Powering Renewable Programs: The Utility Perspective

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:6276KB) PP. 148-159
DOI: 10.4236/ojee.2016.54013    581 Downloads   757 Views  

ABSTRACT

In order to make renewable energy projects successful, there are many factors that utilities need to consider. These include policy drivers, assessing what renewable technologies it will employ, identifying the rates and pricing incentives that could be made available, and how customers can be better engaged. Utilities have created renewable programs with varying degrees of customer participation: some have taken the initiative to provide customers with 100% renewable generated power, others rely exclusively on customers to participate to meet renewable energy goals and the last alternative is a blend of both in which utilities offer customers the option to purchase renewable power matches or install and generate their own renewable power. Overall, the economics of solar and wind technologies are trending in the upward direction—the costs of the technologies are decreasing and the yields are getting higher. Better still, predictive modeling, energy storage and the plethora of research in this area will only make the prospects of integrating renewables more viable.

Cite this paper

Griffin, N. and Silaban, A. (2016) Powering Renewable Programs: The Utility Perspective. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 5, 148-159. doi: 10.4236/ojee.2016.54013.

References

[1] American Wind Energy Association. Wind Energy Facts at a Glance.
http://www.awea.org/Resources/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=5059
[2] Union of Concerned Scientists. Farming the Wind: Wind Power and Agriculture.
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/smart-energy-solutions/increase-renewables/
farming-the-wind-wind-power.html#.WCQv7fkrI2w
[3] American Wind Energy Association. Wind Energy Facts at a Glance.
http://www.awea.org/Resources/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=5059
[4] Weiner, J. (2015) Study Finds That the Price of Wind Energy in the United States Is at an All-Time Low, Averaging under 2.5¢/kWh.
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/08/10/study-finds-that-the-price-of-wind-energy-in-the-united-states
-is-at-an-all-time-low-averaging-under-2-5%C2%A2kwh/
[5] Ren21. (2016) Renewables 2016 Global Status Report.
http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/REN21_GSR2016_
FullReport_en_11.pdf
[6] Darby, M. (2016).
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/26/solar-panel-costs
-predicted-to-fall-10-a-year
[7] US Department of Energy. Tackling the Hidden Costs of Rooftop Solar.
http://energy.gov/science-innovation/energy-sources/renewable-energy/solar
[8] US Department of Energy. (2016) Solar Energy Jobs Outpace U.S. Economy.
http://energy.gov/articles/solar-energy-jobs-outpace-us-economy
[9] Solar Energy Industries Association (2016) Solar Market Insight Report 2016 Q2.
http://www.seia.org/research-resources/solar-market-insight-report-2016-q2
[10] Solar Energy Industries Association (2015) Impacts of Solar Investment Tax Credit Extension.
http://www.seia.org/research-resources/impacts-solar-investment-tax-credit-extension
[11] Union of Concerned Scientists. How Energy Storage Works.
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/how-energy-storage-works#.V73ECEtTHIV
[12] Electrical Energy Storage Project Team, International Electrotechnical Commission. Electric Energy Storage.
http://www.iec.ch/whitepaper/pdf/iecWP-energystorage-LR-en.pdf
[13] Tesla. Powerwall.
https://www.tesla.com/powerwall
[14] Kawashima, M. (2011) Overview of Electrical Power Storage. Internal Paper of Tepco.
[15] Puttre, M. (2015) Analytics and Big Data Are Changing the Energy Market Map.
http://solarindustrymag.com/online/issues/SI1501/FEAT_03_Analytics-And
-Big-Data-Are-Changing-The-Energy-Market-Map.html
[16] Roselund, C. (2015) California Governor Brown Signs 50% Renewable Portfolio Standard into Law.
http://www.pv-magazine.com/news/details/beitrag/california-governor-brown-signs
-50-renewable-portfolio-standard-into-law_100021447/#ixzz4He6NKmAP
[17] US Energy Information Administration. Hawaii State Profile and Energy Estimates.
http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=HI
[18] Georgetown Going 100% Renewable.
https://gus.georgetown.org/renewable-energy
[19] PG&E’s Solar Choice Rate Calculator.
https://www.pge.com/en_US/residential/solar-and-vehicles/options/
solar/solar-choice/rate-calculator.page
[20] SolarShares®: Solar for Everyone!
https://www.smud.org/en/residential/environment/solarshares.htm
[21] John, J. (2016) Breaking: California’s NEM 2.0 Decision Keeps Retail Rate for Rooftop Solar, Adds Time of Use.
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Californias-Net-Metering-2.0-
Decision-Rooftop-Solar-to-Keep-Retail-Payme
[22] Blum, J. (2016) Texas Gets “F” Grade on Net-Metering Policies for Solar Power and More.
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2016/01/26/texas-gets-f-grade-on-net-metering
-policies-for-solar-power-and-more/
[23] Solar Outreach Partnership. Farmer Electric Cooperative: A Small Rural Cooperative Becomes a Solar Leader.
http://www.solarelectricpower.org/media/230417/SEPA031-SolarOPs-Study
_FEC_0914.pdf
[24] New Jersey’s Clean Energy Programs.
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/renewable-energy/programs/programs
[25] New Jersey Renewable Electric Storage.
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/renewable-energy/programs/energy-storage
[26] Coulter, S. (2012). Report Finds Shorter Payback Periods on Home Solar in Ten US States
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/3/prweb9282391.htm
[27] Hawaiian Electric Company. Clean Energy Hawaii: Going Solar.
https://www.hawaiianelectric.com/clean-energy-hawaii/going-solar

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.