[1]
|
Adams, C., & King, K. (1995). Towards a framework for student self assessment. Innovations in Education & Training International, 32, 336-343. doi:10.1080/1355800950320405
|
[2]
|
Amhag, L. (2012). High school students’ argument patterns in online peer feedback. In E. F. P. M. Pumilia-Gnarini, E. Pacetti, J. Bishop, & L. Guerra (Eds.), Handbook of research on didactic strategies and technologies for education: Incorporating advancements, 2, 711-723.
http://www.igi-global.com/chapter/high-school-students-argument-patterns/72113
|
[3]
|
Amhag, L. (2011). Students’ argument patterns in asynchronous dia logues for learning. In Research highlights in technology and teacher education (pp. 137-144) Ed/ITLib Digital Library.
http://storefront.acculink.com/aace
|
[4]
|
Amhag, L. (2010). Between I and other. Web-based student dialogues with arguments and responses for learning. PhD Thesis, Malmo: Malmo University, Malmo Studies in Educational Sciences.
|
[5]
|
Amhag, L., & Jakobsson, A. (2009). Collaborative learning as a collec tive competence when students use the potential of meaning in asynchronous dialogues. Computers & Education, 52, 656-667.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.012
|
[6]
|
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Con tent analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005
|
[7]
|
De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: The impact of role as signment and self-assessment on students’ levels of knowledge con struction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 177-188. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00292.x
|
[8]
|
Dickhut, J. E. (2003). A brief review of creativity.
www.personalityresearch.org/papers/dickhut.html
|
[9]
|
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331-350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935
|
[10]
|
Dysthe, O. (2002). The learning potential of a web-mediated discussion in a university course. Studies in Higher Education, 27.
doi:10.1080/03075070220000716
|
[11]
|
Dysthe, O., Hertzberg, F., & Lokensgard Hoel, T. (2011). Writing to learn: Writing in Higher Education (2nd ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
|
[12]
|
Erdis, M. (2007). Law for educators. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
|
[13]
|
Finegold, A. R. D., & Cooke, L. (2006). Exploring the attitudes, ex periences and dynamics of interaction in online groups. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 201-215. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003
|
[14]
|
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7-23.
doi:10.1080/08923640109527071
|
[15]
|
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
doi:10.3102/003465430298487
|
[16]
|
Hewett, B. L. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Compisition, 17, 265-288. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(00)00035-9
|
[17]
|
Kneupper, C. W. (1978). Teaching argument: An introduction to the Toulmin model. College Composition and Communication, 29, 237-241. doi:10.2307/356935
|
[18]
|
Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Self-assessment and task selection in learner-controlled instruction: Differences between ef fective and ineffective learners. Computers & Education, 54, 932-940. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.025
|
[19]
|
Lindberg, I. (2011). About school's multi-lingual capital (2nd ed.). Stockholm: Liber,
|
[20]
|
Meyer, K. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 55-65.
|
[21]
|
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Lon don: Sage Publications.
|
[22]
|
Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students’ level of cri tical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 52-59.
doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.009
|
[23]
|
Saunders, W. (1989). Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 101-112.
doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90019-0
|
[24]
|
Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asyn chronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive pro cessing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 957-975.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.025
|
[25]
|
Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.006
|
[26]
|
Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and Education. Creative Education, 1, 166-169. doi:10.4236/ce.2010.13026
|
[27]
|
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argu mentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 235-260.
doi:10.1080/09500690500336957
|
[28]
|
Skolverket (2003). Swedish as a second language. In To read and write. http://www.skolverket.se
|
[29]
|
Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Educa tion, 46, 29-48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002
|
[30]
|
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Educa tion, 50, 1183-1202. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
|
[31]
|
Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective mean ing making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1.
doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y
|
[32]
|
Swann, J. (2010). A dialogic approach to online facilitation. Austral ian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 50-62.
|
[33]
|
Topping, K. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631-645. doi:10.1080/01443410500345172
|
[34]
|
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
doi:10.3102/00346543068003249
|
[35]
|
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[36]
|
van der Pol, J., van den Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education, 51, 1804-1817.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001
|
[37]
|
Wegerif, R. (2006). A dialogic understanding of the relationship be tween CSCL and teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 143-157.
doi:10.1007/s11412-006-6840-8
|
[38]
|
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argu mentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collabora tive learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
|
[39]
|
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511794537
|
[40]
|
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communica tion experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77-90.
doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1
|