X. L. WU ET AL.
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. CN
29
From Table 2, it is obvious that M is small when SNR
is low, while in high SNR, M is large. For each stage,
there will be substantial differences in the reliability of
constellation candidates after preprocessing with low
SNR, so the candidates with lower reliability can be re-
moved without anxiety. While in high SNR, the noise is
so weak that every constellation candidate has much the
same probability to become the ML solution, and the
removal of candidates will decrease the possibility of
finding ML solution, so the value of M should be large in
high SNR. Moreover, from the complexity figures of the
proposed detection algorithm, it can be found easily that
with the increase of M, the complexity increased accord-
ingly, which due to the reason that the larger M will in-
crease total lattices in the receiver end.
5. Conclusions
This paper proposed a sphere detection based adaptive
MIMO detection algorithm for LTE and LTE-A system.
In this algorithm, the receiver can adjust the number of
reserved constellation candidates of each stage according
to current value of SNR. Simulation results show that the
proposed algorithm almost achieves the same BER per-
formance as ML detection algorithm, and compared with
full constellation candidates sphere detection, in 2 × 2
MIMO and 4 × 4 MIMO LTE-A systems, the average
complexity of the proposed algorithm is reduced by
27.61% and 32.27% respectively.
6. Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Basic Research
Program of China (973 Program) under Grand No.2013
CB329003, Next Generation Wireless Mobile Commu-
nication Network of China under Grant No. 2012ZX
03001007-005, the Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities under Grant No. HIT.NSRIF2012020,
Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Science-Research Foundation
under Grant No. LBH-Q12081, and China Scholarship
Council.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. K. Suk and H. Y. Kai, “Challenges in Migration to 4G
Mobile Systems,” IEEE Communications Magzine, Vol.
41, No. 12, 2003, pp. 54-59.
doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2003.1252799
[2] G. Forney, “Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation
of Digital Sequences in the Presence of Inter-symbol In-
terference,” IEEE Transations on Information Theory,
Vol. 18, No. 3, 1972, pp. 363-378.
doi: 10.1109/TIT.1972.1054829
[3] Q. H. Li, et al, “MIMO Techniques in WiMAX and LTE:
A Feature Overview,” IEEE Communication Magzine,
Vol. 48, No. 5, 2010, pp. 86-92.
doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2010.5458368
[4] K. Higuchi, H. Kawai, N. Maeda and M. Sawahashi,
“Adaptive Selection of Surviving Symbol Replica Can-
didates Based on Maximum Reliability in QRM-MLD for
OFCDM MIMO Multiplexing,” IEEE Globecom, Dallas,
2004, Vol. 4, pp. 2480-2486.
[5] M. O. Damen, H. El Gamal and G. Caire, “On Maxi-
mum-Likelihood Detection and the Search for the Closest
Lattice Point,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
Vol. 49, No. 10, 2003, pp. 2389-2402.
doi: 10.1109/TIT.2003.817444
[6] S. Nagayama and T. Hattori, “A Proposal of RM
QRM-MLD with Independent Adaptive Control of Sur-
viving Symbol Replica Candidates for MIMO-OFDM
system,” IEEE VTC 2007-Fall, Baltimore, 2007, pp.
452-456.
[7] W. Hou, T. Fujino and T. Kojima, “Adaptive Candidate
Selection Scheme in QRM-MLD Algorithm for MIMO
Detection,” The 8th IEEE International Conference on
Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Com-
munications, Barcelona, 2012, pp. 502-506.
[8] H. Kawai, K. Higuchi and N. Maeda, “Adaptive Control
of Surviving Symbol Replica Candidates in QRM-MLD
for OFDM MIMO Multiplexing,” IEEE Journal on Se-
lected Areas in Communications, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2006, pp.
1130-1140. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2005.864027
[9] E. Viterbo and J. Boutros, “A Universal Lattice Code
Decoder for Fading Channels,” IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory, Vol. 45, No. 5, 1999, pp. 1639-1642.
doi: 10.1109/18.771234
[10] G. Zhan and P. Nilsson, “Reduced Complexity Schnorr-
Euchner Decoding Algorithms for MIMO Systems,”
IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2004, pp.
286-288. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2004.827376
[11] S. Aubert, F. Nouvel and A. Nafkha, “Complexity Gain
of QR Decomposition Based Sphere Decoder in LTE re-
ceivers,” IEEE VTC 2009-Fall, Anchorage, 2009, pp. 1-5.
[12] R. Bosisio and U. Spagnolini, “Interference Coordination
Vs. Interference Randomization in Multicell 3GPP LTE
System,” IEEE Wireless Communications and Network-
ing Conference, Las Vegas, 2008, pp. 824-829.