The Play Was Always the Thing: Drama’s Effect on Brain Function ()
Abstract
The brain is a mysterious canvas of actualized and unrealized possibilities. As Diane Ackerman notes, “…each person carries around atop the body a complete universe in which trillions of sensations, thoughts, and desires stream.” Brain science remains uncharted territory despite the significant efforts that have been and are being realized to better understand brain and behavior. More than mere coincidence or happenstance, plays like Shakespeare’s famous “Romeo and Juliet” with great storylines, brilliant costumes, and emotional stimulation continue to survive for ages based upon pure artistic excellence that engages the audience in a unique manner. There is a need to more fully understand how our brains process drama and the manner in which like versus dislike are decided. Most important is the factor of longevity and what makes the appealing quality of drama survive over years across cultural and generational shifts. To speak to this question, drama has been shown to have impressive effects on brain activation but remains conservative in highlighting potentially profound implications. Drama has advantageous benefits to health as well as to essential activities such as learning and personal growth. Drama should not remain underrated in terms of its influence on brain function and the relationship between environment and brain.
Share and Cite:
H. Hough, B. & Hough, S. (2012). The Play Was Always the Thing: Drama’s Effect on Brain Function.
Psychology, 3, 454-456. doi:
10.4236/psych.2012.36064.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
|
[1]
|
Ackerman, D. (2004). An alchemy of mind. New York: Scribner.
|
|
[2]
|
Andersen, C. (2004). Learning in “as-if” worlds: Cognition in drama in education. Theory into Practice.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NQM/is_4_43/ai_n8686066
|
|
[3]
|
Bell, C. C. (2012). Prevention in action: Promoting creative engagement in the elderly. Clinical Psychiatry News.
http://www.clinicalpsychiatrynews.com/views/prevention-in-action-by-dr-carl-c-bell/blog/promoting-creative-engagement-in-the-elderly/3d27f459c5.html
|
|
[4]
|
Fleshman, B., & Fryrear, J. (1981). The Arts in therapy. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
|
|
[5]
|
Loring, D. W. (1999). INS dictionary of neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
|
[6]
|
Jensen, E. (2010). Teaching high poverty kids using a high impact curriculum. Teaching with poverty in mind.
http://www.jensenlearning.com/news/teaching-high-poverty-kids-using-a-high-impact-curriculum/teaching-with-poverty-in-mind
|
|
[7]
|
Malchiodi, C. (2006). Expressive therapies: History, theory and practice. In C. Malchiodi (Ed.), In expressive therapies (pp. 1-15). New York: The Guilford Press.
|
|
[8]
|
Martin, S. (1977). Developmental drama for brain—Damaged children. Communication Education, 26, 208-213.
doi:10.1080/03634527709378230
|
|
[9]
|
McNiff, S. (1981). The arts and psychotherapy. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
|
|
[10]
|
Munger, D. (2007). Is theater the ultimate brain fitness product? Cognitive Daily.
http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2009/07/is_theater_the_ultimate_brain_1.php
|
|
[11]
|
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
|
|
[12]
|
Scheff, T. J. (2001). Catharsis in healing, ritual, and drama. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.com
|
|
[13]
|
University of Liverpool (2006). Reading shakespeare has dramatic effect on human brain.
http://www.physorg.com/news85664210.html
|