The Collusion Deterrence with Prisoner’s Dilemma

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:150KB) PP. 470-478
DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2010.34053    6,422 Downloads   10,424 Views  


I tried to present a new method to prevent collusion through employing two auditors at the same time and inspiring them provide true report by exploiting their prisoner’s dilemma. But I found this method cannot be put into practice because of the high cost. So I analyzed whether sending the second auditor in a probability, a low cost method, can deter the audit collusion. I find sending the second auditor in a probability, enforcing the rigidly lawful punishment and perfecting the reward mechanism can prevent audit collusion. I also find the auditor’s ethical constraint do good to prevent collusion and the charger of state assets management can play the same role as the real owner of the state-owned enterprise in deterring collusion. This finding provides theory support for the government to implement the publicly audit bidding and random double auditing system on state-owned enterprise. The supervision of PCAOB on auditors is also the operation of this theory.

Cite this paper

A. Liu and J. Liu, "The Collusion Deterrence with Prisoner’s Dilemma," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 3 No. 4, 2010, pp. 470-478. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2010.34053.


[1] C. Cullinan, “Enron as a Symptom of Audit Process Breakdown: Can the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Cure the Disease?” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15, No. 6-7, 2004, pp. 853-864.
[2] S. Baiman, J. Evans and J. Noel, “Optimal Contract with a Utility Maximizing Auditor,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1987, pp. 217-244.
[3] S. Baiman, J. H. Evans III and N. J. Nagarajan, “Collusion in Auditing,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1991, pp. 1-18.
[4] A. Finkle and D. Shin, “Conducting Inaccurate Audits to Commit to the Audit Policy,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2007, pp. 379-389.
[5] E. Maskin and J. Tirole, “The Principal-Agent Relationship with an Informed Principal: The Case of Private Values,” Econometrica, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1990, pp. 379- 409.
[6] J. Tirole, “Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1986, pp. 181-214.
[7] F. Kofman and J. Lawarrée, “A Prisoner’s Dilemma Model of Collusion Deterrence,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 59, No. 1, 1996, pp. 117-136.
[8] F. Kofman and J. Lawarrée, “On the Optimality of Allowing Collusion,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2, 1996, pp. 383-407.
[9] F. Kofman and J. Lawarrée, “Collusion in Hierarchical Agency,” Econometrica, Vol. 61, No. 3, 1993, pp. 629- 656.
[10] B. Lev, “Corporate Earnings: Facts and Fiction,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2003, pp. 27- 50.
[11] A. Sheleifer, “Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior?” American Economic Review, AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2004, pp. 414-418.
[12] B. J. Hall, “Six Challenges in Designing Equity-based Pay,” In: D. H. Chew Jr. and S. L. Gillan, Eds., Corporate Governance at the Crossroads, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005, pp. 268-280.
[13] J.-J. Laffont and D. Martimort, “Duplication of Regulators against Collusive Behavior,” Mimeo, IDEI, Toulouse, 1994.
[14] B. E. Cushing, “Economic Analysis of Accountants’ Ethical Standards: The Case of Audit Opinion Shopping,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1999, pp. 339-363.
[15] D. Baron and R. Myerson, “Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs,” Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 4, 1982, pp. 911-930.
[16] J. -J. Laffont and J. Tirole, “Using Cost Observations to Regulate Firms,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 3, 1986, pp. 614-641.
[17] D. Kreps, P. Milgrom, J. Roberts and R. Wilson, “Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1982, pp. 245-252.
[18] D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, “Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium and Sequential Equilibrium,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1991, pp. 236-260.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.