Frontier Science Philosophies for Quality Lives

Abstract

The optimum science benefits to routine life have insufficiently been proved. Science progress is not merely reflected in machinery and technological breakthroughs. Subordinate impacts of science and scientists on global interactions are an evidence for the major deficiencies and futility of the many current science designations. A primary objective is to describe postmodern global interrelations of science mentoring policies and life quality. Also, global programs are proposed that will aid in the timely achievement of optimal real-life science goals. The global wholeness of science pictures should be visible, acknowledged, and educated. The wholeness of science, no matter how exposed or sophisticated, should never change. Definitive paths should be developed to bestow science with sufficiently empowered authorities to lead and optimize economics, politics, and international relations. Mentoring rather than teaching of science will be a main frontier for quality lives. Postmodern mentors will be cognizant of the science entirety. Mentors will create and designate definitive shapes from discoveries and findings that will grant human life with ongoing peace and ultimate satisfaction.

Share and Cite:

Nikkhah, A. (2012). Frontier Science Philosophies for Quality Lives. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2, 128-129. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.22020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Alberts, B. (2009). Making a science of education. Science, 323, 15. doi:10.1126/science.1169941
[2] Nikkhah, A. (2011). Structuring science education in the New Millennium: Authorizing a succeeding integrity. Progress in Education, New York, NY: Nova Publishers Inc.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.