Yield enhancement of droughted wheat by film antitranspirant application: rationale and evidence

Peter S. Kettlewell, William L. Heath, Ian M. Haigh

.

DOI: 10.4236/as.2010.13017                

Abstract

Extensive research in the 20th century explored the potential for mitigation of drought by applying polymers (film antitranspirants) to leaves to reduce water loss. It was concluded that film antitranspirants are of limited usefulness, since the polymers reduced photosynthesis (in addition to transpiration) and this was assumed to be detrimental to growth and yield. We propose, however, that irrespective of reduced assimilate availability from photosynthesis, the most drought sensitive stage of yield formation in wheat may respond positively to antitranspirant application. Six field experiments involved ap-plying the film antitranspirant di-1-p-menthene at five development stages and 10 soil moisture deficits (SMD) in total over three years. Yield was reduced when the film antitranspirant was applied at development stages less-sensitive to drought, from inflorescence emergence to anthesis, consistent with the conclusions from previous research. In contrast, yield was increased when the film antitranspirant was applied at flag leaf stage, just before the stage most sensitive to drought (boot stage). These results show that film antitranspirant has the potential to mitigate drought effects on yield of wheat.

Keywords

Di-1-p-Menthene; Triticum Aestivum; Water Deficit

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Molden, D., Ed. (2007) Water for food water for life. Earthscan, London.
[2]	Hazell, P. and Wood, S. (2008) Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 495-515.
[3]	Turner, N.C. (2004) Agronomic options for improving rainfall-use efficiency in dryland farming systems. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2413-2425.
[4]	Morison, J.I.L., Baker, N.R., Mullineaux, P.M. and Davies, W.J. (2008) Improving water use in crop production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 639-658.
[5]	Gale, J. and Hagan, R.M. (1966) Plant antitranspirants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 17, 269-282.
[6]	Das, V.S.R. and Raghavendra, A.S. (1979) Antitranspirants for improvement of water use efficiency of crops. Outlook on Agriculture, 10, 92-98.
[7]	Solarova, J., Pospisilova, J. and Slavik, B. (1981) Gas exchange regulation by changing of epidermal conductance with antitranspirants. Photosynthetica, 15, 365-400.
[8]	Kramer, P.J. and Boyer, J.S. (1995) Water relations of plants and soils. Academic Press, San Diego.
[9]	Jones, H.G. (1992) Plants and microclimate. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[10]	Whitmore, J.S. (2000) Drought management on farmland. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[11]	Salter, P.J. and Goode, J.E. (1967) Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK.
[12]	Fischer, R.A. (1973) The effects of water stress at various stages of development on yield processes in wheat. In: Plant Response to Climatic Factors, Proceedings of the Uppsala Symposium 1970, Ecology and Conservation, 5, Unesco, 233-241.
[13]	Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T. and Konzak, C.F. (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14, 415-421.
[14]	Beed, F.D., Paveley, N.D. and Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2007) Predictability of wheat growth and yield in light -limited conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 145, 63-79.
[15]	Hess, T.M. (1996) A Microcomputer Scheduling Program for Supplementary Irrigation. In: Irrigation Scheduling: From Theory to Practice – Proceedings of the ICID/FAO Workshop on Irrigation Scheduling, Rome, Italy, 12-13 September 1995. Food and Agriculture Organisation, http://www.fao.org/ do-crep/w4367e/w4367e08.htm
[16]	Davenport, D.C., Uriu, K. and Hagan, R.M. (1974) Effects of film antitranspirants on growth. Journal of Experimental Botany, 25, 410-419.
[17]	Fuehring, H.D. (1973) Effect of antitranspirants on yield of grain sorghum under limited irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 65, 348-351.
[18]	Patil, B.B. and De, R. (1978) Studies on the effect of nitrogen fertilizer, row spacing and use of antitranspirants on rapeseed (Brassica campestris) grown under dryland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 91, 257-264.
[19]	Fuehring, H.D. and Finckner, M.D. (1983) Effect of Folicote antitranspirant application on field grain yield of moisture-stressed corn. Agronomy Journal, 75, 579-582.
[20]	Plaut, Z. (2004) Antitranspirants: Film-forming types. Encyclopedia of Water Science, 1, 1-4.
[21]	Foulkes, M.J. and Scott, R.K. (1998) Exploitation of varieties for UK cereal production (Volume III) Part 2. varietal responses to drought. Project Report No. 174, Home-Grown Cereals Authority, London.
[22]	Saini, H.S. and Westgate, M.E. (2000) Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Ad-vances in Agronomy, 68, 59-96.
[23]	Koonjul, P.K., Minhas, J.S. Nunes, C. Sheoran, I.S. and Saini, H.S. (2005) Selective transcriptional down-regulation of anther invertase precedes the failure of pollen development in water-stressed wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 179-190.
[24]	Satorre, E.H. and Slafer, G.A., Eds. (1999) Wheat: Ecology and physiology of yield determination. Haworth Press, New York.