Share This Article:

Did Foucault Revolutionize History?

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:68KB) PP. 84-89
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2011.12014    30,458 Downloads   76,022 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

With the pretext of analyzing Foucault’s contribution to history, the paper is an essay on the philosophy of history. It is shaped, fundamentally, as an answer to the historian Paul Veyne’s essay, “Foucault Revolutionizes History” (1978) and his assertions on Foucault and historical methodology; Veyne claimed Foucault to have revolutionized the discipline of history thanks to his singular gaze and his profound skepticism. The paper counters Veyne’s assertions on both Foucault and Veyne’s historiography and seeks to provide a concept of history that is more nuanced and conscious of the human sciences’ ontology and duties. To do so, the paper engages with a number of historical currents, thinkers, and concepts, which shape historical inquiry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Franchetti, C. (2011). Did Foucault Revolutionize History?. Open Journal of Philosophy, 1, 84-89. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2011.12014.

References

[1] Acton, J. E. E. (1886). German schools of history. The English Historical Review, 1, 7-42. doi:10.1093/ehr/I.I.7
[2] Barzun, J. (1974). Clio and the doctors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[3] Benjamin, W. (1977). The Origin of German Tragic Drama. London: NLB.
[4] Blanning, T. (2007). The Pursuit of Glory. New York: The Viking Press.
[5] Bloc, M. (2005). Scritti sulla storia come scienza. Rome: Centro di Ricerca.
[6] Burke, P. (2008). What is Cultural History? Cambridge: Polity.
[7] Michel Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Press.
[8] Foucault, M. (2000a). The Order of Things. In J. Faubon (Ed.), Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, New York: The New Press.
[9] Foucault, M. (2000b). Truth and Power. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Power, New York: The New Press.
[10] Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977-1978. New York: Picador.
[11] Foucault, M. (2010). The archaeology of knowledge; and, the discourse on language. New York: Vintage Press.
[12] Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method. London: Continuum.
[13] Gauchet, M. (1986). La nominalisme historien, A propos de “Foucault révolutionne l’histoire”, de Paul Veyne. Social Science Information, 25, 401-419. doi:10.1177/053901886025002005
[14] Gauchet, M. (1999). The disenchantment of the world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[15] Huizinga, J. (1959). The problem of the renaissance. In Men & Ideas, New York: Meridian Books, 243-287.
[16] Huizinga, J. (1996). The Autumn of the Middle Ages. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[17] Ortega y Gasset, J. (1936). History as a system. In R. Klibansky (Ed.), History and Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 283-322.
[18] Veyne, P. (1978). Foucault revolutionizes history. In A. I. Davidson (Ed.), Foucault and His Interlocutors, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 146-182.
[19] Veyne, P. (2010). Foucault: His Thought, His Character. Cambridge: Polity.
[20] 45Huizinga, 1959: p.287
[21] 46See Maitland, F. W. (1957). History of English Law. Historical Essays. London: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Weintraub, K. J. (1966). Visions of Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.