Share This Article:

Mechanical, Thermal and Morphology Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Copolymers Incorporating α,ω-Dihydroxy-[poly(propyleneoxide)-poly (dimethylsiloxane)-poly(propyleneoxide)] of Varying Poly(propyleneoxide) Molecular Weight

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:3329KB) PP. 41-57
DOI: 10.4236/ojsta.2015.43005    3,542 Downloads   4,259 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Novel segmented thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) copolymers were synthesized using two-step solventless bulk polymerization. 4,4’-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and 1,4-Butanediol (BDO) were used to form hard segment of TPU and α,ω-dihydroxy-[poly(propyleneoxide)-poly (dimethylsiloxane)-poly(propyleneoxide)] (α,ω-dihydroxy-(PPO-PDMS-PPO)) was used to form soft segment of TPU, where the molar ratio of the –N=C=O/OH was 1.02 and the hard segment weight percentage was 30%. A series of TPUs were characterized by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The investigation of triblock oligomer’s PPO molecular weight impact on the derived TPU’s mechanical properties, thermal performance, surface water repellency and morphology performance was carried by Instron material tester, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), water contact angles (WCA), scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) and wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), respectively. FT-IR confirmed α,ω-dihydroxy-(PPO-PDMS-PPO) well cooperating into urethane structure and analyzed hydrogen bonding between N-H group with hard segment C=O group and N-H group with soft segment C-O-C group. DSC and WAXD results showed α,ω-dihydroxy-(PPO-PDMS-PPO) segments crystallization. SEM-EDX results showed that the presence of a spherulitic morphology, which arose from the crystallization of the PPO segments. The thermal properties measured by TGA and DSC were slightly affected by molecular weight of PPO and microphase separation. The weight loss of TPUs started between 294°C and 300°C, and Tg was in the range of -70°C to -107°C. TPU copolymers’ surface hydrophobicity property was excellent with WCA range of 95° to 112°. TPU-3 with 1000 molecular weight PPO has the optimized mechanical properties with tensile strength 16.4 MPa and the modulus at 100% elongation 6.2 MPa and elongation 398%.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Dai, Z. , Yang, K. and Dong, Q. (2015) Mechanical, Thermal and Morphology Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Copolymers Incorporating α,ω-Dihydroxy-[poly(propyleneoxide)-poly (dimethylsiloxane)-poly(propyleneoxide)] of Varying Poly(propyleneoxide) Molecular Weight. Open Journal of Synthesis Theory and Applications, 4, 41-57. doi: 10.4236/ojsta.2015.43005.

References

[1] Chattopadhyay, D.K. and Raju, K.V.S.N. (2007) Structural Engineering of Polyurethane Coatings for High Performance Applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 32, 352-418.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.05.003
[2] Zagar, E. and Zigon, M. (2011) Aliphatic Hyperbranched Polyesters Based on 2, 2-Bis(methylol)propionic Acid— Determination of Structure, Solution and Bulk Properties. Progress in Polymer Science, 36, 53-88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.08.004
[3] Gite, V.V., Mahulikar, P.P. and Hundiwale, D.G. (2010) Preparation and Properties of Polyurethane Coatings Based on Acrylic Polyols and Trimer of Isophoronediisocyanate. Progress in Organic Coatings, 68, 307-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.03.008
[4] Asif, A., Shi, W.F., Shen, X.F. and Nie, K.M. (2005) Physical and Thermal Properties of UV Curable Waterborne Polyurethane Dispersions Incorporating Hyperbranched Aliphatic Polyester of Varying Generation Number. Polymer, 46, 11066-11078.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.046
[5] Cao, Q. and Liu, P. (2006) Structure and Mechanical Properties of Shape Memory Polyurethane Based on Hyperbranched Polyesters. Polymer Bulletin, 57, 889-899.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00289-006-0650-z
[6] Czech, P., Okrasa, L., Ulanski, J., Boiteux, G., Mechin, F. and Cassagnau, P. (2007) Studies of the Molecular Dynamics in Polyurethane Networks with Hyperbranchedcrosslinkers of Different Coordination Numbers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 105, 89-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.26106
[7] Maji, P.K. and Bhowmick, A.K. (2009) Influence of Number of Functional Groups of Hyperbranchedpolyol on Cure Kinetics and Physical Properties of Polyurethane. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 47, 731- 745.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pola.23185
[8] Florian, P., Jena, K.K, Allauddin, S., Narayan, R. and Raju, K.V.S.N. (2010) Preparation and Characterization of Waterborne Hyperbranched Polyurethane-Urea and Their Hybrid Coatings. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49, 4517-4527.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie900840g
[9] Adhikari, R., Gunatillake, P.A. and Bown, M. (2003) Effect of Polydimethylsiloxanemacrodiol Molecular Weight on Properties and Morphology of Polyurethane and Polyurethaneurea. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 90, 1565-1573.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.12748
[10] Sheth, J.P., Aneja, A., Wilkes, G.L., Yilgor, E., Atilla, G.E., Yilgor, I. and Beyer, F.L. (2004) Influence of System Variables on the Morphological and Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of Polydimethylsiloxane Based Segmented Polyurethane and Polyurea Copolymers: A Comparative Perspective. Polymer, 45, 6919-6932.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.06.057
[11] Hernandez, R., Weksler, J., Padsalgikar, A. and Runt, J. (2007) Microstructural Organization of Three-Phase Polydimethylsiloxane-Based Segmented Polyurethanes. Macromolecules, 50, 5441-5449.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma070767c
[12] Pergal, M.V., Antic, V.V., Sanja, O., Milena, M.C. and Jasna, D. (2011) Influence of the Content of Hard Segments on the Properties of Novel Urethane-Siloxane Copolymers Based on a Poly(ε-caprolactone)-b-poly-(dimethylsiloxane)-b- poly(ε-caprolactone) Triblock Copolymer. Journal of Serbia Chemical Society, 76, 1703-1723.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/JSC110307146P
[13] Pergal, M.V., Antic, V.V., Govedarica, M.N., Godjevac, D., Ostojic, D. and Jonlagic, J. (2011) Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Urethane-Siloxane Copolymers with a High Content of PCL-PDMS-PCL Segment. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 122, 2715-2730.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.33926
[14] Pergal, M.V., Antic, V.V., Tovilovic, G., Nestorov, J., Vasiljevic-Radovic, D. and Djonlagic, J.J. (2012) In vitro Biocompatibility Evaluation of Novel Urethane-Siloxane Co-Polymers Based on Poly(ε-caprolactone)-block-poly(di-me- thylsiloxane)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone). Journal of Biomaterials Science, 23, 1629-1657.
[15] Pergal, M.V., Dzunuzovic, J.V., Kicanovic, M., Vodnik, V., Pergal, M.M. and Jovanovic, S. (2011) Thermal Properties of Poly(urethane-ester-siloxane)s Based on Hyperbranched Polyester. Russia Journal Physical Chemistry, 85, 2251- 2256.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0036024411130243
[16] Pergal, M.V., Dzunuzovic, J.V., Ostojic, S., Pergal, M.M., Radulovic, A. and Jovanovic, S. (2012) Poly(urethane-si- loxane)s Based on Hyperbranched Polyester as Crosslinking Agent: Synthesis and Characterization. Journal of Serbia Chemical Society, 77, 919-935.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/JSC111013006P
[17] Dzunuzovic, J.V., Pergal, M.V., Poreba, R., Ostojic, S., Lazic, N., Spirkova, M. and Jovanovic, S. (2012) Studies of the Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Poly(urethane-siloxane)s Cross-Linked by Hyperbranched Polyesters. Indus- trial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51, 10824-10832.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie300927z
[18] Pergal, M.V., Dzunuozic, J.V. and Pergal, M.M. (2013) Structure-Property Correlation Study of Novel Poly(urethane- ester-siloxane) Networks. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 6164-6176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie400467j
[19] Ciolino, A.E., Pieroni, O.I., Vuano, B.M., Villar, M.A. and Valles, E.M. (2004) Synthesis of polybutadiene-graft- poly(dimethylsiloxane) and Polyethylene-graft-poly(dimethylsiloxane) Copolymers with Hydrosilylation Reactions. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 42, 2920-2930.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pola.20032
[20] Zhang, C.L., Hu, J. and Chen, S.J. (2010) Theoretical Study of Hydrogen Bonding Interactions on MDI-Based Polyurethane. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 16, 1391-1399.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-010-0645-4
[21] Milian, B., Vesna, A. and Marija, P. (2013) Influence of the Chemical Structure of Poly(urea-urethane-siloxane)s on Their Morphological, Surface and Thermal Properties. Polymer Bulletin, 70, 2493-2518.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00289-013-0968-2
[22] Quay, J.R., Sun, Z., Blackwell, J., Briber, R.M. and Thomas, E.L. (1990) The Hard Segment Unit Cell for MDI-BDO- Based Polyurethane Elastomer. Polymer, 31, 1003-1008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(90)90244-S
[23] Miller, J.A., Lin, S.B., Hwang, K.K.S., Wu, K.S., Gibson, P.E. and Cooper, S.L. (1985) Properties of Polyether-Poly- urethane Block Copolymers: Effects of Hard Segment Length Distribution. Macromolecules, 18, 32-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma00143a005
[24] Yilgor, I. and McGrath, J.E. (1988) Polysiloxane Containing Copolymers: A Survey of Recent Developments. Advanced Polymer Science, 86, 1-86.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0025274

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.