Share This Article:

Measuring Decentralisation in Reforms Era: A Case of Kalyan-Dombivli, India

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:998KB) PP. 116-126
DOI: 10.4236/cus.2014.22012    2,220 Downloads   3,159 Views   Citations


Since last couple of decades, there is an emerging trend of decentralisation and India is no exception to such a trend. Studies that measure decentralisation in India, however, are mostly comparative and target a limited set of parameters. This paper, attempts at a comprehensive examination of a case of Kalyan-Dombivli (KD), a fringe subcity to Mumbai. The analysis brings out that over the past seven years (since the beginning of the centrally sponsored urban renewal program), even though the local body in KD had higher resources for local development, its functional authority, fiscal autonomy, and accountability has been significantly re-centralised towards higher level governments. The case analysis brings out key lessons in terms of need for focusing on the empowerment (functional and fiscal) of local bodies and creating accountability structures that are effective and responsive to the local citizenry.

Cite this paper

Pancholi, V. (2014) Measuring Decentralisation in Reforms Era: A Case of Kalyan-Dombivli, India. Current Urban Studies, 2, 116-126. doi: 10.4236/cus.2014.22012.


[1] Baid, K. (2008). Spatial Structure of a City, Case Study, Kalyan Dombivili. Mumbai, SPA, UP 857.
[2] Bagchi, S. (2003). Decentralised Urban Governance in India: Implications for Financing of Urban Infrastructure. 1-28.
[3] Banerjee-Guha, S. (2009). Neoliberalising the “Urban”: New Geographies of Power and Injustice in Indian Cities. Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 95-107.
[4] Batra, L. (2009). A Review of Urbanisation and Urban Policy in Post-Independent India. Working Paper Series, New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.
[5] Baud, I. et al. (2013). The Development of Kalyan Dombivili; Fringe City in a Metropolitan Region (City Report No. 2), City Growth and the Sustainability Challenge Comparing Fast Growing Cities in Growing Economies. Bonn: Chance 2 Sustain Project.
[6] Bird, R., & Wallich, C. (1993). Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Relations in Transition Economics: Toward a Systematic Framework of Analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, Public Economics 1-92.
[7] Bhatnagar, S. (2007). Information Technology in Developing Countries. Ahmedabad: Citizen Facilitation Centres (CFC) of KDMC.
[8] CAG, I. (2012). Audit Report (State Finances) for the Year Ended 31st March 2011 (Maharashtra State Financial Audit Report). New Delhi: Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
[9] CDP (2007). City Development Plan for Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation (Tech Report No. 1). Kalyan Dombivli: JNNURM.
[10] CDP (2012). City Development Plan for Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corproration (Tech Report No. 2). Kalyan Dombivli: JNNURM.
[11] Census, (2001). Census of India 2001 (Provisional) Slum Population in Million Plus Cities (Municipal Corporations): Part A. Census of India [WWW Document].
[12] Census (2011). Kalyan and Dombivali City Census 2011 Data [WWW Document].
[13] Chattopadhyay, S. (2004). Strengthening Local Governments: Urban Fiscal Decentralization in India. International Journal of Regulation and Governance, 4, 75-112.
[14] Coelho, K., Kamath, L., Vijaybaskar, M. (2011). Infrastructures of Consent: Interrogating Citizen Participation Mandates in Indian Urban Governance. IDS Working Paper 362.
[15] Denis, E., Mukhopadhyay, P., Zérah, M.-H. (2012). Subaltern Urbanisation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, Review of Urban Affairs, xlviI, 52-62.
[16] Duc, V. (2008). The Economics of Measuring Fiscal Decentralisation Part 1: An Overview of Recent Insights into Fiscal Decentralisation. Economics Discussion/Working Papers No. 08-13, Crawley: The University of Western Australia.
[17] MMRDA Website (2013). Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority. MMRDA [WWW Document].
[18] MoF (2012). Indian Public Finance Statistics. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
[19] Nishandar, V. (2011). A Study of Citizen Facilitation Centre of Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation, Maharshtra. International Referred Research Journal, III, 56-58.
[20] Halder, P, (2007). Measures of Fiscal Decentralization. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Summer Internship Program, Atlanta: Georgia State University.
[21] Harriss, J. (2010). Is Government in India Becoming More Responsive? Has Democratic Decentralisation Made a Difference? Working Paper No. 08/2010, Simons Papers in Security and Development, Vancouver: School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University.
[22] IDF (n.d.). Urban Local Bodies: Decentralisation and Sustainance, Assessment of Decentralisation Process in India. Reserach Report, IDF, 1-36.
[23] KDMC (n.d). KDMC Budgetary Data for Respective Years (Budgetary Data Series). Kalyan Dombivli: Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation.
[24] Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Timofeev, A. (2009). Decentralisation Measure Revisited. Atlanta, GA: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, International Studies Program 09-13.
[25] Martinez, J., Pfeffer, K., & van Dijk, T. (n.d.). The Capacity of e-Government Tools: Claimed Potentials/Unnamed Limitations.
[26] Mukhopadhyay, P. (2006). Whither Urban Renewal? Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 879-884.
[27] Patkar, M., & Singh, S. (2007). Urban Renewal: At Whose Cost? Economic and Political Weekly, 42, 926-928.
[28] Pethe, A., Gandhi, S., & Tandel, V. (2011). Assessing the Mumbai Metropolitan Region: A Governance Perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, Special Article, 46, 187-195.
[29] Rao, M. G., & Bird, R. (2010). Urban Governance and Finance in India. New Delhi: NIPFP Working Paper No. 2010-68.
[30] van Dijk, T. K., & Sridharan, N. (2009). Profile of an Urbanized Society? Slums, Gauthans, and Lifestyle City in Kalyan-Dombivli, India. International Forum on Urbanism Conference, University of Delft, Delft, 27-28 November 2009.
[31] Woolman, H., & Goldsmith, M. J. (1990). Local Autonomy as a Meaningful Concept. Comparing Local Government in the United States and in the United Kingdom. Urban Affairs Review, 26, 3-27.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.