) among all solutions of the problem (5) minimizes the functional (4), then there exists a number r 0 > 0 such that u ¯ ( t ) minimizes the functional J r ( u ) in L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] for r r 0 .

Let g : [ t 0 , T ] × R n ( , + ] be the normal integrant on [ t 0 , T ] × R n ; e : R n ( , + ] the function.

Let assume

S ( u ) = e ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T g ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t ,

H r ( u ) = J ( u ) S ( u ) + r ( ( t 0 T ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t ) β + u ¯ ( ) u ( ) L 1 n β ν ( t 0 T ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t ) ν )

= φ ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) e ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ) + t 0 T f ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t t 0 T g ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ) d t + r ( ( t 0 T ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t ) β + u ¯ ( ) u ( ) L 1 n β ν ( t 0 T ψ ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ( t ) ) d t ) ν ) .

Theorem 9. Let F : [ t 0 , T ] × R n c o m p R n the multivalued mapping, the mapping t F ( t , x ) be measurable on [ t 0 , T ] ; f be the normal integrant on [ t 0 , T ] × R n ; φ the function in R n ; k : [ t 0 , T ] 2 M n the continuous matrix function; z : [ t 0 , T ] R n the continuous function and there exist a summable function M ( t ) > 0 such that ρ x ( F ( t , x ) , F ( t , x 1 ) ) M ( t ) | x x 1 | for x , x 1 R n ; there exist the normal integrant g : [ t 0 , T ] × R n ( , + ] , the functions e : R n ( , + ] , k 1 ( ) L 1 [ t 0 , T ] , k 1 ( t ) > 0 and number k 2 > 0 such that

| f ( t , x 1 ) g ( t , x 1 ) f ( t , x 2 ) + g ( t , x 2 ) | k 1 ( t ) | x 1 x 2 | ν ( | x 2 x ¯ ( t ) | β ν + | x 1 x 2 | β ν )

for x 1 , x 2 R n , where x ¯ ( t ) = t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ˜ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ,

| φ ( x ) e ( x ) φ ( y ) + e ( y ) | k 2 | x y | ν ( | y x ¯ ( T ) | β ν + | x y | β ν )

for x , y R n and let u ˜ ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] solutions of the problem (4)-(5). Then there exist a number r 0 > 0 such that u ˜ ( t ) minimizes the functional H r ( u ) in u { υ L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] : S ( w υ ) S ( u ˜ ) } for r r 0 , where w υ solutions to the problem (5), which satisfy the main theorem 1 for u ¯ ( ) = υ ( t ) .

It’s possible to get the local variant of theorems 8 and 9 analogical to theorem 6.

Let assume

J r { β } + ( u ¯ ; u ) = lim λ 0 ¯ 1 λ β ( J r ( u ¯ + λ u ) J r ( u ¯ ) ) ,

J r { β } ( u ¯ ; u ) = lim _ λ 0 1 λ β ( J r ( u ¯ + λ u ) J r ( u ¯ ) )

for u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Corollary 1. If the condition of theorem 8 is satisfied, then there exist a number r 0 > 0 such that J r { β } + ( u ¯ ; u ) J r { β } ( u ¯ ; u ) 0 for r r 0 and u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Let assume

E r ( u ) = φ { β } ( t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( T ) ; t 0 T k ( T , s ) u ( s ) d s ) + t 0 T f { β } + ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) ; t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s ) d t + r ( ( t 0 T ψ { 1 } + ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ; t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s , u ( t ) ) d t ) β + u ( ) L 1 n β ν ( t 0 T ψ { 1 } + ( t , t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ¯ ( s ) d s + z ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ; t 0 t k ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s , u ( t ) ) d t ) ν ) .

Theorem 10. If the condition of theorem 8 is satisfied, then there exist a number r 0 > 0 such that E r ( u ) 0 for r r 0 and u ( ) L 1 n [ t 0 , T ] .

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Sadygov, M.A. (2019) An Extreme Problem for a Volterra Type Integral Inclusion. Open Access Library Journal, 6: e5605. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105605

References

  1. 1. Sadygov, M.A. (2013) An Extremal Problem for Integral Inclusion. Preprint No. 1, Baku, 129 p.

  2. 2. Rockafellar, R.T. and Wets, R.J.-B. (2009) Variational Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 734 p.

  3. 3. Ekeland, I. and Temam, R. (1979) Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. Mir, Moscow, 309 p.

  4. 4. Clarke, F. (2013) Functional Analysis, Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control. Springer-Verlag, London, 591 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4820-3_4

  5. 5. Sadygov, M.A. (2014) Subdifferential of High Orders and Optimization. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken, 359 p.