|
[1]
|
Experimental Support for Physically Significant Units of Measure
|
|
NULL |
|
|
|
|
[2]
|
Measurement Quantization
|
|
International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern …,
2022 |
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
Measurement Quantization Describes the Physical Constants
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[4]
|
Distance Associated with Charge Couplings
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[5]
|
Properties of Atoms Shown to be a Function of Discrete Geometry
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[6]
|
Effective Mass of a Galaxy, Star Velocity and their Relation
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[7]
|
Discrete Approach to Star Velocities Solves Dark Matter
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[8]
|
Describing Coulomb’s Constant Using Only Planck Units
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[9]
|
Elementary Charge
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[10]
|
Describing the Magnetic Constant Using Only Planck Units
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[11]
|
Diameter & Age of the Universe as a Function of the CMB Temperature
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[12]
|
Electric Constant
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[13]
|
Physical Significance of Gravitational Curvature and the Orbital Path of Stars
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[14]
|
Magnetic Constant
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[15]
|
Classical Description of the CMB Power Spectrum Without ΛCDM
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[16]
|
Distance Associated with Blackbody Radiation
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[17]
|
Measurements of CMB Age Confirms a 363,309 Year Quantum Epoch
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[18]
|
Physical Support for a Universe with a Constant Rate of Radial Expansion
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[19]
|
Angular Measure & Momentum
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[20]
|
Physically Significant Approach to Describing Broken Symmetry
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[21]
|
Planck's Constant
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[22]
|
Extending the Physical Constants to 12 Significant Digits
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[23]
|
Time Dilation of the CMB Age Confirms 363,309 Year Quantum Epoch
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[24]
|
Unifying Gravity with Electromagnetism G= 2πɛ0γ
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[25]
|
Describing the Fine Structure Constant Using Only Planck Units
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[26]
|
Dark Energy–a Classical Description Using Measurement Quantization
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[27]
|
Describing Elementary Charge Using Only Planck Units
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[28]
|
Planck’s Constant – Request for Redefinition with Increased Precision
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[29]
|
Frames of Reference Still Misunderstood; There’s a Third Frame
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[30]
|
Describing the Electric Constant Using Only Planck Units
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[31]
|
Fine Structure Constant
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[32]
|
Classical Description of Mass in the Universe without Λ and CDM
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[33]
|
Spatial Curvature Incompatible with Discrete Phenomena
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[34]
|
Increasing Universal Mass
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
[35]
|
Determinism and the Foundations of Quantum Behavior
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[36]
|
Discrete Expressions for the Gravitational Constant Offer Improved Precision G=6.6740779428(56) 10-11 m^3/kg s^2
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[37]
|
Universe Offers Shared Value for the Measure of Angle and Momentum at the Planck Bound – 3.26239030392(48)
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[38]
|
Four New Constants of Nature
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[39]
|
Correlating the Newton and Planck Constants
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[40]
|
Physical Approach to Demonstrating Singularities Cannot Exist
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[41]
|
Classical Description of Discrete Gravity
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[42]
|
Hubble's Constant and the Underlying Physics of Expansion
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[43]
|
Simplest Relation Between Fundamental Length, Mass, and Time
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[44]
|
Discrete Approach to the Contraction and Dilation of Measure with Respect to a Gravitational Mass
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[45]
|
Discrete Approach to Deriving the Equivalence Principle as a Predicted Outcome
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[46]
|
Length Contraction Associated with Discrete Measure Resolves CODATA Constants Tension
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[47]
|
Establishing the Discreteness of Measure in the Frame of the Observer
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[48]
|
Discrete Approach Offers Physical Confirmation: Three Spatial Dimensions
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[49]
|
Three Frames of Reference Prerequisite to Deriving the Physical Constants
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[50]
|
Upper Bound to Baryonic Mass Density
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[51]
|
What Defines the Fundamental Measures
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[52]
|
Classical Approach to Orbital Star Velocity Obviates Dark Matter Conjecture While Demonstrating Path of Lowest Energy
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[53]
|
Physical Significance of Count Bounds to the Fundamental Measures
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[54]
|
More Precise Expressions for the Planck Units
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[55]
|
What is the Physical Difference Between Baryonic and Electromagnetic Phenomena?
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[56]
|
Informativity Differential
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[57]
|
Measurement Quantization Describes History of Universe—Quantum Inflation, Transition to Expansion, CMB Power Spectrum
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[58]
|
Gravitational Constant
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[59]
|
Fundamental Measures
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[60]
|
Fundamental Constant
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[61]
|
Bounds to Measurement Frequency
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
[62]
|
Physically significant units of measure
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
[63]
|
Measurement Quantization Describes Galactic Rotational Velocities, Obviates Dark Matter Conjecture
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
[64]
|
Physical Significance of Measure
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
[65]
|
Underlying Physics of the Hubble Tension 67.861–73.915 km s-Mpc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[66]
|
Extending Precision of the Physical Constants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[67]
|
Confirming the Discreteness of Measure with a New Form of Length Contraction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[68]
|
Establishing the Discreteness of Measure with Respect to the Internal Frame of the Universe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[69]
|
Physical Significance of Count Bounds of the Fundamental Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[70]
|
Three Fundamental Constants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[71]
|
Classical Description of the CMB Power Spectrum Without Λ or CDM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[72]
|
Physical Significance of the Transition from Classical to Non-classical Behavior in the Orbits of Stars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[73]
|
How to Derive Physical Constants Using Quantization Ratios as a Function of the Discrete and Non-discrete Frames
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[74]
|
Reduced Planck Constant–A New Approach with Increased Precision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[75]
|
Correlating the Gravitational and Reduce Planck Constants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[76]
|
Dark Energy–a Geometric Phenomenon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[77]
|
Time Dilation Between the Quantum and Expansionary Epochs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[78]
|
Support for a Universe without Curvature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[79]
|
Distance Corresponding to the Length Contraction Associated with a Measure of Charge Couplings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[80]
|
Length Contraction Associated with Discrete Measure Resolves the Planck Units Tension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[81]
|
Distance Corresponding to the Length Contraction Associated with a Measure of Blackbody Radiation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[82]
|
Reduced Planck Constant–Request for Redefinition with Increased Precision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[83]
|
Universe Offers Shared Value for the Measure of Angle and Momentum at the Planck Bound–3.26239030392 (48)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[84]
|
Distance Corresponding to the Length Contraction Associated with a Measure of Elementary Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[85]
|
Describing the Fine Structure Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[86]
|
Classical Approach to Discrete Gravity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[87]
|
Fundamental Measures-More Precise Expressions for the Planck Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[88]
|
Discrete Approach to the Contraction and Dilation of Measure with Respect to Motion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[89]
|
Deriving the Planck Unit Expressions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[90]
|
Discrete Approach to Star Velocity Resolves Dark Matter Phenomenon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[91]
|
Describing the Magnetic Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[92]
|
Describing Coulomb's Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[93]
|
Describing the Electric Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[94]
|
Describing Elementary Charge Using Only the Fundamental Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[95]
|
Discrete Expressions for the Gravitational Constant Offer Improved Precision G= 6.6740779428 (56) 10-11 m 3 kg-s-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[96]
|
Planck's Constant–Request for Redefinition with Increased Precision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[97]
|
Simplest Relation Between Fundamental Units of Length, Mass, and Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[98]
|
What Defines the Fundamental Measures?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[99]
|
Introduction to Measurement Quantization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[100]
|
Establishing the Discreteness of Measure with Respect to the Frame of the Observer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[101]
|
Measurements of CMB Age Confirm a 363,309 Year Quantum Epoch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[102]
|
Introduction to Measurement Quantization Supplemental Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[103]
|
363,309 Year Quantum Epoch Confirmed by Time Dilation of the CMB Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[104]
|
Universe Offers Shared Value for the Measure of Angle and Momentum at the Planck Bound–3.26239030392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[105]
|
Discrete Description of Nature Avoids Singularities While Replacing Need for Quantum Gravity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[106]
|
Discrete Approach to the Contraction and Dilation of Measure with Respect to an Inertial Mass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[107]
|
Discrete Approach to Describing the Kinetic Energy Associated with Stars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[108]
|
Frames of Reference Still Misunderstood; There'sa Third Frame
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[109]
|
Demonstrating that Stars Follow the Path of Least Energy Using Only Classical Mechanics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[110]
|
Distance Associated with Elementary Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|