Health care needs need to be focused on health

Johannes Bircher, Karl-Heinz Wehkamp

.

DOI: 10.4236/health.2011.36064                

Abstract

In the past decades health care and medicine in most countries got more or less in a state of crisis. This is not surprising because, so far, there is no consensus about the nature of health. This shortcoming inhibits constructive, interdisciplinary dialogues about health values. It renders priority setting controversial and subject to power struggles. A new definition of health, known as the Meikirch Model, could correct this deficiency. It states: “Health is a dynamic state of wellbeing characterized by a physical, mental and social potential, which satisfies the demands of a life commensurate with age, culture, and personal responsibility. If the potential is insufficient to satisfy these de-mands the state is disease.” The potential is composed of a biologically given and a person-ally acquired component. Thus this definition characterizes health with six essential features, which are suitable for an analysis of and priority setting in medical consultations and in health care policy decisions. A wide discussion about this definition of health followed by its imple-mentation is expected to render health care in-dividually and socially more beneficial.

Keywords

Health; Definition of Health; Health Care Systems; Health Care Needs; Meikirch Model

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Grad, F.P. (2002) Preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80 doi: 10.1590/S0042-96862002001200014
[2]	Franke, A. (2006) Modelle von Gesundheit und Krank- heit. Hans Huber Hogrefe AG, Bern.
[3]	Bircher, J. and Wehkamp, K.-H. (2006) Das ungenutzte Potential der Medizin. Rueffer and Rub Publ, Zürich, 44-77.
[4]	Bircher, J. (2005) Towards a dynamic definition of health and disease. Medicine, Healthcare & Philosophy, 8, 335- 341. doi:10.1007/s11019-005-0538-y
[5]	Bircher J. and Wehkamp K.H. (2011) Gesundheit und Medizin. 10 Thesen—Wie kann ein Gesundheitswesen funktionieren, wenn niemand sagen kann, was Gesundheit ist? Monsenstein und Vannerdat Verlag, Münster, Germany.
[6]	Marmot M. and Wilkinson, R.G. (1999) Social determineants of health. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[7]	Lieberherr, R., Marquis, J.F., Storni, M. and Wieden- mayer, G. (2007) Gesundheit und Gesundheitsverhalten in der Schweiz 2007. Schweizerische Gesundheitsbe- fragung, Neuchatel, Switzerland, Bundesamt für Statistik.
[8]	Porter, M.E. (2010) What is value in health care? The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2477-2481. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024
[9]	Chenilo, D. (2002) The theorization of social co-ordin- ations in differentiated societies: The theory of generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas. British Journal of Sociology, 53, 431-49. doi:10.1080/0007131022000000581
[10]	Boorse, C.A. (1997) Rebuttal on health. In: Humber J.M. and Almeder R.F. Ed., What is disease, Humana Press, Totowa NJ, 1-134.
[11]	Nordenfelt, L. (2001) Health, science and ordinary language. Editions Rodopi BV, Rodopi, New York.
[12]	Porter, M.E. (2008) Defining and introducing value in health care. In: McClellan M.B. Ed., Evidence-Based Medicine and the Changing Nature of Healthcare: Meeting Summary, National Academies Press, IOM, 161-72.
[13]	Savigny, de D. and Adam, T. Ed. (2010) Systems thinking for health care strengthening. Advances in bioinformatics, 2, p. 268925.