1. Introduction
The abusive use of psychoactive substances is considered a problematic factor of social order when observed self-destructive behaviors are consequently harmful to the person and its social environment. Approximately 35 million people worldwide have drug use disorders, an estimate that characterizes the situation as a significant public health problem [1].
For a better demonstration of the problem, it published data from a nationwide survey conducted in Brazil, in which crack has a significant prevalence among illicit drugs, reaching 1.4 million people aged 12 to 65 years who have used the drug before. The same report presents worrying data regarding alcohol consumption patterns, in which about 2.3 million people met the criteria for alcohol dependence in Brazil [2].
Alcohol is the most widely used psychoactive substance in the national context, and the use of crack cocaine, a smoked form of cocaine, has become popular because of its affordability and low price. The consumption of these substances, especially crack, has gained exponential importance in recent years due to the consequences of dependence on the individuals [2] [3]. In this context, due to the public health burden related to psychoactive substance abuse and the associated morbimortality consequences, studies are needed to identify the contributing factors for the development of psychoactive substance use disorders.
Chemical dependence is a complex problem involving several risk factors that determine their degree of consumption. Studies indicate that individuals exposed to early stress during childhood have a high risk of harmful behaviors, the development of noncommunicable diseases and the abuse of drugs in adulthood [4] [5]. Early life stress is an initial tension that stems from a variety of traumatic experiences that occur in childhood and highlight that child maltreatment is a multifaceted phenomenon [6]. The main traumatic experiences found in the literature are physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, and physical and emotional neglect [7].
Early stress is a significant public health problem associated with increased rates of psychiatric disorders, especially those related to drug abuse [8] [9] [10] [11]. Results from studies find that the high prevalence of child abuse and neglect, in which the estimated experience of at least one early childhood stress affects one in four adults globally. It makes the problems of child maltreatment even more worrisome [12] [13].
Regarding the Brazilian context, a meta-analysis published in 2016 found that the country has one of the highest estimates of child maltreatment in the world [14]. In addition to this problem, the Brazilian budget for the prevention of child maltreatment was considered inadequate compared to other contexts and countries [15].
Exposure during childhood to these traumatic experiences is associated with early consumption and dependence on alcohol and other psychoactive substances in adolescence and adulthood [16] - [21]. Individuals from vulnerable groups who experienced traumatic situations during childhood consumed more alcohol when compared to non-traumatized ones [22].
Research from a nationally representative sample in the United States found that physical, sexual and emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglects were associated with an increased risk of developing substance abuse disorders [23]. Besides that, there is a positive association between multiple exposure trauma and substance use disorder, showing a 34% increase in the development of the disease after each subsequent trauma [24]. In this interviewed group, neglect, emotional, and sexual abuse are more prevalent. Another research found a positive relationship between experiences of sexual abuse-related trauma with a higher risk of being a heavy drug user in women and child neglect responsible for the 2.30-fold increase in the risk of substance abuse [25].
Some studies have reported differences in early stress exposure in users of different types of drugs. A longitudinal study of a representative sample of adolescents carried out since the mid-1990s, identified a direct relationship between many traumas and higher consumption of marijuana and cocaine, with a 24% increase in chance to use cannabis for each injury experienced and a 30% chance to use cocaine for each unit increase in the number of traumas [26].
Although some scientific researches have focused on identifying the difference in exposure to early stress in the different groups according to drug use, there is still a gap in the Brazilian context, primarily concerning crack and alcohol users.
In a study that analyzed four different groups (alcohol dependent, addicted to other drugs, depressive patients, and a control group without a diagnosis of mental disorder) the results identified a higher frequency and intensity of early life stress in the alcohol and other drug groups when compared to the depression and control groups [27]. However, researchers do not report the primary substance in the drug-dependent group. Recently, one of the only articles in the national context found in the databases was published that evaluated the experience of childhood maltreatment in groups with different drugs of choice. The authors found a higher intensity of early stress in alcohol users when compared to cocaine, crack, and tobacco users. However, the study did not analyze the influence of early stress on the severity of drug dependence [28].
It is worth mentioning the importance of analyzing specific groups of drug users, especially those dependent on alcohol and crack. There is little information available about the prevalence of early stress experienced by these two groups of drug users, especially in Latin America. The evaluation of these experiences denotes importance, considering that alcohol is the most consumed drug in the country. Crack has a high dependence factor, associated with high social vulnerability, besides being one of the main substances that lead users to seek outpatient treatment in public psychosocial care services in Brazil [29].
These existing studies highlight the importance of the spectrum of childhood traumatic experiences in the risk of drug abuse contributing to the increased severity of the addiction. Furthermore, they indicate the need for further studies that provide the identification of risk factors for lifelong drug use, as this is fundamental for the development of prevention strategies.
From this perspective, this research aims to identify the prevalence of early life stress in drug users, to compare the intensity of trauma in alcohol and crack users, and to relate the power of injury to the severity of drug dependence.
The present study hypothesizes that drug users, who are undergoing outpatient treatment, have a high prevalence of early life stress and that the frequency and intensity of trauma would differ according to the drug used. Furthermore, another hypothesis is that a higher power of early stress could result in differences in the severity of dependence between alcohol and crack users.
2. Method
A cross-sectional analytical study conducted in an outpatient health unit specializing in the treatment of addiction called the Psychosocial Care Center—Alcohol and Drugs (CAPSad) of a municipality of 235,647 inhabitants, located in the Midwest region of Brazil. The service provides coverage for an estimated population of 420,000. The sample consisted of 105 male and female drug users aged 18 years and over.
The data collection procedure followed the research protocol approved by the Ethics Committee (CAAE 49430015.0.0000.5077), in which all participants signed the informed consent document. The data collection period occurred between August 2018 and February 2019. All patients seeking outpatient care were invited to participate in the survey.
The study included patients who were on a new use of psychoactive substances (less than five days abstinence) and age 18 or older. These inclusion criteria were used due to the need to suppress bias related to abstinence time that influences the comprehension of the severity of the dependence. We excluded patients with intellectual disability, schizophrenia, disabling disorders noted by the research or reported by medical records, and poly-substance dependence.
Through simple random sampling, the individuals were divided into two groups according to the psychiatric clinical diagnosis made by outpatient psychiatrists and confirmed by the application of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) [30] performed in 240 patients by the researchers for six months. After evaluation, the final sample consisted of 105 individuals that were allocated according to the primary diagnosis in the Alcohol group (n = 53) and Crack group (n = 52) (Figure 1).
![]()
Figure 1. Flowchart of the sample selection process.
Instruments for data collection: Sociodemographic data questionnaire (gender, date of birth, race, marital status, race, education, occupational status, a specificity of the leading job) (Appendix). This questionnaire also covered questions related to the age of first use of alcohol and crack; Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview [30]: instrument used to define substance use disorder related to alcohol or crack use. Also, we used evaluation to diagnose psychiatric disorders listed in the exclusion criteria; Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): developed by Gossop et al. [31] [32], aims to evaluate the level of severity of drug dependence related to psychological aspects. SDS is composed of variables that address control over drug use and the difficulty of stopping drug use. This instrument has been used in several studies in which it has demonstrated good internal reliability indexes when applied to users of heroin, cocaine, amphetamines, marijuana, alcohol, and methadone maintenance patients [33] [34] [35]. Results from the instrument come from the sum of all five questions, and the higher the score, the higher the severity level of drug dependence [31]. SDS validation study in the Brazilian version demonstrated good reliability and validity for cocaine, crack, marijuana, and alcohol users [33]; Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ): the instrument investigates the history of early stress due to abuse and neglect during childhood [6] [36]. It was translated and validated for the Brazilian context [37]. The instrument has 28 items easy to apply and has been extensively used in numerous clinical and nonclinical populations and is considered a valid and reliable tool due to the solidity of psychometric properties for the evaluation of trauma experienced during childhood [38] [39] [40]. The questionnaire assesses the five subtypes of trauma that may occur during childhood: Emotional abuse (any humiliation or verbal aggression directed from an adult to a child causing embarrassment or mental distress), Physical abuse (physical aggression caused by an adult in a child, who often leaves injuries, sequelae, and can lead to the death of the child depending on its intensity), Sexual abuse (sexual contact of children or under 18 years with an older person), Emotional neglect (caregiver’s failure to meet needs emotional and psychological distress), Physical neglect (caregiver’s failure to provide a child with food, shelter, clothing, and safety) [6]. Items are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very common) [37]. According to the instrument, the application rules the severity of each trauma is classified as emotional abuse (5 to 8—none to a minimum; 9 to 12—mild to moderate; 13 to 15—moderate to severe; above 15—severe to extreme) physical abuse (5 to 7 not minimum; 8 to 9—mild to moderate; 10 to 12 moderate to severe; over 13—severe to extreme) sexual abuse (5—not minimum; 6 to 7—mild to moderate; 8 to 12—moderate to severe; over 13—severe to extreme) emotional neglect (5 to 9—not minimal; 10 to 14—mild to moderate; 15 to 17—moderate to severe; over 18—severe to extreme) physical neglect (5 to 7—not minimal; 8 to 9—mild to moderate; 10 to 12 —moderate to severe; above 13—severe to extreme). After obtaining the sum of all the assertions and five scores, the classification is made through points ranging from 5 to 25 points for each subtype [6]. According to the authors of the instrument, individuals are classified as having early childhood stress if they score moderate-severe or severe-extreme for one or more subtypes.
All the patients attended CAPSad facilities were invited by the researcher to participate in the study. Then the interviewer applied the MINI and the SDS to the participants. According to the results, they were divided into Alcohol and Crack groups.
Statistical Analysis
Data analyses were exploratory and performed in IBM SPSS Statistical Program of Social Science v.20 for Windows. Study variables are described calculating average, absolute, and relative frequencies, as well as the verification of average and standard deviation for continuous variables to characterize the sample. We performed an analysis among the association of categorical variables of the Alcohol and Crack groups using the Chi-squared test (χ2), considering p < 0.05 significance, using the Bonferroni post hoc correction when necessary.
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was the statistical procedure used to look at the possible interaction of the two different groups. The Shapiro-Wilks normality test was used, confirming an asymmetric distribution to evaluate the sample distribution. To assess the difference between sociographic and dependent variables into groups, we used the nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Logistic regression analyses performed with adjusted ORs and CI 95% to assess the influence of each type of abuse and neglect on the drug of use, comparing users of the Alcohol and Crack group.
3. Results
Our study included a total of 120 subjects, divided into two groups: Alcohol and Crack groups (Figure 1). Participants were predominantly male both in Alcohol 39 (73.6%) and Crack 34 (65.4%) groups (χ2 = 0.83; p = 0.36). Participants’ ages differed in the groups (χ2 = 15.58; p = 0.001), in the Crack group users are significantly more representative in the range of 20 - 29 age (36, 5% > 9.4%; p = 0.002) and the percentage of crack use is significantly lower than alcohol in the age group of 50 or older (34.0% > 9.6%; p = 0.004). Also, we found average age-difference between the two groups (F = 29.06; p = 0.001), with the average age of the Alcohol group being 45.02 (±11.30), and in the Crack group, 33.85 (±9.87) (Table 1).
Regarding skin color, the groups showed no significant differences (χ2 = 3.76; p = 0.28), with a predominance of black patients in the Crack (35.8%) and Alcohol (46.2%) groups. The marital status showed significant differences (χ2 = 10.73; p = 0.04); participants with a diagnosis of Crack-related disorder were more numerous than those among alcoholics (65), 4% > 39.6%; p = 0.02) (Table 1).
The groups were similar about education (χ2 = 2.63; p = 0.45); however, it is evident the prevalence of lower education level among users who were part of the sample. The current employment situation was also similar in both groups (χ2 = 6.03; p = 0.11), although no significant differences were found between the groups, there was a predominance of unemployed in the evaluated users (Table 1). In the sample evaluated, the Crack group had significantly higher severity dependence scores, as measured by the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS), (F = 7.38; df = 1; p = 0.008), with an average of 10.6 (±2.7), compared to the Alcohol group with an average of 8.9 (±3.6) (Table 2).
Participants from the Crack group also reported having used alcohol, although the diagnosis and treatment in the health service are related to the use of Crack. The results on the age of first use of alcohol showed a significant difference between the groups regarding the beginning of alcohol consumption (F = 5.14; df = 1; p = 0.02), and the Alcohol group started the consumption of alcohol at a later age when compared to the Crack group. Regarding the age of first use of crack, 56 individuals claim to be users or have tried the drug during their lifetime. When comparing the groups, no significant differences were found between them (Table 2).
Observing the distribution of early stress subtypes in each group we found that the Alcohol group showed high rates of emotional (88.7%) and physical (94.3%) neglect abuse and in the Crack group significant frequency of physical (61.5%) emotional abuse ( 51.9%), sexual (46.2%), and emotional (78.8%), and physical (90.4%) neglect.
The ANOVA technique detected statistical differences between the analyzed individuals, being the Crack group with higher values when it was the average total score (±sd) of the total CTQ (F = 6.77; df = 1; p = 0.01), as well as in all subtypes of abuse, such as emotional abuse (F = 6.31; df = 1; p = 0.01), physical abuse (F = 4.82; df = 1; p = 0.03), sexual abuse (F = 7.55; df = 1; p = 0.007). Regarding neglect subtypes, no statistical differences were found between the two groups (emotional: p = 0.60; physical: p = 0.39), as shown in Table 3.
Analyzing the influence of early life stress and its subtypes on the drug use found a significant influence of emotional abuse (OR = 2.64; 95% CI; 1.20 - 5.80) and sexual abuse (OR = 2.17; 95% CI; 0.97 - 4.88) in the Crack user group. That is, in the sample analyzed, crack users are 2.6 times more likely to have been emotionally abused, and 2.1 times more likely to have been sexually abused during childhood when compared to the Alcohol group. Regarding physical abuse, a tendency was found (OR = 1.93; 95% CI; 0.88 - 4.22), indicating that users of the Crack group are 93% more likely to have suffered physical abuse. In analyzing the influence of neglect, no statistically significant differences were found in either emotional neglect (OR = 0.47; 95% CI; 0.16 - 1.40) or physical neglect (OR = 0.56; 95% CI; 0.12 - 2.49) (Table 4).
![]()
Table 1. Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics according to the drug used (N = 105). Rio Verde, 2019.
*p < 0.05; χ2 = Chi-square (χ2 [df]); A = ANOVA.
![]()
Table 2. Severity of dependence and age of first alcohol and crack use (n = 105). Rio Verde, 2019.
* = p < 0.05; A = ANOVA.
![]()
Table 3. Intensity of early stress subtypes, according to CTQ (n = 105). Rio Verde, 2019.
*p < 0.05.
![]()
Table 4. Influence of early stress subtypes on alcohol and crack use (n = 105). Rio Verde, 2019.
*p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
The present study is one of the first in the Brazilian context to analyze the frequency, severity, and influence of early life stress from five types of childhood trauma on alcohol and crack dependence. The study results show the importance of the problem concerning early life stress and the need for attention to this situation, considering that drug use and the severity of dependence may be related to traumatic events experienced during childhood and adolescence.
Participants on the present study was selected by simple random sampling in an outpatient unit for the treatment of substance use disorders, which highlights the problem involving alcohol and crack use in Brazil. It is important to report that no individuals declined to take part in the research after being approached by the researcher. The high prevalence of alcohol dependents in the sample reflects the national panorama of alcohol consumption, being the most consumed drug in the country [2]. Regarding crack use, although the national prevalence of its use has remained stable in recent years [2] [41], the abusive consumption results in severe consequences for the user. It is evidencing the harm of crack consumption by the demand of these users in seeking outpatient treatment [42].
Our baseline results show that our sample has a similar socio-demographic profile, as reported in other studies, including the majority of black, low-educated level, and unemployed men [43] [44]. Crack consumption was significantly higher when compared to alcohol in young adults with an average age of 33.85 (±9.87) and a single 34 (65.4).
The literature points out those environmental factors, such as family environment and interpersonal relationships, are influential variables in drug use, interacting mutually with other elements in a dynamic process [45] [46]. Besides, the break-in family ties may also be a consequence of drug abuse and the drug of choice, as observed through a study in which the characteristics of family functioning in crack users were more impaired when compared to alcohol users [47]. Although not demonstrating statistically significant differences between the two groups, the predominance of unemployed users reflects the problem of high social vulnerability to which these users are exposed, suggesting a trajectory of social marginalization that precedes or is a consequence of drug use [48].
Regarding the severity of drug dependence, the Crack group had significantly higher scores than the Alcohol group evaluated by the Severity of Dependence Scale instrument. Crack users tend to seek health care because they have higher rates of acute situations caused by substance use and are more likely to report other health-related problems [49]. Another foundation regarding the severity of drug dependence concerns the influence of the drug administration route. Studies have shown more severe health consequences for crack users compared to users of other drugs, such as alcohol. They suggest that this may be related to the route in which this substance is administered and the health consequences to drug users [49] [50].
Crack users have more significant social and judicial damages and other psychosocial problems when compared to users of other drugs, which contributes to the increasing severity of addiction [51] [52]. Besides, the age of onset of drug use influences substance dependence, and the findings of the present study showed that the Crack group started alcohol consumption earlier. It is noteworthy that early drug use can be postulated by the role that early stress entails in the initiation and maintenance of drug use. Thus, the early onset of substance abuse has also been related to more considerable experience of early stress [53] [54].
A research describes the association between early stress and premature age at the onset of drug use and consequently concludes that lifetime dependence is significantly higher if drug use initiates in adolescence [55]. Thus, the Crack group, having experienced higher frequencies and intensities of early stress, began the consumption of substances younger than the Alcohol group, and premature expenditure can be justified as a way of regulating negative emotions resulting from early stress [26] [56].
The presence of early life stress in the analyzed sample indicates high rates of emotional (88.7%) and physical (94.3%) neglect among alcohol users; and emotional abuse (61.5%), physical abuse (51.9%), and emotional (78.8%) and physical (90.4%) neglect among crack users. Statistical analyses showed a significant difference between the two groups in trauma related to emotional (p = 0.01) and sexual (p = 0.05) abuse. In this context, we confirm part of our hypothesis regarding the difference in the presence of early stress subtypes in the analyzed groups.
The results of the present study corroborate the literature showing high exposure to early stress in people diagnosed with substance use disorders [28] [57] [58] [59]. In retrospective studies, the prevalence of early life stress relates to the problematic use of alcohol [60], crack [61], and injecting drugs [62].
Recent studies in Brazil have evaluated early life stress exposure among psychoactive substance users using specific samples, usually focused on gender differences. However, few compared early life stress according to the drug of choice of the user [27] [63] [64]. One study aimed to evaluate patients undergoing treatment for substance dependence reported among alcohol users showed a prevalence of neglect similar to our research, with physical neglect prevalent in 85.4% and emotional neglect in 98.9% of the sample. When compared to the crack user sample, the authors found a higher frequency of emotional abuse (91.3%), physical abuse (69.6%), physical neglect (84.8%), and emotional neglect (95.7%). However, our study sample showed a higher prevalence of sexual abuse among crack users compared with the reference study [28].
To better elucidate the prevalent relationship between early stress and substance use disorders, a systematic review and meta-analysis determined the prospective link between these two conditions through longitudinal studies [65]. The results demonstrated a high magnitude of the association between outcome and history of childhood physical and sexual abuse, with a 74% and 73% increase in the risk of illicit substance abuse, respectively, when experiencing such abuse [65].
Regarding the intensity of trauma experienced by the Alcohol and Crack groups, the total early stress score was significantly higher in crack users, as well as in the emotional abuse, physical abuse, and sexual abuse subtypes when compared to the alcohol user’s group. Therefore, crack users reported experiencing more severe child trauma (except emotional neglect). The study hypothesis that there was a difference in trauma intensity in both groups was confirmed.
The findings of this study show a high intensity of early stress in our sample of Crack users when compared to the survey [66] who identified a total early stress intensity with a score of 48.8 (±18.1), emotional abuse 11.7 (±5.4) physical abuse 10.0 (±5.3), sexual abuse 7.2 (±4.4), and physical neglect 8.8 (±3.8) and emotional 11.0 (±5.3). Regarding the intensity of early stress in alcohol users, the results of our sample were also higher than those presented in another research [67] in the CTQ total score 44.1 (±17.1), as well as early stress subtypes such as emotional abuse 9.8 (±5.1), sexual abuse 7.6 (±5.6), physical abuse 8.8 (±4.3), emotional neglect 10.4 (±5.0) and physical neglect 7.4 (±3.6). The comparison between these results shows the severity of early stress among psychoactive substance users in the present sample.
The scientific literature indicates that early life stress may influence the severity, prognosis, and evolution of crack consumption [61] [68]. An explanatory model for this is the adaptation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis that occurs since early life, with the resulting cortisol secretion responsible for metabolic, immunological, cognitive, and behavioral adjustments to stress. From the moment stress becomes chronic early in life, there is an allostatic overload of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, which causes impairment of stress adaptation mechanisms and results in maladaptive response as the highest chance of developing dependence [50].
One research identified a significant association between early stress and the chance of developing crack addiction, in which the sample showed higher scores on early stress subtypes, citing emotional and physical abuse, as well as emotional and physical neglect [61]. The results of our study provide additional support for previous research that identified the influence of early stress severity on adverse outcomes in drug dependence [3] [69].
The higher intensity of early stress experienced among crack users leads us to consider the use of a substance with high potential dependence as an inappropriate strategy to cope with strongly negative experiences during childhood, resulting in more substantial use over time. Therefore, exposure to trauma can influence the type of addiction drug and cause a greater severity of addiction to this drug [52] [69] [70].
In the present study, the different types of abuse were significant in the sample of Crack users, showing that belonging to this group increased the chances of emotional abuse (OR = 2.64; 95% CI; 1.20 - 5.80) and sexual abuse (OR = 2.17; 95% CI; 0.97 - 4.88), as well as a tendency towards physical abuse (OR = 1.93; 95% CI; 0.88 - 4.22 ).
The effect of early life stress on drug users, especially crack users, demonstrates the social vulnerability in which drug addicts were inserted [3]. Exposure to different types of abuse may have played a prominent role in the development of drug addiction, such as crack, as well as being a potentiator to worsen addiction in adulthood. Early life stress characterized as a pathogenic relational experience and individuals exposed to abuse and neglect initiates a negative probabilistic cascade in various processes at various levels and domains of life, increasing the risk of developing the drug-related disorder [71] [72].
The early life stress increases the risk of substance use problem during adolescence in which a sequence of family-based risk factors like childhood maltreatment has been described, associated with heterogeneous developmental outcomes, including the development of less adaptive personality organizations, psychopathology, and substance use disorders [73]. This model can contribute to elucidate how the consequences after early life stress can turn into issues that affect various domains in adolescence and adulthood, especially related to drug use behavior. A literature review study described that alcohol and other drug abuse could be adopted as a strategy to cope with early stress, resulting in consequences for various spheres of life of the individual, especially the labor aspects [74].
The present study provides ample evidence of the relationship and influence of early stress on drug dependence and suggests that crack users experience greater exposure to different types of early stress compared to alcohol users.
However, it is necessary to describe the limitations observed in this study. The size of the two samples, users of alcohol and crack, was relatively small. However, we minimized the sample bias by the fact that all individuals who sought treatment in the health unit during the scheduled collection period were invited to participate in the study. The problem of sample size had as a contributing factor the low demand for seeking care in outpatient health units for the treatment of drug-related disorders. Therefore, further studies with larger samples that include services with other levels of health care recommended.
The lack of information and control over possible confounding factors is pointed as a limitation, such as a gender. It was not possible to present the differences in early life stress between genders because the number of women in both samples was relatively small. Therefore, further analysis is necessary to adjust these confounding factors. Also, because this is a retrospective study, memory bias may be punctuated because prolonged drug use is a factor that may affect recall of childhood experience.
Despite these limitations, our results contribute to the scientific literature by expanding knowledge to understand the relationship between early life stress and the development of substance use disorders in adulthood, deepening the investigation of the variables present in this context. We emphasize the importance of these data for clinical practice since the trauma is often not recognized or even investigated in clinical settings. The disregard of traumatic experiences that generate early stress in the process of evaluation, planning, and implementation of treatment by professionals tends to contribute negatively to the development of a clinical practice capable of providing alternatives to drug users to cope with these traumas more effectively [40] [75].
In this sense, the results also contribute to legitimize the need for therapeutic approaches that can improve the physiological stress response, such as mindfulness-based interventions [76] [77] [78] have reported benefits for treating drug users.
5. Conclusions
The present study confirms the high prevalence of early life stress in drug users, especially among people diagnosed with crack dependence. The comparison between the two groups made it possible to identify the influence and severity of early stress and to understand the seriousness of drug dependence among users, suggesting that crack users face greater exposure to different types of trauma in childhood and have a higher severity of drug dependence.
Our study contributes by providing evidence on the magnitude of the relationship between early stress and the influence of this experience on drug users. In the clinical setting, mental health nurses should be guided by the level of exposure of users to early stress and the type of drug used. Individually, we may suggest that the increased involvement of early stress may aggravate drug dependence in adulthood as a way to alleviate the long-term adverse effects of trauma exposure. Finally, we emphasize that the incorporation of early stress assessment in drug user care protocols can contribute to the comprehensive care offered, with the potential to improve the effectiveness of substance dependence treatment.
Financing
This work was funded by the University of Rio Verde [4.04.16.1.002].
Appendix
Suicidal Behavior and Early Life Stress in Users of Psychoactive Substances
Coordinator: Prof. Msc. Elton Brás Camargo Júnior
Patient’s code: _________________
Interviewer: _______________________________________
Interview date: ___________________________________
P-Sociodemographic Profile
P1—Gender (1) male; (2) female)
P2—Date of birth: _____/_____/_____
(Age: _______________)
P3—What color do you consider yourself?
1) Black; 5) Indigenous
2) White 6) Other
3) Yellow
4) Mestizo/pardo
P4—What is your marital status?
1) Married 4) Divorced
2) Domestic partnership 5) Separated
3) Widower 6) single
P5—Education
1) Illiterate 3) Incomplete/complete secondary school
2) Incomplete/complete primary school 4) Incomplete/complete college
Note: Specify last school year: _________________________
P6—What is your main current employment situation?
1) Full time (TI) (35+ h/week),
2) Part time (<35 h/week)
3) Unemployed and actively looking for a “temporary layoff”
4) Outside the labor market—does not work and does not actively seek work
5) Casual work (irregular work and no fixed schedule)
6) Retired
