1 + 1 = 3: Synergy Arithmetic in Economics

Download Download as PDF (Size:504KB)  HTML   XML  PP. 133-144  
DOI: 10.4236/am.2017.82011    648 Downloads   827 Views  

ABSTRACT

Counting has always been one of the most important operations for human be-ings. Naturally, it is inherent in economics and business. We count with the unique arithmetic, which humans have used for millennia. However, over time, the most inquisitive thinkers have questioned the validity of standard arithmetic in certain settings. It started in ancient Greece with the famous philosopher Zeno of Elea, who elaborated a number of paradoxes questioning popular knowledge. Millennia later, the famous German researcher Herman Helmholtz (1821-1894) [1] expressed reservations about applicability of conventional arithmetic with respect to physical phenomena. In the 20th and 21st century, mathematicians such as Yesenin-Volpin (1960) [2], Van Bendegem (1994) [3], Rosinger (2008) [4] and others articulated similar concerns. In validation, in the 20th century expressions such as 1 + 1 = 3 or 1 + 1 = 1 occurred to reflect important characteristics of economic, business, and social processes. We call these expressions synergy arithmetic. It is common notion that synergy arithmetic has no meaning mathematically. However in this paper we mathematically ground and explicate synergy arithmetic.

Cite this paper

Burgin, M. and Meissner, G. (2017) 1 + 1 = 3: Synergy Arithmetic in Economics. Applied Mathematics, 8, 133-144. doi: 10.4236/am.2017.82011.

References

[1] Helmholtz, H. (1887) Zahlen und Messen in Philosophische Aufsatze. Fues’s Verlag, Leipzig, 17-52. (Translated by Bryan, C.L. (1930) Counting and Measuring. Van Nostrand)
[2] Yesenin-Volpin, А.С. (1960) On the Grounding of Set Theory. In: Application of Logic in Science and Technology, Мoscow, 22-118. (In Russian)
[3] Van Bendegem, J.P. (1994/1996) Strict Finitism as a Viable Alternative in the Foundations of Mathematics. Logique et Analyse, 37, 23-40.
[4] Rosinger, E.E. (2008) On the Safe Use of Inconsistent Mathematics. arXiv.org, math.GM, 0811.2405v2.
[5] Kline, M. (1980) Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty. Oxford University Press, New York.
[6] Mattessich, R. (1998) From Accounting to Negative Numbers: A Signal Contribution of Medieval India to Mathematics. Accounting Historians Journal, 25, 129-145.
[7] Martinez, A.A. (2006) Negative Math: How Mathematical Rules Can Be Positively Bent. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[8] von Neumann, J. (1955) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
[9] Blehman, I.I., Myshkis, A.D. and Panovko, Ya.G. (1983) Mechanics and Applied Logic. Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian)
[10] Kolmogorov, A.N. (1961) Automata and Life in Knowledge Is Power, No. 10, No. 11.
[11] Littlewood, J.E. (1953) Miscellany. Methuen, London.
[12] Burgin, M.S. (1977) Non-Classical Models of Natural Numbers. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 32, 209-210.
[13] Czachor, M. (2016) Information Processing and Fechner’s Problem as a Choice of Arithmetic. arXiv:1602.00587
[14] Dummett, M. (1975) Wang’s Paradox. Synthese, 30, 301-324.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485048
[15] Knuth, D.E. (1976) Mathematics and Computer Science: Coping with Finiteness. Science, 194, 1235-1242.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.194.4271.1235
[16] Burgin, M. (1997) Non-Diophantine Arithmetics. Ukrainian Academy of Information Sciences, Kiev. (In Russian)
[17] Burgin, M. (2007) Elements of Non-Diophantine Arithmetics. 6th Annual International Conference on Statistics, Mathematics and Related Fields, Honolulu, 17-19 January 2007, 190-203.
[18] Burgin, M. (2010) Introduction to Projective Arithmetics, Preprint in Mathematics. Math.GM/1010.3287, 21 p.
http://arXiv.org
[19] Czachor, M. (2014) Relativity of Arithmetic as a Fundamental Symmetry of Physics. Quantum Stud. Math. Found. arXiv:1412.8583
[20] McKinsey (2004)
http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/where-mergers-go-wrong
[21] Beechler, D. (2013) How to Create “1 + 1=3” Marketing Campaigns.
http://www.marketingcloud.com/blog/how-to-create-1-1-3-marketing-campaigns
[22] Cambridge Business English Dictionary (2011) Cambridge University Press, London.
[23] Cartwright, S. and Schoenberg, R. (2006) 30 Years of Mergers and Acquisitions Research. British Journal of Management, 15, 51-55.
[24] Krug, J. and Aguilera, R. (2005) Top Management Team Turnover in Mergers and Acquisitions. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 4, 121-149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-361X(04)04005-0
[25] Agraval, A. and Jaffe, J. (2000) The Post Merger Performance Puzzle. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 1, 119-156.
[26] Angier, M. (2005) One plus One Equals Three? SuccessNet.
http://successnet.org/articles/angier-synergy.htm
[27] Tufte, E.R. (1990) Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire.
[28] Burgin, M. (2001) Diophantine and Non-Diophantine Aritmetics: Operations with Numbers in Science and Everyday Life. LANL, Preprint Mathematics GM/0108149.
http://arXiv.org
[29] Archibald, J. (2014) One plus One Equals One: Symbiosis and the Evolution of Complex Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[30] Trott, D. (2015) One plus One Equals Three: A Masterclass in Creative Thinking. Macmillan, London.
[31] DK (2014) The Business Book: Big Ideas Simply Explained. Penguin.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.