Analysis of Dynamics Fields in Noninertial Systems

Gabriel Barceló

Advanced Dynamics S.A., Madrid, Spain.

DOI: 10.4236/wjm.2012.23021                

Abstract

In this paper, I present evidence that there exists an unstructured area in the present general assumptions of classical mechanics, especially in case of rigid bodies exposed to simultaneous noncoaxial rotations. To address this, I propose dynamics hypotheses that lead to interesting results and numerous noteworthy scientific and technological applications. I constructed a new mathematical model in rotational field dynamics, and through this model, results based on a rational interpretation of the superposition of motions caused by torques were obtained. For this purpose, I analyze velocity and acceleration fields that are generated in an object with intrinsic angular momentum, and assessed new criteria for coupling velocities. In this context, I will discuss reactions and inertial fields that cannot be explained by classical mechanics. The experiments have been analyzed and explained in a video accompanying this text. I am not aware of any concurrent study on the subject and conclusions evidenced in this paper, preventing us from making additional theoretical com- parisons or indicate to the reader other sources to compare criteria.

Keywords

Rotational Dynamics; Superposition of Simultaneous Motions; Inertial Fields

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	P. Appell, “Traité de Mécanique Rationnelle,” Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1909
[2]	I. Newton, “Principia,” Im. Du Chasteller, Paris, Proposition 2, 1757.
[3]	G. Barceló, “El Vuelo del Bumerán,” Marcombo, Barcelona, 2006, p. 98.
[4]	M. E. Jouffret, “Théorie élémentaire des Phénomènes que Présentent le Gyroscope, la Toupie et le Projectile Oblong,” Berger-Levrault, Extract Revue d′Artillerie, París, 1874.
[5]	P. Gilbert, “Problème de la Rotation d’un Corps Solide Autour d’un Point,” Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles, 1876, p. 316.
[6]	G. Barceló, “Un Mundo en Rotación,” Marcombo, Barcelona, 2008, p. 208.
[7]	G. Bruhat, “Mécanique,” Masson & Cie, Paris, 1955.
[8]	A. P. French, “Newtonian Mechanics (The M.I.T. Intro- ductory Physics Series),” W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1971.
[9]	L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Mechanic: Volume 1 (Course of Theoretical Physics),” 3rd Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1976,
[10]	L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Mecánica,” Ed. S.A. Reverté, 1994, p. 24.
[11]	E. Mach, “Die Mechanik in Ihrer Entwicklung Historisch-Kritisch Dargestellt,” Leipzig, Brockhaus, 1921.
[12]	H. Goldstein, “Classical Mechanics,” Addison Wesley, Reading, 1994.
[13]	L. Poinsot, “Théorie Nouvelle de la Rotation des Corps,” 1834.
[14]	Gilbert, “Problème de la Rotation d’un Corps Solide Au- tor d’un Point Solide,” Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles, 1878, p. 258.
[15]	G. Barceló, “El Vuelo del Bumerán,” Marcombo, Barcelona, 2006, p. 121.
[16]	G. Barceló, “On the Equivalence Principle,” The 61st International Astronautical Congress, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Prague, 27 September-1 October 2010.